Aufgaben:Exercise 4.5: Coaxial Cable - Impulse Response: Difference between revisions

From LNTwww
Fix interlanguage link: resolve redirect chain
 
(26 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Properties_of_Coaxial_Cables
}}
[[File:P_ID1814__LZI_A_4_5.png|right|frame|Impulse response of a coaxial cable]]
The frequency response of a coaxial cable  (German:  "Koaxialkabel"   ⇒   subscipt  "K")  of length  $l$  can be represented by the following formula:
:$$H_{\rm K}(f)  = {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l}\cdot{\rm e}^{- (\alpha_1 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_1) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot f \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}  \cdot{\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
The first term of this equation is due to the ohmic losses,  the second term to the transverse losses.  Dominant,  however,  is the skin effect,  which is expressed by the third term.
With the coefficients valid for the  "standard coaxial cable"  $\text{(2.6 mm}$  core diameter,  $\text{9.5 mm}$  outer diameter$)$ 
:$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm} \beta_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}$$
this frequency response can also be represented as follows:
:$$H_{\rm K}(f) \approx {\rm e}^{- 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
That means:   
Attenuation curve  ${a}_{\rm K}(f)$  and phase curve  $b_{\rm K}(f)$  are identical except for the pseudo units  "Np"  and  "rad",  respectively.
If one defines the characteristic cable attenuation  ${a}_{\rm *}$  at half the bit rate  $($i.e., at  $R/2)$  and normalizes the frequency to  $R$,  one can treat digital systems of different bit rate and length uniformly:
:$${a}_{\rm \star} = {a}_{\rm K}(f ={R}/{2})\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-{a}_{\rm \star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {a}_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*The corresponding  $\rm dB$  value is greater by a factor of  $8.686$.
*For a binary system,  $R = 1/T$ holds,  so that the characteristic cable attenuation refers to the frequency  $f = 1/(2T)$.


{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Lineare zeitinvariante Systeme/Koaxialkabel
}}


[[File:P_ID1814__LZI_A_4_5.png|right|Impulsantwort eines Koaxialkabels]]
The  [[Signal_Representation/The_Fourier_Transform_and_its_Inverse#Fourier_transform|Fourier transform]]  of  $H_{\rm K}(f)$  yields the impulse response  $h_{\rm K}(t)$,  which can be specified in closed-analytic form for a coaxial cable using the approximations described here.  For a binary system holds:
Der Frequenzgang eines Koaxialkabels der Länge <i>l</i> ist durch folgende Formel darstellbar:
:$$h_{\rm K}(t) =   \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{ \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot{\rm e}^{ - {{a}_{\rm \star}^2}/(2 \hspace{0.05cm} \pi  \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t/T)}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\rm \star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
$$H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l}
Subtask&nbsp; '''(5)'''&nbsp; refers to the basic reception pulse &nbsp;$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t)$, where the basic transmission pulse &nbsp;$g_s(t)$&nbsp; is assumed to be a rectangle&nbsp; $($height &nbsp;$s_0$,&nbsp; duration &nbsp;$T)$.
  \cdot
  {\rm e}^{- (\alpha_1 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_1) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot f \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot
  {\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}
    \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Der erste Term dieser Gleichung ist auf die Ohmschen Verluste zurückzuführen und der zweite Term auf die Querverluste. Dominant ist jedoch der Skineffekt, der durch den dritten Term ausgedrückt wird.


Mit den für ein so genanntes Normalkoaxialkabel (2.6 mm Kerndurchmesser und 9.5 mm Außendurchmesser) gültigen Koeffizienten
$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}
  \hspace{0.05cm},
  \hspace{0.2cm} \beta_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm
  MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}$$
lässt sich dieser Frequenzgang auch wie folgt darstellen:
$$H_{\rm K}(f) \approx {\rm e}^{- 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}
  \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}
  0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}
  \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}}
    \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Das heißt: Der Dämpfungsverlauf ${\rm a}_{\rm K}(f)$ und der Phasenverlauf $b_{\rm K}(f)$ sind bis auf die Pseudoeinheiten &bdquo;Np&rdquo; bzw. &bdquo;rad&rdquo; identisch.


Definiert man die charakteristische Kabeldämpfung ${\rm a}_{\rm *}$ bei der halben Bitrate (also bei $R/2$), so kann man  Digitalsysteme unterschiedlicher Bitrate und Länge einheitlich behandeln:
$${\rm a}_{\rm \star} = {\rm a}_{\rm K}(f ={R}/{2})
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-
{\rm a}_{\rm \star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {\rm a}_{\rm \star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm a}_{\rm \star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Der entsprechende dB&ndash;Wert ist um den Faktor $8.686$ größer. Bei einem Binärsystem gilt $R = 1/T$, so dass sich die charakteristische Kabeldämpfung auf die Frequenz $f = 1/(2T)$ bezieht.


Die Fouriertransformierte von $H_{\rm K}(f)$ liefert die Impulsantwort $h_{\rm K}(t)$, die für ein Koaxialkabel mit den hier beschriebenen Näherungen in geschlossen&ndash;analytischer Form angebbar ist. Für ein Binärsystem gilt:
$$h_{\rm K}(t) =  \frac{ {\rm a}_{\rm \star}/T}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot
  {\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{{\rm a}_{\rm \star}^2}{2  \pi  \cdot t/T}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]
  \hspace{0.4cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm a}_{\rm \star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Die Teilaufgabe (5) bezieht sich auf den Empfangsgrundimpuls $g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t)$, wobei für $g_s(t)$ ein Rechteckimpuls mit der Höhe $s_0$ und der Dauer $T$ angenommen werden soll.


''Hinweise:''
Notes:  
*Die Aufgabe gehört zum Kapitel   [[Lineare_zeitinvariante_Systeme/Eigenschaften_von_Koaxialkabeln|Eigenschaften von Koaxialkabeln]].
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&nbsp;   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Eigenschaften_von_Koaxialkabeln|Properties of Coaxial Cables]].
*Sollte die Eingabe des Zahlenwertes &bdquo;0&rdquo; erforderlich sein, so geben Sie bitte &bdquo;0.&rdquo; ein.
*Sie können zur Überprüfung Ihrer Ergebnisse das Interaktionsmodul [[Zeitverhalten von Kupferkabeln]] benutzen.
*You can use the&nbsp; (German language)&nbsp; interactive SWF applet &nbsp;[[Applets:Zeitverhalten_von_Kupferkabeln|"Zeitverhalten von Kupferkabeln"]] &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; "Time behavior of copper cables"&nbsp; to check your results.






===Fragebogen===
===Questions===


<quiz display=simple>
<quiz display=simple>
{Wie groß ist die Länge $l$ eines Normalkoaxialkabels, wenn sich für die Bitrate $R = 140 \ \rm Mbit/s$ die charakteristische Kabeldämpfung ${\rm a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$ ergibt?
{What is the length &nbsp;$l$&nbsp; of a standard coaxial cable if the characteristic cable attenuation is &nbsp;${a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; for the bit rate &nbsp;$R = 140 \ \rm Mbit/s$&nbsp;?
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$l \ =$  { 3 3% } $\ \rm km$
$l \ =\ $  { 3 3% } $\ \rm km$




{Zu welcher Zeit $t_{\rm max}$ besitzt $h_{\rm K}(t)$ sein Maximum? Es gelte weiter ${\rm a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$.
{At which time &nbsp;$t_{\rm max}$&nbsp; does &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$&nbsp; have its maximum? Let &nbsp;${a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
  $t_{\rm max}/T \ =$ { 5 3% }
  $t_{\rm max} \ = \ $ { 5 3% } $\ \cdot T$




{Wie groß ist der Maximalwert der Impulsantwort?
{What is the maximum value of the impulse response?
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
${\rm Max}[h_{\rm K}(t)] \ =$ { 0.03 3% } $\ \cdot 1/T$
${\rm Max}\, \big [h_{\rm K}(t)\big ] \ = \ $ { 0.03 3% } $\ \cdot 1/T$




{Ab welcher Zeit $t_{\rm 5\%}$ ist $h_{\rm K}(t)$ kleiner als $5\%$ des Maximums? Berücksichtigen Sie als Näherung nur den ersten Term der angegebenen Formel.
{From which time &nbsp;$t_{\rm 5\%}$&nbsp; is &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$&nbsp; less than &nbsp;$5\%$&nbsp; of the maximum?&nbsp; As an approximation, consider only the first term of the given formula.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$t_{\rm 5\%}/T \ =$  { 103.5 3% }
$t_{\rm 5\%} \ = \ $  { 103.5 3% } $\ \cdot T$




{Welche Aussagen treffen für den Empfangsgrundimpuls $g_r(t)$ zu?
{Which statements are true for the basic reception pulse &nbsp;$g_r(t)$&nbsp;?
|type="[]"}
|type="[]"}
- $g_r(t)$ ist doppelt so breit wie $h_{\rm K}(t)$.
- $g_r(t)$&nbsp; is twice as wide as &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$.
+ Es gilt näherungsweise $g_r(t) = s_0 \cdot T \cdot h_{\rm K}(t)$.
+ It is approximated &nbsp;$g_r(t) = s_0 \cdot T \cdot h_{\rm K}(t)$.
- $g_r(t)$ kann durch einen Gaußimpuls angenähert werden.
- $g_r(t)$&nbsp; can be approximated by a Gaussian pulse.




Line 79: Line 69:
</quiz>
</quiz>


===Musterlösung===
===Solution===
{{ML-Kopf}}
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Die charakteristische Kabeldämpfung ${\rm a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$ entspricht in etwa $6.9\ \rm  Np$. Deshalb muss gelten:
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The characteristic cable attenuation&nbsp; ${a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; corresponds approximately to&nbsp; $6.9\ \rm  Np$. Therefore the following must hold:
$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rm
:$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rm Np}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} l = \frac{6.9\,\,{\rm Np}}{0.2722 \,\, {\rm Np}/({\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}})\cdot \sqrt{70\,\,{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 3\,\,{\rm km}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Np}
 
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} l = \frac{6.9\,\,{\rm
 
Np}}{0.2722 \,\, {\rm Np}/({\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}})
'''(2)'''&nbsp; With the substitutions
\cdot \sqrt{70\,\,{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 3\,\,{\rm km}}
:$$x =   \frac{ t}{  T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{\sqrt{2  \pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm}K_2 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}^2}{2  \pi}$$
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
the impulse response can be described as follows:
:$$h_{\rm K}(x) =  K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*By setting the derivative to zero:
:$$- {3}/{2} \cdot  K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {3}/{2} \cdot x^{-5/2} = K_2 \cdot x^{-7/2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot  K_2 = \frac{{a}_{\rm \star}^2}{3  \pi}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*This results in the following for&nbsp; $60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; cable attenuation&nbsp; $({a}_{\rm \star}  \approx 6.9 \ \rm Np)$:
:$$x_{\rm max} =  { t_{\rm max}}/{  T}= { 6.9^2}/{(3\pi)}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 5 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
 
 
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Substituting the result into the given equation, we get (for simplicity, we use "${a}$" instead of "${a}_{\rm \star}$"):
:$$h_{\rm K}(t_{\rm max})  =  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{ {a}}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot {{a}^6}/{(3\pi)^3}}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot{\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{{a}^2}{2\pi} \cdot\frac{3\pi}{{\rm a}^2}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]=  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1}{{a}^2}\cdot\sqrt{\frac{27 \pi}{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2} \approx  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{{a}^2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*With&nbsp; $a = 6.9$&nbsp; we obtain the final result:
:$${\rm Max}\,[h_{\rm K}(t)]  = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx  0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


'''(2)'''&nbsp; Mit den Substitutionen
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Using the result from&nbsp; '''(3)'''&nbsp;, the appropriate equation of determination is:
$$x =  \frac{ t}{  T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{ {\rm a}_{\rm \star}/T}{\sqrt{2  \pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm}
:$$\frac{ {a}/T}{ \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}{= 0.0015 \cdot {1}/{T}}\hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} (t_{5\%}/T)^{3/2} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi \cdot 0.0015}\approx 1036 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{t_{5\%}/T \approx 103.5} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  K_2 = \frac{ {\rm a}_{\rm \star}^2}{2  \pi}$$
*This value is a bit too large, because the second term&nbsp; ${\rm e}^{-0.05}\approx 0.95$&nbsp; was neglected.
kann die Impulsantwort wie folgt beschrieben werden: &nbsp; $h_{\rm K}(x) =   K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}
*The exact calculation gives&nbsp; $t_{\rm 5\%}/T \approx 97$.
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$
Durch Nullsetzen der Ableitung folgt daraus:
$$- {3}/{2} \cdot K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm
  e}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {3}/{2} \cdot x^{-5/2} = K_2 \cdot
x^{-7/2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}
x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot  K_2 = \frac{{\rm a}_{\rm \star}^2}{3  \pi}
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Daraus ergibt sich für $60 \ \rm dB$ Kabeldämpfung (${\rm a}_{\rm \star} \approx 6.9 \ \rm Np$):
$$x_{\rm max} =  { t_{\rm max}}/T}= { 6.9^2}/{(3\pi)}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 5 }\hspace{0.05cm}
  .$$


'''(3)'''&nbsp; Setzt man das letzte Ergebnis in die vorgegebene Gleichung ein, so erhält man (zur Vereinfachung verwenden wir &bdquo;${\rm a}$&rdquo;anstelle von &bdquo;${\rm a}_{\rm \star}$&rdquo;):
$$h_{\rm K}(t_{\rm max})  =  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{ {\rm a}}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot {{\rm a}^6}/{(3\pi)^3}}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot
  {\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{{\rm a}^2}{2\pi} \cdot
  \frac{3\pi}{{\rm a}^2}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]
  =  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1}{{\rm a}^2}\cdot
  \sqrt{\frac{27 \pi
}{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2} \approx  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{{\rm a}^2}
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Mit $\rm a = 6.9$ kommt man somit zum Endergebnis:
$${\rm Max}[h_{\rm K}(t)]  = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx  0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}}
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


'''(4)'''&nbsp; Mit dem Ergebnis aus (3) lautet die geeignete Bestimmungsgleichung:
$$\frac{ {\rm a}/T}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 {1}/{T}
\hspace{0.15cm}{= 0.0015  \cdot {1}/{T}}
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}  (t_{5\%}/T)^{3/2} = \frac{\rm a}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi \cdot
  0.0015}\approx 1036 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow
  \hspace{0.3cm}
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{t_{5\%}/T \approx 103.5} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Dieser Wert ist etwas zu groß, da der zweite Term ${\rm e}^{-0.05}\approx 0.95$ vernachlässigt wurde. Die exakte Berechnung liefert $t_{\rm 5\%}/T \approx 97$.


'''(5)'''&nbsp; Richtig ist <u>der zweite Lösungsvorschlag</u>. Allgemein gilt:
'''(5)'''&nbsp; <u>The second solution</u> is correct:
$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot
*In general:
\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$
:$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$
Da sich die Kanalimpulsantwort $h_{\rm K}(t)$ innerhalb einer Symboldauer nur unwesentlich ändert, kann hierfür auch
*Since the channel pulse response $h_{\rm K}(t)$ changes only insignificantly within a symbol duration, it can also be written:
$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T$  geschrieben werden.
:$$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T.$$   
{{ML-Fuß}}
{{ML-Fuß}}






[[Category:Aufgaben zu Lineare zeitinvariante Systeme|^4.2 Koaxialkabel^]]
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^4.2 Coaxial Cable^]]
[[de:Aufgaben:Aufgabe 4.5: Koaxialkabel – Impulsantwort]]

Latest revision as of 17:57, 16 March 2026

Impulse response of a coaxial cable

The frequency response of a coaxial cable  (German:  "Koaxialkabel"   ⇒   subscipt  "K")  of length  $l$  can be represented by the following formula:

$$H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l}\cdot{\rm e}^{- (\alpha_1 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_1) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot f \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot{\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The first term of this equation is due to the ohmic losses,  the second term to the transverse losses.  Dominant,  however,  is the skin effect,  which is expressed by the third term.

With the coefficients valid for the  "standard coaxial cable"  $\text{(2.6 mm}$  core diameter,  $\text{9.5 mm}$  outer diameter$)$ 

$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm} \beta_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}$$

this frequency response can also be represented as follows:

$$H_{\rm K}(f) \approx {\rm e}^{- 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

That means:  

Attenuation curve  ${a}_{\rm K}(f)$  and phase curve  $b_{\rm K}(f)$  are identical except for the pseudo units  "Np"  and  "rad",  respectively.


If one defines the characteristic cable attenuation  ${a}_{\rm *}$  at half the bit rate  $($i.e., at  $R/2)$  and normalizes the frequency to  $R$,  one can treat digital systems of different bit rate and length uniformly:

$${a}_{\rm \star} = {a}_{\rm K}(f ={R}/{2})\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-{a}_{\rm \star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {a}_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The corresponding  $\rm dB$  value is greater by a factor of  $8.686$.
  • For a binary system,  $R = 1/T$ holds,  so that the characteristic cable attenuation refers to the frequency  $f = 1/(2T)$.


The  Fourier transform  of  $H_{\rm K}(f)$  yields the impulse response  $h_{\rm K}(t)$,  which can be specified in closed-analytic form for a coaxial cable using the approximations described here.  For a binary system holds:

$$h_{\rm K}(t) = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot{\rm e}^{ - {{a}_{\rm \star}^2}/(2 \hspace{0.05cm} \pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t/T)}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\rm \star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Subtask  (5)  refers to the basic reception pulse  $g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t)$, where the basic transmission pulse  $g_s(t)$  is assumed to be a rectangle  $($height  $s_0$,  duration  $T)$.



Notes:

  • You can use the  (German language)  interactive SWF applet  "Zeitverhalten von Kupferkabeln"   ⇒   "Time behavior of copper cables"  to check your results.


Questions

1 What is the length  $l$  of a standard coaxial cable if the characteristic cable attenuation is  ${a}_{\rm \star} = 60 \ \rm dB$  for the bit rate  $R = 140 \ \rm Mbit/s$ ?

$l \ =\ $ $\ \rm km$

2 At which time  $t_{\rm max}$  does  $h_{\rm K}(t)$  have its maximum? Let  ${a}_{\rm \star} = 60 \ \rm dB$.

$t_{\rm max} \ = \ $ $\ \cdot T$

3 What is the maximum value of the impulse response?

${\rm Max}\, \big [h_{\rm K}(t)\big ] \ = \ $ $\ \cdot 1/T$

4 From which time  $t_{\rm 5\%}$  is  $h_{\rm K}(t)$  less than  $5\%$  of the maximum?  As an approximation, consider only the first term of the given formula.

$t_{\rm 5\%} \ = \ $ $\ \cdot T$

5 Which statements are true for the basic reception pulse  $g_r(t)$ ?

$g_r(t)$  is twice as wide as  $h_{\rm K}(t)$.
It is approximated  $g_r(t) = s_0 \cdot T \cdot h_{\rm K}(t)$.
$g_r(t)$  can be approximated by a Gaussian pulse.


Solution

(1)  The characteristic cable attenuation  ${a}_{\rm \star} = 60 \ \rm dB$  corresponds approximately to  $6.9\ \rm Np$. Therefore the following must hold:

$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rm Np}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} l = \frac{6.9\,\,{\rm Np}}{0.2722 \,\, {\rm Np}/({\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}})\cdot \sqrt{70\,\,{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 3\,\,{\rm km}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  With the substitutions

$$x = \frac{ t}{ T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{\sqrt{2 \pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm}K_2 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}^2}{2 \pi}$$

the impulse response can be described as follows:

$$h_{\rm K}(x) = K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • By setting the derivative to zero:
$$- {3}/{2} \cdot K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {3}/{2} \cdot x^{-5/2} = K_2 \cdot x^{-7/2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot K_2 = \frac{{a}_{\rm \star}^2}{3 \pi}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This results in the following for  $60 \ \rm dB$  cable attenuation  $({a}_{\rm \star} \approx 6.9 \ \rm Np)$:
$$x_{\rm max} = { t_{\rm max}}/{ T}= { 6.9^2}/{(3\pi)}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 5 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(3)  Substituting the result into the given equation, we get (for simplicity, we use "${a}$" instead of "${a}_{\rm \star}$"):

$$h_{\rm K}(t_{\rm max}) = \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{ {a}}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot {{a}^6}/{(3\pi)^3}}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot{\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{{a}^2}{2\pi} \cdot\frac{3\pi}{{\rm a}^2}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]= \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1}{{a}^2}\cdot\sqrt{\frac{27 \pi}{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2} \approx \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{{a}^2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • With  $a = 6.9$  we obtain the final result:
$${\rm Max}\,[h_{\rm K}(t)] = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

(4)  Using the result from  (3) , the appropriate equation of determination is:

$$\frac{ {a}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}{= 0.0015 \cdot {1}/{T}}\hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} (t_{5\%}/T)^{3/2} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi \cdot 0.0015}\approx 1036 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{t_{5\%}/T \approx 103.5} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This value is a bit too large, because the second term  ${\rm e}^{-0.05}\approx 0.95$  was neglected.
  • The exact calculation gives  $t_{\rm 5\%}/T \approx 97$.


(5)  The second solution is correct:

  • In general:
$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$
  • Since the channel pulse response $h_{\rm K}(t)$ changes only insignificantly within a symbol duration, it can also be written:
$$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T.$$