Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.2: Low-Pass for Signal Reconstruction"
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite= | + | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Modulation_Methods/Pulse_Code_Modulation |
}} | }} | ||
− | [[File: | + | [[File:EN_Mod_A_4_2.png|right|frame|Examples of continuous and discrete spectra]] |
− | + | We consider in this exercise two different source signals $q_{\rm con}(t)$ and $q_{\rm dis}(t)$ whose magnitude spectra $|Q_{\rm con}(f)|$ and $|Q_{\rm dis}(f)|$ are plotted. The highest frequency occurring in the signals is in each case $4 \rm kHz$. | |
− | * | + | * Nothing more is known of the spectral function $Q_{\rm con}(f)$ than that it is a continuous spectrum, where: |
− | :$$Q_{\rm | + | :$$Q_{\rm con}(|f| \le 4\,{\rm kHz}) \ne 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ |
− | * | + | * The spectrum $Q_{\rm dis}(f)$ contains spectral lines at $±1 \ \rm kHz$, $±2 \ \rm kHz$, $±3 \ \rm kHz$ and $±4 \ \rm kHz$. Thus: |
:$$q_{\rm dis}(t) = \sum_{i=1}^{4}C_i \cdot \cos (2 \pi \cdot f_i \cdot t - \varphi_i),$$ | :$$q_{\rm dis}(t) = \sum_{i=1}^{4}C_i \cdot \cos (2 \pi \cdot f_i \cdot t - \varphi_i),$$ | ||
− | : | + | :Amplitude values: $C_1 = 1.0 \ \rm V$, $C_2 = 1.8 \ \rm V$, $C_3 = 0.8 \ \rm V$, $C_4 = 0.4 \ \rm V.$ |
− | : | + | :The phase values $φ_1$, $φ_2$ and $φ_3$ are respectively in the range $±180^\circ$ and it holds $φ_4 = 90^\circ$. |
− | + | The signals are each sampled at frequency $f_{\rm A}$ and immediately fed to an ideal rectangular low-pass filter with cutoff frequency $f_{\rm G}$ This scenario applies, for example, to | |
− | * | + | * the interference-free pulse amplitude modulation $\rm (PAM)$ and |
− | * | + | * the interference-free pulse code modulation $\rm (PCM)$ at infinitely large quantization stage number $M$. |
− | + | The output signal of the (rectangular) low-pass filter is called the sink signal $v(t)$ and for the error signal: | |
:$$ε(t) = v(t) - q(t).$$ | :$$ε(t) = v(t) - q(t).$$ | ||
− | + | This is different from zero only if the parameters of the sampling $($sampling frequency $f_{\rm A})$ and/or the signal reconstruction $($cutoff frequency $f_{\rm G})$ are not dimensioned in the best possible way. | |
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
− | + | Hints: | |
− | + | *The exercise belongs to the chapter [[Modulation_Methods/Pulse_Code_Modulation|"Pulse Code Modulation"]]. | |
− | + | *Reference is made in particular to the page [[Modulation_Methods/Pulse_Code_Modulation#Sampling_and_signal_reconstruction|"Sampling and Signal Reconstruction"]]. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | * | ||
− | === | + | ===Questions=== |
<quiz display=simple> | <quiz display=simple> | ||
− | { | + | {Which statements are true for $f_{\rm A} = 8\ \rm kHz$ and $f_{\rm G} = 4\ \rm kHz$ ? |
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
− | + | + | + The signal $q_{\rm con}(t)$ can be completely reconstructed: $ε_{\rm con}(t) = 0$. |
− | - | + | - The signal $q_{\rm dis}(t)$ can be completely reconstructed: $ε_{\rm dis}(t) = 0$. |
− | { | + | {Which statements are true for $f_{\rm A} = 10\ \rm kHz$ and $f_{\rm G} = 5\ \rm kHz$ ? |
|type="()"} | |type="()"} | ||
− | + | + | + The signal $q_{\rm dis}(t)$ can be completely reconstructed: $ε_{\rm dis}(t) = 0$. |
− | - $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ | + | - $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ is a harmonic oscillation with $4 \rm kHz$. |
− | - $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ | + | - $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ is a harmonic oscillation with $6 \rm kHz$. |
− | { | + | {Which statements are true for $f_{\rm A} = 10\ \rm kHz$ and $f_{\rm G} = 3.5\ \rm kHz$ ? |
|type="()"} | |type="()"} | ||
− | - | + | - The signal $q_{\rm dis}(t)$ can be completely reconstructed: $ε_{\rm dis}(t) = 0$. |
− | + $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ | + | + $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ is a harmonic oscillation with $4 \rm kHz$. |
− | - $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ | + | - $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ is a harmonic oscillation with $6 \rm kHz$. |
− | { | + | {Which statements are true for $f_{\rm A} = 10\ \rm kHz$ and $f_{\rm G} = 6.5\ \rm kHz$? |
|type="()"} | |type="()"} | ||
− | - | + | - The signal $q_{\rm dis}(t)$ can be completely reconstructed: $ε_{\rm dis}(t) = 0$. |
− | - $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ | + | - $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ is a harmonic oscillation with $4 \rm kHz$. |
− | + $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ | + | + $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ is a harmonic oscillation with $6 \ \rm kHz$. |
</quiz> | </quiz> | ||
− | === | + | ===Solution=== |
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
− | '''(1)''' | + | '''(1)''' Only the <u>first statement</u> is correct: |
− | * | + | *Sampling $q_{\rm dis}(t)$ with sampling frequency $f_{\rm A} = 8 \ \rm kHz$ leads to an irreversible error, since $Q_{\rm dis}(f)$ involves a discrete spectral component (Dirac delta line) at $f_4 = 4\ \rm kHz$ and the phase value is $φ_4 ≠ 0$. |
− | * | + | *With the phase value $φ_4 = 90^\circ$ $(4 \ \rm kHz$ sinusoidal component$)$ given here holds $ε_{\rm dis}(t) = v_{\rm dis}(t) - q_{\rm dis}(t) = -0. 4 \ \rm V - \sin(2π \cdot f_4 \cdot t)$. See also solution to Exercise 4.2Z. |
− | * | + | *On the other hand, the signal $q_{\rm con}(t)$ with the continuous spectrum $Q_{\rm con}(f)$ can also then be measured with a rectangular low-pass filter $($with cutoff frequency $f_{\rm G} = 4\ \rm kHz)$ be completely reconstructed if sampling frequency $f_{\rm A} = 8\ \rm kHz$ was used. For all frequencies not equal to $f_4$ the sampling theorem is satisfied. |
− | * | + | *The contribution of the $f_4$ component to the total spectrum $Q_{\rm con}(f)$ is only vanishingly small ⇒ ${\rm Pr}(f_4) → 0$ as long as the spectrum has no Dirac delta line at $f_4$. |
− | '''(2)''' | + | '''(2)''' Only the <u>proposed solution 1</u> is correct: |
− | * | + | *With $f_{\rm A} = 10\ \rm kHz$ the sampling theorem is satisfied in both cases. |
− | * | + | *With $f_{\rm G} = f_{\rm A} /2$ both error signals $ε_{\rm con}(t)$ and $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ are identically zero. |
− | * | + | *In addition, the signal reconstruction also works as long as $f_{\rm G} > 4 \ \rm kHz$ and $f_{\rm G} < 6 \ \rm kHz$ holds. |
− | '''(3)''' | + | '''(3)''' The correct solution here is <u>suggested solution 2</u>: |
− | * | + | *With $f_{\rm G} = 3.5 \ \rm kHz$ the low-pass incorrectly removes the $4\ \rm kHz$ component, that is, then holds: |
:$$ v_{\rm dis}(t) = q_{\rm dis}(t) - 0.4\,{\rm V} \cdot \sin (2 \pi \cdot f_{\rm 4} \cdot t)\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \varepsilon_{\rm dis}(t) = - 0.4\,{\rm V} \cdot \sin (2 \pi \cdot f_{\rm 4} \cdot t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$ v_{\rm dis}(t) = q_{\rm dis}(t) - 0.4\,{\rm V} \cdot \sin (2 \pi \cdot f_{\rm 4} \cdot t)\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \varepsilon_{\rm dis}(t) = - 0.4\,{\rm V} \cdot \sin (2 \pi \cdot f_{\rm 4} \cdot t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
− | [[File: | + | [[File:EN_Mod_A_4_2d_neu.png|P_ID1609__Mod_A_4_2d.png|right|frame|Signal reconstruction with too large cutoff frequency]] |
− | '''(4)''' | + | '''(4)''' The correct solution here is <u>suggested solution 3</u>: |
− | * | + | *Sampling with $f_{\rm A} = 10\ \rm kHz$ yields the periodic spectrum sketched on the right. |
− | * | + | *The low-pass with $f_{\rm G} = 6.5 \ \rm kHz$ removes all discrete frequency components with $|f| ≥ 7\ \rm kHz$, but not the $6\ \rm kHz$ component. |
− | + | The error signal $ε_{\rm dis}(t) = v_{\rm dis}(t) - q_{\rm dis}(t)$ is then a harmonic oscillation with | |
− | * | + | * the frequency $f_6 = f_{\rm A} - f_4 = 6\ \rm kHz$, |
− | * | + | * the amplitude $A_4$ of the $f_4$ component, |
− | * | + | * the phase $φ_{-4} = -φ_4$ of the $Q(f)$ component at $f = -f_4$. |
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
Line 104: | Line 100: | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Modulation Methods: Exercises|^4.1 Pulse Code Modulation^]] |
Latest revision as of 15:31, 18 January 2023
We consider in this exercise two different source signals $q_{\rm con}(t)$ and $q_{\rm dis}(t)$ whose magnitude spectra $|Q_{\rm con}(f)|$ and $|Q_{\rm dis}(f)|$ are plotted. The highest frequency occurring in the signals is in each case $4 \rm kHz$.
- Nothing more is known of the spectral function $Q_{\rm con}(f)$ than that it is a continuous spectrum, where:
- $$Q_{\rm con}(|f| \le 4\,{\rm kHz}) \ne 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- The spectrum $Q_{\rm dis}(f)$ contains spectral lines at $±1 \ \rm kHz$, $±2 \ \rm kHz$, $±3 \ \rm kHz$ and $±4 \ \rm kHz$. Thus:
- $$q_{\rm dis}(t) = \sum_{i=1}^{4}C_i \cdot \cos (2 \pi \cdot f_i \cdot t - \varphi_i),$$
- Amplitude values: $C_1 = 1.0 \ \rm V$, $C_2 = 1.8 \ \rm V$, $C_3 = 0.8 \ \rm V$, $C_4 = 0.4 \ \rm V.$
- The phase values $φ_1$, $φ_2$ and $φ_3$ are respectively in the range $±180^\circ$ and it holds $φ_4 = 90^\circ$.
The signals are each sampled at frequency $f_{\rm A}$ and immediately fed to an ideal rectangular low-pass filter with cutoff frequency $f_{\rm G}$ This scenario applies, for example, to
- the interference-free pulse amplitude modulation $\rm (PAM)$ and
- the interference-free pulse code modulation $\rm (PCM)$ at infinitely large quantization stage number $M$.
The output signal of the (rectangular) low-pass filter is called the sink signal $v(t)$ and for the error signal:
- $$ε(t) = v(t) - q(t).$$
This is different from zero only if the parameters of the sampling $($sampling frequency $f_{\rm A})$ and/or the signal reconstruction $($cutoff frequency $f_{\rm G})$ are not dimensioned in the best possible way.
Hints:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter "Pulse Code Modulation".
- Reference is made in particular to the page "Sampling and Signal Reconstruction".
Questions
Solution
- Sampling $q_{\rm dis}(t)$ with sampling frequency $f_{\rm A} = 8 \ \rm kHz$ leads to an irreversible error, since $Q_{\rm dis}(f)$ involves a discrete spectral component (Dirac delta line) at $f_4 = 4\ \rm kHz$ and the phase value is $φ_4 ≠ 0$.
- With the phase value $φ_4 = 90^\circ$ $(4 \ \rm kHz$ sinusoidal component$)$ given here holds $ε_{\rm dis}(t) = v_{\rm dis}(t) - q_{\rm dis}(t) = -0. 4 \ \rm V - \sin(2π \cdot f_4 \cdot t)$. See also solution to Exercise 4.2Z.
- On the other hand, the signal $q_{\rm con}(t)$ with the continuous spectrum $Q_{\rm con}(f)$ can also then be measured with a rectangular low-pass filter $($with cutoff frequency $f_{\rm G} = 4\ \rm kHz)$ be completely reconstructed if sampling frequency $f_{\rm A} = 8\ \rm kHz$ was used. For all frequencies not equal to $f_4$ the sampling theorem is satisfied.
- The contribution of the $f_4$ component to the total spectrum $Q_{\rm con}(f)$ is only vanishingly small ⇒ ${\rm Pr}(f_4) → 0$ as long as the spectrum has no Dirac delta line at $f_4$.
(2) Only the proposed solution 1 is correct:
- With $f_{\rm A} = 10\ \rm kHz$ the sampling theorem is satisfied in both cases.
- With $f_{\rm G} = f_{\rm A} /2$ both error signals $ε_{\rm con}(t)$ and $ε_{\rm dis}(t)$ are identically zero.
- In addition, the signal reconstruction also works as long as $f_{\rm G} > 4 \ \rm kHz$ and $f_{\rm G} < 6 \ \rm kHz$ holds.
(3) The correct solution here is suggested solution 2:
- With $f_{\rm G} = 3.5 \ \rm kHz$ the low-pass incorrectly removes the $4\ \rm kHz$ component, that is, then holds:
- $$ v_{\rm dis}(t) = q_{\rm dis}(t) - 0.4\,{\rm V} \cdot \sin (2 \pi \cdot f_{\rm 4} \cdot t)\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \varepsilon_{\rm dis}(t) = - 0.4\,{\rm V} \cdot \sin (2 \pi \cdot f_{\rm 4} \cdot t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(4) The correct solution here is suggested solution 3:
- Sampling with $f_{\rm A} = 10\ \rm kHz$ yields the periodic spectrum sketched on the right.
- The low-pass with $f_{\rm G} = 6.5 \ \rm kHz$ removes all discrete frequency components with $|f| ≥ 7\ \rm kHz$, but not the $6\ \rm kHz$ component.
The error signal $ε_{\rm dis}(t) = v_{\rm dis}(t) - q_{\rm dis}(t)$ is then a harmonic oscillation with
- the frequency $f_6 = f_{\rm A} - f_4 = 6\ \rm kHz$,
- the amplitude $A_4$ of the $f_4$ component,
- the phase $φ_{-4} = -φ_4$ of the $Q(f)$ component at $f = -f_4$.