Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 1.17Z: BPSK Channel Capacity"
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Kanalcodierung/Informationstheoretische Grenzen der Kanalcodierung }} [[File:|right|]] ===Fragebogen=== <quiz display=simple> {…“) |
|||
(25 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite= | + | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Channel_Coding/Information_Theoretical_Limits_of_Channel_Coding}} |
+ | [[File:EN_KC_Z_1_17.png|right|frame|For clarification of the BPSK channel capacity]] | ||
+ | Binary signals can be transmitted error-free over the [[Channel_Coding/Channel_Models_and_Decision_Structures#AWGN_channel_at_Binary_Input|"AWGN channel"]] according to the [[Channel_Coding/Information_Theoretical_Limits_of_Channel_Coding#Channel_coding_theorem_and_channel_capacity|"channel coding theorem"]] if and only if | ||
− | + | *one uses a channel code of rate $R = k/n$, | |
− | + | *the block length $n$ of this code is chosen very large ⇒ $n → ∞$, | |
+ | *the rate $R$ is smaller than the channel capacity valid for binary input $C_{2}$, | ||
+ | |||
+ | *where the BPSK channel capacity $C_{2}$ depends on the AWGN quotient $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$ . | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <u>Note:</u> | ||
+ | #The permissible range for the code rate $R$ is highlighted in green in the graph. | ||
+ | #The limit curve $C_{2}$, valid for binary input signals $($therefore the index $2)$ and sometimes also referred to as BPSK channel capacity (stands for "Binary Phase Shift Keying"). | ||
+ | #However, this curve cannot be specified in mathematically closed form, but is the result of an integral that can only be evaluated numerically. | ||
+ | #As blue curve the channel capacity $C$ is entered, if arbitrary real input signals are allowed. | ||
+ | #For multilevel signals the rate may well assume values $R > 1$. | ||
+ | #For a Gaussian distribution the rate $R$ is the smallest possible $(E_{\rm B}/N_{0})_{\rm min}$ according to the equation | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::$$\left (E_{\rm B}/N_0 \right)_{\rm min} = \frac{2^{2R}-1}{2R}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Conversely, the rate $R$ for the given AWGN quotient $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$ is upper bounded: | ||
+ | *The just allowable code rate $R_{\rm max}$ for a given channel $(E_{\rm B}/N_{0} = \rm const.)$ we refer to as the channel capacity $C$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *For $E_{\rm B}/N_{0} = 1 ⇒ 10 \ \lg {E_{\rm B}/N_0} = 0\ {\rm dB}$ we obtain, for example $C = 0.5$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *This means: Even with the best possible amplitude distribution of the real input signal, the code rate must not exceed $R = 0.5$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *For binary input, a slightly smaller value results according to $C_{2}.$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | In this exercise, try to approximate the graphically given channel capacitance $C_{2}$ by an exponential function: | ||
+ | |||
+ | *For the abscissa, use the auxiliary variable (see graph) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :$$x = \frac {x_0 + 10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 }{1\,{\rm dB}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | :That is, $x$ is without unit; the pseudo unit "$\rm dB$" is omitted. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Consider that for a small $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$ the approximation $C_{2} \approx C$ is valid (see graph), from which the parameter $x_{0}$ can be determined. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Set for $C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}' = 1 - {\rm e}^{-a\hspace{0.05cm} · \hspace{0.05cm}x}$ and determine the parameter $a$ from the red dashed tangent such that $C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm} ' \approx C$ holds. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Hints: | ||
+ | * The exercise belongs to the chapter [[Channel_Coding/Information_Theoretical_Limits_of_Channel_Coding|"Information Theoretical Limits of Channel Coding"]]. It complements the [[Aufgaben:Exercise_1.17:_About_the_Channel_Coding_Theorem|"Exercise 1.17"]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The "bit/channel use" pseudo-unit of channel capacity is omitted in these exercises. | ||
+ | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | { | + | ===Questions=== |
+ | <quiz display=simple> | ||
+ | {Calculate from the limit for $C → 0$ the curve parameter $x_{0}$? | ||
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
− | $\ | + | $x_{0} \ = \ $ { 1.6 3% }$\ \rm dB$ |
+ | {Approximate $C_{2}(x)$ by $C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}'(x) = 1 -{\rm e}^{-a\hspace{0.05cm} · \hspace{0.05cm}x}$. What is the value of $a$? | ||
+ | |type="{}"} | ||
+ | $a \ = \ $ { 0.4 3% } | ||
+ | {What channel capacity $C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}'$ results from this approximation for $E_{\rm B} = N_{0}$ ⇒ $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B} / N_0} = 0 \ {\rm dB}$? | ||
+ | |type="{}"} | ||
+ | $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B} / N_0} = 0 \ {\rm dB} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} \ C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}' \ = \ $ { 0.47 3% } | ||
+ | {Calculate also the channel capacity approximation for the following values: | ||
+ | |type="{}"} | ||
+ | $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B} / N_0} = 2 \ {\rm dB} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} \ C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}' \ = \ $ { 0.76 3% } | ||
+ | $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B} / N_0} = 4 \ {\rm dB} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} \ C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}' \ = \ $ { 0.89 3% } | ||
+ | $10 · \lg {E_{\rm B} / N_0} = 6 \ {\rm dB} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} \ C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}' \ = \ $ { 0.95 3% } | ||
</quiz> | </quiz> | ||
− | === | + | |
+ | ===Solution=== | ||
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | '''(1)''' In the lower $E_{\rm B} /N_{0}$ range, the capacity curves | ||
+ | *$C_{2}$ $($valid for binary input, for example BPSK$)$ and | ||
+ | *$C$ $($valid for analog real-valued input$)$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | converge. For a given rate $R$ ⇒ $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$ must be greater than $(2^{2R} - 1)/2R.$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The limit transition for $R → 0$ provides the absolute Shannon limit above which error-free transmission is no longer possible: | ||
+ | |||
+ | :$${\rm Min}\hspace{0.1cm}\left [E_{\rm B}/N_0 \right] = \lim_{R \rightarrow 0}\hspace{0.1cm} \frac{2^{2R}-1}{2R} = {\rm ln}\hspace{0.1cm}2 \approx 0.693\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} | ||
+ | 10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} {\rm Min}\hspace{0.1cm}\left [E_{\rm B}/N_0 \right] \approx -1.6 \,{\rm dB} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x_0 \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 1.6 \,{\rm dB}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''(2)''' The tangent increase at the zero point can be estimated from the graph in the data section: | ||
+ | |||
+ | :$$\frac{{\rm d}C_2}{{\rm d}x} (x=0) = \frac{1.6 + 1.5}{1.25} =2.48 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} a = \frac{1}{2.48} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{\approx 0.4}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus, the approximation for the BPSK channel capacity as a function of the abscissa value $x$ is: | ||
+ | |||
+ | :$$C_2' = \hspace{0.15cm} \left\{ \begin{array}{c} 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}x} \\ 0 \end{array} \right.\quad \begin{array}{*{1}c} {\rm for\hspace{0.15cm}} x > 0, \\{\rm for\hspace{0.15cm}} x < 0. \end{array}$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''(3)''' From $E_{\rm B} = N_{0}$ follows $\ 10 · \lg {(E_{\rm B} = N_0)} = 0 \ {\rm dB}$ and $x = 1.6$: | ||
+ | |||
+ | :$$C_2\hspace{0.01cm}' = 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}1.6}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.47}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''(4)''' The corresponding numerical values are: | ||
+ | :$$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = \text{2 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2\hspace{0.01cm}' \hspace{-0.15cm}\ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}3.6}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.76}$$ | ||
+ | :$$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = \text{4 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2\hspace{0.01cm}' \hspace{-0.15cm}\ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}5.6}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.89}$$ | ||
+ | :$$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = \text{6 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2\hspace{0.01cm}' \hspace{-0.15cm}\ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}7.6}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.95}.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The values $C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}'$ of the channel capacity for binary input approximated in this way are somewhat too small. | ||
+ | |||
+ | From the graph in the information section the exact values $C_{2}$ can be estimated: | ||
+ | |||
+ | :$$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 =\text{2 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2 \hspace{-0.15cm}\ \approx \ \hspace{-0.15cm} {0.78}\hspace{0.05cm},$$ | ||
+ | :$$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = \text{4 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2 \hspace{-0.15cm}\ \approx \ \hspace{-0.15cm} {0.94}\hspace{0.05cm},$$ | ||
+ | :$$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = \text{6 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2 \hspace{-0.15cm}\ \approx \ \hspace{-0.15cm} {0.99}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | From about $\ 10 \cdot \lg {(E_{\rm B} / N_0)} = 8 \ {\rm dB}$ applies within character accuracy: $C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}'= C_{2} = 1$ $($bit/channel use$)$. | ||
+ | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
− | |||
− | ^]] | + | [[Category:Channel Coding: Exercises|^1.7 Channel Capacity^]] |
Latest revision as of 17:04, 23 January 2023
Binary signals can be transmitted error-free over the "AWGN channel" according to the "channel coding theorem" if and only if
- one uses a channel code of rate $R = k/n$,
- the block length $n$ of this code is chosen very large ⇒ $n → ∞$,
- the rate $R$ is smaller than the channel capacity valid for binary input $C_{2}$,
- where the BPSK channel capacity $C_{2}$ depends on the AWGN quotient $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$ .
Note:
- The permissible range for the code rate $R$ is highlighted in green in the graph.
- The limit curve $C_{2}$, valid for binary input signals $($therefore the index $2)$ and sometimes also referred to as BPSK channel capacity (stands for "Binary Phase Shift Keying").
- However, this curve cannot be specified in mathematically closed form, but is the result of an integral that can only be evaluated numerically.
- As blue curve the channel capacity $C$ is entered, if arbitrary real input signals are allowed.
- For multilevel signals the rate may well assume values $R > 1$.
- For a Gaussian distribution the rate $R$ is the smallest possible $(E_{\rm B}/N_{0})_{\rm min}$ according to the equation
- $$\left (E_{\rm B}/N_0 \right)_{\rm min} = \frac{2^{2R}-1}{2R}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Conversely, the rate $R$ for the given AWGN quotient $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$ is upper bounded:
- The just allowable code rate $R_{\rm max}$ for a given channel $(E_{\rm B}/N_{0} = \rm const.)$ we refer to as the channel capacity $C$.
- For $E_{\rm B}/N_{0} = 1 ⇒ 10 \ \lg {E_{\rm B}/N_0} = 0\ {\rm dB}$ we obtain, for example $C = 0.5$.
- This means: Even with the best possible amplitude distribution of the real input signal, the code rate must not exceed $R = 0.5$.
- For binary input, a slightly smaller value results according to $C_{2}.$
In this exercise, try to approximate the graphically given channel capacitance $C_{2}$ by an exponential function:
- For the abscissa, use the auxiliary variable (see graph)
- $$x = \frac {x_0 + 10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 }{1\,{\rm dB}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- That is, $x$ is without unit; the pseudo unit "$\rm dB$" is omitted.
- Consider that for a small $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$ the approximation $C_{2} \approx C$ is valid (see graph), from which the parameter $x_{0}$ can be determined.
- Set for $C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}' = 1 - {\rm e}^{-a\hspace{0.05cm} · \hspace{0.05cm}x}$ and determine the parameter $a$ from the red dashed tangent such that $C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm} ' \approx C$ holds.
Hints:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter "Information Theoretical Limits of Channel Coding". It complements the "Exercise 1.17".
- The "bit/channel use" pseudo-unit of channel capacity is omitted in these exercises.
Questions
Solution
(1) In the lower $E_{\rm B} /N_{0}$ range, the capacity curves
- $C_{2}$ $($valid for binary input, for example BPSK$)$ and
- $C$ $($valid for analog real-valued input$)$
converge. For a given rate $R$ ⇒ $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$ must be greater than $(2^{2R} - 1)/2R.$
The limit transition for $R → 0$ provides the absolute Shannon limit above which error-free transmission is no longer possible:
- $${\rm Min}\hspace{0.1cm}\left [E_{\rm B}/N_0 \right] = \lim_{R \rightarrow 0}\hspace{0.1cm} \frac{2^{2R}-1}{2R} = {\rm ln}\hspace{0.1cm}2 \approx 0.693\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} 10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} {\rm Min}\hspace{0.1cm}\left [E_{\rm B}/N_0 \right] \approx -1.6 \,{\rm dB} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x_0 \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 1.6 \,{\rm dB}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(2) The tangent increase at the zero point can be estimated from the graph in the data section:
- $$\frac{{\rm d}C_2}{{\rm d}x} (x=0) = \frac{1.6 + 1.5}{1.25} =2.48 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} a = \frac{1}{2.48} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{\approx 0.4}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Thus, the approximation for the BPSK channel capacity as a function of the abscissa value $x$ is:
- $$C_2' = \hspace{0.15cm} \left\{ \begin{array}{c} 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}x} \\ 0 \end{array} \right.\quad \begin{array}{*{1}c} {\rm for\hspace{0.15cm}} x > 0, \\{\rm for\hspace{0.15cm}} x < 0. \end{array}$$
(3) From $E_{\rm B} = N_{0}$ follows $\ 10 · \lg {(E_{\rm B} = N_0)} = 0 \ {\rm dB}$ and $x = 1.6$:
- $$C_2\hspace{0.01cm}' = 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}1.6}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.47}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(4) The corresponding numerical values are:
- $$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = \text{2 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2\hspace{0.01cm}' \hspace{-0.15cm}\ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}3.6}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.76}$$
- $$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = \text{4 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2\hspace{0.01cm}' \hspace{-0.15cm}\ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}5.6}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.89}$$
- $$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = \text{6 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2\hspace{0.01cm}' \hspace{-0.15cm}\ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} 1 - {\rm e}^{- 0.4 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}7.6}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.95}.$$
The values $C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}'$ of the channel capacity for binary input approximated in this way are somewhat too small.
From the graph in the information section the exact values $C_{2}$ can be estimated:
- $$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 =\text{2 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2 \hspace{-0.15cm}\ \approx \ \hspace{-0.15cm} {0.78}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
- $$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = \text{4 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2 \hspace{-0.15cm}\ \approx \ \hspace{-0.15cm} {0.94}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
- $$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} E_{\rm B}/N_0 = \text{6 dB:} \hspace{0.3cm} C_2 \hspace{-0.15cm}\ \approx \ \hspace{-0.15cm} {0.99}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
From about $\ 10 \cdot \lg {(E_{\rm B} / N_0)} = 8 \ {\rm dB}$ applies within character accuracy: $C_{2}\hspace{0.01cm}'= C_{2} = 1$ $($bit/channel use$)$.