Aufgaben:Exercise 1.6: (7, 4) Hamming Code

• Return to book

Code table of the  $\text{HC (7, 4)}$

In 1962,  Richard Wesley Hamming  specified a class of binary block codes that differ in the number  $m$  of check bits supplied. The codeword length is always  $n = 2^m - 1$. The information word consists of  $k = n - m$  bits:

• $m = 2$:   $\text{(3, 1)}$ Hamming code   ⇒   identical to  $\text{RC (3, 1)}$,
• $m = 3$:   $\text{(7, 4)}$ Hamming code,
• $m = 4$:   $\text{(15, 11)}$ Hamming code,
• $m = 5$:   $\text{(31, 26)}$ Hamming code, etc.

In the course of this exercise there are questions

• to the code size  $ |\hspace{0.05cm}\mathcal{C}\hspace{0.05cm}|$,
• to the code rate  $R$,  and
• to the minimum distance  $d_{\rm min}$.

Furthermore,  we want to clarify whether the  $\text{(7, 4)}$  Hamming code given for this task by its code table  $\underline{u}_{i} ⇒ \underline{x}_{i}$  is systematic,  and whether it is a so called  "perfect code".  The control index can take the values  $i = 1, \text{...}\hspace{0.05cm} , 2^k =16$ .

One speaks of a  "perfect code"  if the following condition is satisfied:

$$2^k = \frac{2^n} {\sum_{f=0}^t {n \choose f}}\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} 2^m = {\sum_{f=0}^t {n \choose f}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Here  $t$  denotes the number of correctable errors.  For odd minimum distance  $d_{\rm min}$  holds:

$$ t = \frac{d_{\rm min}-1 } {2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The interpretation to this condition can be found in the sample solution.

Hints:

• This exercise belongs to the chapter  "Examples of Binary Block Codes".

• Reference is made to the section  "Hamming Codes".

• For this Hamming code,  different parity-check equations were used than in the  theory section.  Therefore,  the code tables also differ.

• In the  Exercise 1.7,  where the same code is used,  the chart of the parity-check equations is given.

Questions

1

Specify the characteristics of the given code  $\mathcal{C}$:

$ |\hspace{0.05cm}\mathcal{C}\hspace{0.05cm}| \ = \ $

$ k \hspace{0.46cm} = \ $

$ n \hspace{0.44cm} = \ $

$ R \hspace{0.40cm} = \ $

2

Is this a systematic code?

	Yes,
	No.

3

What is the minimum distance between any two code words?

$ \ d_{\rm min} \ = \ $

4

How many transmission errors can be detected  $(e)$  or corrected  $(t)$  respectively?

$e\hspace{0.22cm} = \ $

$t\hspace{0.28cm} = \ $

5

Is the Hamming code considered here  "perfect"?

	Yes,
	No.

6

Which statements are true regarding a  "perfect code"?

	A perfect code always results in zero block error probability.
	All receive words  $\underline{y}$  are assignable to a valid code word.
	For perfect codes,  the minimum Hamming distance is odd.

7

Which of the codes listed below are perfect?

	The  $\text{(15, 11)}$ Hamming code,
	the  $\text{(63, 57)}$ Hamming code,
	the  $\text{(3, 1)}$ repetition code,
	the  $\text{(4, 1)}$ repetition Code,
	the  $\text{(5, 1)}$ repetition code.

Solution

Solution

(1)  The code table has sixteen entries: $\underline{|C| = 16}$.

• From the equation  $|C| = 2^k$  it follows that  $\underline{k = 4}$.
• The length of each code word is  $\underline{n = 7}$.
• Thus,  the code rate is $\underline{R = 4/7} = 0.571$.

(2)  Correct  YES:

• Each code word  $\underline{x}$  first contains the  $k = 4$  bits of the information word  $\underline{u}$.  This is followed by  $m = 3$  check bits:

$$\underline{x} = ( x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_5, x_5,x_7) = ( u_1, u_2, u_3, u_4, p_1, p_2, p_3) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

• This corresponds exactly to the definition of a  "systematic code" .

(3)  For any Hamming code,  the minimum distance $d_{\rm min} \underline{= 3}$.

• From the table,  you can see that the minimum  Hamming weight  (the number of ones in a code word)  is equal to 3.
• A linear code,  in fact,  also includes the zero word,  so that holds:

$$d_{\rm min}(\mathcal{C}) = \min_{\substack{\underline{x},\hspace{0.05cm}\underline{x}' \hspace{0.05cm}\in \hspace{0.05cm} \mathcal{C} \ {\underline{x}} \hspace{0.05cm}\ne \hspace{0.05cm} \underline{x}'}}\hspace{0.1cm}d_{\rm H}(\underline{x}, \hspace{0.05cm}\underline{x}') = \min_{\underline{x} \hspace{0.05cm}\in \hspace{0.05cm} \mathcal{C} }\hspace{0.1cm}w_{\rm H}(\underline{x}) = 3 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

(4)  The specification  $d_{\rm min} = 3$  means that  $\underline{e = 2}$  errors can be detected and  $\underline{t = 1}$  errors can be corrected.

(5)  Correct is  YES:

• The condition for a perfect code is according to the specification:

$$ 2^m = {\sum_{f=0}^t {n \choose f}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

• In the  $\text{(7, 4) Hamming code}$  considered here,  $n = 7$,  $m = 3$,  and  $t = 1$,  giving a value of  $8$  on both sides of the equation:

$$ 2^3 = 8\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.35cm} {\sum_{f=0}^1 {7 \choose f}} = {7 \choose 0} + {7 \choose 1} = 1 + 7 = 8 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

(6)  Correct  statements 2 and 3:

• If there were a channel code with finite code word length  $n$  that made the block error probability zero for all channels,  it would not only be perfect,  but a  "miracle".
• But due to the channel coding theorem,  ${\rm Pr(block error)} = 0$  is not even possible with finite  $n$.

Illustration of a  "perfect code"

Let's illustrate statement 2 with a graph.  Here,  the high-dimensional space is shown in a highly simplified way  ("2D").  We assume the numerical values  $k = 4$,  $n = 7$,  $m = 3$  and  $t = 1$  of the  $\text{(7, 4, 3)}$  Hamming code:

• For the receive word,  $2^7 = 128$  points are possible in seven-dimensional space.  The red dots mark the  $2^4 = 16$  valid code words.

• The circles include  $8$  points each,  namely a valid code word and  $n = 7$  receive words after only one error,  which are assigned to exactly this code word during decoding.

• Total there are  $2^4 = 16$  such circles.  Therefore,  because of $128 = 16 \cdot 8$,  not a single receive word  $\underline{y}$  lies outside such an assignment circle.

Also the  last statement  is true,  which shall be shown exemplarily for  $d_{\rm min} = 4$:

• Hereby also only  $t = 1$  error can be corrected.
• If a receive word  $\underline{y}$  differs from permissible code words in two bits,  this point is not to be assigned to any circle.  Then there are also points outside the circles and the condition of a  "perfect code"  is no longer fulfilled.

(7)  Correct are  statements 1, 2, 3  and  5:

• All Hamming codes have the minimum Hamming distance  $d_{\rm min} = 3$   ⇒   $t = 1$.
• At the same time,  any  $(n, k)$  Hamming code can also be written as a  $(2^m - 1, 2^m - 1 - m)$  code,  where $m = n - k$  indicates the number of parity bits.
• Thus,  the equation of a  "perfect code"  is always satisfied:

$${\sum_{f=0}^1 {n \choose f}} = 1 + n = 2^m \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Where:

• $m = 2$:  $\rm (3, 1)$  Hamming code, ⇒ identical to$  [[Channel_Coding/Examples_of_Binary_Block_Codes#RepetitionCodes|$\text{RC (3, 1)}$,]] *$m = 3$:  $\rm (7, 4)$  Hamming code, *$m = 4$:  $\rm (15, 11)$  Hamming code, *$m = 5$:  $\rm (31, 26)$  Hamming code, *$m = 6$:  $\rm (63, 57)$  Hamming code, The repetition code with  $n = 5$  also satisfies the condition.  With  $d_{\rm min} = 5$,  $t = 2$  and  $m = 4$  we obtain: :'"`UNIQ-MathJax24-QINU`"' The other repetition codes  $\rm (RC)$  with odd  $n$  are also perfect,  but not with even  $n$:  $\text{RC (4, 1)}$,  $\text{RC (6, 1)}$,  etc. This has already been justified in the solution to the subtask  (6).