Applets:Linear Distortions of Periodic Signals

Open Applet in new Tab

Applet description

This applet illustrates the effects of linear distortions(attenuation distortions and phase distortions) with

Meanings of the signals used

• the input signal $x(t)$   ⇒   power $P_x$:

$$x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) = A_1\cdot \cos\left(2\pi f_1\cdot t- \varphi_1\right)+A_2\cdot \cos\left(2\pi f_2\cdot t- \varphi_2\right), $$

• the output signal $y(t)$   ⇒   power $P_y$:

$$y(t) = \alpha_1 \cdot x_1(t-\tau_1) + \alpha_2 \cdot x_2(t-\tau_2),$$

• the matching output signal $z(t)$   ⇒   power $P_z$:

$$z(t) = k_{\rm M} \cdot y(t-\tau_{\rm M}) + \alpha_2 \cdot x_2(t-\tau_2),$$

• the difference signal   $\varepsilon(t) = z(t) - x(t)$   ⇒   power $P_\varepsilon$.

Beginn Anpassen The next block in the above model is „Matching„: The output signal $y(t)$ is adjusted in amplitude and phase with uniform quantities $k_{\rm M}$ and $\tau_{\rm M}$ for all frequencies which means that this is not a frequency-dependent distortion. Using the signal $z(t)$, a differentiation can be made between:

• attenuation distortion and frequency–independant attenuation, as well as
• phase distortion and pure frequency–independant delay.

The Distortion Power $P_{\rm D}$ is used to measure the strength of the linear distortion and is defined as:

$$P_{\rm D} = \min_{k_{\rm M}, \ \tau_{\rm M}} P_\varepsilon.$$

Ende Anpassen

Beginn Änderungen im deutschen Text:

Als nächster Block im obigen Modell folgt das „Matching”: Dabei wird das Ausgangssignal $y(t)$ mit für alle Frequenzen einheitlichen Größen $k_{\rm M}$ und $\tau_{\rm M}$ in Amplitude bzw. Phase angepasst. Dies ist also keine frequenzabhängige Entzerrung. Anhand des Signals $z(t)$ kann unterschieden werden

• zwischen einer Dämpfungsverzerrung und einer frequenzunabhängigen Dämpfung, sowie
• zwischen einer Phasenverzerrung und einer für alle Frequenzen gleichen Laufzeit.

Als Maß für die Stärke der linearen Verzerrungen wird die Verzerrungsleistung (englisch: Distortion Power) $P_{\rm D}$ verwendet. Für diese gilt:

$$P_{\rm D} = \min_{k_{\rm M}, \ \tau_{\rm M}} P_\varepsilon.$$

'Ende Änderungen im deutschen Text:

Theoretical background

Distortions refer to generally unwanted alterations of a message signal through a transmission system. Together with the strong stochastic effects (noise, crosstalk, etc.), they are a crucial limitation for the quality and rate of transmission.

Just as the „Stärke” of noise can be assessed through

• the Noise Power $P_{\rm N}$ and
• the Signal–to–Noise Ratio (SNR) $\rho_{\rm N}$,

Distortions can be quantified through

• the Distortion Power $P_{\rm D}$ and
• the Signal–to–Distortion Ratio (SDR)

$$\rho_{\rm D}=\frac{\rm Signal \ Power}{\rm Distortion \ Power} = \frac{P_x}{P_{\rm D} }.$$

Linear and nonlinear distortions

A distinction is made between linear and nonlinear distortions:

• Nonlinear distortions occur, if at all times $t$ the nonlinear correlation $y = g(x) \ne {\rm const.} \cdot x$ exists between the signal values $x = x(t)$ at the input and $y = y(t)$ at the output, whereby $y = g(x)$ is defined as the system's nonlinear characteristic. By creating a cosine signal at the input with frequency $f_0$ the output signal value includes $f_0$ as well as multiple harmonic waves. We conclude that new frequencies arise through nonlinear distortion.

For clarification of nonlinear distortions

Description of a linear system

• Linear distortions occur, if the transmission channel is characterized by a frequency response $H(f) \ne \rm const.$ Various frequencies are attenuated and delayed differently. Characteristic of this is that although frequencies can disappear (for example, through a Low–pass or a High–pass), no new frequencies can arise.

In this applet only linear distortions are considered.

Description forms for the frequency response

The generally complex valued frequency response can be represented as follows:

$$H(f) = |H(f)| \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} b(f)} = {\rm e}^{-a(f)}\cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} b(f)}.$$

This results in the following description variables:

• The absolute value $|H(f)|$ is called Amplitude response and in logarithmic form Attenuation curve:

$$a(f) = - \ln |H(f)|\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in \hspace{0.1cm}Neper \hspace{0.1cm}(Np) } = - 20 \cdot \lg |H(f)|\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in \hspace{0.1cm}Decibel \hspace{0.1cm}(dB) }.$$

• The Phase response $b(f)$ indicates the negative frequency–dependent angle of $H(f)$ in the complex plane based on the real axis:

$$b(f) = - {\rm arc} \hspace{0.1cm}H(f) \hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in \hspace{0.1cm}Radian \hspace{0.1cm}(rad)}.$$

Low–pass of order N

Dämpfungsverlauf und Phasenverlauf eines Tiefpasses N–ter Ordnung

The frequency response of a realizable N grade low pass is:

$$H(f) = \left [\frac{1}{1 + {\rm j}\cdot f/f_0 }\right ]^N\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

For example the RC low pass is a first grade low pass. Consequently we can obtain

• the attenuation curve:

$$a(f) =N/2 \cdot \ln [1+( f/f_0)^2] \hspace{0.05cm},$$

• the phase curve:

$$b(f) =N \cdot \arctan( f/f_0) \hspace{0.05cm},$$

• the attenuation factor for the frequency $f=f_i$:

$$\alpha_i =|H(f = f_i)| = [1+( f/f_0)^2]^{N/2}$$

$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x(t)= A_i\cdot \cos(2\pi f_i t) \hspace{0.1cm}\rightarrow \hspace{0.1cm} y(t)= \alpha_i \cdot A_i\cdot \cos(2\pi f_i t)\hspace{0.05cm},$$

• the phase delay for the frequency $f=f_i$:

$$\tau_i =\frac{b(f_i)}{2 \pi f_i} = \frac{N \cdot \arctan( f_i/f_0)}{2 \pi f_i}$$

$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x(t)= A_i\cdot \cos(2\pi f_i t) \hspace{0.1cm}\rightarrow \hspace{0.1cm} y(t)=A_i\cdot \cos(2\pi f_i (t- \tau_i))\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

High–pass of order N

Dämpfungsverlauf und Phasenverlauf eines Hochpasses N–ter Ordnung

The frequency response of a realizable N grade high pass is:

$$H(f) = \left [\frac{ {\rm j}\cdot f/f_0 }{1 + {\rm j}\cdot f/f_0 }\right ]^N\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

For example the LC high pass is a first grade high pass. Consequently we can obtain

• the attenuation curve:

$$a(f) =N/2 \cdot \ln [1+( f_0/f)^2] \hspace{0.05cm},$$

• the phase curve:

$$b(f) =-N \cdot \arctan( f_0/f) \hspace{0.05cm},$$

• the attenuation factor for the frequency $f=f_i$:

$$\alpha_i =|H(f = f_i)| = [1+( f_0/f)^2]^{N/2}$$

$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x(t)= A_i\cdot \cos(2\pi f_i t) \hspace{0.1cm}\rightarrow \hspace{0.1cm} y(t)= \alpha_i \cdot A_i\cdot \cos(2\pi f_i t)\hspace{0.05cm},$$

• the phase delay for the frequency $f=f_i$:

$$\tau_i =\frac{b(f_i)}{2\pi f_i} = \frac{-N \cdot \arctan( f_0/f_i)}{2\pi f_i}$$

$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x(t)= A_i\cdot \cos(2\pi f_i t) \hspace{0.1cm}\rightarrow \hspace{0.1cm} y(t)=A_i\cdot \cos(2\pi f_i (t- \tau_i))\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Beginn Änderungen im deutschen Text:

Phase function $b(f)$ of high–pass and low–pass

$\text{Example:}$  This graphic shows the phase function $b(f)$ with the cut–off frequency $f_0 = 1\ \rm kHz$ and the order $N=1$

• of a Low–pass as a green graph and
• of a High–pass as a violet graph.

The input signal is sinusoidal with frequency $f_{\rm S} = 1.25\ {\rm kHz}$ whereby this signal is only turned on at $t=0$:

Formel überprüfen!

$$x(t) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} \hspace{0.75cm}0 \\ \sin(2\pi \cdot f_{\rm S} \cdot t ) \\ \end{array} \right.\quad \quad \begin{array}{*{20}c} {\rm{f\ddot{u}r} } \\ {\rm{f\ddot{u}r} } \\ \end{array}\begin{array} t < 0, \\ t>0. \\ \end{array}$$

The left (outlined in blue) Graphic shows the signal $x(t)$. The dashed line marks the first zero at $t = T_0 = 0.8\ {\rm ms}$. The other two graphics show the output signals $y_{\rm TP}(t)$ und $y_{\rm HP}(t)$of High–pass and Low–pass, whereby the change in amplitude was balanced in both cases.

Input signal $x(t)$ as well as output signals $y_{\rm TP}(t)$ und $y_{\rm HP}(t)$

• The first zero of the signal $y_{\rm TP}(t)$ after the Low–pass is delayed by $\tau_{\rm TP} = 0.9/(2\pi) \cdot T_0 \approx 0.115 \ {\rm ms}$ compared to the first zero of $x(t)$   ⇒   marked with green arrow, whereby $b_{\rm TP}(f/f_{\rm S} = 0.9 \ {\rm rad})$ was considered.
• In contrast, the phase delay of the High–pass is negative: $\tau_{\rm HP} = -0.67/(2\pi) \cdot T_0 \approx 0.085 \ {\rm ms}$ and therefor the first zero $y_{\rm HP}(t)$ occurs before the dashed line.
• Following this transient response, in both cases the zero crossings again come in the raster of the period duration $T_0 = 0.8 \ {\rm ms}.$

Annotation: The shown signal paths were created using the interactive applet Causal systems – Laplace transform.

Attenuation Distortions and Phase Distortions

Requirements for a non–distorting channel

The adjacent figure shows

• the even attenuation curve $a(f)$   ⇒   $a(-f) = a(f)$, and
• the uneven phase curve $b(f)$   ⇒   $b(-f) = -b(- f)$

of a non–distorting channel. One notices:

• In a distortion–free system the attenuation function $a(f)$ must be constant between$f_{\rm U}$ and $f_{\rm O}$ around the carrier frequency $f_{\rm T}$, where proportions of $x(t)$ exist.
• From the specified constant attenuation value $6 \ \rm dB$ follows for the amplitude response $|H(f)| = 0.5$   ⇒   The signal values of all frequencies are thus halved by the system   ⇒   no attenuation distortions.
• In addition, in such a system, the phase curve $b(f)$ between $f_{\rm U}$ and $f_{\rm O}$ must increase linearly with the frequency. As a result, all frequency components are delayed by the same phase delay $τ$   ⇒   no phase delay.
• The delay $τ$ is fixed by the slope of $b(f)$. $b(f) = 0$ would result in a delay–less system   ⇒   $τ = 0$.

The following summary considers that in this applet the input signal is always the sum of two harmonic oscillations,

$$x(t) = x_1(t) + x_2(t) = A_1\cdot \cos\left(2\pi f_1\cdot t- \varphi_1\right)+A_2\cdot \cos\left(2\pi f_2\cdot t- \varphi_2\right), $$

and therefor the channel influence is fully described by the attenuation factors $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$ as well as the phase delays $\tau_1 = \tau_2$:

$$y(t) = \alpha_1 \cdot x_1(t-\tau_1) + \alpha_2 \cdot x_2(t-\tau_2).$$

$\text{Summary:}$ 

• Attenuation distortions occur when $\alpha_1 \ne \alpha_2$. If $\alpha_1 \ne \alpha_2$ and $\tau_1 = \tau_2$, then there are exclusively attenuation distortions.
• Phase distortions occur when $\tau_1 \ne \tau_2$. If $\tau_1 \ne \tau_2$ and $\alpha_1 = \alpha_2$, then there are exclusively phase distortions.
• A signal $y(t)$ is only distortion–free compared to $x(t)$ if $\alpha_1 = \alpha_2= \alpha$   and   $\tau_1 = \tau_2= \tau$   ⇒   $y(t) = \alpha \cdot x(t-\tau)$.

Ende Änderungen im deutschen Text:

Vorschlag für die Versuchsdurchführung

BlaBla

(1)   We set the parameters for the transmitter signal $x(t)$ to $A_1 = 0.8\ {\rm V}, \ A_2 = 0.6\ {\rm V}, \ f_1 = 0.5\ {\rm kHz}, \ f_2 = 1.5\ {\rm kHz}, \ \varphi_1 = 90^\circ, \ \varphi_2 = 0^\circ$.

Calculate the signal's cycle duration $T_0$ and power $P_x$. Can you read the value for $P_x$ off the applet?

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}T_0 = \big [\hspace{-0.1cm}\text{ greatest common divisor }(0.5 \ {\rm kHz}, \ 1.5 \ {\rm kHz})\big ]^{-1}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 2.0 \ {\rm ms}};$

$\hspace{1.85cm} P_x = A_1^2/2 + A_2^2/2 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.5 \ {\rm V^2}} = P_\varepsilon\text{, if }\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{k_{\rm M} = 0} \ \Rightarrow \ z(t) \equiv 0$.

(2)  Vary $\varphi_2$ between $\pm 180^\circ$ while assuming the other parameters from (1). How does the value of $T_0$ and $P_x$ change?

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\text{No changes:}\hspace{0.2cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ T_0 = 2.0 \ {\rm ms}; \hspace{0.2cm} P_x = 0.5 \ {\rm V^2}}$.

(3)   Vary $f_2$ between $0 \le f_2 \le 5\ {\rm kHz}$ while assuming the other parameters from (1). How does the value of $P_x$ change?

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}\text{No changes if }f_2 \ne 0\text{ oder } f_2 \ne f_1\text{:}\hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{P_x = 0.5 \ {\rm V^2}}\text{.} \hspace{0.2cm} T_0 \text{ changes if }f_2\text{is not a multiple of }f_1$.

$\hspace{1.85cm}\text{If }f_2 = 0\text{:}\hspace{0.2cm} P_x = A_1^2/2 + A_2^2\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.68 \ {\rm V^2}}$. $\hspace{3cm}$

$\hspace{1.85cm}\text{If}f_2 = f_1\text{:}\hspace{0.2cm} P_x = [A_1\cos(\varphi_1) + A_2\cos(\varphi_2)]^2/2 + [A_1\sin(\varphi_1) + A_2\sin(\varphi_2)]^2/2 \text{. Mit } \varphi_1 = 90^\circ, \ \varphi_2 = 0^\circ\text{:}\hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ P_x = 0.5 \ {\rm V^2}}\text{.} $

(4)   Going by the previous output signal $x(t)$ we set following parameters to: $\alpha_1 = \alpha_2 = 0.5, \ \tau_1 = \tau_2 = 0.5\ {\rm ms}$, $k_{\rm M} = 1 \text{ and } \tau_{\rm M} = 0$ .

Are there linear distortions? Calculate the reception power $P_y$ and the power $P_\varepsilon$ of the differential signal $\varepsilon(t) = z(t) - x(t)$

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ y(t) = 0.5 \cdot x(t- 1\ {\rm ms})}\text{ is only attenuated and delayed, but not distorted.}$

$\hspace{1.85cm}\text{Reception power:}\hspace{0.2cm} P_y = (A_1/2)^2/2 + (A_2/2)^2/2\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.125 \ {\rm V^2}}\text{. } P_\varepsilon \text{ is significantly greater:} \hspace{0.1cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{P_\varepsilon = 0.625 \ {\rm V^2}}.$

(5)   With otherwise the same settings as (4), vary the matching parameters $k_{\rm M} \text{ and } \tau_{\rm M}$. How big is the distortion power $P_{\rm D}$?

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} P_{\rm D}\text{is equal to }P_\varepsilon \text{ when using the ideal matching parameters:} \hspace{0.2cm}k_{\rm M} = 2 \text{ und } \tau_{\rm M}=T_0 - 0.5\ {\rm ms} = 1.5\ {\rm ms}$

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}z(t) = x(t)\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\varepsilon(t) = 0\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}P_{\rm D}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = P_\varepsilon = 0} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\text{Neither attenuation nor phase distortion.}$

(6)   The channel parameters are now set to: $\alpha_1 = 0.5, \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\alpha_2 = 0.2}, \ \tau_1 = \tau_2 = 0.5\ {\rm ms}$. Calculate the distortion power $P_{\rm D}$ and the $\rm SDR$ $\rho_{\rm D}$?

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} P_{\rm D} = P_\varepsilon \text{ when using the best matching parameters:} \hspace{0.2cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{k_{\rm M} = 2.24} \text{ und } \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\tau_{\rm M} = 1.5\ {\rm ms} }\text{:} \hspace{0.2cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{P_{\rm D} = 0.059 \ {\rm V^2}}$.

$\hspace{1.85cm}\text{Attenuation distortions only.} \hspace{0.3cm}\text{Signal-to-Distortion-Ratio}\ \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\rho_{\rm D} = P_x/P_\varepsilon \approx 8.5}$.

(7)   The channel parameters are now set to: $\alpha_1 = \alpha_2 = 0.5, \ \tau_1 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 2\ {\rm ms} }, \ \tau_2 = 0.5\ {\rm ms}$. Calculate the distortion power $P_{\rm D}$ and the SDR $\rho_{\rm D}$?

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} P_{\rm D} = P_\varepsilon \text{when using the best matching parameters:} \hspace{0.2cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{k_{\rm M} = 1.82} \text{ and } \tau_{\rm M}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.15\ {\rm ms} }\text{:} \hspace{0.2cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{P_{\rm D} = 0.072 \ {\rm V^2}}$.

$\hspace{1.85cm}\text{Phase distortions only.} \hspace{0.3cm}\text{Signal-to-Distortion-Ratio}\ \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\rho_{\rm D} = P_x/P_\varepsilon \approx 7}$.

(8)   `The channel parameters are now set to: $\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\alpha_1 = 0.5} , \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\alpha_2 = 0.2} , \ \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\tau_1= 2\ {\rm ms} }, \ \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\tau_2 = 0.5\ {\rm ms} }$. Calculate the distortion power $P_{\rm D}$ and the SDR $\rho_{\rm D}$? How can $y(t)$ be approximated?

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm} \text{Both attenuation and phase distortions. Best possible adaptation:} \hspace{0.2cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{k_{\rm M} = 2.06} \text{, } \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\tau_{\rm M} = 0.15\ {\rm ms} }\text{:} \hspace{0.2cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{P_{\rm D} = 0.136 \ {\rm V^2}},\hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\rho_{\rm D} \approx 3.7}$.

$\hspace{1.85cm}\text{Combining }\varphi \text{- und } \tau\text{-Parameter: } y(t) = 0.4 \ {\rm V} \cdot \sin\ (2\pi f_1 t) - 0.12 \ {\rm V} \cdot \sin\ (2\pi \cdot 3f_1\cdot t) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.52 \ {\rm V} \cdot \sin^3(2\pi f_1 t)}$.

(9)   Nun gelte $\underline{A_1 = A_2 = 1\ {\rm V}, \ f_1 = 1\ {\rm kHz}, \ f_2 = 1\ {\rm kHz}, \ \varphi_1 = 0^\circ, \ \varphi_2 = 0^\circ}$. Der Kanal sei ein Tiefpass erster Ordnung $\underline{(f_0 = 1\ {\rm kHz})}$.

Gibt es Dämpfungsverzerrungen? Gibt es Phasenverzerrungen? Wie groß ist nun die Verzerrungsleistung $P_{\rm D}$?

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm} \text{Dämpfungsverzerrungen, da }\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\alpha_1 = 0.71 \ne \alpha_2 = 0.45} \text{; geringere Phasenverzerrungen, da }\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \tau_1 = 0.13 \ {\rm ms} \approx \tau_2 = 0.09 \ {\rm ms}}$.

$\hspace{1.85cm}\text{ Verzerrungsleistung }\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{P_{\rm D} = 0.074 \ {\rm V^2}} \text{ bei bestmöglicher Anpassung:} \hspace{0.2cm}k_{\rm M}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 1.6} \text{ und } \tau_{\rm M}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.9\ {\rm ms} }$.

(10)   Wie ändern sich die Kanalparameter durch einen Tiefpass zweiter Ordnung gegenüber einem Tiefpass erster Ordnung $(f_0 = 1\ {\rm kHz})$.

Wie groß ist nun die Verzerrungsleistung $P_{\rm D}$? Wie groß ist nun die Verzerrungsleistung $P_{\rm D}$?

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm} \text{Es gilt }\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\alpha_1 = 0.71^2 \approx 0.5, \alpha_2 = 0.45^2 \approx 0.5, \tau_1 = 2 \cdot 0.13 \approx 0.25 \ {\rm ms} \tau_2 = 2 \cdot 0.09 \ {\rm ms} \approx 0.18 \ {\rm ms}} $.

$\hspace{1.85cm}P_{\rm D} = 0.228 \ {\rm V^2} \text { ist größer und der 2 kHz-Anteil wird im Vergleich zum 2 kHz-Anteil noch mehr unterdrückt}$.

(11)   Welche Unterschiede ergeben sich bei einem Hochpass zweiter Ordnung gegenüber einem Tiefpass zweiter Ordnung $(f_0 = 1\ {\rm kHz})$.

$\hspace{1.0cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm} \text{???????????????}$

Zur Handhabung des Applets

    (A)     Parametereingabe per Slider

    (B)     Bereich der graphischen Darstellung

    (C)     Variationsmöglichkeit für die graphische Darstellung

    (D)     Abspeichern und Zurückholen von Parametersätzen

    (E)     Numerikausgabe des Hauptergebnisses $T_0$; graphische Verdeutlichung durch rote Linie

    (F)     Ausgabe von $x_{\rm max}$ und der Signalwerte $x(t_*) = x(t_* + T_0)= x(t_* + 2T_0)$

    (G)     Darstellung der Signalwerte $x(t_*) = x(t_* + T_0)= x(t_* + 2T_0)$ durch grüne Punkte

    (H)     Einstellung der Zeit $t_*$ für die Signalwerte $x(t_*) = x(t_* + T_0)= x(t_* + 2T_0)$

Details zum obigen Punkt (C)

    (*)   Zoom–Funktionen „$+$” (Vergrößern), „$-$” (Verkleinern) und $\rm o$ (Zurücksetzen)

    (*)   Verschieben mit „$\leftarrow$” (Ausschnitt nach links, Ordinate nach rechts), „$\uparrow$” „$\downarrow$” und „$\rightarrow$”

Andere Möglichkeiten:

    (*)   Gedrückte Shifttaste und Scrollen: Zoomen im Koordinatensystem,

    (*)   Gedrückte Shifttaste und linke Maustaste: Verschieben des Koordinatensystems.

Über die Autoren

Dieses interaktive Berechnungstool wurde am Lehrstuhl für Nachrichtentechnik der Technischen Universität München konzipiert und realisiert.

• Die erste Version wurde 2005 von Bettina Hirner im Rahmen ihrer Diplomarbeit mit „FlashMX–Actionscript” erstellt (Betreuer: Günter Söder ).
• 2018 wurde dieses Programm von Jimmy He im Rahmen seiner Bachelorarbeit (Betreuer: Tasnád Kernetzky) auf „HTML5” umgesetzt und neu gestaltet.

Nochmalige Aufrufmöglichkeit des Applets in neuem Fenster

Open Applet in new Tab