Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.4: Extrinsic L-values at SPC"

From LNTwww
Line 9: Line 9:
 
:$$\underline{x}^{(-i)} = \big ( \hspace{0.03cm}x_1, \hspace{0.05cm} \text{...} \hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.03cm} x_{i-1}, \hspace{0.43cm} x_{i+1},  \hspace{0.05cm} \text{...} \hspace{0.05cm} , x_{n} \hspace{0.03cm} \big )\hspace{0.03cm}. $$
 
:$$\underline{x}^{(-i)} = \big ( \hspace{0.03cm}x_1, \hspace{0.05cm} \text{...} \hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.03cm} x_{i-1}, \hspace{0.43cm} x_{i+1},  \hspace{0.05cm} \text{...} \hspace{0.05cm} , x_{n} \hspace{0.03cm} \big )\hspace{0.03cm}. $$
  
The extrinsic  $L$ value over the  $i$th code symbol reads with the  [[Channel_Coding/Objective_of_Channel_Coding#Important_definitions_for_block_coding|"Hamming–weight"]]  $w_{\rm H}$  of the truncated sequence  $\underline{x}^{(-i)}$:
+
The extrinsic  $L$ value over the  $i$th code symbol reads with the  [[Channel_Coding/Objective_of_Channel_Coding#Important_definitions_for_block_coding|"Hamming weight"]]  $w_{\rm H}$  of the truncated sequence  $\underline{x}^{(-i)}$:
 
:$$L_{\rm E}(i) = \frac{{\rm Pr} \left [w_{\rm H}(\underline{x}^{(-i)})\hspace{0.15cm}{\rm ist \hspace{0.15cm} gerade} \hspace{0.05cm} | \hspace{0.05cm}\underline{y} \hspace{0.05cm}\right ]}{{\rm Pr} \left [w_{\rm H}(\underline{x}^{(-i)})\hspace{0.15cm}{\rm ist \hspace{0.15cm} ungerade} \hspace{0.05cm} | \hspace{0.05cm}\underline{y} \hspace{0.05cm}\right ]}
 
:$$L_{\rm E}(i) = \frac{{\rm Pr} \left [w_{\rm H}(\underline{x}^{(-i)})\hspace{0.15cm}{\rm ist \hspace{0.15cm} gerade} \hspace{0.05cm} | \hspace{0.05cm}\underline{y} \hspace{0.05cm}\right ]}{{\rm Pr} \left [w_{\rm H}(\underline{x}^{(-i)})\hspace{0.15cm}{\rm ist \hspace{0.15cm} ungerade} \hspace{0.05cm} | \hspace{0.05cm}\underline{y} \hspace{0.05cm}\right ]}
 
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Revision as of 18:44, 29 October 2022

Suitable auxiliary table

We consider again the  "single parity–check code". In such a  ${\rm SPC} \ (n, \, n-1, \, 2)$  the  $n$  bits of a codeword  $\underline{x}$  come from the  $k = n -1$  bits from the source sequence  $\underline{u}$  and only a single check bit  $p$  is added, such that the number of ones in the codeword is even:

$$\underline{x} = \big ( \hspace{0.03cm}x_1, \hspace{0.03cm} x_2, \hspace{0.05cm} \text{...} \hspace{0.05cm} , x_{n-1}, \hspace{0.03cm} x_n \hspace{0.03cm} \big ) = \big ( \hspace{0.03cm}u_1, \hspace{0.03cm} u_2, \hspace{0.05cm} \text{...} \hspace{0.05cm} , u_{k}, \hspace{0.03cm} p \hspace{0.03cm} \big )\hspace{0.03cm}. $$

The extrinsic information about the  $i$th code bit is formed over all other symbols  $(j ≠ i)$ . Therefore we write for the code word shorter by one bit:

$$\underline{x}^{(-i)} = \big ( \hspace{0.03cm}x_1, \hspace{0.05cm} \text{...} \hspace{0.05cm} , \hspace{0.03cm} x_{i-1}, \hspace{0.43cm} x_{i+1}, \hspace{0.05cm} \text{...} \hspace{0.05cm} , x_{n} \hspace{0.03cm} \big )\hspace{0.03cm}. $$

The extrinsic  $L$ value over the  $i$th code symbol reads with the  "Hamming weight"  $w_{\rm H}$  of the truncated sequence  $\underline{x}^{(-i)}$:

$$L_{\rm E}(i) = \frac{{\rm Pr} \left [w_{\rm H}(\underline{x}^{(-i)})\hspace{0.15cm}{\rm ist \hspace{0.15cm} gerade} \hspace{0.05cm} | \hspace{0.05cm}\underline{y} \hspace{0.05cm}\right ]}{{\rm Pr} \left [w_{\rm H}(\underline{x}^{(-i)})\hspace{0.15cm}{\rm ist \hspace{0.15cm} ungerade} \hspace{0.05cm} | \hspace{0.05cm}\underline{y} \hspace{0.05cm}\right ]} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • If the probability in the numerator is greater than that in the denominator, then  $L_{\rm E}(i) > 0$  and thus the a posteriori–$L$– value  $L_{\rm APP}(i) = L_{\rm A}(i) + L_{\rm E}(i)$  magnified, that is tends to be affected in the direction of the symbol  $x_i = 0$ .
  • If  $L_{\rm E}(i) < 0$  from the point of view of the other symbols  $(j ≠ i)$  there is much to be said for  $x_i = 1$ .


Only the  $\text{SPC (4, 3, 4)}$ is treated, where for the probabilities  $p_i = {\rm Pr}(x_i = 1)$  holds:

$$p_1 = 0.2 \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.3cm} p_2 = 0.9 \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.3cm} p_3 = 0.3 \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.3cm} p_4 = 0.6 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

From this the apriori–$L$ values result to:

$$L_{\rm A}(i) = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{{\rm Pr}(x_i = 0)}{{\rm Pr}(x_i = 1)} \right ] = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{1-p_i}{p_i} \right ] \hspace{0.05cm}.$$





Hints:

In column 2:   the probability  $q_i = {\rm Pr}(x_i = 0) = 1 - p_i$,
in column 3:   the values for  $1 - 2p_i$,
in column 4:   the apriori $L$ values  $L_i = \ln {\big [(1 - p_i)/p_ i \big ]} = L_{\rm A}(i)$.
  • The  hyperbolic tangent  ($\tanh$)  of $L_i/2$  is identical to  $1-2p_i$   ⇒   column 3.
  • In the  "Exercise 4.4Z"  it is shown that for the extrinsic  $L$–value can also be written:
$$L_{\rm E}(i) = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{1 + \pi}{1 - \pi}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm mit} \hspace{0.3cm} \pi = \prod\limits_{j \ne i}^{n} \hspace{0.25cm}(1-2p_j) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Questions

1

It holds  $p_1 = 0.2, \ p_2 = 0.9, \ p_3 = 0.3, \ p_4 = 0.6$. From this, calculate the apriori $L$ values of the  $\text{SPC (4, 3, 4)}$  for bit 1 and bit 2.

$L_{\rm A}(i = 1) \ = \ $

$L_{\rm A}(i = 2) \ = \ $

2

What are the extrinsic $L$ values for bit 1 and bit 2.

$L_{\rm E}(i = 1) \ = \ $

$L_{\rm E}(i = 2) \ = \ $

3

What are the relationships between  $p_j$  and  $L_j = L_{\rm A}(j)$?

Es gilt  $p_j = 1/(1 + {\rm e}^ {L_j})$.
Es gilt  $1-2p_j = ({\rm e}^ {L_j} - 1) \ / \ ({\rm e}^ {L_j} + 1)$.
Es gilt  $1-2p_j = \tanh {(L_j/2)}$.

4

It further  $p_1 = 0.2, \ p_2 = 0.9, \ p_3$ and $p_4 = 0.6$. Calculate the extrinsic $L$ values for bit 3 and bit 4.
Use different equations for this purpose.

$L_{\rm E}(i = 3) \ = \ $

$L_{\rm E}(i = 4) \ = \ $


Solution

(1)  For the apriori $L$ values of the first two bits of the code word:

$$L_{\rm A}(i = 1) \hspace{-0.15cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{1-p_1}{p_1} \right ] = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} 4 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= +1.386} \hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$L_{\rm A}(i = 2) \hspace{-0.15cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{1-p_2}{p_2} \right ] = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} 1/9 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= -2.197} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The values can be read from the fourth column of the table attached to the information page.


(2)  To calculate the extrinsic $L$ value over the $i$th bit, only the information about the other three bits $(j ≠ i)$ may be used. With the given equation holds:

$$L_{\rm E}(i = 1) = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{1 + \prod\limits_{j \ne 1} \hspace{0.25cm}(1-2p_j)}{1 - \prod\limits_{j \ne 1} \hspace{0.25cm}(1-2p_j)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • For the product, we obtain according to the third column of "table":
$$\prod\limits_{j =2, \hspace{0.05cm}3,\hspace{0.05cm} 4} \hspace{0.05cm}(1-2p_j) = (-0.8) \cdot (+0.4) \cdot (-0.2) = 0.064 \hspace{0.05cm}\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}L_{\rm E}(i = 1) = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{1 + 0.064}{1 - 0.064} = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} (1.137)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= +0.128} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • In terms of bit 2, one obtains accordingly:
$$\prod\limits_{j =1, \hspace{0.05cm}3,\hspace{0.05cm} 4} \hspace{0.05cm}(1-2p_j) = (+0.6) \cdot (+0.4) \cdot (-0.2) = -0.048 \hspace{0.05cm}\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}L_{\rm E}(i = 2) = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{1 -0.048}{1 +0.048} = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} (0.908)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= -0.096} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(3)  For the apriori $L$ value holds:

$$L_j = L_{\rm A}(j) = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{{\rm Pr}(x_j = 0)}{{\rm Pr}(x_j = 1)} \right ] = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} \left [ \frac{1-p_j}{p_j} \right ]\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} 1-p_j = p_j \cdot {\rm e}^{L_j} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} p_j = \frac{1}{1+{\rm e}^{L_j} } \hspace{0.05cm} .$$
  • Thus also applies:
$$1- 2 \cdot p_j = 1 - \frac{2}{1+{\rm e}^{L_j} } = \frac{1+{\rm e}^{L_j}-2}{1+{\rm e}^{L_j} } = \frac{{\rm e}^{L_j}-1}{{\rm e}^{L_j} +1}\hspace{0.05cm} .$$
  • Multiplying the numerator and denominator by ${\rm e}^{-L_j/2}$, we get:
$$1- 2 \cdot p_j = \frac{{\rm e}^{L_j/2}-{\rm e}^{-L_j/2}}{{\rm e}^{L_j/2}+{\rm e}^{-L_j/2}}={\rm tanh} (L_j/2) \hspace{0.05cm} .$$
  • Thus all proposed solutions are correct.
  • The function hyperbolic tangent can be found, for example, in tabular form in collections of formulas or in the last column of the table given in front.


(4)  We first calculate $L_{\rm E}(i = 3)$ in the same way as in subtask (2):

$$\prod\limits_{j =1, \hspace{0.05cm}2,\hspace{0.05cm} 4} \hspace{0.05cm}(1-2p_j) = (+0.6) \cdot (-0.8) \cdot (-0.2) = +0.096 \hspace{0.05cm}\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}L_{\rm E}(i = 3) = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{1 +0.096}{1 -0.096} = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.1cm} (1.212)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= +0.193} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • We calculate the extrinsic $L$ value with respect to the last bit according to the equation
$$L_{\rm E}(i = 4) = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{1 + \pi}{1 - \pi}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm mit} \hspace{0.3cm} \pi = {\rm tanh}(L_1/2) \cdot {\rm tanh}(L_2/2) \cdot {\rm tanh}(L_3/2) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This results in accordance with the above "table":
$$p_1 = 0.2 \hspace{0.2cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} L_1 = +1.386 \hspace{0.2cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} L_1/2 = +0.693 \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm tanh}(L_1/2) = \frac{{\rm e}^{+0.693}-{\rm e}^{-0.693}}{{\rm e}^{+0.693}+{\rm e}^{-0.693}} = 0.6 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm identisch \hspace{0.15cm}mit\hspace{0.15cm} }1-2\cdot p_1\hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$p_2 = 0.9 \hspace{0.2cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} L_2 = -2.197 \hspace{0.2cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} L_2/2 = -1.099\hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm tanh}(L_2/2) = \frac{{\rm e}^{-1.099}-{\rm e}^{+1.099}}{{\rm e}^{-1.099}+{\rm e}^{+1.099}} = -0.8 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm identisch \hspace{0.15cm}mit\hspace{0.15cm} }1-2\cdot p_2\hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$p_3 = 0.3 \hspace{0.2cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} L_3 = 0.847 \hspace{0.2cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} L_3/2 = +0.419 \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} {\rm tanh}(L_3/2) = \frac{{\rm e}^{+0.419}-{\rm e}^{-0.419}}{{\rm e}^{+0.419}+{\rm e}^{-0.419}} = 0.4 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm identisch \hspace{0.15cm}mit\hspace{0.15cm} }1-2\cdot p_3\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The final result is thus:
$$\pi = (+0.6) \cdot (-0.8) \cdot (+0.4) = -0.192 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} L_{\rm E}(i = 4) = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.2cm} \frac{1 -0.192}{1 +0.192}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= -0.389} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$