Aufgaben:Exercise 1.11Z: Syndrome Decoding again: Difference between revisions

From LNTwww
No edit summary
Fix interlanguage link: resolve redirect chain
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 46: Line 46:
- No.
- No.


{Received  $\underline{y} = (1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$. Is this a valid codeword?
{With received vector  $\underline{y} = (1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$.  Is this a valid code word?
|type="()"}
|type="()"}
+ Yes,
+ Yes,
Line 57: Line 57:
- $\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{7} = (1, 1, 1).$
- $\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{7} = (1, 1, 1).$


{Which received words lead to the same syndrome as in subtask '''(3)'''?
{Which received words lead to the same syndrome as in subtask  '''(3)'''?
|type="[]"}
|type="[]"}
-  $\underline{y} = (1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0),$
-  $\underline{y} = (1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0),$
Line 66: Line 66:
===Solution===
===Solution===
{{ML-Kopf}}
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The answer is <u>YES</u>, as can be seen from the given parity-check matrix $\mathbf{H}$:
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The answer is&nbsp; <u>YES</u>,&nbsp; as can be seen from the given parity-check matrix&nbsp; $\mathbf{H}$:
*This contains a $3×3$ diagonal matrix at the end.  
*This contains a&nbsp; $3×3$&nbsp; diagonal matrix at the end.  
*The code words are therefore:
*The code words are therefore:


Line 74: Line 74:




'''(2)'''&nbsp; With this received vector $\underline{y} = (1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$ all parity-check equations are satisfied:
'''(2)'''&nbsp; With this received vector&nbsp; $\underline{y} = (1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$,&nbsp; all parity-check equations are satisfied:


:$$u_1 \oplus u_2 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_1 = 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
:$$u_1 \oplus u_2 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_1 = 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
Line 80: Line 80:
:$$u_1 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_3 = 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
:$$u_1 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_3 = 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Accordingly, the correct answer is <u>YES</u>.
Accordingly,&nbsp; the correct answer is&nbsp; <u>YES</u>.




Line 86: Line 86:
'''(3)'''&nbsp;  It holds $\underline{s} = \underline{y} · \boldsymbol{\rm H}^{\rm T}$:
'''(3)'''&nbsp;  It holds $\underline{s} = \underline{y} · \boldsymbol{\rm H}^{\rm T}$:


:$$ \underline{s} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 &0 &1 &0 &1 &0 \end{pmatrix} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 &1\\ 1 &1 &0\\ 0 &1 &1\\ 1 &1 &1\\ 1 &0 &0\\ 0 &1 &0\\ 0 &0 &1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 &0 &0 \end{pmatrix} = \underline{s}_0 \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow\hspace{0.2cm} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{ \rm Antwort \hspace{0.15cm}1} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
:$$ \underline{s} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 &0 &1 &0 &1 &0 \end{pmatrix} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 &1\\ 1 &1 &0\\ 0 &1 &1\\ 1 &1 &1\\ 1 &0 &0\\ 0 &1 &0\\ 0 &0 &1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 &0 &0 \end{pmatrix} = \underline{s}_0 \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow\hspace{0.2cm} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{ \rm Answer \hspace{0.15cm}1} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$






'''(4)'''&nbsp; One could now for each $\underline{y}$ check the equation $\underline{y} · \boldsymbol{\rm H}^{\rm T} = (0, 0, 0)$. Now here the result shall be obtained in a different way:
'''(4)'''&nbsp; One could now for each&nbsp; $\underline{y}$&nbsp; check the equation&nbsp; $\underline{y} · \boldsymbol{\rm H}^{\rm T} = (0, 0, 0)$.&nbsp; Now here the result shall be obtained in a different way:


*$\underline{y}= (1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$ differs from $\underline{y} = (1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$ in bit $u_{2}$, which is used only in the first two parity-check equations, but not in the last  ⇒  $\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{6} = (1, 1, 0)$.
*$\underline{y}= (1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$&nbsp; differs from&nbsp; $\underline{y} = (1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$&nbsp; in bit&nbsp; $u_{2}$,&nbsp; which is used only in the first two parity-check equations,&nbsp; but not in the last  ⇒  $\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{6} = (1, 1, 0)$.


*Applying the parity-check equations to  $\underline{y} = (0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1)$, we obtain $\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{0} = (0, 0, 0)$, as evidenced by the following calculation:
*Applying the parity-check equations to&nbsp; $\underline{y} = (0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1)$,&nbsp; we obtain $\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{0} = (0, 0, 0)$, as evidenced by the following calculation:


:$$u_1 \oplus u_2 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_1 = 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
:$$u_1 \oplus u_2 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_1 = 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
Line 100: Line 100:
:$$u_1 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_3 = 0 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 1 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
:$$u_1 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_3 = 0 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 1 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


*The same result is obtained with the received vector $\underline{y} = (0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1),$ which differs from the vector $(1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$ in all seven bit positions:
*The same result is obtained with the received vector&nbsp; $\underline{y} = (0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1),$&nbsp; which differs from the vector&nbsp; $(1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$&nbsp; in all seven bit positions:


:$$u_1 \oplus u_2 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_1 = 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
:$$u_1 \oplus u_2 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_1 = 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
Line 106: Line 106:
:$$u_1 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_3 = 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
:$$u_1 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_3 = 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


So the correct answers are <u>answers 2 and 3</u>.
So the correct answers are&nbsp; <u>answers 2 and 3</u>.


{{ML-Fuß}}
{{ML-Fuß}}
Line 113: Line 113:


[[Category:Channel Coding: Exercises|^1.5 Linear Block Code Decoding^]]
[[Category:Channel Coding: Exercises|^1.5 Linear Block Code Decoding^]]
[[de:Aufgaben:Aufgabe 1.11Z: Nochmals Syndromdecodierung]]

Latest revision as of 17:54, 16 March 2026

Parity-check chart

The same constellation is considered as in  "Exercise 1.11":  The decoding of a  $(7, 4, 3)$  Hamming code with the parity-check matrix

$${ \boldsymbol{\rm H}}_{\rm } = \begin{pmatrix} 1 &1 &0 &1 &1 &0 &0\\ 0 &1 &1 &1 &0 &1 &0\\ 1 &0 &1 &1 &0 &0 &1 \end{pmatrix} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Accordingly,  the generator matrix is:

$${ \boldsymbol{\rm G}} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 &0 &0 &1 &0 &1\\ 0 &1 &0 &0 &1 &1 &0\\ 0 &0 &1 &0 &0 &1 &1\\ 0 &0 &0 &1 &1 &1 &1 \end{pmatrix}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

In  "syndrome decoding"  one forms from the received vector  $\underline{y}$  the syndrome  $\underline{s}$  according to the equation

$$\underline{s} = \underline{y} \cdot { \boldsymbol{\rm H}}^{\rm T} \in {\rm GF}(2^m) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

With this result,  any single error in the code word can be corrected in the Hamming code under consideration.

  • In the error-free case  $\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{0} = (0, 0, 0)$.
  • But even three transmission errors may result in  $\underline{s}_{0} = (0, 0, 0)$,  so these errors remain undetected.




Hints:

  • For more information on syndrome decoding,  see the specification sheet for  "Exercise 1.11".
  • The graph illustrates the three parity-check equations corresponding to the parity-check matrix:
    • first row:   red circle,
    • second row:   green circle,
    • third row:   blue circle.



Questions

1 Is it a systematic code?

Yes,
No.

2 With received vector  $\underline{y} = (1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$.  Is this a valid code word?

Yes,
No.

3 What syndrome results with this received word?

$\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{0} = (0, 0, 0),$
$\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{3} = (0, 1, 1),$
$\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{7} = (1, 1, 1).$

4 Which received words lead to the same syndrome as in subtask  (3)?

$\underline{y} = (1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0),$
$\underline{y} = (0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1),$
$\underline{y} = (0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1).$


Solution

(1)  The answer is  YES,  as can be seen from the given parity-check matrix  $\mathbf{H}$:

  • This contains a  $3×3$  diagonal matrix at the end.
  • The code words are therefore:
$$ \underline{x} = ( x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_5, x_6, x_7) = ( u_1, u_2, u_3, u_4, p_1, p_2, p_{3}) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  With this received vector  $\underline{y} = (1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$,  all parity-check equations are satisfied:

$$u_1 \oplus u_2 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_1 = 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$u_2 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_2 = 0 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 1 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$u_1 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_3 = 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Accordingly,  the correct answer is  YES.


(3)  It holds $\underline{s} = \underline{y} · \boldsymbol{\rm H}^{\rm T}$:

$$ \underline{s} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 &0 &1 &0 &1 &0 \end{pmatrix} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} 1 &0 &1\\ 1 &1 &0\\ 0 &1 &1\\ 1 &1 &1\\ 1 &0 &0\\ 0 &1 &0\\ 0 &0 &1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 &0 &0 \end{pmatrix} = \underline{s}_0 \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow\hspace{0.2cm} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{ \rm Answer \hspace{0.15cm}1} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(4)  One could now for each  $\underline{y}$  check the equation  $\underline{y} · \boldsymbol{\rm H}^{\rm T} = (0, 0, 0)$.  Now here the result shall be obtained in a different way:

  • $\underline{y}= (1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$  differs from  $\underline{y} = (1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$  in bit  $u_{2}$,  which is used only in the first two parity-check equations,  but not in the last ⇒ $\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{6} = (1, 1, 0)$.
  • Applying the parity-check equations to  $\underline{y} = (0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1)$,  we obtain $\underline{s} = \underline{s}_{0} = (0, 0, 0)$, as evidenced by the following calculation:
$$u_1 \oplus u_2 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_1 = 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$u_2 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_2 = 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$u_1 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_3 = 0 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 1 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The same result is obtained with the received vector  $\underline{y} = (0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1),$  which differs from the vector  $(1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0)$  in all seven bit positions:
$$u_1 \oplus u_2 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_1 = 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$u_2 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_2 = 1 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 0 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$u_1 \oplus u_3 \oplus u_4 \oplus p_3 = 0 \oplus 1 \oplus 0 \oplus 1 = 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

So the correct answers are  answers 2 and 3.