Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.16: Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors"
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
===Solution=== | ===Solution=== | ||
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
− | '''(1)''' Correct are <u>proposed solutions 1 and 2</u>: | + | '''(1)''' Correct are the <u>proposed solutions 1 and 2</u>: |
− | *$\mathbf{K_y}$ is indeed the most general correlation matrix of a | + | *$\mathbf{K_y}$ is indeed the most general correlation matrix of a two-dimensional random variable with $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2 = \sigma$. |
*The parameter $\rho$ specifies the correlation coefficient. This can take all values between $\pm 1$ including these marginal values. | *The parameter $\rho$ specifies the correlation coefficient. This can take all values between $\pm 1$ including these marginal values. | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
'''(2)''' In this case, the governing equation is: | '''(2)''' In this case, the governing equation is: | ||
:$${\rm det}\left[ \begin{array}{cc} | :$${\rm det}\left[ \begin{array}{cc} | ||
− | 1- \lambda & 0 \ | + | 1- \lambda & 0 \\ |
0 & 1- \lambda | 0 & 1- \lambda | ||
\end{array} \right] = 0 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} | \end{array} \right] = 0 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} | ||
− | (1- \lambda)^2 = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow | + | (1- \lambda)^2 = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow |
\hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\lambda_{1/2} =1}.$$ | \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\lambda_{1/2} =1}.$$ | ||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
*For $\rho= 0.5$ one gets $\underline{\lambda_{1} =1.5}$ and $\underline{\lambda_{2} =0.5}$. | *For $\rho= 0.5$ one gets $\underline{\lambda_{1} =1.5}$ and $\underline{\lambda_{2} =0.5}$. | ||
− | *By the way, the equation holds in the whole domain of definition $-1 \le \rho \le +1$. | + | *By the way, the equation holds in the whole domain of definition $-1 \le \rho \le +1$. |
− | *For $\rho = 0$ | + | *For $\rho = 0$ ⇒ $\lambda_1 = \lambda_2 = +1$ ⇒ see subtask '''(2)'''. |
− | *For $\rho = \pm 1$ | + | *For $\rho = \pm 1$ ⇒ $\lambda_1 = 2$ and $\lambda_2 = 0$. |
− | '''(4)''' The eigenvectors are obtained by substituting the eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ into the correlation matrix: | + | '''(4)''' Correct are <u>the proposed solutions 1 and 2</u>. |
+ | |||
+ | The eigenvectors are obtained by substituting the eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ into the correlation matrix: | ||
:$$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} | :$$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} | ||
1- (1+\rho) & \rho \\ | 1- (1+\rho) & \rho \\ | ||
Line 146: | Line 148: | ||
\end{array} \right].$$ | \end{array} \right].$$ | ||
− | [[File:P_ID676__Sto_A_4_16_d.png|right|frame| | + | [[File:P_ID676__Sto_A_4_16_d.png|right|frame|Rotate the coordinate system]] |
− | Putting this into | + | Putting this into the "orthonormal form", the following holds: |
:$${\boldsymbol{\eta_1}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\cdot \left[ | :$${\boldsymbol{\eta_1}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\cdot \left[ | ||
\begin{array}{c} | \begin{array}{c} | ||
Line 160: | Line 162: | ||
The sketch illustrates the result: | The sketch illustrates the result: | ||
− | *The coordinate system defined by $\mathbf{\eta_1}$ and $\mathbf{\eta_2}$ is actually in the direction of the | + | *The coordinate system defined by $\mathbf{\eta_1}$ and $\mathbf{\eta_2}$ is actually in the direction of the main axes of the original system. |
− | *With $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2$ almost always results $($exception: $\rho= 0)$ the angle | + | *With $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2$ almost always results $($exception: $\rho= 0)$ the rotation angle $\alpha = 45^\circ$. |
*This also follows from the equation given in the theory section: | *This also follows from the equation given in the theory section: | ||
:$$\alpha = {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot\rho \cdot | :$$\alpha = {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot\rho \cdot | ||
Line 167: | Line 169: | ||
{1}/{2}\cdot \arctan | {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan | ||
(\infty)\hspace{0.3cm}\rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\alpha = 45^\circ.$$ | (\infty)\hspace{0.3cm}\rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\alpha = 45^\circ.$$ | ||
− | *The eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ do not denote the | + | *The eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ do not denote the standard deviations with respect to the new axes, but the variances. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | '''(5)''' By comparing the matrices $\mathbf{K_x}$ and $\mathbf{K_z}$ we get. | + | '''(5)''' By comparing the matrices $\mathbf{K_x}$ and $\mathbf{K_z}$ we get. |
*$\sigma_{1}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =2}$, | *$\sigma_{1}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =2}$, | ||
*$\sigma_{2}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =1}$, | *$\sigma_{2}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =1}$, | ||
Line 209: | Line 209: | ||
The accompanying sketch shows the joint PDF of the random variable $\mathbf{z}$: | The accompanying sketch shows the joint PDF of the random variable $\mathbf{z}$: | ||
− | *Because $\rho = 1$ all values lie on the correlation line with coordinates $z_1$ and $z_2 = z_1/2$. | + | *Because of $\rho = 1$ all values lie on the correlation line with coordinates $z_1$ and $z_2 = z_1/2$. |
− | *By rotating by the angle $\alpha = \arctan(0.5) = 26.56^\circ$ a new coordinate system is formed. | + | *By rotating by the angle $\alpha = \arctan(0.5) = 26.56^\circ$ a new coordinate system is formed. |
− | *The variance along the axis $\mathbf{\zeta_1}$ is $\lambda_1 = 5$ $($ | + | *The variance along the axis $\mathbf{\zeta_1}$ is $\lambda_1 = 5$ $($standard deviation $\sigma_1 = \sqrt{5} = 2.236)$, |
− | *while in the direction orthogonal to it $\mathbf{\zeta_2}$ | + | *while in the direction orthogonal to it, the random variable $\mathbf{\zeta_2}$ is not extended $(\lambda_2 = \sigma_2 = 0)$. |
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:43, 29 March 2022
Although the description of Gaussian random variables using vectors and matrices is actually only necessary and makes sense for more than $N = 2$ dimensions, here we restrict ourselves to the special case of two-dimensional random variables for simplicity.
In the graph above, the general correlation matrix $\mathbf{K_x}$ of the two-dimensional random variable $\mathbf{x} = (x_1, x_2)^{\rm T}$ is given, where $\sigma_1^2$ and $\sigma_2^2$ describe the variances of the individual components. $\rho$ denotes the correlation coefficient between the two components.
The random variables $\mathbf{y}$ and $\mathbf{z}$ give two special cases of $\mathbf{x}$ whose process parameters are to be determined from the correlation matrices $\mathbf{K_y}$ and $\mathbf{K_z}$ respectively.
Hints:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter Generalization to N-Dimensional Random Variables.
- Some basics on the application of vectors and matrices can be found on the pages Determinant of a Matrix and Inverse of a Matrix .
- According to the page "Contour lines for correlated random variables" the angle $\alpha$ between the old and the new system is given by the following equation:
- $$\alpha = {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot\rho \cdot \frac{\sigma_1\cdot\sigma_2}{\sigma_1^2 -\sigma_2^2}).$$
- In particular, note:
- A $2×2$-covariance matrix has two real eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$.
- These two eigenvalues determine two eigenvectors $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$.
- These span a new coordinate system in the direction of the principal axes of the old system.
Questions
Solution
- $\mathbf{K_y}$ is indeed the most general correlation matrix of a two-dimensional random variable with $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2 = \sigma$.
- The parameter $\rho$ specifies the correlation coefficient. This can take all values between $\pm 1$ including these marginal values.
(2) In this case, the governing equation is:
- $${\rm det}\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1- \lambda & 0 \\ 0 & 1- \lambda \end{array} \right] = 0 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} (1- \lambda)^2 = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\lambda_{1/2} =1}.$$
(3) With positive $\rho$ the governing equation of the eigenvalues is:
- $$(1- \lambda)^2 -\rho^2 = 0\hspace{0.5cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.5cm}\lambda^2 - 2\lambda + 1 - \rho^2 = 0\hspace{0.5cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.5cm}\lambda_{1/2} =1 \pm \rho.$$
- For $\rho= 0.5$ one gets $\underline{\lambda_{1} =1.5}$ and $\underline{\lambda_{2} =0.5}$.
- By the way, the equation holds in the whole domain of definition $-1 \le \rho \le +1$.
- For $\rho = 0$ ⇒ $\lambda_1 = \lambda_2 = +1$ ⇒ see subtask (2).
- For $\rho = \pm 1$ ⇒ $\lambda_1 = 2$ and $\lambda_2 = 0$.
(4) Correct are the proposed solutions 1 and 2.
The eigenvectors are obtained by substituting the eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ into the correlation matrix:
- $$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1- (1+\rho) & \rho \\ \rho & 1- (1+\rho) \end{array} \right]\cdot{\boldsymbol{\eta_1}} = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} -\rho & \rho \\ \rho & -\rho \end{array} \right]\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} \eta_{11} \\ \eta_{12} \end{array} \right]=0$$
- $$\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}-\rho \cdot \eta_{11} + \rho \cdot \eta_{12} = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\eta_{11}= {\rm const} \cdot \eta_{12}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}{\boldsymbol{\eta_1}}= {\rm const}\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 1 \end{array} \right];$$
- $$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1- (1-\rho) & \rho \\ \rho & 1- (1-\rho) \end{array} \right]\cdot{\boldsymbol{\eta_2}} = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} \rho & \rho \\ \rho & \rho \end{array} \right]\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} \eta_{21} \\ \eta_{22} \end{array} \right]=0$$
- $$\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\rho \cdot \eta_{21} + \rho \cdot \eta_{22} = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\eta_{21}= -{\rm const} \cdot \eta_{22}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}{\boldsymbol{\eta_2}}= {\rm const}\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} -1 \\ 1 \end{array} \right].$$
Putting this into the "orthonormal form", the following holds:
- $${\boldsymbol{\eta_1}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 1 \end{array} \right],\hspace{0.5cm} {\boldsymbol{\eta_2}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} -1 \\ 1 \end{array} \right].$$
The sketch illustrates the result:
- The coordinate system defined by $\mathbf{\eta_1}$ and $\mathbf{\eta_2}$ is actually in the direction of the main axes of the original system.
- With $\sigma_1 = \sigma_2$ almost always results $($exception: $\rho= 0)$ the rotation angle $\alpha = 45^\circ$.
- This also follows from the equation given in the theory section:
- $$\alpha = {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot\rho \cdot \frac{\sigma_1\cdot\sigma_2}{\sigma_1^2 -\sigma_2^2})= {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (\infty)\hspace{0.3cm}\rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\alpha = 45^\circ.$$
- The eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ do not denote the standard deviations with respect to the new axes, but the variances.
(5) By comparing the matrices $\mathbf{K_x}$ and $\mathbf{K_z}$ we get.
- $\sigma_{1}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =2}$,
- $\sigma_{2}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =1}$,
- $\rho = 2/(\sigma_{1} \cdot \sigma_{2})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =1}$.
(6) According to the now familiar scheme:
- $$(4- \lambda) \cdot (1- \lambda) -4 = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\lambda^2 - 5\lambda = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\lambda_{1} =5,\hspace{0.1cm} \lambda_{2} =0}.$$
(7) According to the equation given on the specification sheet:
- $$\alpha ={1}/{2}\cdot \arctan (2 \cdot 1 \cdot \frac{2 \cdot 1}{2^2 -1^2})= {1}/{2}\cdot \arctan ({4}/{3}) = 26.56^\circ.$$
The same result is obtained using the eigenvector:
- $$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 4-5 & 2 \\ 2 & 1-5 \end{array} \right]\cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} \zeta_{11} \\ \zeta_{12} \end{array} \right]=0 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}-\zeta_{11}= 2\zeta_{12}=0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\zeta_{12}={\zeta_{11}}/{2}$$
- $$\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\alpha = \arctan ({\zeta_{12}}/{\zeta_{11}}) = \arctan(0.5) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 26.56^\circ}.$$
The accompanying sketch shows the joint PDF of the random variable $\mathbf{z}$:
- Because of $\rho = 1$ all values lie on the correlation line with coordinates $z_1$ and $z_2 = z_1/2$.
- By rotating by the angle $\alpha = \arctan(0.5) = 26.56^\circ$ a new coordinate system is formed.
- The variance along the axis $\mathbf{\zeta_1}$ is $\lambda_1 = 5$ $($standard deviation $\sigma_1 = \sqrt{5} = 2.236)$,
- while in the direction orthogonal to it, the random variable $\mathbf{\zeta_2}$ is not extended $(\lambda_2 = \sigma_2 = 0)$.