Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 1.17: About the Channel Coding Theorem"
From LNTwww
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
===Solution=== | ===Solution=== | ||
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
− | '''(1)''' Correct are <u>all proposed solutions</u>: | + | '''(1)''' Correct are <u>all proposed solutions</u>: |
− | *From the graph you can already see that the rate of $\rm Z$ is greater than the rate of $\rm Y$ and the rate of $\rm Y$ is greater than the rate of $\rm X$. | + | *From the graph you can already see that the rate of $\rm Z$ is greater than the rate of $\rm Y$ and the rate of $\rm Y$ is greater than the rate of $\rm X$. |
− | *The actual rates of these three systems are $R_{\rm X} = 4/7 = 0.571$, $R_{\rm Y} = 11/15 = 0.733$, and $R_{\rm Z} = 26/31 = 0.839$ | + | |
− | + | *The actual rates of these three systems are $R_{\rm X} = 4/7 = 0.571$, $R_{\rm Y} = 11/15 = 0.733$, and $R_{\rm Z} = 26/31 = 0.839$. | |
+ | *In addition, since the $(31, 26, 3)$ Hamming code ⇒ code $\rm Z$ has the largest code word length $n$, it requires $n$ despite a larger code rate $R$ for ${\rm BER} = 10^{-5}$ a smaller $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$ than the other two Hamming codes. | ||
− | '''(2)''' Correct is <u>the answer 2</u>: | + | |
− | *For a smaller bit error rate, one always needs a larger $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$. | + | '''(2)''' Correct is <u>the answer 2</u>: |
− | *There is no vertical shift, because even with $\rm BER = 10^{-10}$ there is no change in the code rates. | + | *For a smaller bit error rate, one always needs a larger $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$. |
+ | |||
+ | *There is no vertical shift, because even with $\rm BER = 10^{-10}$ there is no change in the code rates. | ||
− | '''(3)''' For the logarithmized AWGN parameter $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B}/N_0} = 3 \ {\rm dB}$, we obtain the auxiliary quantity $x = 1.6 + 3 = 4.6.$ This gives: | + | '''(3)''' For the logarithmized AWGN parameter $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B}/N_0} = 3 \ {\rm dB}$, we obtain the auxiliary quantity $x = 1.6 + 3 = 4.6.$ This gives: |
:$$R_{\rm max} = C (x = 4.6)= 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} 4.6} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 0.84} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$R_{\rm max} = C (x = 4.6)= 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} 4.6} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 0.84} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
Line 86: | Line 89: | ||
− | '''(4)''' Now, according to the given equation: | + | '''(4)''' Now, according to the given equation: |
:$$1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} x} = 0.5 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x = \frac{-{\rm ln}(0.5)}{-0.4} = 1.73\hspace{0.3cm} | :$$1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} x} = 0.5 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x = \frac{-{\rm ln}(0.5)}{-0.4} = 1.73\hspace{0.3cm} | ||
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} 10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = 1.73 - 1.6 = 0.13 \,{\rm dB}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} 10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = 1.73 - 1.6 = 0.13 \,{\rm dB}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
− | * $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B}/N_0}$ could thus be decreased by $3 \ \rm dB - 0.13 \ dB = 2.87 \ dB$, i.e. by a factor $A = 10^{0.287}\hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 1.94} \hspace{0.05cm}.$ | + | * $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B}/N_0}$ could thus be decreased by $3 \ \rm dB - 0.13 \ dB = 2.87 \ dB$, i.e. by a factor $A = 10^{0.287}\hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 1.94} \hspace{0.05cm}.$ |
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:48, 28 September 2022
The graph shows the maximum allowable code rate $R < C$ according to Shannon's "channel coding theorem":
- The green curve indicates the channel capacity $C$ for the AWGN channel assuming a binary input signal ("BPSK").
- In the Exercise 1.17Z a simple approximation is given for this. With the second abscissa
- $$x = \frac {1.6\,{\rm dB} + 10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 }{1\,{\rm dB}}$$
- results approximately:
- $$C \approx \hspace{0.15cm} \left\{ \begin{array}{c} 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} x} \\ \\ 0 \end{array} \right.\quad \begin{array}{*{1}c} {\rm for\hspace{0.15cm}} x > 0, \\ \\{\rm for\hspace{0.15cm}} x < 0. \end{array}$$
- For $R < C$, a code can be found which leads to the error probability "zero" for infinitely long blocks $(n → ∞)$.
- What this code looks like is not determined by the channel coding theorem and does not matter for this exercise.
Drawn into the graph as dots are the characteristics of established coding systems:
- The dots $\rm X$, $\rm Y$, $\rm Z$ mark three Hamming codes of different code lengths, namely with $n = 7$, $n = 15$ and $n = 31$.
- The coding system $\rm W$ is characterized by the parameters $R = 0.5$ and $10 \ \cdot \lg {E_{\rm B}/N_0} = 3 {\rm dB}$ .
Hints:
- This exercise belongs to the topic of chapter "Information Theoretical Limits of Channel Coding".
- The information theoretical limit "channel capacity" refers to the error probability $\rm BER =0$.
- The plotted points of real transmission systems, on the other hand, result under the assumption $\rm BER = 10^{-5}$.
Questions
Solution
(1) Correct are all proposed solutions:
- From the graph you can already see that the rate of $\rm Z$ is greater than the rate of $\rm Y$ and the rate of $\rm Y$ is greater than the rate of $\rm X$.
- The actual rates of these three systems are $R_{\rm X} = 4/7 = 0.571$, $R_{\rm Y} = 11/15 = 0.733$, and $R_{\rm Z} = 26/31 = 0.839$.
- In addition, since the $(31, 26, 3)$ Hamming code ⇒ code $\rm Z$ has the largest code word length $n$, it requires $n$ despite a larger code rate $R$ for ${\rm BER} = 10^{-5}$ a smaller $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$ than the other two Hamming codes.
(2) Correct is the answer 2:
- For a smaller bit error rate, one always needs a larger $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$.
- There is no vertical shift, because even with $\rm BER = 10^{-10}$ there is no change in the code rates.
(3) For the logarithmized AWGN parameter $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B}/N_0} = 3 \ {\rm dB}$, we obtain the auxiliary quantity $x = 1.6 + 3 = 4.6.$ This gives:
- $$R_{\rm max} = C (x = 4.6)= 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} 4.6} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 0.84} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(4) Now, according to the given equation:
- $$1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} x} = 0.5 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x = \frac{-{\rm ln}(0.5)}{-0.4} = 1.73\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} 10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = 1.73 - 1.6 = 0.13 \,{\rm dB}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B}/N_0}$ could thus be decreased by $3 \ \rm dB - 0.13 \ dB = 2.87 \ dB$, i.e. by a factor $A = 10^{0.287}\hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 1.94} \hspace{0.05cm}.$