Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.16: Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors"
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ {{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Stochastische Signaltheorie/Verallgemeinerung auf N-dimensionale Zufallsgrößen }} right| :Obwohl…“) |
|||
(21 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite= | + | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Generalization_to_N-Dimensional_Random_Variables |
}} | }} | ||
− | [[File:P_ID671__Sto_A_4_16.png|right|]] | + | [[File:P_ID671__Sto_A_4_16.png|right|frame|Three correlation matrices]] |
− | + | Although the description of Gaussian random variables using vectors and matrices is actually only necessary and makes sense for more than $N = 2$ dimensions, here we restrict ourselves to the special case of two-dimensional random variables for simplicity. | |
− | + | In the graph above, the general correlation matrix $\mathbf{K_x}$ of the two-dimensional random variable $\mathbf{x} = (x_1, x_2)^{\rm T}$ is given, where $\sigma_1^2$ and $\sigma_2^2$ describe the variances of the individual components. $\rho$ denotes the correlation coefficient between the two components. | |
− | + | The random variables $\mathbf{y}$ and $\mathbf{z}$ give two special cases of $\mathbf{x}$ whose process parameters are to be determined from the correlation matrices $\mathbf{K_y}$ and $\mathbf{K_z}$ respectively. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | :* | + | |
− | :$$\alpha = | + | |
− | \frac{\sigma_1\cdot\sigma_2}{\sigma_1^2 -\sigma_2^2}).$$ | + | Hints: |
− | === | + | *The exercise belongs to the chapter [[Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Generalization_to_N-Dimensional_Random_Variables|Generalization to N-Dimensional Random Variables]]. |
+ | *Some basics on the application of vectors and matrices can be found on the pages [[Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Generalization_to_N-Dimensional_Random_Variables#Basics_of_matrix_operations:_Determinant_of_a_matrix|Determinant of a Matrix]] and [[Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Generalization_to_N-Dimensional_Random_Variables#Basics_of_matrix_operations:_Inverse_of_a_matrix|Inverse of a Matrix]] . | ||
+ | * According to the page [[Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Two-Dimensional_Gaussian_Random_Variables#Contour_lines_for_correlated_random_variables|"Contour lines for correlated random variables"]] the angle $\alpha$ between the old and the new system is given by the following equation: | ||
+ | :$$\alpha = {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot\rho \cdot | ||
+ | \frac{\sigma_1\cdot\sigma_2}{\sigma_1^2 -\sigma_2^2}).$$ | ||
+ | *In particular, note: | ||
+ | **A $2×2$-covariance matrix has two real eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$. | ||
+ | **These two eigenvalues determine two eigenvectors $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$. | ||
+ | **These span a new coordinate system in the direction of the principal axes of the old system. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Questions=== | ||
<quiz display=simple> | <quiz display=simple> | ||
− | { | + | {Which statements are true for the correlation matrix $\mathbf{K_y}$ ? |
+ | |type="[]"} | ||
+ | + $\mathbf{K_y}$ describes all possible two-dimensional random variables with $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2 = \sigma$. | ||
+ | + The value range of the parameter $\rho$ is $-1 \le \rho \le +1$. | ||
+ | - The value range of the parameter $\rho$ is $0 < \rho < 1$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {Calculate the eigenvalues of $\mathbf{K_y}$ under the condition $\sigma = 1$ and $\rho = 0$. | ||
+ | |type="{}"} | ||
+ | $\lambda_1 \ = \ $ { 1 3% } $\ (\lambda_1 \ge \lambda_2)$ | ||
+ | $\lambda_2 \ = \ $ { 1 3% } $\ (\lambda_2 \le \lambda_1)$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {Give the eigenvalues of $\mathbf{K_y}$ under the condition $\sigma = 1$ and $0 < \rho < 1$ What values result for $\rho = 0.5 $, assuming $\lambda_1 \ge \lambda_2$? | ||
+ | |type="{}"} | ||
+ | $\lambda_1 \ = \ $ { 1.5 3% } $\ (\lambda_1 \ge \lambda_2)$ | ||
+ | $\lambda_2 \ = \ $ { 0.5 3% } $\ (\lambda_2 \le \lambda_1)$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {Calculate the corresponding eigenvectors $\mathbf{\eta_1}$ and $\mathbf{\eta_2}$. Which of the following statements are true? | ||
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
− | + | + $\mathbf{\eta_1}$ and $\mathbf{\eta_2}$ lie in the direction of the ellipse main axes. | |
− | + | + | + The new coordinates are rotated by $45^\circ$. |
+ | - The standard deviations with respect to the new system are $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$. | ||
− | { | + | {What are the characteristics of the random variable $\mathbf{z}$ specified by $\mathbf{K_z}$? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
− | $\alpha$ = { | + | $\sigma_1 = \ $ { 2 3% } |
+ | $\sigma_2 = \ $ { 1 3% } | ||
+ | $\rho = \ $ { 1 3% } | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {Calculate the eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2 \le \lambda_1$ of the correlation matrix $\mathbf{K_z}$. | ||
+ | |type="{}"} | ||
+ | $\lambda_1 \ = \ $ { 5 3% } $\ (\lambda_1 \ge \lambda_2)$ | ||
+ | $\lambda_2 \ = \ $ { 0. } $\ (\lambda_2 \le \lambda_1)$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {By what angle $\alpha$ is the new coordinate system $(\mathbf{\zeta_1}, \ \mathbf{\zeta_2})$ rotated with respect to the original system $(\mathbf{z_1}, \ \mathbf{z_2})$ ? | ||
+ | |type="{}"} | ||
+ | $\alpha \ = \ $ { 26.56 3% } $\ \rm deg$ | ||
Line 37: | Line 78: | ||
</quiz> | </quiz> | ||
− | === | + | ===Solution=== |
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
− | '''1 | + | '''(1)''' Correct are the <u>proposed solutions 1 and 2</u>: |
− | '''2 | + | *$\mathbf{K_y}$ is indeed the most general correlation matrix of a two-dimensional random variable with $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2 = \sigma$. |
− | '''3.''' | + | *The parameter $\rho$ specifies the correlation coefficient. This can take all values between $\pm 1$ including these marginal values. |
− | '''4 | + | |
− | '''5 | + | |
− | '''6 | + | |
− | '''7 | + | '''(2)''' In this case, the governing equation is: |
+ | :$${\rm det}\left[ \begin{array}{cc} | ||
+ | 1- \lambda & 0 \\ | ||
+ | 0 & 1- \lambda | ||
+ | \end{array} \right] = 0 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} | ||
+ | (1- \lambda)^2 = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow | ||
+ | \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\lambda_{1/2} =1}.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''(3)''' With positive $\rho$ the governing equation of the eigenvalues is: | ||
+ | :$$(1- \lambda)^2 -\rho^2 = 0\hspace{0.5cm}\Rightarrow | ||
+ | \hspace{0.5cm}\lambda^2 - 2\lambda + 1 - \rho^2 = | ||
+ | 0\hspace{0.5cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.5cm}\lambda_{1/2} =1 \pm \rho.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | *For $\rho= 0.5$ one gets $\underline{\lambda_{1} =1.5}$ and $\underline{\lambda_{2} =0.5}$. | ||
+ | *By the way, the equation holds in the whole domain of definition $-1 \le \rho \le +1$. | ||
+ | *For $\rho = 0$ ⇒ $\lambda_1 = \lambda_2 = +1$ ⇒ see subtask '''(2)'''. | ||
+ | *For $\rho = \pm 1$ ⇒ $\lambda_1 = 2$ and $\lambda_2 = 0$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''(4)''' Correct are <u>the proposed solutions 1 and 2</u>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The eigenvectors are obtained by substituting the eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ into the correlation matrix: | ||
+ | :$$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} | ||
+ | 1- (1+\rho) & \rho \\ | ||
+ | \rho & 1- (1+\rho) | ||
+ | \end{array} \right]\cdot{\boldsymbol{\eta_1}} = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} | ||
+ | -\rho & \rho \\ | ||
+ | \rho & -\rho | ||
+ | \end{array} \right]\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | \eta_{11} \\ | ||
+ | \eta_{12} | ||
+ | \end{array} \right]=0$$ | ||
+ | :$$\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}-\rho \cdot \eta_{11} + \rho \cdot | ||
+ | \eta_{12} = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\eta_{11}= | ||
+ | {\rm const} \cdot | ||
+ | \eta_{12}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}{\boldsymbol{\eta_1}}= | ||
+ | {\rm const}\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | 1 \\ | ||
+ | 1 | ||
+ | \end{array} \right];$$ | ||
+ | :$$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} | ||
+ | 1- (1-\rho) & \rho \\ | ||
+ | \rho & 1- (1-\rho) | ||
+ | \end{array} \right]\cdot{\boldsymbol{\eta_2}} = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} | ||
+ | \rho & \rho \\ | ||
+ | \rho & \rho | ||
+ | \end{array} \right]\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | \eta_{21} \\ | ||
+ | \eta_{22} | ||
+ | \end{array} \right]=0$$ | ||
+ | :$$\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\rho \cdot \eta_{21} + \rho \cdot | ||
+ | \eta_{22} = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\eta_{21}= | ||
+ | -{\rm const} \cdot | ||
+ | \eta_{22}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}{\boldsymbol{\eta_2}}= | ||
+ | {\rm const}\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | -1 \\ | ||
+ | 1 | ||
+ | \end{array} \right].$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:P_ID676__Sto_A_4_16_d.png|right|frame|Rotate the coordinate system]] | ||
+ | Putting this into the "orthonormal form", the following holds: | ||
+ | :$${\boldsymbol{\eta_1}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\cdot \left[ | ||
+ | \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | 1 \\ | ||
+ | 1 | ||
+ | \end{array} \right],\hspace{0.5cm} | ||
+ | {\boldsymbol{\eta_2}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\cdot \left[ | ||
+ | \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | -1 \\ | ||
+ | 1 | ||
+ | \end{array} \right].$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The sketch illustrates the result: | ||
+ | *The coordinate system defined by $\mathbf{\eta_1}$ and $\mathbf{\eta_2}$ is actually in the direction of the main axes of the original system. | ||
+ | *With $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2$ almost always results $($exception: $\rho= 0)$ the rotation angle $\alpha = 45^\circ$. | ||
+ | *This also follows from the equation given in the theory section: | ||
+ | :$$\alpha = {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot\rho \cdot | ||
+ | \frac{\sigma_1\cdot\sigma_2}{\sigma_1^2 -\sigma_2^2})= | ||
+ | {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan | ||
+ | (\infty)\hspace{0.3cm}\rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\alpha = 45^\circ.$$ | ||
+ | *The eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ do not denote the standard deviations with respect to the new axes, but the variances. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''(5)''' By comparing the matrices $\mathbf{K_x}$ and $\mathbf{K_z}$ we get. | ||
+ | *$\sigma_{1}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =2}$, | ||
+ | *$\sigma_{2}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =1}$, | ||
+ | *$\rho = 2/(\sigma_{1} \cdot \sigma_{2})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =1}$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''(6)''' According to the now familiar scheme: | ||
+ | :$$(4- \lambda) \cdot (1- \lambda) -4 = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow | ||
+ | \hspace{0.3cm}\lambda^2 - 5\lambda = | ||
+ | 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\lambda_{1} | ||
+ | =5,\hspace{0.1cm} \lambda_{2} =0}.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''(7)''' According to the equation given on the specification sheet: | ||
+ | :$$\alpha ={1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot 1 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot | ||
+ | 1}{2^2 -1^2})= {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan ({4}/{3}) = | ||
+ | 26.56^\circ.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:P_ID677__Sto_A_4_16_g.png|right|frame|Best possible decorrelation]] | ||
+ | The same result is obtained using the eigenvector: | ||
+ | :$$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} | ||
+ | 4-5 & 2 \\ | ||
+ | 2 & 1-5 | ||
+ | \end{array} \right]\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} | ||
+ | \zeta_{11} \\ | ||
+ | \zeta_{12} | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
+ | \right]=0 \hspace{0.3cm} | ||
+ | \Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}-\zeta_{11}= | ||
+ | 2\zeta_{12}=0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\zeta_{12}={\zeta_{11}}/{2}$$ | ||
+ | :$$\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\alpha = \arctan | ||
+ | ({\zeta_{12}}/{\zeta_{11}}) = \arctan(0.5) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 26.56^\circ}.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The accompanying sketch shows the joint PDF of the random variable $\mathbf{z}$: | ||
+ | *Because of $\rho = 1$ all values lie on the correlation line with coordinates $z_1$ and $z_2 = z_1/2$. | ||
+ | *By rotating by the angle $\alpha = \arctan(0.5) = 26.56^\circ$ a new coordinate system is formed. | ||
+ | *The variance along the axis $\mathbf{\zeta_1}$ is $\lambda_1 = 5$ $($standard deviation $\sigma_1 = \sqrt{5} = 2.236)$, | ||
+ | *while in the direction orthogonal to it, the random variable $\mathbf{\zeta_2}$ is not extended $(\lambda_2 = \sigma_2 = 0)$. | ||
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Theory of Stochastic Signals: Exercises|^4.7 N-dimensionale Zufallsgrößen^]] |
Latest revision as of 14:43, 29 March 2022
Although the description of Gaussian random variables using vectors and matrices is actually only necessary and makes sense for more than $N = 2$ dimensions, here we restrict ourselves to the special case of two-dimensional random variables for simplicity.
In the graph above, the general correlation matrix $\mathbf{K_x}$ of the two-dimensional random variable $\mathbf{x} = (x_1, x_2)^{\rm T}$ is given, where $\sigma_1^2$ and $\sigma_2^2$ describe the variances of the individual components. $\rho$ denotes the correlation coefficient between the two components.
The random variables $\mathbf{y}$ and $\mathbf{z}$ give two special cases of $\mathbf{x}$ whose process parameters are to be determined from the correlation matrices $\mathbf{K_y}$ and $\mathbf{K_z}$ respectively.
Hints:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter Generalization to N-Dimensional Random Variables.
- Some basics on the application of vectors and matrices can be found on the pages Determinant of a Matrix and Inverse of a Matrix .
- According to the page "Contour lines for correlated random variables" the angle $\alpha$ between the old and the new system is given by the following equation:
- $$\alpha = {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot\rho \cdot \frac{\sigma_1\cdot\sigma_2}{\sigma_1^2 -\sigma_2^2}).$$
- In particular, note:
- A $2×2$-covariance matrix has two real eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$.
- These two eigenvalues determine two eigenvectors $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$.
- These span a new coordinate system in the direction of the principal axes of the old system.
Questions
Solution
- $\mathbf{K_y}$ is indeed the most general correlation matrix of a two-dimensional random variable with $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2 = \sigma$.
- The parameter $\rho$ specifies the correlation coefficient. This can take all values between $\pm 1$ including these marginal values.
(2) In this case, the governing equation is:
- $${\rm det}\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1- \lambda & 0 \\ 0 & 1- \lambda \end{array} \right] = 0 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} (1- \lambda)^2 = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\lambda_{1/2} =1}.$$
(3) With positive $\rho$ the governing equation of the eigenvalues is:
- $$(1- \lambda)^2 -\rho^2 = 0\hspace{0.5cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.5cm}\lambda^2 - 2\lambda + 1 - \rho^2 = 0\hspace{0.5cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.5cm}\lambda_{1/2} =1 \pm \rho.$$
- For $\rho= 0.5$ one gets $\underline{\lambda_{1} =1.5}$ and $\underline{\lambda_{2} =0.5}$.
- By the way, the equation holds in the whole domain of definition $-1 \le \rho \le +1$.
- For $\rho = 0$ ⇒ $\lambda_1 = \lambda_2 = +1$ ⇒ see subtask (2).
- For $\rho = \pm 1$ ⇒ $\lambda_1 = 2$ and $\lambda_2 = 0$.
(4) Correct are the proposed solutions 1 and 2.
The eigenvectors are obtained by substituting the eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ into the correlation matrix:
- $$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1- (1+\rho) & \rho \\ \rho & 1- (1+\rho) \end{array} \right]\cdot{\boldsymbol{\eta_1}} = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} -\rho & \rho \\ \rho & -\rho \end{array} \right]\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} \eta_{11} \\ \eta_{12} \end{array} \right]=0$$
- $$\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}-\rho \cdot \eta_{11} + \rho \cdot \eta_{12} = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\eta_{11}= {\rm const} \cdot \eta_{12}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}{\boldsymbol{\eta_1}}= {\rm const}\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 1 \end{array} \right];$$
- $$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1- (1-\rho) & \rho \\ \rho & 1- (1-\rho) \end{array} \right]\cdot{\boldsymbol{\eta_2}} = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} \rho & \rho \\ \rho & \rho \end{array} \right]\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} \eta_{21} \\ \eta_{22} \end{array} \right]=0$$
- $$\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\rho \cdot \eta_{21} + \rho \cdot \eta_{22} = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\eta_{21}= -{\rm const} \cdot \eta_{22}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}{\boldsymbol{\eta_2}}= {\rm const}\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} -1 \\ 1 \end{array} \right].$$
Putting this into the "orthonormal form", the following holds:
- $${\boldsymbol{\eta_1}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 1 \end{array} \right],\hspace{0.5cm} {\boldsymbol{\eta_2}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} -1 \\ 1 \end{array} \right].$$
The sketch illustrates the result:
- The coordinate system defined by $\mathbf{\eta_1}$ and $\mathbf{\eta_2}$ is actually in the direction of the main axes of the original system.
- With $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2$ almost always results $($exception: $\rho= 0)$ the rotation angle $\alpha = 45^\circ$.
- This also follows from the equation given in the theory section:
- $$\alpha = {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot\rho \cdot \frac{\sigma_1\cdot\sigma_2}{\sigma_1^2 -\sigma_2^2})= {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (\infty)\hspace{0.3cm}\rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\alpha = 45^\circ.$$
- The eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ do not denote the standard deviations with respect to the new axes, but the variances.
(5) By comparing the matrices $\mathbf{K_x}$ and $\mathbf{K_z}$ we get.
- $\sigma_{1}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =2}$,
- $\sigma_{2}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =1}$,
- $\rho = 2/(\sigma_{1} \cdot \sigma_{2})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =1}$.
(6) According to the now familiar scheme:
- $$(4- \lambda) \cdot (1- \lambda) -4 = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\lambda^2 - 5\lambda = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\lambda_{1} =5,\hspace{0.1cm} \lambda_{2} =0}.$$
(7) According to the equation given on the specification sheet:
- $$\alpha ={1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot 1 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot 1}{2^2 -1^2})= {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan ({4}/{3}) = 26.56^\circ.$$
The same result is obtained using the eigenvector:
- $$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 4-5 & 2 \\ 2 & 1-5 \end{array} \right]\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} \zeta_{11} \\ \zeta_{12} \end{array} \right]=0 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}-\zeta_{11}= 2\zeta_{12}=0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\zeta_{12}={\zeta_{11}}/{2}$$
- $$\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\alpha = \arctan ({\zeta_{12}}/{\zeta_{11}}) = \arctan(0.5) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 26.56^\circ}.$$
The accompanying sketch shows the joint PDF of the random variable $\mathbf{z}$:
- Because of $\rho = 1$ all values lie on the correlation line with coordinates $z_1$ and $z_2 = z_1/2$.
- By rotating by the angle $\alpha = \arctan(0.5) = 26.56^\circ$ a new coordinate system is formed.
- The variance along the axis $\mathbf{\zeta_1}$ is $\lambda_1 = 5$ $($standard deviation $\sigma_1 = \sqrt{5} = 2.236)$,
- while in the direction orthogonal to it, the random variable $\mathbf{\zeta_2}$ is not extended $(\lambda_2 = \sigma_2 = 0)$.