Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 1.08: Comparison of ASK and BPSK"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite= | + | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Digital_Signal_Transmission/Linear_Digital_Modulation_-_Coherent_Demodulation |
}} | }} | ||
− | [[File:P_ID1680__Dig_A_4_1.png|right|frame| | + | [[File:P_ID1680__Dig_A_4_1.png|right|frame|Bit error probabilities <br>of ASK and BPSK]] |
− | + | The bit error probabilities of ''Amplitude Shift Keying'' (ASK) and ''Binary Shift Keying'' (BPSK) modulation modes are often given by the following two equations: | |
:pASK= Q(√EBN0)= 1/2⋅erfc(√EB2⋅N0), | :pASK= Q(√EBN0)= 1/2⋅erfc(√EB2⋅N0), | ||
:pBPSK= Q(√2⋅EBN0)= 1/2⋅erfc(√EBN0). | :pBPSK= Q(√2⋅EBN0)= 1/2⋅erfc(√EBN0). | ||
− | + | These two equations are evaluated in the attached table. The following applies: | |
− | *EB | + | *EB indicates the average energy per bit. |
− | *N0 | + | *N0 is the noise power density. |
− | * | + | *There is a fixed relationship between the error functions Q(x) and erfc(x). |
− | + | It should be noted that these equations do not apply in general, but only under certain idealized conditions. These conditions are to be worked out in this exercise. | |
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
− | '' | + | ''Notes:'' |
− | * | + | *The exercise belongs to the chapter [[Digital_Signal_Transmission/Linear_Digital_Modulation_-_Coherent_Demodulation|Linear Digital Modulation - Coherent Demodulation]]. |
− | * | + | *You can check the results with the applet [[Applets:Komplementäre_Gaußsche_Fehlerfunktionen|Complementary Gaussian Error Functions]]. |
− | === | + | ===Questions=== |
<quiz display=simple> | <quiz display=simple> | ||
− | { | + | {What is the relationship between Q(x) and erfc(x)? |
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
− | - | + | - Q(x)=2⋅erfc(x) holds, |
− | + | + | + Q(x)=0.5⋅erfc(x)/√2) holds, |
− | - | + | - erfc(x)=0.5⋅Q(x)/√2) holds. |
− | { | + | {When do the given equations for the error probability apply? |
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
− | + | + | + They apply only to the AWGN channel. |
− | + | + | + They apply only to the matched filter receiver (or variants). |
− | - | + | - The equations take into account intersymbol interfering. |
− | - | + | - The equations apply only to rectangular signals. |
− | { | + | {What are the error probabilities for 10⋅lg EB/N0=12dB? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
pASK = { 0.343 3% } ⋅10−4 | pASK = { 0.343 3% } ⋅10−4 | ||
pBPSK = { 0.901 3% } ⋅10−8 | pBPSK = { 0.901 3% } ⋅10−8 | ||
− | { | + | {What are the error probabilities for EB/N0=8? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
pASK = { 0.241 3% } ⋅10−2 | pASK = { 0.241 3% } ⋅10−2 | ||
pBPSK = { 0.336 3% } ⋅10−4 | pBPSK = { 0.336 3% } ⋅10−4 | ||
− | { | + | {The error probability should not exceed 10−8. What is the required 10⋅lg EB/N0 for ASK? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
(EB/N0)min = { 15 3% } dB | (EB/N0)min = { 15 3% } dB | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
</quiz> | </quiz> | ||
− | === | + | ===Solution=== |
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
− | '''(1)''' | + | '''(1)''' It is already obvious from the equations on the information page that <u>solution 2</u> is correct. The defining equations are: |
:$$\rm Q ({\it x}) = \ \frac{\rm 1}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}}\int_{\it | :$$\rm Q ({\it x}) = \ \frac{\rm 1}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}}\int_{\it | ||
x}^{+\infty}\rm e^{\it -u^{\rm 2}/\rm 2}\,d \it u | x}^{+\infty}\rm e^{\it -u^{\rm 2}/\rm 2}\,d \it u | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
\pi}}\int_{\it x}^{+\infty}\rm e^{\it -u^{\rm 2}}\,d \it u | \pi}}\int_{\it x}^{+\infty}\rm e^{\it -u^{\rm 2}}\,d \it u | ||
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
− | + | By simple substitutions, the above relationship can be easily proved: | |
:Q(x)=1/2⋅erfc(x/√2). | :Q(x)=1/2⋅erfc(x/√2). | ||
− | '''(2)''' | + | '''(2)''' The <u>first two solutions</u> are correct: |
− | * | + | *The equations are valid only for the AWGN channel and for an optimal binary receiver, for example, according to the matched filter approach. |
− | * | + | *Intersymbol interfering – caused by the channel or the receiver filter – is not covered by this. |
− | * | + | *The exact transmission pulse shaping, on the other hand, does not matter as long as the receiver filter HE(f) is matched to the transmission spectrum. Rather: |
− | * | + | *Two different transmission pulse shapers HS(f) lead to exactly the same error probability if they have the same energy per bit. |
− | '''(3)''' | + | '''(3)''' The results can be read directly from the table: |
:pASK=0.343⋅10−4_,pBPSK=0.901⋅10−8_. | :pASK=0.343⋅10−4_,pBPSK=0.901⋅10−8_. | ||
− | '''(4)''' | + | '''(4)''' With EB/N0=8 ⇒ 10⋅lg EB/N0≈9 dB, the following error probabilities are obtained: |
:pASK=0.241⋅10−2_,pBPSK=0.336⋅10−4_. | :pASK=0.241⋅10−2_,pBPSK=0.336⋅10−4_. | ||
− | '''(5)''' | + | '''(5)''' From question '''(3)''', it follows that for binary phase modulation, 10⋅lg EB/N0≈12 dB must be satisfied for pBPSK≈10−8 to be possible. |
− | * | + | *However, the given equations also show that the ASK curve is 3 dB (exactly 3.01 dB) to the right of the BPSK curve. |
− | * | + | *It follows that: |
:10⋅lg(EB/N0)min≈15dB_. | :10⋅lg(EB/N0)min≈15dB_. | ||
Revision as of 15:22, 29 March 2022
The bit error probabilities of Amplitude Shift Keying (ASK) and Binary Shift Keying (BPSK) modulation modes are often given by the following two equations:
- pASK= Q(√EBN0)= 1/2⋅erfc(√EB2⋅N0),
- pBPSK= Q(√2⋅EBN0)= 1/2⋅erfc(√EBN0).
These two equations are evaluated in the attached table. The following applies:
- EB indicates the average energy per bit.
- N0 is the noise power density.
- There is a fixed relationship between the error functions Q(x) and erfc(x).
It should be noted that these equations do not apply in general, but only under certain idealized conditions. These conditions are to be worked out in this exercise.
Notes:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter Linear Digital Modulation - Coherent Demodulation.
- You can check the results with the applet Complementary Gaussian Error Functions.
Questions
Solution
- Q(x)= 1√2π∫+∞xe−u2/2du,
- erfc(x)= 2√π∫+∞xe−u2du.
By simple substitutions, the above relationship can be easily proved:
- Q(x)=1/2⋅erfc(x/√2).
(2) The first two solutions are correct:
- The equations are valid only for the AWGN channel and for an optimal binary receiver, for example, according to the matched filter approach.
- Intersymbol interfering – caused by the channel or the receiver filter – is not covered by this.
- The exact transmission pulse shaping, on the other hand, does not matter as long as the receiver filter HE(f) is matched to the transmission spectrum. Rather:
- Two different transmission pulse shapers HS(f) lead to exactly the same error probability if they have the same energy per bit.
(3) The results can be read directly from the table:
- pASK=0.343⋅10−4_,pBPSK=0.901⋅10−8_.
(4) With EB/N0=8 ⇒ 10⋅lg EB/N0≈9 dB, the following error probabilities are obtained:
- pASK=0.241⋅10−2_,pBPSK=0.336⋅10−4_.
(5) From question (3), it follows that for binary phase modulation, 10⋅lg EB/N0≈12 dB must be satisfied for pBPSK≈10−8 to be possible.
- However, the given equations also show that the ASK curve is 3 dB (exactly 3.01 dB) to the right of the BPSK curve.
- It follows that:
- 10⋅lg(EB/N0)min≈15dB_.