Aufgaben:Exercise 3.3: Noise at Channel Equalization: Difference between revisions

From LNTwww
Add German interlanguage link
Join split $$ formula lines for correct rendering
Line 6: Line 6:
We consider two different system variants,  both using NRZ rectangular transmission pulses and are affected by AWGN noise.
We consider two different system variants,  both using NRZ rectangular transmission pulses and are affected by AWGN noise.
*To limit the noise power,  in both cases a Gaussian low-pass filter
*To limit the noise power,  in both cases a Gaussian low-pass filter
:$$H_{\rm G}(f) = {\rm exp}(- \pi \cdot
:$$H_{\rm G}(f) = {\rm exp}(- \pi \cdot\frac{f^2}{(2f_{\rm G})^2})$$
\frac{f^2}{(2f_{\rm G})^2})$$


:with normalized cutoff frequency  $f_{\rm G} \cdot T = 0.35$  is used, so that both systems also have the same eye opening with  $\ddot{o}(T_{\rm D} = 0) = 0.478 \cdot s_0$.   
:with normalized cutoff frequency  $f_{\rm G} \cdot T = 0.35$  is used, so that both systems also have the same eye opening with  $\ddot{o}(T_{\rm D} = 0) = 0.478 \cdot s_0$.   
Line 13: Line 12:


* The channel frequency response of system  $\rm A$  is frequency-independent:   $H_{\rm K}(f) = \alpha$.  Accordingly,   for the receiver filter  $H_{\rm E}(f) = H_{\rm G}(f)/\alpha$  must be assumed,  so that the following applies to the detection noise power:
* The channel frequency response of system  $\rm A$  is frequency-independent:   $H_{\rm K}(f) = \alpha$.  Accordingly,   for the receiver filter  $H_{\rm E}(f) = H_{\rm G}(f)/\alpha$  must be assumed,  so that the following applies to the detection noise power:
:$$\sigma_d^2 = {N_0}/{2} \cdot \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}
:$$\sigma_d^2 = {N_0}/{2} \cdot \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|H_{\rm E}(f)|^2 \,{\rm d} f = \frac{N_0 \cdot f_{\rm G}}{\sqrt{2}\cdot \alpha^2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
|H_{\rm E}(f)|^2 \,{\rm d} f = \frac{N_0 \cdot f_{\rm G}}{\sqrt{2}
\cdot \alpha^2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


* In contrast,  system  $\rm B$  assumes a coaxial cable with characteristic attenuation  $($at half the bit rate$)$  $a_* = 80 \, {\rm dB}$  $($or  $9.2 \, {\rm Np})$  so that the channel magnitude frequency response is:
* In contrast,  system  $\rm B$  assumes a coaxial cable with characteristic attenuation  $($at half the bit rate$)$  $a_* = 80 \, {\rm dB}$  $($or  $9.2 \, {\rm Np})$  so that the channel magnitude frequency response is:
:$$|H_{\rm K}(f)| = {\rm e}^{- 9.2 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot
:$$|H_{\rm K}(f)| = {\rm e}^{- 9.2 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}\sqrt{2 f T}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
\hspace{0.05cm}\sqrt{2 f T}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


* Thus,  the equation for the noise power density  $\rm (PSD)$  before the decision is  $($with  $f_{\rm G} \cdot T = 0.35)$:
* Thus,  the equation for the noise power density  $\rm (PSD)$  before the decision is  $($with  $f_{\rm G} \cdot T = 0.35)$:
:$${\it \Phi}_{d{\rm N}}(f) = {N_0}/{2} \cdot \frac{|H_{\rm G
:$${\it \Phi}_{d{\rm N}}(f) = {N_0}/{2} \cdot \frac{|H_{\rm G}(f)|^2}{|H_{\rm K}(f)|^2} = {N_0}/{2} \cdot {\rm exp}\left[18.4 \cdot \sqrt{2  f  T} - 2\pi \cdot \frac{(f \cdot T)^2}{(2 \cdot 0.35)^2}\right ] \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
}(f)|^2}{|H_{\rm K}(f)|^2} = {N_0}/{2} \cdot {\rm exp}\left
[18.4 \cdot \sqrt{2  f  T} - 2\pi \cdot \frac{(f \cdot T)^2}{(2 \cdot 0.35)^2}
\right ] \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


*The noise PSD of system  $\rm B$  is shown in red in the above graph and the noise PSD of system  $\rm A$  is drawn in blue.
*The noise PSD of system  $\rm B$  is shown in red in the above graph and the noise PSD of system  $\rm A$  is drawn in blue.


*For the system  $\rm B$,  the worst-case error probability  
*For the system  $\rm B$,  the worst-case error probability  
:$$p_{\rm U} = {\rm Q} \left( \sqrt{\rho_{\rm U}}
:$$p_{\rm U} = {\rm Q} \left( \sqrt{\rho_{\rm U}}\right) \hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with} \hspace{0.4cm} \rho_{\rm U} = \frac{[\ddot{o}(T_{\rm D})/2]^2}{ \sigma_d^2}$$
  \right) \hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with} \hspace{0.4cm} \rho_{\rm U} = \frac{[\ddot{o}(T_{\rm D})/2]^2}{ \sigma_d^2}$$


:was determined.  The measurement resulted in  $p_{\rm U} = 4 \cdot 10^{\rm -8}$,  which corresponds to the signal-to-noise ratio  $10 \cdot {\rm lg} \, \rho_{\rm U} = 14.8 \, {\rm dB}$.   
:was determined.  The measurement resulted in  $p_{\rm U} = 4 \cdot 10^{\rm -8}$,  which corresponds to the signal-to-noise ratio  $10 \cdot {\rm lg} \, \rho_{\rm U} = 14.8 \, {\rm dB}$.   
Line 78: Line 70:
{{ML-Kopf}}
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''  From  $10 \cdot {\rm lg} \, \rho_{\rm U} = 14.8 \, {\rm dB}$  follows  $\rho_{\rm U} = 10^{\rm 1.48} ≈ 30.2$  and with the given equation:
'''(1)'''  From  $10 \cdot {\rm lg} \, \rho_{\rm U} = 14.8 \, {\rm dB}$  follows  $\rho_{\rm U} = 10^{\rm 1.48} ≈ 30.2$  and with the given equation:
:$$\sqrt{\rho_{\rm U}} = \frac{\ddot{o}(T_{\rm D})/2}{ \sigma_d}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow
:$$\sqrt{\rho_{\rm U}} = \frac{\ddot{o}(T_{\rm D})/2}{ \sigma_d}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm} \sigma_d = \frac{0.478 \cdot s_0/2}{ \sqrt{30.2}}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { \approx 0.044 \cdot s_0 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
\hspace{0.3cm} \sigma_d = \frac{0.478 \cdot s_0/2}{ \sqrt{30.2}}
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { \approx 0.044 \cdot s_0 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$




Line 96: Line 86:


Expressed in  ${\rm dB}$,  one thus obtains
Expressed in  ${\rm dB}$,  one thus obtains
:$$20 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\alpha = 10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\alpha^2 =
:$$20 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\alpha = 10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\alpha^2 =-70\,{\rm dB}\hspace{0.1cm}+\hspace{0.1cm}10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}1.28\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { =-68.9\,{\rm dB}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  -70\,{\rm dB}\hspace{0.1cm}+\hspace{0.1cm}10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}1.28\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { =
  -68.9\,{\rm dB}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$




Line 111: Line 99:


has the maximum value.  Thus,  with $x = f \cdot T$,  the optimization function is:
has the maximum value.  Thus,  with $x = f \cdot T$,  the optimization function is:
:$$y(x) = 26.022 \cdot  \sqrt{x} - 12.823 \cdot x^2 \approx 26 \cdot
:$$y(x) = 26.022 \cdot  \sqrt{x} - 12.823 \cdot x^2 \approx 26 \cdot\sqrt{x} - 13 \cdot x^2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac{{\rm d}y}{{\rm d}x} = \frac{26}{2\cdot \sqrt{x}} - 13 \cdot 2 \cdot x = 0$$
\sqrt{x} - 13 \cdot x^2 \hspace{0.3cm}
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac{1} { \sqrt{x}} = 2 \cdot x\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac{1} { x} = 4 \cdotx^2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x^3 = 0.25\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x \approx 0.63\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac{{\rm d}y}{{\rm d}x} = \frac{26}
{2\cdot \sqrt{x}} - 13 \cdot 2 \cdot x = 0$$
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac{1} { \sqrt{x}} = 2 \cdot x
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac{1} { x} = 4 \cdot
x^2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x^3 = 0.25
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x \approx 0.63
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


This gives  $f_{\rm max} \cdot T\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.63}$.
This gives  $f_{\rm max} \cdot T\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.63}$.
Line 126: Line 107:
'''(6)'''  With  $x_{\rm max} = 0.63$  we get the function value
'''(6)'''  With  $x_{\rm max} = 0.63$  we get the function value


:$$y(x_{\rm max})  \approx 26 \cdot \sqrt{0.63} - 13 \cdot 0.63^2
:$$y(x_{\rm max})  \approx 26 \cdot \sqrt{0.63} - 13 \cdot 0.63^2\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 15.477}.$$
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 15.477}.$$
[[File:EN_Dig_A_3_3f.png|frame|right|Noise component  $d_{\rm N}(t)$  of the detection signal]]
[[File:EN_Dig_A_3_3f.png|frame|right|Noise component  $d_{\rm N}(t)$  of the detection signal]]
It follows:
It follows:

Revision as of 15:30, 16 March 2026

Noise PSD before the decision

We consider two different system variants,  both using NRZ rectangular transmission pulses and are affected by AWGN noise.

  • To limit the noise power,  in both cases a Gaussian low-pass filter
$$H_{\rm G}(f) = {\rm exp}(- \pi \cdot\frac{f^2}{(2f_{\rm G})^2})$$
with normalized cutoff frequency  $f_{\rm G} \cdot T = 0.35$  is used, so that both systems also have the same eye opening with  $\ddot{o}(T_{\rm D} = 0) = 0.478 \cdot s_0$. 
  • The transmission energy  $E_{\rm B} = s_0^2 \cdot T$  spent per bit is larger than the noise power density  $N_0$   by a factor of  $10^9$  ⇒   $10\cdot {\rm lg} \, E_{\rm B}/N_0 = 90 \, {\rm dB}$.
  • The channel frequency response of system  $\rm A$  is frequency-independent:   $H_{\rm K}(f) = \alpha$.  Accordingly,  for the receiver filter  $H_{\rm E}(f) = H_{\rm G}(f)/\alpha$  must be assumed,  so that the following applies to the detection noise power:
$$\sigma_d^2 = {N_0}/{2} \cdot \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}|H_{\rm E}(f)|^2 \,{\rm d} f = \frac{N_0 \cdot f_{\rm G}}{\sqrt{2}\cdot \alpha^2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • In contrast,  system  $\rm B$  assumes a coaxial cable with characteristic attenuation  $($at half the bit rate$)$  $a_* = 80 \, {\rm dB}$  $($or  $9.2 \, {\rm Np})$  so that the channel magnitude frequency response is:
$$|H_{\rm K}(f)| = {\rm e}^{- 9.2 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot\hspace{0.05cm}\sqrt{2 f T}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • Thus,  the equation for the noise power density  $\rm (PSD)$  before the decision is  $($with  $f_{\rm G} \cdot T = 0.35)$:
$${\it \Phi}_{d{\rm N}}(f) = {N_0}/{2} \cdot \frac{|H_{\rm G}(f)|^2}{|H_{\rm K}(f)|^2} = {N_0}/{2} \cdot {\rm exp}\left[18.4 \cdot \sqrt{2 f T} - 2\pi \cdot \frac{(f \cdot T)^2}{(2 \cdot 0.35)^2}\right ] \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The noise PSD of system  $\rm B$  is shown in red in the above graph and the noise PSD of system  $\rm A$  is drawn in blue.
  • For the system  $\rm B$,  the worst-case error probability
$$p_{\rm U} = {\rm Q} \left( \sqrt{\rho_{\rm U}}\right) \hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with} \hspace{0.4cm} \rho_{\rm U} = \frac{[\ddot{o}(T_{\rm D})/2]^2}{ \sigma_d^2}$$
was determined.  The measurement resulted in  $p_{\rm U} = 4 \cdot 10^{\rm -8}$,  which corresponds to the signal-to-noise ratio  $10 \cdot {\rm lg} \, \rho_{\rm U} = 14.8 \, {\rm dB}$. 



Notes:



Questions

1 What  (normalized)  noise rms value occurs in system  $\rm B$? 

$\sigma_d/s_0 \ = \ $

2 What noise rms value occurs for system  $\rm A$  when it leads to exactly the same  "worst-case error probability"  as system  $\rm B$? 

$\sigma_d/s_0 \ = \ $

3 By what attenuation factor  $\alpha$  is system  $\rm A$  equivalent to system  $\rm B$  in terms of worst-case error probability?

$20 \cdot {\rm lg} \ \alpha \ = \ $ ${\ \rm dB}$

4 What is the noise power-spectral density  $($at  $f = 0)$  normalized to  $N_0/2$  before the decision for system  $\rm A$  and system  $\rm B$?

$\text{System A:}\hspace{0.4cm} {\it \Phi}_{d \rm N} (f = 0)/(N_0/2) \ = \ $ $\ \cdot 10^6$
$\text{System B:}\hspace{0.42cm} {\it \Phi}_{d \rm N} (f = 0)/(N_0/2) \ = \ $ $\ \cdot 10^0$

5 For the rest of the exercise,  we will only consider system  $\rm B$.  At what frequency  $f_{\rm max}$  does  ${\it \Phi}_{d \rm N}(f)$  have its maximum?

$f_{\rm max} \cdot T\ = \ $

6 By what factor is the noise power-spectral density at frequency  $f_{\rm max}$  greater than at  $f = 0$?

${\it \Phi}_{d \rm N}(f_{\rm max})/{\it \Phi}_{d \rm N}(0)\ = \ $ $\ \cdot 10^6$


Solution

(1)  From  $10 \cdot {\rm lg} \, \rho_{\rm U} = 14.8 \, {\rm dB}$  follows  $\rho_{\rm U} = 10^{\rm 1.48} ≈ 30.2$  and with the given equation:

$$\sqrt{\rho_{\rm U}} = \frac{\ddot{o}(T_{\rm D})/2}{ \sigma_d}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm} \sigma_d = \frac{0.478 \cdot s_0/2}{ \sqrt{30.2}}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { \approx 0.044 \cdot s_0 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  With the same worst-case error probability  $p_{\rm U}$  (and thus the same  $\rho_{\rm U}$),  $\sigma_d$ must have exactly the same value as calculated in subtask  (1),  since the eye opening also remains the same   ⇒   $\sigma_d/s_0 \underline{= 0.044}.$


(3)  According to the specification section:

$$\alpha^2 = \frac{N_0 \cdot f_{\rm G}}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \sigma_d^2}

= \frac{10^{-9} \cdot s_0^2 \cdot T \cdot f_{\rm G}}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \sigma_d^2} = 10^{-9} \cdot \frac{ f_{\rm G} \cdot T}{\sqrt{2} \cdot (\sigma_d/s_0)^2}\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \alpha^2 = 10^{-9} \cdot \frac{ 0.35}{\sqrt{2} \cdot 0.044^2} \approx 1.28 \cdot 10^{-7}

\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Expressed in  ${\rm dB}$,  one thus obtains

$$20 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\alpha = 10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\alpha^2 =-70\,{\rm dB}\hspace{0.1cm}+\hspace{0.1cm}10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}1.28\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { =-68.9\,{\rm dB}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(4)  For system  $\rm B$,  because of  $H_{\rm E}(f = 0) = 1$,  the normalized value is equal  to $1$,  that means,  it is  ${\it \Phi}_{d \rm N}(f = 0) = N_0/2$.

In contrast,  for system  $\rm A$,  this value is larger  by the factor  $1/\alpha^2$  due to the components of the frequency-independent cable attenuation  $\alpha$:

$${\rm System}\hspace{0.15cm}{\rm A:}\hspace{0.1cm}\frac{{\it \Phi}_{d{\rm N}}(f = 0)}{N_0/2} = \frac{1}{\alpha^2} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 7.8 \cdot 10^{6}} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{1.05cm}{\rm System\hspace{0.15cm}B}: \frac{{\it \Phi}_{d \rm N}(f = 0)}{N_0/2} \, \underline {= 1}.$$


(5)  ${\it \Phi}_{d \rm N}(f)$  is maximal if the exponent

$$18.4 \cdot \sqrt{2 f T} - 2\pi \cdot \frac{(f \cdot T)^2}{0.49}$$

has the maximum value.  Thus,  with $x = f \cdot T$,  the optimization function is:

$$y(x) = 26.022 \cdot \sqrt{x} - 12.823 \cdot x^2 \approx 26 \cdot\sqrt{x} - 13 \cdot x^2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac{{\rm d}y}{{\rm d}x} = \frac{26}{2\cdot \sqrt{x}} - 13 \cdot 2 \cdot x = 0$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac{1} { \sqrt{x}} = 2 \cdot x\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac{1} { x} = 4 \cdotx^2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x^3 = 0.25\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x \approx 0.63\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

This gives  $f_{\rm max} \cdot T\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.63}$.


(6)  With  $x_{\rm max} = 0.63$  we get the function value

$$y(x_{\rm max}) \approx 26 \cdot \sqrt{0.63} - 13 \cdot 0.63^2\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 15.477}.$$
Noise component  $d_{\rm N}(t)$  of the detection signal

It follows:

  • The noise PSD at the  (normalized)  frequency  $f \cdot T \approx 0.63$  is larger than at the frequency  $f = 0$  by a factor of  $e^{\rm 15.5} \ \underline{\approx 5.4 \cdot 10^6}$.
  • Thus,  periodic components with period  $T_0 \approx 1.6 \cdot T$  predominate in the noise component  $d_{\rm N}(t)$.
  • The graph shows a simulation and confirms this result.