Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 2.5: DSB-AM via a Gaussian channel"
m |
m |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
{Is there a carrier frequency $f_{\rm T}$ that results in no distortion for the given source signal and channel? Justify your answer. | {Is there a carrier frequency $f_{\rm T}$ that results in no distortion for the given source signal and channel? Justify your answer. | ||
|type="()"} | |type="()"} | ||
− | + | + | + Yes, |
− | - | + | - No. |
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
===Solution=== | ===Solution=== | ||
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
− | [[File:P_ID1011__Mod_A_2_5_a.png|right|frame| | + | [[File:P_ID1011__Mod_A_2_5_a.png|right|frame|Resulting baseband frequency response for $f_{\rm T} = f_{\rm M}$]] |
− | '''(1)''' | + | '''(1)''' The equation given states that the BP frequency response $H_{\rm K}(f)$ has to be shifted left and right by the carrier frequency $f_{\rm T}$ , respectively, and the two components have to be added up. |
− | * | + | *The factor $1/2$ must still be taken into account (see plot). |
− | * | + | *At low frequencies, this results in a Gaussian function around the center frequency "0": |
:$$H_{\rm MKD}(f) = {\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left ({f}/{\Delta f_{\rm K}}\right)^2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$H_{\rm MKD}(f) = {\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left ({f}/{\Delta f_{\rm K}}\right)^2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
− | * | + | *The two components at $±2f_{\rm T}$ need not be considered further. For the two frequencies we are looking for $f_1 = 1\ \rm kHz$ and $f_5 = 5 \ \rm kHz$ , we obtain: |
:$$ H_{\rm MKD}(f = f_1) = {\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{1\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2} = {\rm e}^{-\pi/100}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.969} \hspace{0.05cm},$$ | :$$ H_{\rm MKD}(f = f_1) = {\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{1\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2} = {\rm e}^{-\pi/100}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.969} \hspace{0.05cm},$$ | ||
:$$H_{\rm MKD}(f = f_5) = {\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{5\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2} = {\rm e}^{-\pi/4} \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.456} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$H_{\rm MKD}(f = f_5) = {\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{5\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2} = {\rm e}^{-\pi/4} \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.456} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
− | '''(2)''' | + | '''(2)''' With $ω_1 = 2π · 1\ \rm kHz$ and $ω_5 = 2π · 5 \ \rm kHz$ , it holds that: |
:$$ v(t) = 0.969 \cdot 2\,{\rm V}\cdot \cos (\omega_1 \cdot t)+ 0.456 \cdot 3\,{\rm V}\cdot \cos (\omega_5 \cdot t) = \underline { 1.938\,{\rm V}}\cdot \cos (\omega_1 \cdot t) + \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {1.368\,{\rm V}}\cdot \cos (\omega_5 \cdot t) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$ v(t) = 0.969 \cdot 2\,{\rm V}\cdot \cos (\omega_1 \cdot t)+ 0.456 \cdot 3\,{\rm V}\cdot \cos (\omega_5 \cdot t) = \underline { 1.938\,{\rm V}}\cdot \cos (\omega_1 \cdot t) + \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {1.368\,{\rm V}}\cdot \cos (\omega_5 \cdot t) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
− | * | + | *It can be seen that now, unlike the source signal $q(t)$ , the component at $1 \ \rm kHz$ ⇒ $A_1 = 1.938 \ \rm V$ is larger than the $5 \ \rm kHz$ component ⇒ $A_5 = 1.368 \ \rm V$, because the channel attenuates the $49 \ \rm kHz$ and $51 \ \rm kHz$ frequencies less than the spectral components at $45 \ \rm kHz$ und $55 \ \rm kHz$. |
− | '''(3)''' | + | '''(3)''' The two spectral functions shifted by $±f_{\rm T}$ now no longer come to lie directly on top of each other, but are offset from each other by $10 \ \rm kHz$ . |
− | * | + | *The resulting frequency response $H_{\rm MKD}(f)$ is thus no longer Gaussian, but characterized according to the sketch below: |
:$$H_{\rm MKD}(f ) = {1}/{2}\cdot \left[{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{f - 5\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}+{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{f + 5\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}\right]\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$H_{\rm MKD}(f ) = {1}/{2}\cdot \left[{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{f - 5\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}+{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{f + 5\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}\right]\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
− | * | + | *For the frequencies $f_1$ and $f_5$ we get: |
:$$H_{\rm MKD}(f = 1\,{\rm kHz}) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[ H_{\rm K}(f = 56\,{\rm kHz}) + H_{\rm K}(f = -54\,{\rm kHz})\right]=$$ | :$$H_{\rm MKD}(f = 1\,{\rm kHz}) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[ H_{\rm K}(f = 56\,{\rm kHz}) + H_{\rm K}(f = -54\,{\rm kHz})\right]=$$ | ||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
:$$H_{\rm MKD}(f = 5\,{\rm kHz}) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[ H_{\rm K}(f = 60\,{\rm kHz}) + H_{\rm K}(f = -50\,{\rm kHz})\right]= \hspace{0.75cm}$$ | :$$H_{\rm MKD}(f = 5\,{\rm kHz}) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[ H_{\rm K}(f = 60\,{\rm kHz}) + H_{\rm K}(f = -50\,{\rm kHz})\right]= \hspace{0.75cm}$$ | ||
:$$\hspace{1.25cm}= \frac{1}{2}\cdot \left[{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{60\, {\rm kHz}- 50\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}+{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{-50\, {\rm kHz}+ 50\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}\right] = 0.022 + 0.500 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.521}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$\hspace{1.25cm}= \frac{1}{2}\cdot \left[{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{60\, {\rm kHz}- 50\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}+{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{-50\, {\rm kHz}+ 50\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}\right] = 0.022 + 0.500 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.521}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
− | [[File:P_ID1012__Mod_A_2_5_c.png|right|frame| | + | [[File:P_ID1012__Mod_A_2_5_c.png|right|frame|Resulting baseband frequency response for $f_{\rm T} \ne f_{\rm M}$]] |
− | * | + | *While the synchronous demodulator extracts information about the message signal from both sidebands in the same way at $f_{\rm T} = f_{\rm M} = 50 \ \rm kHz$ , the lower sideband (LSB) provides the larger contribution at $f_{\rm T} = 55\ \rm kHz$ . |
− | * | + | *For example, the LSB of the $5 \ \rm kHz$ component is now exactly at $f_{\rm M} = 50 \ \rm kHz$ and is transmitted undamped, while the USB is subject to heavy attenuation at $60 \ \rm kHz$ . |
− | '''(4)''' | + | '''(4)''' With the result of the previous subtask, one obtains: |
:$$ A_1 = 0.463 \cdot 2\,{\rm V}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.926\,{\rm V}}\hspace{0.05cm},$$ | :$$ A_1 = 0.463 \cdot 2\,{\rm V}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.926\,{\rm V}}\hspace{0.05cm},$$ | ||
:$$A_5 = 0.521 \cdot 3\,{\rm V} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 1.563\,{\rm V}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$A_5 = 0.521 \cdot 3\,{\rm V} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 1.563\,{\rm V}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
− | '''(5)''' | + | '''(5)''' YES is correct: |
− | * | + | *With the carrier frequency $f_{\rm T} = f_{\rm M} = 50 \ \rm kHz$ , the $5 \ \rm kHz$component is more attenuated than the $1 \ \rm kHz$ component, while at $f_{\rm T} = 55 \ {\rm kHz} \ne f_{\rm M}$ , the $1 \ \rm kHz$ component is slightly more attenuated. |
− | * | + | *If one then chooses $f_{\rm T} \approx 54.5 \ \rm kHz$ for example, both components are attenuated equally $($etwa um den Faktor $0.53)$ and there is no or less distortion. |
− | * | + | *However, this result is only valid for the source signal considered. Another $q(t)$ also with two spectral components would require a different "optimal carrier frequency". |
− | * | + | *For a message signal with three or more spectral lines, linear distortions would always occur. |
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} |
Revision as of 19:09, 1 December 2021
The communication system considered here is composed of the following blocks:
- DSB-AM without carrier with $f_{\rm T} = 50 \ \rm kHz$ and $f_{\rm T} = 55 \ \rm kHz$:
- $$ s(t) = q(t) \cdot \cos (2 \pi f_{\rm T} \hspace{0.05cm} t).$$
- GGaussian bandpass channel; the magnitude $|f|$ in the exponent causes $H_K(–f) = H_K(f)$ to hold:
- $$H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (({|f| - f_{\rm M}})/{\Delta f_{\rm K}}\right)^2} ,\hspace{0.2cm} f_{\rm M} = 50\,{\rm kHz},\hspace{0.2cm} \Delta f_{\rm K} = 10\,{\rm kHz}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- The synchronous demodulator has optimal parameters such that the sink signal $v(t)$ completely coincides with the source signal $q(t)$ when $H_{\rm K}(f) = 1$ (ideal channel).
On the page Influence of linear channel distortions it was shown that the entire system is is sufficiently accurately characterized by the resulting frequency response
- $$H_{\rm MKD}(f) = {1}/{2} \cdot \big[ H_{\rm K}(f + f_{\rm T}) + H_{\rm K}(f - f_{\rm T})\big]$$
Here the index stands for Modulator–K (for german "Kanal" i.e. Channel) –Demodulator.
The source signal $q(t)$ is composed of two cosine oscillations:
- $$q(t) = 2\,{\rm V}\cdot \cos (2 \pi \cdot 1\,{\rm kHz} \cdot t)+ 3\,{\rm V}\cdot \cos (2 \pi \cdot 5\,{\rm kHz} \cdot t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Hints:
- This exercise belongs to the chapter Synchronous Demodulation.
- Particular reference is made to the page Influence of linear channel distortions.
Questions
Solution
(1) The equation given states that the BP frequency response $H_{\rm K}(f)$ has to be shifted left and right by the carrier frequency $f_{\rm T}$ , respectively, and the two components have to be added up.
- The factor $1/2$ must still be taken into account (see plot).
- At low frequencies, this results in a Gaussian function around the center frequency "0":
- $$H_{\rm MKD}(f) = {\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left ({f}/{\Delta f_{\rm K}}\right)^2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- The two components at $±2f_{\rm T}$ need not be considered further. For the two frequencies we are looking for $f_1 = 1\ \rm kHz$ and $f_5 = 5 \ \rm kHz$ , we obtain:
- $$ H_{\rm MKD}(f = f_1) = {\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{1\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2} = {\rm e}^{-\pi/100}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.969} \hspace{0.05cm},$$
- $$H_{\rm MKD}(f = f_5) = {\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{5\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2} = {\rm e}^{-\pi/4} \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.456} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(2) With $ω_1 = 2π · 1\ \rm kHz$ and $ω_5 = 2π · 5 \ \rm kHz$ , it holds that:
- $$ v(t) = 0.969 \cdot 2\,{\rm V}\cdot \cos (\omega_1 \cdot t)+ 0.456 \cdot 3\,{\rm V}\cdot \cos (\omega_5 \cdot t) = \underline { 1.938\,{\rm V}}\cdot \cos (\omega_1 \cdot t) + \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {1.368\,{\rm V}}\cdot \cos (\omega_5 \cdot t) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- It can be seen that now, unlike the source signal $q(t)$ , the component at $1 \ \rm kHz$ ⇒ $A_1 = 1.938 \ \rm V$ is larger than the $5 \ \rm kHz$ component ⇒ $A_5 = 1.368 \ \rm V$, because the channel attenuates the $49 \ \rm kHz$ and $51 \ \rm kHz$ frequencies less than the spectral components at $45 \ \rm kHz$ und $55 \ \rm kHz$.
(3) The two spectral functions shifted by $±f_{\rm T}$ now no longer come to lie directly on top of each other, but are offset from each other by $10 \ \rm kHz$ .
- The resulting frequency response $H_{\rm MKD}(f)$ is thus no longer Gaussian, but characterized according to the sketch below:
- $$H_{\rm MKD}(f ) = {1}/{2}\cdot \left[{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{f - 5\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}+{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{f + 5\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}\right]\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- For the frequencies $f_1$ and $f_5$ we get:
- $$H_{\rm MKD}(f = 1\,{\rm kHz}) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[ H_{\rm K}(f = 56\,{\rm kHz}) + H_{\rm K}(f = -54\,{\rm kHz})\right]=$$
- $$\hspace{1.25cm}= \frac{1}{2}\cdot \left[{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{56\, {\rm kHz}- 50\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}+{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{-54\, {\rm kHz}+ 50\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}\right] = 0.161 + 0.302 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.463}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
- $$H_{\rm MKD}(f = 5\,{\rm kHz}) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[ H_{\rm K}(f = 60\,{\rm kHz}) + H_{\rm K}(f = -50\,{\rm kHz})\right]= \hspace{0.75cm}$$
- $$\hspace{1.25cm}= \frac{1}{2}\cdot \left[{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{60\, {\rm kHz}- 50\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}+{\rm e}^{-\pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \left (\frac{-50\, {\rm kHz}+ 50\,{\rm kHz}}{10\,{\rm kHz}}\right)^2}\right] = 0.022 + 0.500 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.521}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- While the synchronous demodulator extracts information about the message signal from both sidebands in the same way at $f_{\rm T} = f_{\rm M} = 50 \ \rm kHz$ , the lower sideband (LSB) provides the larger contribution at $f_{\rm T} = 55\ \rm kHz$ .
- For example, the LSB of the $5 \ \rm kHz$ component is now exactly at $f_{\rm M} = 50 \ \rm kHz$ and is transmitted undamped, while the USB is subject to heavy attenuation at $60 \ \rm kHz$ .
(4) With the result of the previous subtask, one obtains:
- $$ A_1 = 0.463 \cdot 2\,{\rm V}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.926\,{\rm V}}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
- $$A_5 = 0.521 \cdot 3\,{\rm V} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 1.563\,{\rm V}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- In diesem Fall sind die linearen Verzerrungen sogar weniger stark, da nun auch der $1 \ \rm kHz$–Anteil stärker gedämpft wird.
(5) YES is correct:
- With the carrier frequency $f_{\rm T} = f_{\rm M} = 50 \ \rm kHz$ , the $5 \ \rm kHz$component is more attenuated than the $1 \ \rm kHz$ component, while at $f_{\rm T} = 55 \ {\rm kHz} \ne f_{\rm M}$ , the $1 \ \rm kHz$ component is slightly more attenuated.
- If one then chooses $f_{\rm T} \approx 54.5 \ \rm kHz$ for example, both components are attenuated equally $($etwa um den Faktor $0.53)$ and there is no or less distortion.
- However, this result is only valid for the source signal considered. Another $q(t)$ also with two spectral components would require a different "optimal carrier frequency".
- For a message signal with three or more spectral lines, linear distortions would always occur.