Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 3.11: Viterbi Path Finding"

From LNTwww
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 30: Line 30:
 
*This exercise belongs to the chapter  [[Channel_Coding/Decoding_of_Convolutional_Codes| "Decoding of Convolutional Codes"]].
 
*This exercise belongs to the chapter  [[Channel_Coding/Decoding_of_Convolutional_Codes| "Decoding of Convolutional Codes"]].
  
*Reference is made in particular to the section  [[Channel_Coding/Decoding_of_Convolutional_Codes#Evaluating_the_trellis_in_the_error-free_case_.E2.80.93_Path_finding|"Evaluating the trellis in the error-free case – Path finding"]].
+
*Reference is made in particular to the section  [[Channel_Coding/Decoding_of_Convolutional_Codes#Evaluating_the_trellis_in_the_error-free_case_.E2.80.93_Path_search|"Evaluating the trellis in the error-free case – Path finding"]].
 
   
 
   
  
Line 83: Line 83:
 
===Solution===
 
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Correct is the <u>proposed solution 2</u>:
+
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Correct is the&nbsp; <u>proposed solution 2</u>:
*Unambiguously find the surviving path by searching backwards, i.e., from node ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$ to node ${\it \Lambda}_0(S_0)$.  
+
*Unambiguously find the surviving path by searching backwards,&nbsp; i.e.,&nbsp; from node&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$&nbsp; to node&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_0(S_0)$.
*Using the code sequences $(00, \, 01, \, 10$ or $11)$ given at the transitions, we obtain in the forward direction the result according to <u>Proposition 2</u> &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$:
+
 +
*Using the 2-bit sequences&nbsp; $(00, \, 01, \, 10$ or $11)$&nbsp; given at the transitions,&nbsp; we obtain in the forward direction the result according to&nbsp; <u>proposition 2</u>:
 
:$$\underline{z} = \big (00\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 10\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big ) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$\underline{z} = \big (00\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 10\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big ) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
*Do not reach the final node ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$ along the other paths.
+
*One  not reach the final node&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$&nbsp; along other paths.
  
  
  
'''(2)'''&nbsp; By comparing the code sequence $\underline{z}$ selected in subtask (1) with the received sequence  
+
'''(2)'''&nbsp; By comparing the decoder sequence&nbsp; $\underline{z}$&nbsp; selected in subtask&nbsp; '''(1)'''&nbsp; with the received sequence  
:$$\underline{y} = \big (01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big )$$
+
:$$\underline{y} = \big (01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big ),$$
  
one detects <u>three bit errors</u> at positions 2, 5, and 8.  
+
one detects&nbsp; <u>three bit errors</u>&nbsp; at positions&nbsp; '''2''',&nbsp; '''5''',&nbsp; and&nbsp; '''8'''.
*If a code sequence $\underline{x} &ne; \underline{z}$ was sent, there can of course be more.  
+
*Because of the final value ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0) = 8$ or ${\it \Gamma}_7(S_0) = 3$ &ndash; see [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.10:_Metric_Calculation| "Exercise 3.10"]] &ndash; but one can assume that a correct decision &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; $\underline{z} = \underline{x}$ has been made.
+
*If a encoded sequence&nbsp; $\underline{x} &ne; \underline{z}$&nbsp; was sent,&nbsp; there can of course be more.
 +
 +
*Because of the final value&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0) = 8$&nbsp; or&nbsp; ${\it \Gamma}_7(S_0) = 3$&nbsp; &ndash; see [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.10:_Metric_Calculation|$\text{Exercise 3.10}$]]&nbsp; &ndash; but one can assume that a correct decision &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; $\underline{z} = \underline{x}$&nbsp; has been made.
  
  
 
[[File:P_ID2697__KC_A_3_11_ML_neu.png|right|frame|Viterbi path finding]]  
 
[[File:P_ID2697__KC_A_3_11_ML_neu.png|right|frame|Viterbi path finding]]  
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Correct is <u>proposed solution 1</u>:
+
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Correct is the&nbsp; <u>proposed solution 1</u>:
*From the colors of the surviving path &ndash; red represents $u_i = 0$ and blue represents $u_i = 1$ &ndash; one can see the correctness of <u>solution proposal 1</u>: red &ndash; blue &ndash; red &ndash; blue &ndash; blue &ndash; red &ndash; red.  
+
*From the colors of the surviving path&nbsp; &ndash; red represents&nbsp; $u_i = 0$&nbsp; and blue represents&nbsp; $u_i = 1$&nbsp; &ndash;&nbsp; one can see the correctness of&nbsp; <u>solution proposal 1</u>:&nbsp; red &ndash; blue &ndash; red &ndash; blue &ndash; blue &ndash; red &ndash; red.
*It should be noted that the actual information sequence $\underline{u}$ is only of length $L = 5$.  
+
*Only by termination one arrives at the total length $L' = L + m = 7$.
+
*It should be noted that the actual information sequence&nbsp; $\underline{u}$&nbsp; is only of length&nbsp; $L = 5$.&nbsp; Only by termination one arrives at the total length&nbsp; $L' = L + m = 7$.
  
  
'''(4)'''&nbsp; At time $i = 6$ there are still two surviving paths. A decision could be forcibly made based on the larger metric. However, because of ${\it \Lambda}_6(S_0) = {\it \Lambda}_6(S_2) = 6$ this is not possible in our example &nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp; <u>No</u>.
+
'''(4)'''&nbsp; At time&nbsp; $i = 6$&nbsp; there are still two surviving paths.&nbsp;
 +
*A decision could be forcibly made based on the larger metric.&nbsp;  
  
 +
*However,&nbsp; because of&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_6(S_0) = {\it \Lambda}_6(S_2) = 6$&nbsp; this is not possible in our example &nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp; <u>No</u>.
  
'''(5)'''&nbsp; The graph shows that <u>all proposed solutions</u> are correct. The paths are labeled ${\it \Phi}_5(S_0)$, ...  , ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$.
 
  
 +
'''(5)'''&nbsp; The graph shows that&nbsp; <u>all proposed solutions</u>&nbsp; are correct.&nbsp; The paths are labeled&nbsp; ${\it \Phi}_5(S_0)$, ...  , ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$.
  
'''(6)'''&nbsp; The constraint decision at time $i = 5$ would select the path with the largest metric ${\it \Lambda}_5(S_{\mu})$, i.e., the path ${\it \Phi}_5(S_2)$ corresponding to <u>proposition 3</u>.
 
  
 +
'''(6)'''&nbsp; The constraint decision at&nbsp; time $i = 5$&nbsp; would select the path with the largest metric&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_5(S_{\mu})$, <br>i.e.,&nbsp; the path&nbsp; ${\it \Phi}_5(S_2)$&nbsp; corresponding to&nbsp; <u>proposition 3</u>.
  
'''(7)'''&nbsp; Based on our solution to subtask (1), the path ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$ according to <u>proposition 4</u> would have been the better choice.  
+
 
*This is part of the path ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$.  
+
'''(7)'''&nbsp; Based on our solution to subtask&nbsp; '''(1)''',&nbsp; the path&nbsp; ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$&nbsp; according to&nbsp; <u>proposition 4</u>&nbsp; would have been the better choice.&nbsp; This is part of the path to&nbsp; ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$.
*At the time $i = 5$, however, there is still nothing in favor of this choice.  
+
*The (ultimately correct) path is only highlighted by the two termination bits.
+
*At time&nbsp; $i = 5$,&nbsp; however,&nbsp; there is still nothing in favor of this choice.
 +
 +
*The&nbsp; (ultimately correct)&nbsp; path is only highlighted by the two termination bits.
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
  

Latest revision as of 16:06, 19 November 2022

Evaluated trellis diagram

One result of  $\text{Exercise 3.10}$  was adjacent trellis evaluation in terms of metrics  ${\it \Lambda}_i(S_{\mu})$. 

  • At all decoding steps  $i$  the  $($in general$)$  $2^m = 4$  metrics were determined,  selecting for each node the larger of two comparison values. 
  • The branch with the lower value was discarded. One can recognize discarded branches in the graph by dotted lines.


Otherwise,  the same conditions apply as for  $\text{Exercise 3.10}$.  For example,  also in the adjacent graph,  a red arrow indicates the information bit  $u_i = 0$  and a blue arrow stands for  $u_i = 1$.

In the present exercise we consider the second and important part of the Viterbi algorithm,  namely the search for the  "surviving paths"  ${\it \Phi}_i(S_{\mu})$.  These are at time  $i$  in state  $S_{\mu}$  with $\mu \in \{1,\ 2,\ 3,\ 4 \}$.  The search is best organized in the backward direction  $($i.e.,  from bottom to top in the graph$)$.

At the end time  $($in the example  $i = 7)$  there is only one surviving path  ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$ due to termination.  From this it is possible to extract:

  • the sequence  $\underline{z}$   selected by the decoder  $($short:  "decoder sequence"$)$  ⇒   highest possible probability  ${\rm Pr}(\underline{z} = \underline{x})$,
  • the associated information sequence  $\underline{v}$  with the greatest possible probability  ${\rm Pr}(\underline{v} = \underline{u})$.


A decision at an earlier time,  for example at  $i = 5$,  does not always satisfy the maximum likelihood criterion.  Here there are four surviving paths  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_0), \hspace{0.05cm}\text{ ...} \hspace{0.1cm} , \ {\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$, which at time  $i = 5$  are in states  $S_0, \hspace{0.05cm}\text{ ...} \hspace{0.1cm} , \ S_3$.

  • One of these four paths is certainly part of the maximum likelihood path,  which is the best possible path for  $i → ∞$  $($at termination significantly earlier,  here at  $i = 7)$.
  • But if a constraint decision is to be made already at time  $i = 5$,  one usually chooses the path  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_{\mu})$  with the largest metric at that time  ${\it \Lambda}_5(S_{\mu})$.



Hints:



Questions

1

For which estimated sequence  $\underline{z}$  $($for the encoded sequence  $\underline{z})$  does the decision fall at time  $i = 7$?

$\underline{z} = (11, \, 10, \, 00, \, 01, \, 01, \, 11, \, 00)$,
$\underline{z} = (00, \, 11, \, 10, \, 00, \, 01, \, 01, \, 11)$,
$\underline{z} = (00, \, 11, \, 01, \, 01, \, 00, \, 10, \, 11)$.

2

How many transmission errors have occurred  $($at least$)$?

$N_{\rm bit\:error} \ = \ $

3

Which information sequence  $\underline{v}$  does the Viterbi decoder choose?

$\underline{v} = (0, \, 1, \, 0, \, 1, \, 1, \, 0, \, 0)$,
$\underline{v} = (1, \, 0, \, 1, \, 1, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0)$,
$\underline{v} = (0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0)$.

4

Would a final  $($and correct$)$  decision have been possible already at  $i = 6$?

Yes.
No.

5

What surviving paths exist at time  $i = 5$?

$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_0$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_1$,
$S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3$.

6

Which path would you choose at time  $i = 5$?

$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_0$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_1$,
$S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3$.

7

But which of the paths would probably be the right one?

$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_0$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_1$,
$S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3$.


Solution

(1)  Correct is the  proposed solution 2:

  • Unambiguously find the surviving path by searching backwards,  i.e.,  from node  ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$  to node  ${\it \Lambda}_0(S_0)$.
  • Using the 2-bit sequences  $(00, \, 01, \, 10$ or $11)$  given at the transitions,  we obtain in the forward direction the result according to  proposition 2:
$$\underline{z} = \big (00\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 10\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big ) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • One not reach the final node  ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$  along other paths.


(2)  By comparing the decoder sequence  $\underline{z}$  selected in subtask  (1)  with the received sequence

$$\underline{y} = \big (01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big ),$$

one detects  three bit errors  at positions  25,  and  8.

  • If a encoded sequence  $\underline{x} ≠ \underline{z}$  was sent,  there can of course be more.
  • Because of the final value  ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0) = 8$  or  ${\it \Gamma}_7(S_0) = 3$  – see $\text{Exercise 3.10}$  – but one can assume that a correct decision   ⇒   $\underline{z} = \underline{x}$  has been made.


Viterbi path finding

(3)  Correct is the  proposed solution 1:

  • From the colors of the surviving path  – red represents  $u_i = 0$  and blue represents  $u_i = 1$  –  one can see the correctness of  solution proposal 1:  red – blue – red – blue – blue – red – red.
  • It should be noted that the actual information sequence  $\underline{u}$  is only of length  $L = 5$.  Only by termination one arrives at the total length  $L' = L + m = 7$.


(4)  At time  $i = 6$  there are still two surviving paths. 

  • A decision could be forcibly made based on the larger metric. 
  • However,  because of  ${\it \Lambda}_6(S_0) = {\it \Lambda}_6(S_2) = 6$  this is not possible in our example  ⇒  No.


(5)  The graph shows that  all proposed solutions  are correct.  The paths are labeled  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_0)$, ... , ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$.


(6)  The constraint decision at  time $i = 5$  would select the path with the largest metric  ${\it \Lambda}_5(S_{\mu})$,
i.e.,  the path  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_2)$  corresponding to  proposition 3.


(7)  Based on our solution to subtask  (1),  the path  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$  according to  proposition 4  would have been the better choice.  This is part of the path to  ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$.

  • At time  $i = 5$,  however,  there is still nothing in favor of this choice.
  • The  (ultimately correct)  path is only highlighted by the two termination bits.