Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.8: HSDPA and HSUPA"
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
'''(2)''' The <u>first two statements</u> are correct: | '''(2)''' The <u>first two statements</u> are correct: | ||
*For a detailed description of the HARQ procedure, see the [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Further_Developments_of_UMTS#HARQ_procedure_and_.22Node_B_Scheduling.22|"theory section"]]. | *For a detailed description of the HARQ procedure, see the [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Further_Developments_of_UMTS#HARQ_procedure_and_.22Node_B_Scheduling.22|"theory section"]]. | ||
− | *In contrast, statement 3 is not correct. The [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Further_Developments_of_UMTS#HARQ_procedure_and_.22Node_B_Scheduling.22 |" | + | *In contrast, statement 3 is not correct. The [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Further_Developments_of_UMTS#HARQ_procedure_and_.22Node_B_Scheduling.22 |"diagram"]] in the theory part rather shows that for $10 \cdot {\rm lg} E_{\rm B}/N_{0} = 0 \ \rm dB$ (AWGN channel) the data rate can be increased from $600 \ \rm kbit/s$ to nearly $800 \ \rm kbit/s$ . |
*Below $-2 \ \rm dB$ usable transmission is possible exclusively with HARQ. In contrast, for good channels $(E_{\rm B}/N_{0} > 2 \ \rm dB)$, HARQ is not required. | *Below $-2 \ \rm dB$ usable transmission is possible exclusively with HARQ. In contrast, for good channels $(E_{\rm B}/N_{0} > 2 \ \rm dB)$, HARQ is not required. | ||
Revision as of 20:50, 2 March 2023
To achieve better quality of service, the UMTS Release $99$ standard was further developed. The most important further developments were:
- UMTS Release $5$ with HSDPA (2002),
- UMTS Release $6$ with HSUPA (2004).
Collectively, these developments are known as High-Speed Packet Access (HSPA).
The chart shows some of the features of HSDPA and HSUPA that particularly contribute to the increase in performance:
- Both use Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) and Node B Scheduling.
- With HSDPA, the high-speed transport channel HS-PDSCH (High-Speed Physical Downlink Shared Channel) was newly introduced, which is shared by multiple users and allows simultaneous transmission of the same data to many subscribers.
- In the HSUPA standard, there is the additional transport channel Enhanced Dedicated Channel ('E-DCH). Among other things, this minimizes the negative impact of applications with very intensive or highly varying data volumes.
- In HSPA, adaptive modulation and coding is used; the transmission rate is adjusted accordingly.
- In good conditions, a $\rm 16-QAM$ $(4$ bit per symbol$)$ or $64$-QAM $(6$ bit per symbol$)$ is used, in worse conditions only $\rm 4-QAM\ (QPSK)$.
- The maximum achievable bit rate depends on receiver performance, but also on transport format and resource combinations $\text{(TFRC)}$.
Of the ten specified TFRC classes, only a few are listed here arbitrarily:
- $\text{TFRC2:}$ $\rm 4-QAM\ (QPSK)$ with code rate $R_{\rm C} =1/2$ ⇒ bit rate $240 \rm kbit/s$,
- $\text{TFRC4:}$ $\rm 16-QAM$, with code rate $R_{\rm C} =1/2$ ⇒ bit rate $480 \rm kbit/s$,
- $\text{TFRC8:}$ $\rm 64-QAM$, with code rate $R_{\rm C} =3/4$ ⇒ bit rate $1080 \rm kbit/s$.
Other TFRC classes are discussed in subtasks (4) and (5) .
Hints:
- This exercise belongs to the chapter "Further Developments of UMTS".
Questions
Solution
(1) Correct is solution suggestion 2.:
- For conventional UMTS, the data transfer rate is between $144 \ \rm kbit/s$ and $2 \ \rm Mbit/s$.
- For HSDPA (the abbreviation stands for High-Speed Downlink Packet Access), data rates between $500 \ \rm kbit/s$ and $3.6 \ \rm Mbit/s$ are specified, and as a limit even $14.4 \ \rm Mbit/s$.
- HSUPA (High-Speed Uplink Packet Access), on the other hand, refers to the uplink channel, which always has a lower data rate than the downlink. In practice, data rates up to $800 \ \rm kbit/s$ are achieved, the theoretical limit being $5.8 \ \rm Mbit/s$.
(2) The first two statements are correct:
- For a detailed description of the HARQ procedure, see the "theory section".
- In contrast, statement 3 is not correct. The "diagram" in the theory part rather shows that for $10 \cdot {\rm lg} E_{\rm B}/N_{0} = 0 \ \rm dB$ (AWGN channel) the data rate can be increased from $600 \ \rm kbit/s$ to nearly $800 \ \rm kbit/s$ .
- Below $-2 \ \rm dB$ usable transmission is possible exclusively with HARQ. In contrast, for good channels $(E_{\rm B}/N_{0} > 2 \ \rm dB)$, HARQ is not required.
(3) All statements are correct. For further guidance on Node B Scheduling, see "theory section".
(4) The bitrate $R_{\rm B}\hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 360 \rm kbit/s}$ is larger than the bit rate of TFRC2 by a factor $(3/4)/(1/2) = 1.5$ because of the larger code rate.
(5)
- With the code rate $R_{\rm C} =1$ , QPSK $(2 \ \rm bit \ per \ symbol)$ would result in the bit rate $480 \ \rm kbit/s$ .
- For $64$-QAM ($6 \ \rm bit$ per symbol) the value is three times: $R_{\rm B} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 1440 \ \rm kbit/s}$.