Aufgaben:Exercise 4.1: Attenuation Function: Difference between revisions

From LNTwww
Hwang (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
}}
}}


[[File:P_ID1797__LZI_A_4_1.png|right|frame|Dämpfungsmaß und Schranken]]
[[File:P_ID1797__LZI_A_4_1.png|right|frame|Attenuation function and bounds]]
Das Dämpfungsmaß  $\alpha(f)$ – sprich "alpha" – einer Leitung gibt die auf die Leitungslänge bezogene Dämpfung an.  Diese Größe ist durch die Leitungsbeläge  $R\hspace{0.05cm}'$,  $L\hspace{0.05cm}'$,  $G\hspace{0.08cm}'$ und  $C\hspace{0.08cm}'$  festgelegt, wobei die exakte Gleichung etwas kompliziert ist. Daher wurden zwei leichter handhabbare Näherungen entwickelt:
The attenuation function per unit length  $\alpha(f)$ – pronounced "alpha" – of a line indicates the attenuation related to the line length.  This quantity is determined by the primary line parameters  $R\hspace{0.05cm}'$,  $L\hspace{0.05cm}'$,  $G\hspace{0.08cm}'$ and  $C\hspace{0.08cm}'$  where the exact equation is somewhat complicated. Therefore, two more manageable approximations have been developed:
:$$\frac{\alpha_{_{\rm I}}(f)}{\rm Np}  = {1}/{2} \cdot \left [R\hspace{0.05cm}' \cdot \sqrt{{C\hspace{0.08cm}'}/{ L\hspace{0.05cm}'} } + G\hspace{0.08cm}' \cdot \sqrt{{L\hspace{0.05cm}'}/{ C\hspace{0.08cm}'} }\hspace{0.05cm}\right ]
:$$\frac{\alpha_{_{\rm I}}(f)}{\rm Np}  = {1}/{2} \cdot \left [R\hspace{0.05cm}' \cdot \sqrt{{C\hspace{0.08cm}'}/{ L\hspace{0.05cm}'} } + G\hspace{0.08cm}' \cdot \sqrt{{L\hspace{0.05cm}'}/{ C\hspace{0.08cm}'} }\hspace{0.05cm}\right ]
  \hspace{0.05cm},$$
  \hspace{0.05cm},$$
:$$\frac{\alpha_{_{\rm II}}(f)}{\rm Np}  =  \sqrt{1/2 \cdot \omega  \cdot {R\hspace{0.05cm}' \cdot C\hspace{0.08cm}'} }\hspace{0.1cm}
:$$\frac{\alpha_{_{\rm II}}(f)}{\rm Np}  =  \sqrt{1/2 \cdot \omega  \cdot {R\hspace{0.05cm}' \cdot C\hspace{0.08cm}'} }\hspace{0.1cm}
  \bigg |_{\omega \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi f}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  \bigg |_{\omega \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi f}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Diese beiden Näherungen sind zusammen mit dem tatsächlichen Verlauf  $\alpha(f)$  in der Grafik dargestellt. Der Schnittpunkt von  $\alpha_{\rm I}(f)$  und  $\alpha_{\rm II}(f)$  ergibt die charakteristische Frequenz  $f_∗$  mit folgender Bedeutung:
These two approximations are shown in the graph together with the actual  $\alpha(f)$  curve. The intersection of  $\alpha_{\rm I}(f)$  and  $\alpha_{\rm II}(f)$  gives the characteristic frequency  $f_∗$  with the following meaning:
*Für  $f \gg f_∗$  gilt  $α(f) ≈ α_{\rm I}(f)$.  
*For  $f \gg f_∗$  holds  $α(f) ≈ α_{\rm I}(f)$.  
*Für  $f \ll f_∗$  gilt  $α(f) ≈ α_{\rm II}(f)$.
*For  $f \ll f_∗$  holds  $α(f) ≈ α_{\rm II}(f)$.




Mit diesen Näherungen soll das Dämpfungsmaß  $\alpha(f)$  für ein Nachrichtensignal der Frequenz  $f_0 = 2 \ \rm kHz$  ermittelt werden, wobei folgende Übertragungsmedien zu betrachten sind:
These approximations are used to determine the attenuation function  $\alpha(f)$  for a message signal of frequency  $f_0 = 2 \ \rm kHz$ , whereby the following transmission media are to be considered:


* ein Kupferkabel mit  $0.6 \ \rm mm$  Durchmesser:
*a copper cable with  $0.6 \ \rm mm$  diameter:
:$$R\hspace{0.05cm}' = 130\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
:$$R\hspace{0.05cm}' = 130\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  L\hspace{0.03cm}' = 0.6\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  L\hspace{0.03cm}' = 0.6\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
Line 22: Line 22:
  C\hspace{0.08cm}' = 35\,\,{\rm nF}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},$$
  C\hspace{0.08cm}' = 35\,\,{\rm nF}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},$$


* eine Bronzefreileitung mit  $5 \ \rm mm$  Durchmesser:
*a bronze overhead line with  $5 \ \rm mm$  diameter:
:$$R\hspace{0.05cm}' = 2.2\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
:$$R\hspace{0.05cm}' = 2.2\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  L\hspace{0.03cm}' = 1.8\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  L\hspace{0.03cm}' = 1.8\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
Line 33: Line 33:




''Hinweise:''  
''Notes:''  
*Die Aufgabe gehört zum Kapitel    [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Einige_Ergebnisse_der_Leitungstheorie|Einige Ergebnisse der Leitungstheorie]].
*The exercise belongs to the chapter [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Some_Results_from_Line_Transmission_Theory|Some Results from Line Transmission Theory]].
   
   
*Die Hinweiseinheit "Neper" (Np) in obigen Gleichungen für  $α_{\rm I}(f)$  und  $α_{\rm II}(f)$  und damit auch für das gesamte Dämpfungsmaß  $α(f)$  ergibt sich aus der Tatsache, dass der Betragsfrequenzgang als   $|H(f)| = {\rm e}^{-a}$  definiert ist.  
*The reference unit "Neper" (Np) in the above equations for  $α_{\rm I}(f)$  and  $α_{\rm II}(f)$  and thus also for the total attenuation function  $α(f)$  results from the fact that the magnitude frequency response is defined as  $|H(f)| = {\rm e}^{-a}$ .  
*Daraus folgt  für die Dämpfung   $ a = - {\rm ln} \; |H(f)|$, wobei der Zusammenhang über den natürlichen Logarithmus durch "Neper" (Np) gekennzeichnet wird.
*From this follows for the attenuation  $ a = - {\rm ln} \; |H(f)|$, where the relationship via the natural logarithm is denoted by "Neper" (Np).
*Die Einheit des Dämpfungsmaßes  $α = a/l$  ist somit "Np/km".
*The unit of the attenuation function per unit length  $α = a/l$  is thus "Np/km".




===Fragebogen===
===Questions===


<quiz display=simple>
<quiz display=simple>
{Berechnen Sie für das Kupferkabel und das Bronzekabel die angegebene Näherung &nbsp;$\alpha_{\rm I}$ .
{Calculate for the copper cable and the bronze cable the given approximation &nbsp;$\alpha_{\rm I}$ .
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
${\rm Kupfer}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} \alpha_{\rm I} \ = \ $  { 0.496 3% } $\ \rm Np/km$
${\rm Copper}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} \alpha_{\rm I} \ = \ $  { 0.496 3% } $\ \rm Np/km$
${\rm Bronze}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} \alpha_{\rm I} \ = \ $ { 0.0023 3% } $\ \rm Np/km$
${\rm Bronze}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} \alpha_{\rm I} \ = \ $ { 0.0023 3% } $\ \rm Np/km$




{Geben Sie die jeweilige charakteristische Frequenz &nbsp;$f_*$&nbsp; an, die die Gültigkeitsbereiche der beiden Näherungen begrenzt.
{Specify the respective characteristic frequency &nbsp;$f_*$&nbsp; that bounds the ranges of validity of the two approximations.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
${\rm Kupfer}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} f_* \ = \ $ { 17.2 3% } $\ \rm kHz$
${\rm Copper}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} f_* \ = \ $ { 17.2 3% } $\ \rm kHz$
${\rm Bronze}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} f_* \ = \ $ { 0.109 3% } $\ \rm kHz$
${\rm Bronze}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} f_* \ = \ $ { 0.109 3% } $\ \rm kHz$




{Geben Sie unter Zuhilfenahme der beiden Näherungen das Dämpfungsmaß für die Frequenz &nbsp;$f_0 = 2 \ \rm kHz$&nbsp; an.
{Using the two approximations, give the attenuation function for frequency &nbsp;$f_0 = 2 \ \rm kHz$&nbsp;.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
${\rm Kupfer}\hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.2cm} \alpha (f = f_0) \ = \ $  { 0.17 3% } $\ \rm Np/km$
${\rm Copper}\hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.2cm} \alpha (f = f_0) \ = \ $  { 0.17 3% } $\ \rm Np/km$
${\rm Bronze}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} \alpha (f = f_0) \ = \ $  { 0.0023 3% } $\ \rm  Np/km$
${\rm Bronze}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} \alpha (f = f_0) \ = \ $  { 0.0023 3% } $\ \rm  Np/km$


Line 65: Line 65:
</quiz>
</quiz>


===Musterlösung===
===Solution===
{{ML-Kopf}}
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Für das Kupferkabel gilt mit &nbsp;$R\hspace{0.03cm}' = 130\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; For the copper cable, &nbsp;$R\hspace{0.03cm}' = 130\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  L' = 0.6\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  L' = 0.6\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  G\hspace{0.03cm}' = 1\,\,{\rm &micro; S}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  G\hspace{0.03cm}' = 1\,\,{\rm &micro; S}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
Line 78: Line 78:
  \left [130 \cdot 7.638 \cdot 10^{-3}+ 10^{-6} \cdot 0.131 \cdot 10^{3}\right
  \left [130 \cdot 7.638 \cdot 10^{-3}+ 10^{-6} \cdot 0.131 \cdot 10^{3}\right
  ] {\rm Np/km}  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.496\,{\rm Np/km}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  ] {\rm Np/km}  \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.496\,{\rm Np/km}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Für die Bronzeleitung ergibt sich mit &nbsp;$R\hspace{0.03cm}' = 2.2\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
For the bronze line the result is &nbsp;$R\hspace{0.03cm}' = 2.2\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  L' = 1.8\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  L' = 1.8\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  G\hspace{0.03cm}' = 0.5\,\,{\rm &micro; S}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
  G\hspace{0.03cm}' = 0.5\,\,{\rm &micro; S}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
Line 94: Line 94:




'''(2)'''&nbsp; Die in der Teilaufgabe '''(1)''' berechnete Schranke &nbsp;$α_{\rm I}(f)$&nbsp; gilt nur für &nbsp;$f \gg f_∗$, während die Schranke &nbsp;$α_{\rm II}(f)$&nbsp; für &nbsp;$f \ll f_∗$&nbsp; gültig ist.  
'''(2)'''&nbsp; The bound &nbsp;$α_{\rm I}(f)$&nbsp; calculated in subtask '''(1)''' is valid only for &nbsp;$f \gg f_∗$, while the bound &nbsp;$α_{\rm II}(f)$&nbsp; is valid for &nbsp;$f \ll f_∗$&nbsp;.
*Die charakteristische Frequenz ergibt sich als der Schnittpunkt der beiden Näherungen:
*The characteristic frequency is obtained as the intersection of the two approximations:
:$$\alpha_{\rm II}(f = f_{\star})  =  \sqrt{1/2 \cdot  \omega_{\star}  \cdot R' \cdot C' }\hspace{0.1cm}
:$$\alpha_{\rm II}(f = f_{\star})  =  \sqrt{1/2 \cdot  \omega_{\star}  \cdot R' \cdot C' }\hspace{0.1cm}
  \bigg |_{\omega_{\star} \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi f_{\star}} = \alpha_{\rm I}(f = f_{\star})$$
  \bigg |_{\omega_{\star} \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi f_{\star}} = \alpha_{\rm I}(f = f_{\star})$$
*Für das Kupferkabel mit&nbsp; $\text{0.6 mm}$&nbsp; Durchmesser gilt folgende Bestimmungsgleichung:
*For the copper cable with&nbsp; $\text{0.6 mm}$&nbsp; diameter, the following equation holds:
:$$f_{\star}  =  \frac {{\alpha^2_{_{\rm I}}(f = f_{\star})}}{\pi \cdot R' \cdot C'}=
:$$f_{\star}  =  \frac {{\alpha^2_{_{\rm I}}(f = f_{\star})}}{\pi \cdot R' \cdot C'}=
     \frac {0.496^2 \, {\rm 1/km^2}}{\pi \cdot 130\,{\rm \Omega/km} \cdot 35 \cdot 10^{-9}\,{\rm s/(\Omega \cdot km)}}
     \frac {0.496^2 \, {\rm 1/km^2}}{\pi \cdot 130\,{\rm \Omega/km} \cdot 35 \cdot 10^{-9}\,{\rm s/(\Omega \cdot km)}}
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 17.2\,{\rm kHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 17.2\,{\rm kHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*Dagegen erhält man für die Bronzeleitung mit&nbsp; $\text{5 mm}$&nbsp;Durchmesser:
*In contrast, for the bronze line with diameter &nbsp; $\text{5 mm}$&nbsp;:
:$$f_{\star}  =
:$$f_{\star}  =
     \frac {(2.25 \cdot 10^{-3})^2 }{\pi \cdot 2.2 \cdot 6.7 \cdot 10^{-9}}\,{\rm kHz}
     \frac {(2.25 \cdot 10^{-3})^2 }{\pi \cdot 2.2 \cdot 6.7 \cdot 10^{-9}}\,{\rm kHz}
Line 109: Line 109:




'''(3)'''&nbsp; Für das Kupferkabel gilt &nbsp;$f_0 \ll f_∗$.  
'''(3)'''&nbsp; For the copper cable &nbsp;$f_0 \ll f_∗$ holds.  
*Deshalb ist hier die Näherung &nbsp;$α_{\rm II}(f)$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; "starke Dämpfung" zu verwenden:
*Therefore, the approximation is &nbsp;$α_{\rm II}(f)$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; "strong attenuation" should be used:
:$$\alpha(f = f_0)  \approx \sqrt{\pi \cdot f_0 \cdot R' \cdot C'}= \sqrt{\pi \cdot 2 \cdot 10^{3} \cdot 130 \cdot 35 \cdot 10^{-9}}
:$$\alpha(f = f_0)  \approx \sqrt{\pi \cdot f_0 \cdot R' \cdot C'}= \sqrt{\pi \cdot 2 \cdot 10^{3} \cdot 130 \cdot 35 \cdot 10^{-9}}
  \hspace{0.1cm}{\rm Np}/{ {\rm km} }
  \hspace{0.1cm}{\rm Np}/{ {\rm km} }
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.17 \hspace{0.1cm}{\rm Np}/{ {\rm km} }}
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.17 \hspace{0.1cm}{\rm Np}/{ {\rm km} }}
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*Für die Bronzeleitung ist wegen &nbsp;$f_0 \gg f_∗$&nbsp; die Näherung &nbsp;$α_{\rm I}(f)$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; "schwache Dämpfung" besser geeignet, siehe Teilaufgabe&nbsp; '''(1)''':
*For the bronze line, because of &nbsp;$f_0 \gg f_∗$&nbsp; the approximation is &nbsp;$α_{\rm I}(f)$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; "weak attenuation" is more suitable, see subtask&nbsp; '''(1)''':
:$$\alpha(f = f_0)   
:$$\alpha(f = f_0)   
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.0023\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm Np}/{ {\rm km} }}
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.0023\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm Np}/{ {\rm km} }}

Revision as of 15:30, 5 November 2021

Attenuation function and bounds

The attenuation function per unit length  $\alpha(f)$ – pronounced "alpha" – of a line indicates the attenuation related to the line length.  This quantity is determined by the primary line parameters  $R\hspace{0.05cm}'$,  $L\hspace{0.05cm}'$,  $G\hspace{0.08cm}'$ and  $C\hspace{0.08cm}'$  where the exact equation is somewhat complicated. Therefore, two more manageable approximations have been developed:

$$\frac{\alpha_{_{\rm I}}(f)}{\rm Np} = {1}/{2} \cdot \left [R\hspace{0.05cm}' \cdot \sqrt{{C\hspace{0.08cm}'}/{ L\hspace{0.05cm}'} } + G\hspace{0.08cm}' \cdot \sqrt{{L\hspace{0.05cm}'}/{ C\hspace{0.08cm}'} }\hspace{0.05cm}\right ]
\hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$\frac{\alpha_{_{\rm II}}(f)}{\rm Np} = \sqrt{1/2 \cdot \omega \cdot {R\hspace{0.05cm}' \cdot C\hspace{0.08cm}'} }\hspace{0.1cm}
\bigg |_{\omega \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi f}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

These two approximations are shown in the graph together with the actual  $\alpha(f)$  curve. The intersection of  $\alpha_{\rm I}(f)$  and  $\alpha_{\rm II}(f)$  gives the characteristic frequency  $f_∗$  with the following meaning:

  • For  $f \gg f_∗$  holds  $α(f) ≈ α_{\rm I}(f)$.
  • For  $f \ll f_∗$  holds  $α(f) ≈ α_{\rm II}(f)$.


These approximations are used to determine the attenuation function  $\alpha(f)$  for a message signal of frequency  $f_0 = 2 \ \rm kHz$ , whereby the following transmission media are to be considered:

  • a copper cable with  $0.6 \ \rm mm$  diameter:
$$R\hspace{0.05cm}' = 130\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
L\hspace{0.03cm}' = 0.6\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
G\hspace{0.08cm}' = 1\,\,{\rm µ S}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
C\hspace{0.08cm}' = 35\,\,{\rm nF}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},$$
  • a bronze overhead line with  $5 \ \rm mm$  diameter:
$$R\hspace{0.05cm}' = 2.2\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
L\hspace{0.03cm}' = 1.8\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
G\hspace{0.08cm}' = 0.5\,\,{\rm µ S}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
C\hspace{0.08cm}' = 6.7\,\,{\rm nF}/{ {\rm km}}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$



Notes:

  • The reference unit "Neper" (Np) in the above equations for  $α_{\rm I}(f)$  and  $α_{\rm II}(f)$  and thus also for the total attenuation function  $α(f)$  results from the fact that the magnitude frequency response is defined as  $|H(f)| = {\rm e}^{-a}$ .
  • From this follows for the attenuation  $ a = - {\rm ln} \; |H(f)|$, where the relationship via the natural logarithm is denoted by "Neper" (Np).
  • The unit of the attenuation function per unit length  $α = a/l$  is thus "Np/km".


Questions

1 Calculate for the copper cable and the bronze cable the given approximation  $\alpha_{\rm I}$ .

${\rm Copper}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} \alpha_{\rm I} \ = \ $ $\ \rm Np/km$
${\rm Bronze}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} \alpha_{\rm I} \ = \ $ $\ \rm Np/km$

2 Specify the respective characteristic frequency  $f_*$  that bounds the ranges of validity of the two approximations.

${\rm Copper}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} f_* \ = \ $ $\ \rm kHz$
${\rm Bronze}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} f_* \ = \ $ $\ \rm kHz$

3 Using the two approximations, give the attenuation function for frequency  $f_0 = 2 \ \rm kHz$ .

${\rm Copper}\hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.2cm} \alpha (f = f_0) \ = \ $ $\ \rm Np/km$
${\rm Bronze}\hspace{-0.1cm}:\hspace{0.2cm} \alpha (f = f_0) \ = \ $ $\ \rm Np/km$


Solution

(1)  For the copper cable,  $R\hspace{0.03cm}' = 130\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}

L' = 0.6\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
G\hspace{0.03cm}' = 1\,\,{\rm µ S}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
C\hspace{0.03cm}' = 35\,\,{\rm nF}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm}$:
$${\alpha_{_{\rm I}}(f)} = \frac{1 \,\rm Np/km}{2} \cdot
\left [130\,{\rm \Omega} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{35 \cdot 10^{-9}\,{\rm s/\Omega}}{ 0.6 \cdot 10^{-3}\,{\rm \Omega \,s}} }
+ 10^{-6}\,{\rm \Omega^{-1}} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{0.6 \cdot 10^{-3}\,{\rm \Omega \,s}}{ 35 \cdot 10^{-9}\,{\rm s/\Omega}} }\hspace{0.1cm}\right
]  $$ 
$$ \Rightarrow \; \alpha_{\rm I}(f) = 1/2 \cdot
\left [130 \cdot 7.638 \cdot 10^{-3}+ 10^{-6} \cdot 0.131 \cdot 10^{3}\right
] {\rm Np/km}   \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.496\,{\rm Np/km}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

For the bronze line the result is  $R\hspace{0.03cm}' = 2.2\,\,{\rm \Omega}/{ {\rm km} }\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}

L' = 1.8\,\,{\rm mH}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
G\hspace{0.03cm}' = 0.5\,\,{\rm µ S}/{ {\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
C\hspace{0.03cm}' = 6.7\,\,{\rm nF}/{ {\rm km}}
\hspace{0.05cm}:$
$$\alpha_{\rm I}(f) = 1/2 \cdot
\left [2.2 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{6.7 \cdot 10^{-9}}{ 1.8 \cdot 10^{-3}} }
+ 0.5 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{ 1.8 \cdot 10^{-3}} {6.7 \cdot 10^{-9}}}\hspace{0.1cm}\right
] $$
$$ \Rightarrow \; \alpha_{\rm I}(f) = \frac{1 \,\rm Np/km}{2} \cdot
\big [4.244 \cdot 10^{-3}+   0.259 \cdot 10^{-3}\big
] {\rm Np/km}

\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.0023\,{\rm Np}/{ {\rm km} }}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  The bound  $α_{\rm I}(f)$  calculated in subtask (1) is valid only for  $f \gg f_∗$, while the bound  $α_{\rm II}(f)$  is valid for  $f \ll f_∗$ .

  • The characteristic frequency is obtained as the intersection of the two approximations:
$$\alpha_{\rm II}(f = f_{\star}) = \sqrt{1/2 \cdot \omega_{\star} \cdot R' \cdot C' }\hspace{0.1cm}
\bigg |_{\omega_{\star} \hspace{0.05cm}= \hspace{0.05cm}2\pi f_{\star}} = \alpha_{\rm I}(f = f_{\star})$$
  • For the copper cable with  $\text{0.6 mm}$  diameter, the following equation holds:
$$f_{\star} = \frac {{\alpha^2_{_{\rm I}}(f = f_{\star})}}{\pi \cdot R' \cdot C'}=
   \frac {0.496^2 \, {\rm 1/km^2}}{\pi \cdot 130\,{\rm \Omega/km} \cdot 35 \cdot 10^{-9}\,{\rm s/(\Omega \cdot km)}}

\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 17.2\,{\rm kHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

  • In contrast, for the bronze line with diameter   $\text{5 mm}$ :
$$f_{\star} =
   \frac {(2.25 \cdot 10^{-3})^2 }{\pi \cdot 2.2 \cdot 6.7 \cdot 10^{-9}}\,{\rm kHz}

\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.109\,{\rm kHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(3)  For the copper cable  $f_0 \ll f_∗$ holds.

  • Therefore, the approximation is  $α_{\rm II}(f)$   ⇒   "strong attenuation" should be used:
$$\alpha(f = f_0) \approx \sqrt{\pi \cdot f_0 \cdot R' \cdot C'}= \sqrt{\pi \cdot 2 \cdot 10^{3} \cdot 130 \cdot 35 \cdot 10^{-9}}
\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm Np}/{ {\rm km} }

\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.17 \hspace{0.1cm}{\rm Np}/{ {\rm km} }}

\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • For the bronze line, because of  $f_0 \gg f_∗$  the approximation is  $α_{\rm I}(f)$   ⇒   "weak attenuation" is more suitable, see subtask  (1):
$$\alpha(f = f_0)

\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.0023\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm Np}/{ {\rm km} }}

\hspace{0.05cm}.$$