Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.5: Non-Linear Quantization"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
This means: | This means: | ||
*In the range $|q_{\rm A}| ≤ 1/64$ holds $q_{\rm K} = q_{\rm A}$. | *In the range $|q_{\rm A}| ≤ 1/64$ holds $q_{\rm K} = q_{\rm A}$. | ||
− | *For $q_{\rm A} > 1/64$, there are the following six additional ranges $(k = 1$, ... , $6)$ of the compressor characteristic:<br> ⇒ range $k\hspace{0.3cm}{\rm (if}\hspace{0.3cm} 2^{k-7}< q_{\rm A} \le 2^{k-6}) \hspace{0.05cm}$ ⇒ $q_{\rm K}(q_{\rm A}) = 2^{4-k} \cdot q_{\rm A} + {k}/{8} | + | *For $q_{\rm A} > 1/64$, there are the following six additional ranges $(k = 1$, ... , $6)$ of the compressor characteristic: <br> ⇒ range $k\hspace{0.3cm}{\rm (if}\hspace{0.3cm} 2^{k-7}< q_{\rm A} \le 2^{k-6}) \hspace{0.05cm}$ ⇒ $q_{\rm K}(q_{\rm A}) = 2^{4-k} \cdot q_{\rm A} + {k}/{8}.$ |
*Another six domains exist for negative $q_{\rm A}$ values with $k = -1$, ... , $-6$, which are point-symmetric with respect to the origin. <br>However, these are not considered further in this exercise. | *Another six domains exist for negative $q_{\rm A}$ values with $k = -1$, ... , $-6$, which are point-symmetric with respect to the origin. <br>However, these are not considered further in this exercise. | ||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
===Solution=== | ===Solution=== | ||
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
− | '''(1)''' The sample $q_{\rm A} = 0.4$ belongs to the segment $k = 5$ covering the range $1/4 < q_{\rm A} ≤ 1/2$ From the given equation it follows that with $k = 5$: | + | '''(1)''' The sample $q_{\rm A} = 0.4$ belongs to the segment $k = 5$ covering the range $1/4 < q_{\rm A} ≤ 1/2$. From the given equation it follows that with $k = 5$: |
:$$q_{\rm K}(q_{\rm A}) = 2^{4-k} \cdot q_{\rm A} + {k}/{8}={1}/{2}\cdot 0.4 + {5}/{8} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.825}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$q_{\rm K}(q_{\rm A}) = 2^{4-k} \cdot q_{\rm A} + {k}/{8}={1}/{2}\cdot 0.4 + {5}/{8} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.825}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
− | '''(2)''' The input value of the linear quantizer is now $q_{\rm K} = 0.825$, so the following calculation applies: | + | '''(2)''' The input value of the linear quantizer is now $q_{\rm K} = 0.825$, so the following calculation applies: |
:$${105}/{128} < q_{\rm K} = 0.825 \le {106}/{128}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} m = 105 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \mu = 128 + 105\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 233} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$${105}/{128} < q_{\rm K} = 0.825 \le {106}/{128}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} m = 105 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \mu = 128 + 105\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 233} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
'''(3)''' According to the specification page, the quantization interval $μ = 128 + m$ is given by the value | '''(3)''' According to the specification page, the quantization interval $μ = 128 + m$ is given by the value | ||
− | $q_{\rm Q} = 1/256 + m/128$ | + | $q_{\rm Q} = 1/256 + m/128$. With $m = 105$ it follows: |
:$$q_{\rm Q} = \frac{1}{256} + \frac{105}{128} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.824} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$q_{\rm Q} = \frac{1}{256} + \frac{105}{128} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.824} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
− | '''(4)''' According to the sample solution to | + | '''(4)''' According to the sample solution to subtask '''(3)''' with the input value $q_{\rm A} = 0.04$: |
− | :$$ \frac{1}{32} < q_{\rm A} \frac{1}{16}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} k = 2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} q_{\rm K} = 2^2 \cdot 0.04 + \frac{2}{8}= 0.41$$ | + | :$$ \frac{1}{32} < q_{\rm A} \le \frac{1}{16}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} k = 2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} q_{\rm K} = 2^2 \cdot 0.04 + \frac{2}{8}= 0.41$$ |
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac{52}{128} < q_{\rm K} = 0.41 \le \frac{53}{128}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} m = 52 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \mu = 128 + 52 = 180\hspace{0.3cm} | :$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac{52}{128} < q_{\rm K} = 0.41 \le \frac{53}{128}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} m = 52 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \mu = 128 + 52 = 180\hspace{0.3cm} | ||
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}q_{\rm Q} = \frac{1}{256} + \frac{52}{128} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.41} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}q_{\rm Q} = \frac{1}{256} + \frac{52}{128} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.41} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
− | [[File:Mod_A_4_5_ML_S2a_version2.png|right|frame| | + | [[File:Mod_A_4_5_ML_S2a_version2.png|right|frame|Characteristics of compressor (blue) & expander (green)]] |
'''(5)''' We are looking for the solution in several steps: | '''(5)''' We are looking for the solution in several steps: | ||
− | *In the compressor | + | *In the compressor: $q_{\rm A} = 0.4$ led to the initial value $q_{\rm K} = 0.825$ and after quantization to the value $q_{\rm Q} = 0. 824$ ⇒ see subtasks '''(1)''' and '''(3)'''. ⇒ red marks in the graph. |
− | * | + | *On the receiver side, this results in $v_{\rm Q} = 0.824$ approximately back to $v_{\rm E} ≈ 0.4$ ⇒ brown marks in the graph. |
+ | *However, due to quantization, this is only an approximation. Exactly: | ||
+ | :$$ v_{\rm E} = 0.25 + \frac{0.824-0.750}{0.875-0.750} \cdot 0.25 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.398} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
+ | This calculation process can be understood from the graph. | ||
− | + | :Although the expander characteristic $v_E(υ_{\rm Q})$ is equal to the inverse function of the compressor characteristic $q_K(q_{\rm A})$ an error results because the input $v_{\rm Q}$ of the expander is discrete in value (influence of quantization). | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''(6)''' Correct are <u>statements 1 and 4</u>, as can be verified by the following left graph: | + | '''(6)''' Correct are the <u>statements 1 and 4</u>, as can be verified by the following left graph: |
[[File:P_ID1622__Mod_A_4_5f.png|right|frame|13-segment characteristic curves: left: $q_{\rm Q}(q_{\rm A})$, right: $v_{\rm E}(q_{\rm A})$]] | [[File:P_ID1622__Mod_A_4_5f.png|right|frame|13-segment characteristic curves: left: $q_{\rm Q}(q_{\rm A})$, right: $v_{\rm E}(q_{\rm A})$]] | ||
− | *The width of each step is different in each segment. | + | *The width of each step is different in each segment. In the outermost segment $(k = 6)$ the step width is $0.5/16 = 1/32$, in the next segment $(k = 5)$ only more $0.25/16 = 1/64$. |
− | |||
*The step widths in the further segments are $1/128 \ (k = 4)$, $1/256 \ (k = 3)$, $1/512\ (k = 2)$ and $1/1024 \ (k = 1)$. | *The step widths in the further segments are $1/128 \ (k = 4)$, $1/256 \ (k = 3)$, $1/512\ (k = 2)$ and $1/1024 \ (k = 1)$. | ||
− | *The innermost range from $-1/64$ to $+1/64$ is divided into $64$ steps, resulting in the step width $1/2048$ | + | *The innermost range from $-1/64$ to $+1/64$ is divided into $64$ steps, resulting in the step width $1/2048$. |
− | *The step height, on the other hand, is constantly equal $1/8$ divided by $16 = 1/128$ in the segments $k ≠ 0$ and equal $1/256$ in the middle segment. | + | *The step height, on the other hand, is constantly equal $1/8$ divided by $16 = 1/128$ in the segments $k ≠ 0$ and equal $1/256$ in the middle segment. |
− | '''(7)''' Correct here is <u>only the second statement</u>: | + | '''(7)''' Correct here is <u>only the second statement</u>: |
− | *By the expander, the quantization is now along the bisector of the angle. | + | *By the expander, the quantization is now along the bisector of the angle. |
− | *In each segment, step width and step height are constant. | + | *In each segment, step width and step height are constant. |
− | *As the right graphic shows, however, in the next inner segment the width and the height are only half as large. | + | *As the right graphic shows, however, in the next inner segment the width and the height are only half as large. |
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:10, 9 April 2022
To investigate "non-linear quantization" we start from the outlined system model.
- We disregard the influence of the channel and the PCM coding or decoding.
- Thus, $v_{\rm Q}(ν \cdot T_{\rm A}) = q_{\rm Q}(ν \cdot T_{\rm A})$ always applies, whereby the time specification $ν \cdot T_{\rm A}$ is omitted in the following.
By comparing one output variable with one input variable at the same time, it is possible to determine the influence
- of the compressor ⇒ $q_{\rm K}(q_{\rm A})$,
- of the linear quantizer ⇒ $q_{\rm Q}(q_{\rm K})$,
- of the non-linear quantizer ⇒ $q_{\rm Q}(q_{\rm A})$,
- of the expander ⇒ $v_{\rm E}(v_{\rm Q})$, and
- of the overall system ⇒ $v_{\rm E}(q_{\rm A})$.
The following assumptions are made:
- All samples $q_{\rm A}$ are in the value range $±1$ .
- The (linear) quantizer works with $M = 256$ quantization levels, which are marked with $μ = 0$ to $μ = 255$ .
- For compression, the so-called "13-segment" characteristic is used.
This means:
- In the range $|q_{\rm A}| ≤ 1/64$ holds $q_{\rm K} = q_{\rm A}$.
- For $q_{\rm A} > 1/64$, there are the following six additional ranges $(k = 1$, ... , $6)$ of the compressor characteristic:
⇒ range $k\hspace{0.3cm}{\rm (if}\hspace{0.3cm} 2^{k-7}< q_{\rm A} \le 2^{k-6}) \hspace{0.05cm}$ ⇒ $q_{\rm K}(q_{\rm A}) = 2^{4-k} \cdot q_{\rm A} + {k}/{8}.$ - Another six domains exist for negative $q_{\rm A}$ values with $k = -1$, ... , $-6$, which are point-symmetric with respect to the origin.
However, these are not considered further in this exercise.
Hints:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter "Pulse Code Modulation.
- Reference is made in particular to the section "Compression and Expansion".
Questions
Solution
- $$q_{\rm K}(q_{\rm A}) = 2^{4-k} \cdot q_{\rm A} + {k}/{8}={1}/{2}\cdot 0.4 + {5}/{8} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.825}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(2) The input value of the linear quantizer is now $q_{\rm K} = 0.825$, so the following calculation applies:
- $${105}/{128} < q_{\rm K} = 0.825 \le {106}/{128}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} m = 105 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \mu = 128 + 105\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 233} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(3) According to the specification page, the quantization interval $μ = 128 + m$ is given by the value $q_{\rm Q} = 1/256 + m/128$. With $m = 105$ it follows:
- $$q_{\rm Q} = \frac{1}{256} + \frac{105}{128} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.824} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(4) According to the sample solution to subtask (3) with the input value $q_{\rm A} = 0.04$:
- $$ \frac{1}{32} < q_{\rm A} \le \frac{1}{16}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} k = 2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} q_{\rm K} = 2^2 \cdot 0.04 + \frac{2}{8}= 0.41$$
- $$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac{52}{128} < q_{\rm K} = 0.41 \le \frac{53}{128}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} m = 52 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \mu = 128 + 52 = 180\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}q_{\rm Q} = \frac{1}{256} + \frac{52}{128} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.41} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(5) We are looking for the solution in several steps:
- In the compressor: $q_{\rm A} = 0.4$ led to the initial value $q_{\rm K} = 0.825$ and after quantization to the value $q_{\rm Q} = 0. 824$ ⇒ see subtasks (1) and (3). ⇒ red marks in the graph.
- On the receiver side, this results in $v_{\rm Q} = 0.824$ approximately back to $v_{\rm E} ≈ 0.4$ ⇒ brown marks in the graph.
- However, due to quantization, this is only an approximation. Exactly:
- $$ v_{\rm E} = 0.25 + \frac{0.824-0.750}{0.875-0.750} \cdot 0.25 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.398} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
This calculation process can be understood from the graph.
- Although the expander characteristic $v_E(υ_{\rm Q})$ is equal to the inverse function of the compressor characteristic $q_K(q_{\rm A})$ an error results because the input $v_{\rm Q}$ of the expander is discrete in value (influence of quantization).
(6) Correct are the statements 1 and 4, as can be verified by the following left graph:
- The width of each step is different in each segment. In the outermost segment $(k = 6)$ the step width is $0.5/16 = 1/32$, in the next segment $(k = 5)$ only more $0.25/16 = 1/64$.
- The step widths in the further segments are $1/128 \ (k = 4)$, $1/256 \ (k = 3)$, $1/512\ (k = 2)$ and $1/1024 \ (k = 1)$.
- The innermost range from $-1/64$ to $+1/64$ is divided into $64$ steps, resulting in the step width $1/2048$.
- The step height, on the other hand, is constantly equal $1/8$ divided by $16 = 1/128$ in the segments $k ≠ 0$ and equal $1/256$ in the middle segment.
(7) Correct here is only the second statement:
- By the expander, the quantization is now along the bisector of the angle.
- In each segment, step width and step height are constant.
- As the right graphic shows, however, in the next inner segment the width and the height are only half as large.