Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 1.16Z: Bounds for the Gaussian Error Function"
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
<quiz display=simple> | <quiz display=simple> | ||
− | { | + | {What values do the upper and lower bounds for x=4 provide? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
Qo(x=4) = { 3.346 3% } ⋅10−5 | Qo(x=4) = { 3.346 3% } ⋅10−5 | ||
Qu(x=4) = { 3.137 3% } ⋅10−5 | Qu(x=4) = { 3.137 3% } ⋅10−5 | ||
− | { | + | {What statements hold for the functions Qo(x) and Qu(x)? |
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
− | + | + | + For x≥2 the two bounds are usable. |
− | + | + | + For x<1 is Qu(x) unusable (because Qu(x)<0). |
− | - | + | - For x<1 is Qo(x) unusable (because Qo(x)>1). |
− | { | + | {By what factor is the Chernoff-Rubin bound above Qo(x)? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
QCR(x=2)/Qo(x=2) = { 5 3% } | QCR(x=2)/Qo(x=2) = { 5 3% } | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
QCR(x=6)/Qo(x=6) = { 15 3% } | QCR(x=6)/Qo(x=6) = { 15 3% } | ||
− | { | + | {Determine K such that K⋅QCR(x) as close as possible to Q(x) and at the same time Q(x)≤K·QCR(x) is observed for all x>0 . |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
K = { 0.5 3% } | K = { 0.5 3% } | ||
</quiz> | </quiz> | ||
− | === | + | ===Solution=== |
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
− | '''(1)''' | + | '''(1)''' The upper bound is: |
:Qo(x)=1√2π⋅x⋅e−x2/2⇒Qo(4)=1√2π⋅4⋅e−8≈3.346⋅10−5_. | :Qo(x)=1√2π⋅x⋅e−x2/2⇒Qo(4)=1√2π⋅4⋅e−8≈3.346⋅10−5_. | ||
− | + | The lower bound can be converted as follows: | |
:Qu(x)=(1−1/x2)⋅Qo(x)⇒Qu(4)≈3.137⋅10−5_. | :Qu(x)=(1−1/x2)⋅Qo(x)⇒Qu(4)≈3.137⋅10−5_. | ||
− | * | + | *The relative deviations from the "real" value Q(4)=3.167·10–5 sind +5% bzw. –1%. |
− | '''(2)''' | + | '''(2)''' Correct are the <u>solutions 1 and 2</u>: |
− | * | + | *For x=2, the actual function value ${\rm Q}(x) = 2.275 - 10^{-2}$ is bounded by ${\rm Q_{o}}(x) = 2.7 - 10^{-2}$ and ${\rm Q_u}(x) = 2.025 - 10^{-2}$, respectively. |
− | * | + | *The relative deviations are therefore 18.7% and $-11\%,$ respectively. |
− | * | + | *The last statement is wrong: Only for x<0.37 ${\rm Q_o}(x) > 1$ is valid. |
− | '''(3)''' | + | '''(3)''' For the quotient of QCR(x) and Qo(x), according to the given equations: |
:q(x)=QCR(x)Qo(x)=exp(−x2/2)exp(−x2/2)/(√2π⋅x)=√2π⋅x | :q(x)=QCR(x)Qo(x)=exp(−x2/2)exp(−x2/2)/(√2π⋅x)=√2π⋅x | ||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
:⇒q(x)≈2.5⋅x⇒q(x=2)=5_,q(x=4)=10_,q(x=6)=15_. | :⇒q(x)≈2.5⋅x⇒q(x=2)=5_,q(x=4)=10_,q(x=6)=15_. | ||
− | * | + | *The larger the abscissa value x is, the more inaccurately Q(x) is approximated by QCR(x). |
− | * | + | *When looking at the graph on the information page, one has (I had) the impression that QCR(x) results from Q(x) by shifting down or shifting up. But this is only an optical illusion and does not correspond to the facts. |
− | '''(4)''' | + | '''(4)''' With K=0.5_ the new bound $0.5 - {\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ for x=0 agrees exactly with Q(x=0)=0.500. |
− | * | + | *For larger abscissa values, the corruption $q \approx 1.25 - x$ thus also becomes only half as large. |
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
Revision as of 20:23, 30 July 2022
The probability that a zero mean Gaussian random variable n with standard deviation σ ⇒ variance σ2 is greater in amount than a given value A is equal to
- Pr(n>A)=Pr(n<−A)=Q(A/σ).
Here is used one of the most important functions for communications engineering (drawn in red in the diagram):
the "complementary Gaussian error function"
- Q(x)=1√2π∫+∞xe−u2/2du.
Q(x) is a monotonically decreasing function with Q(0)=0.5. For very large values of x, Q(x)tends→0.
The integral of the Q function is not analytically solvable and is usually given in tabular form. From the literature, however, manageable approximations or bounds for positive x values are known:
- the upper bound (upper blue curve in adjacent graph, only valid for x>0):
- Qo(x)=1√2π⋅x⋅e−x2/2≥Q(x),
- the lower bound (lower blue curve in the graph, only valid for x>1):
- Qu(x)=1−1/x2√2π⋅x⋅e−x2/2≤Q(x),
- the Chernoff-Rubin bound (green curve in the graph, drawn for K=1):
- QCR(x)=K⋅e−x2/2≥Q(x).
In the exercise it is to be investigated to what extent these bounds can be used as approximations for Q(x) and what corruptions result.
Hints:
- This exercise belongs to the chapter block error probability bounds.
- Reference is also made to the chapter Gaussian distributed random variables in the book "Stochastic Signal Theory".
- The exercise also provides some important hints for solving Exercise 1.16, in which the function QCR(x) is used to derive Bhattacharyya barrier is required for the AWGN channel.
- Further we refer to the interactive applet Complementary Gaussian Error Functions.
Questions
Solution
- Qo(x)=1√2π⋅x⋅e−x2/2⇒Qo(4)=1√2π⋅4⋅e−8≈3.346⋅10−5_.
The lower bound can be converted as follows:
- Qu(x)=(1−1/x2)⋅Qo(x)⇒Qu(4)≈3.137⋅10−5_.
- The relative deviations from the "real" value Q(4)=3.167·10–5 sind +5% bzw. –1%.
(2) Correct are the solutions 1 and 2:
- For x=2, the actual function value Q(x)=2.275−10−2 is bounded by Qo(x)=2.7−10−2 and Qu(x)=2.025−10−2, respectively.
- The relative deviations are therefore 18.7% and −11%, respectively.
- The last statement is wrong: Only for x<0.37 Qo(x)>1 is valid.
(3) For the quotient of QCR(x) and Qo(x), according to the given equations:
- q(x)=QCR(x)Qo(x)=exp(−x2/2)exp(−x2/2)/(√2π⋅x)=√2π⋅x
- ⇒q(x)≈2.5⋅x⇒q(x=2)=5_,q(x=4)=10_,q(x=6)=15_.
- The larger the abscissa value x is, the more inaccurately Q(x) is approximated by QCR(x).
- When looking at the graph on the information page, one has (I had) the impression that QCR(x) results from Q(x) by shifting down or shifting up. But this is only an optical illusion and does not correspond to the facts.
(4) With K=0.5_ the new bound 0.5−QCR(x) for x=0 agrees exactly with Q(x=0)=0.500.
- For larger abscissa values, the corruption q≈1.25−x thus also becomes only half as large.