Aufgaben:Exercise 4.8: HSDPA and HSUPA: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[File:P_ID1983__Bei_A_4_8.png|right|frame| | [[File:P_ID1983__Bei_A_4_8.png|right|frame|Overview of HSDPA and HSUPA]] | ||
To achieve better quality of service, the UMTS Release $99$ standard was further developed. The most important further developments were: | |||
*UMTS Release $5$ | *UMTS Release $5$ with '''HSDPA''' (2002), | ||
*UMTS Release $6$ | *UMTS Release $6$ with '''HSUPA''' (2004). | ||
Collectively, these developments are known as '''High-Speed Packet Access''' (HSPA). | |||
The chart shows some of the features of HSDPA and HSUPA that particularly contribute to the increase in performance: | |||
* | *Both use ''Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request'' (HARQ) and ''Node B Scheduling''. | ||
* | *With HSDPA, the high-speed transport channel '''HS-PDSCH''' (''High-Speed Physical Downlink Shared Channel'') was newly introduced, which is shared by multiple users and allows simultaneous transmission of the same data to many subscribers. | ||
* | *In the HSUPA standard, there is the additional transport channel ''Enhanced Dedicated Channel''' ('''E-DCH'''). Among other things, this minimizes the negative impact of applications with very intensive or highly varying data volumes. | ||
* | *In HSPA, adaptive modulation and coding is used; the transmission rate is adjusted accordingly. | ||
* | *In good conditions, a $\rm 16-QAM$ $(4$ bit per symbol$)$ or $64$-QAM $(6$ bit per symbol$)$ is used, in worse conditions only $\rm 4-QAM\ (QPSK)$. | ||
* | *The maximum achievable bit rate depends on receiver performance, but also on ''transport format and resource combinations'' $\text{(TFRC)}$. | ||
Of the ten specified TFRC classes, only a few are listed here arbitrarily: | |||
*$\text{TFRC2:}$ $\rm | *$\text{TFRC2:}$ $\rm 4-QAM\ (QPSK)$ with code rate $R_{\rm C} =1/2$ ⇒ bit rate $240 \rm kbit/s$, | ||
*$\text{TFRC4:}$ $\rm | *$\text{TFRC4:}$ $\rm 16-QAM$, with code rate $R_{\rm C} =1/2$ ⇒ bit rate $480 \rm kbit/s$, | ||
*$\text{TFRC8:}$ $\rm | *$\text{TFRC8:}$ $\rm 64-QAM$, with code rate $R_{\rm C} =3/4$ ⇒ bit rate $1080 \rm kbit/s$. | ||
Other TFRC classes are discussed in subtasks '''(4)''' and '''(5)''' . | |||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Hints: | |||
* | *This exercise belongs to the chapter [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Further_Developments_of_UMTS|"Further Developments of UMTS"]]. | ||
=== | ===Questions=== | ||
<quiz display=simple> | <quiz display=simple> | ||
{ | {Which standard allows the highest data rates? | ||
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
- UMTS (Release $99$), | - UMTS (Release $99$), | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
- HSUPA. | - HSUPA. | ||
{ | {What is meant by $\rm HARQ$ and what does it achieve? | ||
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
+ | + Transmission of a frame starts only after evaluation of the sent control data by the receiver. | ||
+ | + If the transmission is error-free, a positive acknowledgement is sent, otherwise a NACK (''Non Acknowledgement''). | ||
- | - The achievable data rate is lowered by HARQ, assuming the AWGN channel and equal $E_{\rm B}/N_{0}$. | ||
{ | {What is meant by $\rm Node \ B \ Scheduling$ ? What can be achieved with it? | ||
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
+ | + Assigning priorities to the individual data frames. | ||
+ | + The user with the highest priority gets the best channel. | ||
+ | + Scheduling significantly increases the cell capacity. | ||
{ | {What is the bit rate of $\rm TFRC3$ $($QPSK, Coderate $R_{\rm C} =3/4)$ ? | ||
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
$R_{\rm B} \ = \ $ { 360 3% } $\ \rm kbit/s$ | $R_{\rm B} \ = \ $ { 360 3% } $\ \rm kbit/s$ | ||
{ | {What is the bit rate of $\rm TFRC10$ $($64-QAM, code rate $R_{\rm C} =1)$ ? | ||
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
$R_{\rm B} \ = \ $ { 1440 3% } $\ \rm kbit/s$ | $R_{\rm B} \ = \ $ { 1440 3% } $\ \rm kbit/s$ | ||
</quiz> | </quiz> | ||
=== | ===Solution=== | ||
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
'''(1)''' | '''(1)''' Correct is <u>solution suggestion 2</u>.: | ||
* | *For conventional UMTS, the data transfer rate is between $144 \ \rm kbit/s$ and $2 \ \rm Mbit/s$. | ||
* | *For HSDPA (the abbreviation stands for ''High-Speed Downlink Packet Access''), data rates between $500 \ \rm kbit/s$ and $3.6 \ \rm Mbit/s$ are specified, and as a limit even $14.4 \ \rm Mbit/s$. | ||
*HSUPA ('' | *HSUPA (''High-Speed Uplink Packet Access''), on the other hand, refers to the uplink channel, which always has a lower data rate than the downlink. In practice, data rates up to $800 \ \rm kbit/s$ are achieved, the theoretical limit being $5.8 \ \rm Mbit/s$. | ||
'''(2)''' | '''(2)''' The <u>first two statements</u> are correct: | ||
* | *For a detailed description of the HARQ procedure, see the [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Further_Developments_of_UMTS#HARQ_procedure_and_.22Node_B_Scheduling.22|"theory section"]]. | ||
* | *In contrast, statement 3 is not correct. The [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Further_Developments_of_UMTS#HARQ_procedure_and_.22Node_B_Scheduling.22 |"Diagram"]] in the theory part rather shows that for $10 \cdot {\rm lg} E_{\rm B}/N_{0} = 0 \ \rm dB$ (AWGN channel) the data rate can be increased from $600 \ \rm kbit/s$ to nearly $800 \ \rm kbit/s$ . | ||
* | *Below $-2 \ \rm dB$ usable transmission is possible exclusively with HARQ. In contrast, for good channels $(E_{\rm B}/N_{0} > 2 \ \rm dB)$, HARQ is not required. | ||
'''(3)''' <u> | '''(3)''' <u>All statements are correct</u>. For further guidance on ''Node B Scheduling'', see [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Further_Developments_of_UMTS#HARQ_procedure_and_.22Node_B_Scheduling.22|"theory section"]]. | ||
'''(4)''' | '''(4)''' The bitrate $R_{\rm B}\hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 360 \rm kbit/s}$ is larger than the bit rate of TFRC2 by a factor $(3/4)/(1/2) = 1.5$ because of the larger code rate. | ||
'''(5)''' | '''(5)''' | ||
* | *With the code rate $R_{\rm C} =1$ , QPSK $(2 \ \rm bit \ per \ symbol)$ would result in the bit rate $480 \ \rm kbit/s$ . | ||
* | *For $64$-QAM ($6 \ \rm bit$ per symbol) the value is three times: $R_{\rm B} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 1440 \ \rm kbit/s}$. | ||
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
Revision as of 21:49, 2 March 2023

To achieve better quality of service, the UMTS Release $99$ standard was further developed. The most important further developments were:
- UMTS Release $5$ with HSDPA (2002),
- UMTS Release $6$ with HSUPA (2004).
Collectively, these developments are known as High-Speed Packet Access (HSPA).
The chart shows some of the features of HSDPA and HSUPA that particularly contribute to the increase in performance:
- Both use Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) and Node B Scheduling.
- With HSDPA, the high-speed transport channel HS-PDSCH (High-Speed Physical Downlink Shared Channel) was newly introduced, which is shared by multiple users and allows simultaneous transmission of the same data to many subscribers.
- In the HSUPA standard, there is the additional transport channel Enhanced Dedicated Channel ('E-DCH). Among other things, this minimizes the negative impact of applications with very intensive or highly varying data volumes.
- In HSPA, adaptive modulation and coding is used; the transmission rate is adjusted accordingly.
- In good conditions, a $\rm 16-QAM$ $(4$ bit per symbol$)$ or $64$-QAM $(6$ bit per symbol$)$ is used, in worse conditions only $\rm 4-QAM\ (QPSK)$.
- The maximum achievable bit rate depends on receiver performance, but also on transport format and resource combinations $\text{(TFRC)}$.
Of the ten specified TFRC classes, only a few are listed here arbitrarily:
- $\text{TFRC2:}$ $\rm 4-QAM\ (QPSK)$ with code rate $R_{\rm C} =1/2$ ⇒ bit rate $240 \rm kbit/s$,
- $\text{TFRC4:}$ $\rm 16-QAM$, with code rate $R_{\rm C} =1/2$ ⇒ bit rate $480 \rm kbit/s$,
- $\text{TFRC8:}$ $\rm 64-QAM$, with code rate $R_{\rm C} =3/4$ ⇒ bit rate $1080 \rm kbit/s$.
Other TFRC classes are discussed in subtasks (4) and (5) .
Hints:
- This exercise belongs to the chapter "Further Developments of UMTS".
Questions
Solution
(1) Correct is solution suggestion 2.:
- For conventional UMTS, the data transfer rate is between $144 \ \rm kbit/s$ and $2 \ \rm Mbit/s$.
- For HSDPA (the abbreviation stands for High-Speed Downlink Packet Access), data rates between $500 \ \rm kbit/s$ and $3.6 \ \rm Mbit/s$ are specified, and as a limit even $14.4 \ \rm Mbit/s$.
- HSUPA (High-Speed Uplink Packet Access), on the other hand, refers to the uplink channel, which always has a lower data rate than the downlink. In practice, data rates up to $800 \ \rm kbit/s$ are achieved, the theoretical limit being $5.8 \ \rm Mbit/s$.
(2) The first two statements are correct:
- For a detailed description of the HARQ procedure, see the "theory section".
- In contrast, statement 3 is not correct. The "Diagram" in the theory part rather shows that for $10 \cdot {\rm lg} E_{\rm B}/N_{0} = 0 \ \rm dB$ (AWGN channel) the data rate can be increased from $600 \ \rm kbit/s$ to nearly $800 \ \rm kbit/s$ .
- Below $-2 \ \rm dB$ usable transmission is possible exclusively with HARQ. In contrast, for good channels $(E_{\rm B}/N_{0} > 2 \ \rm dB)$, HARQ is not required.
(3) All statements are correct. For further guidance on Node B Scheduling, see "theory section".
(4) The bitrate $R_{\rm B}\hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 360 \rm kbit/s}$ is larger than the bit rate of TFRC2 by a factor $(3/4)/(1/2) = 1.5$ because of the larger code rate.
(5)
- With the code rate $R_{\rm C} =1$ , QPSK $(2 \ \rm bit \ per \ symbol)$ would result in the bit rate $480 \ \rm kbit/s$ .
- For $64$-QAM ($6 \ \rm bit$ per symbol) the value is three times: $R_{\rm B} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 1440 \ \rm kbit/s}$.