Aufgaben:Exercise 1.1Z: Simple Path Loss Model: Difference between revisions
m Javier verschob die Seite Exercises:Exercise 1.1Z: Simple Path Loss Model nach Aufgaben:Exercise 1.1Z: Simple Path Loss Model |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:P_ID2121__Mob_Z_1_1.png|right|frame|Bandbreitenorganisation bei DSL]] | [[File:P_ID2121__Mob_Z_1_1.png|right|frame|Bandbreitenorganisation bei DSL]] | ||
Radio transmission with line-of-sight can be described by the so-called path loss model, which is given by the following equations: | |||
$$V_{\rm P}(d) = V_{\rm 0} + \gamma \cdot 10\,{\rm dB} \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} (d/d_0)\hspace{0.05cm},$$ | |||
$$V_{\rm 0} = \gamma \cdot 10\,{\rm dB} \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | |||
The graphic shows the path loss $V_{\rm P}(d)$ in $\rm dB$. The abscissa $d$ is also displayed logarithmically. | |||
In | In the above equation are used: | ||
* | * the distance $d$ of sender and receiver, | ||
* | * the reference distance $d_0 = 1 \ \rm m$, | ||
* | * the path loss exponent $\gamma$, | ||
* | * the wavelength $\lambda$ of electromagnetic wave. | ||
Two scenarios are shown $\rm (A)$ and $\rm (B)$ with the same path loss at distance $d_0 = 1 \ \rm m$: | |||
$$V_{\rm 0} = V_{\rm P}(d = d_0) = 20\,{\rm dB} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | |||
One of these two scenarios describes the so-called <i>free space attenuation</i>, characterized by the path loss exponent $\gamma = 2$. However, the equation for the free space attenuation only applies in the <i>far-field</i>, i.e. when the distance $d$ between transmitter and receiver is greater than the „Fraunhofer–distance” | |||
$$d_{\rm F} = {2 D^2}/{\lambda} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | |||
Where $D$ is the largest physical dimension of the transmitting antenna. With an $\lambda/2$–antenna, you get the simple result for this: | |||
$$d_{\rm F} = \frac{2 \cdot (\lambda/2)^2}{\lambda} = {\lambda}/{2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | |||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
'' | ''Notes:'' | ||
* | * The task belongs to the chapter [[Mobile_Communication/Distancedependent%C3%A4ngige_D%C3%A4mpfung_und_Abschattung|Distance-dependent attenuation and shading]]. | ||
* | * The speed of light is $c = 3 \cdot 10^8 \ {\rm m/s}$. | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
=== | ===Questionnaire=== | ||
<quiz display=simple> | <quiz display=simple> | ||
{ | {Which path loss exponents apply to the scenarios $\rm (A)$ and $\rm (B)$? | ||
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
$\gamma_{\rm A}\ = \ $ { 2 3% } | $\gamma_{\rm A}\ = \ $ { 2 3% } | ||
$\gamma_{\rm B} \ = \ $ { 2.5 3% } | $\gamma_{\rm B} \ = \ $ { 2.5 3% } | ||
{ | {Which scenario describes the free space attenuation? | ||
|type="()"} | |type="()"} | ||
+ | + scenario $\rm (A)$, | ||
- | - Scenario $\rm (B)$. | ||
{ | {Which signal frequencies are the basis for the scenarios $\rm (A)$ and $\rm (B)$ ? | ||
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
$f_{\rm A} \ = \ $ { 240 3% } $\ \rm MHz$ | $f_{\rm A} \ = \ $ { 240 3% } $\ \ \rm MHz$ | ||
$f_{\rm B} \ = \ $ { 151.4 3% } $\ \rm MHz$ | $f_{\rm B} \ = \ $ { 151.4 3% } $\ \ \rm MHz$ | ||
Does the free space&ndash scenario apply to all distances between $1 \ \ \rm m$ and $10 \ \rm km$? | |||
|type="()"} | |type="()"} | ||
+ | + Yes, | ||
- | - No. | ||
</quiz> | </quiz> | ||
=== | ===Sample solution=== | ||
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
'''(1) | '''(1)'' The (simplest) path loss equation is | ||
$$V_{\rm P}(d) = V_{\rm 0} + \gamma \cdot 10\,{\rm dB} \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} (d/d_0)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | |||
* | *In scenario (A), the waste per decade (for example, between $d_0 = 1 \ \rm m$ and $d = 10 \ \rm m$) is exactly $20 \ \rm dB$ and in scenario (B) $25 \ \rm dB$. | ||
* | *It follows: | ||
$$\gamma_{\rm A} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 2}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}\gamma_{\rm B} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 2.5}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | |||
'''(2)''' | '''(2)''' Correct is <u>solution 1</u>, since the free space attenuation is characterized by the path loss exponent $\gamma = 2$. | ||
'''(3)''' | '''(3)''' The path loss at $d_0 = 1 \ \rm m$ is in both cases $V_0 = 20 \ \rm dB$. For scenario (A) the same applies: | ||
$$10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm A}}\right ]^2 = 20\,{\rm dB} \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} | |||
\frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm A}} = 10 \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} | \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm A}} = 10 \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} | ||
\lambda_{\rm A} = 4 | \lambda_{\rm A} = 4 \pi \cdot 0.1\,{\rm m} = 1,257\,{\rm m} | ||
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
* | *The frequency $f_{\rm A}$ is related to the wavelength $\lambda_{\rm A}$ over the speed of light $c$: | ||
$$f_{\rm A} = \frac{c}{\lambda_{\rm A}} = \frac{3 \cdot 10^8\,{\rm m/s}}}{1.257\,{\rm m}} = 2.39 \cdot 10^8\,{\rm Hz} | |||
\hspace{0.15cm} \underline{\approx | \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{\approx 240 \,\,{\rm MHz}} | ||
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
* | *On the other hand, the scenario (B) | ||
$$10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm B}}\right ]^{2.5} = 20\,{\rm dB} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} 25 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm B}}\right ] = 20\,{\rm dB}$$ | |||
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm B}} = 10^{0.8} \approx 6.31 | |||
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} | \hspace {0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} | ||
{\lambda_{\rm B}} = \frac{10}{6.31} \cdot {\lambda_{\rm A}}\hspace{0.3cm} | {\lambda_{\rm B}} = \frac{10}{6.31} \cdot {\lambda_{\rm A}}\hspace{0.3cm} | ||
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} | \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} | ||
{f_{\rm B}} = \frac{6.31}{10} \cdot {f_{\rm A}} = 0.631 \cdot 240 \,{\rm MHz}\hspace{0.15cm} \underline{\approx | {f_{\rm B}}} = \frac{6.31}{10} \cdot {f_{\rm A}}} = 0.631 \cdot 240 \,{\rm MHz}\hspace{0.15cm} \underline {\approx 151.4 \,\,{\rm MHz}} | ||
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
'''(4)''' | '''(4)''' <u>first suggested solution</u> is correct: | ||
* | *In free space–scenario (A) the Fraunhofer–distance $d_{\rm F} = \lambda_{\rm A}/2 \approx 63 \ \rm cm$. Thus, the following always applies $d > d_{\rm F}$. | ||
* | *Also in scenario (B) is because of $\lambda_{\rm B} \approx 2 \ \rm m$ or $d_{\rm F} \approx 1 \ \rm m$ the entire displayed course correct. | ||
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
Revision as of 16:44, 25 March 2020

Radio transmission with line-of-sight can be described by the so-called path loss model, which is given by the following equations: $$V_{\rm P}(d) = V_{\rm 0} + \gamma \cdot 10\,{\rm dB} \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} (d/d_0)\hspace{0.05cm},$$ $$V_{\rm 0} = \gamma \cdot 10\,{\rm dB} \cdot {\rm lg} \hspace{0.1cm} \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
The graphic shows the path loss $V_{\rm P}(d)$ in $\rm dB$. The abscissa $d$ is also displayed logarithmically.
In the above equation are used:
- the distance $d$ of sender and receiver,
- the reference distance $d_0 = 1 \ \rm m$,
- the path loss exponent $\gamma$,
- the wavelength $\lambda$ of electromagnetic wave.
Two scenarios are shown $\rm (A)$ and $\rm (B)$ with the same path loss at distance $d_0 = 1 \ \rm m$:
$$V_{\rm 0} = V_{\rm P}(d = d_0) = 20\,{\rm dB} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
One of these two scenarios describes the so-called free space attenuation, characterized by the path loss exponent $\gamma = 2$. However, the equation for the free space attenuation only applies in the far-field, i.e. when the distance $d$ between transmitter and receiver is greater than the „Fraunhofer–distance” $$d_{\rm F} = {2 D^2}/{\lambda} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Where $D$ is the largest physical dimension of the transmitting antenna. With an $\lambda/2$–antenna, you get the simple result for this: $$d_{\rm F} = \frac{2 \cdot (\lambda/2)^2}{\lambda} = {\lambda}/{2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Notes:
- The task belongs to the chapter Distance-dependent attenuation and shading.
- The speed of light is $c = 3 \cdot 10^8 \ {\rm m/s}$.
Questionnaire
Sample solution
- In scenario (A), the waste per decade (for example, between $d_0 = 1 \ \rm m$ and $d = 10 \ \rm m$) is exactly $20 \ \rm dB$ and in scenario (B) $25 \ \rm dB$.
- It follows:
$$\gamma_{\rm A} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 2}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}\gamma_{\rm B} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 2.5}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(2) Correct is solution 1, since the free space attenuation is characterized by the path loss exponent $\gamma = 2$.
(3) The path loss at $d_0 = 1 \ \rm m$ is in both cases $V_0 = 20 \ \rm dB$. For scenario (A) the same applies: $$10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm A}}\right ]^2 = 20\,{\rm dB} \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm}
\frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm A}} = 10 \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm}
\lambda_{\rm A} = 4 \pi \cdot 0.1\,{\rm m} = 1,257\,{\rm m}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- The frequency $f_{\rm A}$ is related to the wavelength $\lambda_{\rm A}$ over the speed of light $c$:
$$f_{\rm A} = \frac{c}{\lambda_{\rm A}} = \frac{3 \cdot 10^8\,{\rm m/s}}}{1.257\,{\rm m}} = 2.39 \cdot 10^8\,{\rm Hz}
\hspace{0.15cm} \underline{\approx 240 \,\,{\rm MHz}}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- On the other hand, the scenario (B)
$$10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm B}}\right ]^{2.5} = 20\,{\rm dB} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} 25 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm B}}\right ] = 20\,{\rm dB}$$ $$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac{4 \cdot \pi \cdot d_0}{\lambda_{\rm B}} = 10^{0.8} \approx 6.31
\hspace {0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}
{\lambda_{\rm B}} = \frac{10}{6.31} \cdot {\lambda_{\rm A}}\hspace{0.3cm}
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}
{f_{\rm B}}} = \frac{6.31}{10} \cdot {f_{\rm A}}} = 0.631 \cdot 240 \,{\rm MHz}\hspace{0.15cm} \underline {\approx 151.4 \,\,{\rm MHz}}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(4) first suggested solution is correct:
- In free space–scenario (A) the Fraunhofer–distance $d_{\rm F} = \lambda_{\rm A}/2 \approx 63 \ \rm cm$. Thus, the following always applies $d > d_{\rm F}$.
- Also in scenario (B) is because of $\lambda_{\rm B} \approx 2 \ \rm m$ or $d_{\rm F} \approx 1 \ \rm m$ the entire displayed course correct.