Aufgaben:Exercise 4.5: Coaxial Cable - Impulse Response: Difference between revisions
Add German interlanguage link |
Join split $$ formula lines for correct rendering |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[File:P_ID1814__LZI_A_4_5.png|right|frame|Impulse response of a coaxial cable]] | [[File:P_ID1814__LZI_A_4_5.png|right|frame|Impulse response of a coaxial cable]] | ||
The frequency response of a coaxial cable (German: "Koaxialkabel" ⇒ subscipt "K") of length $l$ can be represented by the following formula: | The frequency response of a coaxial cable (German: "Koaxialkabel" ⇒ subscipt "K") of length $l$ can be represented by the following formula: | ||
:$$H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l} | :$$H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l}\cdot{\rm e}^{- (\alpha_1 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_1) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot f \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot{\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
The first term of this equation is due to the ohmic losses, the second term to the transverse losses. Dominant, however, is the skin effect, which is expressed by the third term. | The first term of this equation is due to the ohmic losses, the second term to the transverse losses. Dominant, however, is the skin effect, which is expressed by the third term. | ||
With the coefficients valid for the "standard coaxial cable" $\text{(2.6 mm}$ core diameter, $\text{9.5 mm}$ outer diameter$)$ | With the coefficients valid for the "standard coaxial cable" $\text{(2.6 mm}$ core diameter, $\text{9.5 mm}$ outer diameter$)$ | ||
:$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}} | :$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm} \beta_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rmMHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}$$ | ||
this frequency response can also be represented as follows: | this frequency response can also be represented as follows: | ||
:$$H_{\rm K}(f) \approx {\rm e}^{- 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km} | :$$H_{\rm K}(f) \approx {\rm e}^{- 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
That means: | That means: | ||
| Line 28: | Line 17: | ||
If one defines the characteristic cable attenuation ${a}_{\rm *}$ at half the bit rate $($i.e., at $R/2)$ and normalizes the frequency to $R$, one can treat digital systems of different bit rate and length uniformly: | If one defines the characteristic cable attenuation ${a}_{\rm *}$ at half the bit rate $($i.e., at $R/2)$ and normalizes the frequency to $R$, one can treat digital systems of different bit rate and length uniformly: | ||
:$${a}_{\rm \star} = {a}_{\rm K}(f ={R}/{2}) | :$${a}_{\rm \star} = {a}_{\rm K}(f ={R}/{2})\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-{a}_{\rm \star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {a}_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{- | |||
{a}_{\rm \star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {a}_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np} | |||
*The corresponding $\rm dB$ value is greater by a factor of $8.686$. | *The corresponding $\rm dB$ value is greater by a factor of $8.686$. | ||
*For a binary system, $R = 1/T$ holds, so that the characteristic cable attenuation refers to the frequency $f = 1/(2T)$. | *For a binary system, $R = 1/T$ holds, so that the characteristic cable attenuation refers to the frequency $f = 1/(2T)$. | ||
| Line 37: | Line 23: | ||
The [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_and_Its_Inverse#Fouriertransformation|Fourier transform]] of $H_{\rm K}(f)$ yields the impulse response $h_{\rm K}(t)$, which can be specified in closed-analytic form for a coaxial cable using the approximations described here. For a binary system holds: | The [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_and_Its_Inverse#Fouriertransformation|Fourier transform]] of $H_{\rm K}(f)$ yields the impulse response $h_{\rm K}(t)$, which can be specified in closed-analytic form for a coaxial cable using the approximations described here. For a binary system holds: | ||
:$$h_{\rm K}(t) = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot | :$$h_{\rm K}(t) = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot{\rm e}^{ - {{a}_{\rm \star}^2}/(2 \hspace{0.05cm} \pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t/T)}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\rm \star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | |||
Subtask '''(5)''' refers to the basic reception pulse $g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t)$, where the basic transmission pulse $g_s(t)$ is assumed to be a rectangle $($height $s_0$, duration $T)$. | Subtask '''(5)''' refers to the basic reception pulse $g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t)$, where the basic transmission pulse $g_s(t)$ is assumed to be a rectangle $($height $s_0$, duration $T)$. | ||
| Line 89: | Line 72: | ||
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
'''(1)''' The characteristic cable attenuation ${a}_{\rm \star} = 60 \ \rm dB$ corresponds approximately to $6.9\ \rm Np$. Therefore the following must hold: | '''(1)''' The characteristic cable attenuation ${a}_{\rm \star} = 60 \ \rm dB$ corresponds approximately to $6.9\ \rm Np$. Therefore the following must hold: | ||
:$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\ | :$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rmNp}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} l = \frac{6.9\,\,{\rmNp}}{0.2722 \,\, {\rm Np}/({\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}})\cdot \sqrt{70\,\,{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 3\,\,{\rm km}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} l = \frac{6.9\,\,{\ | |||
\cdot \sqrt{70\,\,{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 3\,\,{\rm km}} | |||
'''(2)''' With the substitutions | '''(2)''' With the substitutions | ||
:$$x = \frac{ t}{ T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{\sqrt{2 \pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm} | :$$x = \frac{ t}{ T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{\sqrt{2 \pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm}K_2 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}^2}{2 \pi}$$ | ||
the impulse response can be described as follows: | the impulse response can be described as follows: | ||
:$$h_{\rm K}(x) = K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x} | :$$h_{\rm K}(x) = K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
*By setting the derivative to zero: | *By setting the derivative to zero: | ||
:$$- {3}/{2} \cdot K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\ | :$$- {3}/{2} \cdot K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rme}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {3}/{2} \cdot x^{-5/2} = K_2 \cdotx^{-7/2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot K_2 = \frac{{a}_{\rm \star}^2}{3 \pi}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | |||
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {3}/{2} \cdot x^{-5/2} = K_2 \ | |||
*This results in the following for $60 \ \rm dB$ cable attenuation $({a}_{\rm \star} \approx 6.9 \ \rm Np)$: | *This results in the following for $60 \ \rm dB$ cable attenuation $({a}_{\rm \star} \approx 6.9 \ \rm Np)$: | ||
:$$x_{\rm max} = { t_{\rm max}}/{ T}= { 6.9^2}/{(3\pi)}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 5 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | :$$x_{\rm max} = { t_{\rm max}}/{ T}= { 6.9^2}/{(3\pi)}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 5 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
| Line 123: | Line 94: | ||
\sqrt{\frac{27 \pi | \sqrt{\frac{27 \pi | ||
}{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2} \approx \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{{a}^2} | }{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2} \approx \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{{a}^2} | ||
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | \hspace{0.05cm}.$$*With $a = 6.9$ we obtain the final result::$${\rm Max}\,[h_{\rm K}(t)] = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}} | ||
*With $a = 6.9$ we obtain the final result: | \hspace{0.05cm}.$$'''(4)''' Using the result from '''(3)''' , the appropriate equation of determination is::$$\frac{ {a}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 {1}/{T} | ||
:$${\rm Max}\,[h_{\rm K}(t)] = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}} | |||
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | |||
'''(4)''' Using the result from '''(3)''' , the appropriate equation of determination is: | |||
:$$\frac{ {a}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 {1}/{T} | |||
\hspace{0.15cm}{= 0.0015 \cdot {1}/{T}} | \hspace{0.15cm}{= 0.0015 \cdot {1}/{T}} | ||
\hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} (t_{5\%}/T)^{3/2} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi \cdot | \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} (t_{5\%}/T)^{3/2} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi \cdot | ||
| Line 143: | Line 108: | ||
'''(5)''' <u>The second solution</u> is correct: | '''(5)''' <u>The second solution</u> is correct: | ||
*In general: | *In general: | ||
:$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot | :$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$ | ||
\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$ | |||
*Since the channel pulse response $h_{\rm K}(t)$ changes only insignificantly within a symbol duration, it can also be written: | *Since the channel pulse response $h_{\rm K}(t)$ changes only insignificantly within a symbol duration, it can also be written: | ||
:$$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T.$$ | :$$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T.$$ | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 16 March 2026

The frequency response of a coaxial cable (German: "Koaxialkabel" ⇒ subscipt "K") of length $l$ can be represented by the following formula:
- $$H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l}\cdot{\rm e}^{- (\alpha_1 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_1) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot f \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot{\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
The first term of this equation is due to the ohmic losses, the second term to the transverse losses. Dominant, however, is the skin effect, which is expressed by the third term.
With the coefficients valid for the "standard coaxial cable" $\text{(2.6 mm}$ core diameter, $\text{9.5 mm}$ outer diameter$)$
- $$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm} \beta_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rmMHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}$$
this frequency response can also be represented as follows:
- $$H_{\rm K}(f) \approx {\rm e}^{- 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
That means:
Attenuation curve ${a}_{\rm K}(f)$ and phase curve $b_{\rm K}(f)$ are identical except for the pseudo units "Np" and "rad", respectively.
If one defines the characteristic cable attenuation ${a}_{\rm *}$ at half the bit rate $($i.e., at $R/2)$ and normalizes the frequency to $R$, one can treat digital systems of different bit rate and length uniformly:
- $${a}_{\rm \star} = {a}_{\rm K}(f ={R}/{2})\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-{a}_{\rm \star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {a}_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- The corresponding $\rm dB$ value is greater by a factor of $8.686$.
- For a binary system, $R = 1/T$ holds, so that the characteristic cable attenuation refers to the frequency $f = 1/(2T)$.
The Fourier transform of $H_{\rm K}(f)$ yields the impulse response $h_{\rm K}(t)$, which can be specified in closed-analytic form for a coaxial cable using the approximations described here. For a binary system holds:
- $$h_{\rm K}(t) = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot{\rm e}^{ - {{a}_{\rm \star}^2}/(2 \hspace{0.05cm} \pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t/T)}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\rm \star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Subtask (5) refers to the basic reception pulse $g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t)$, where the basic transmission pulse $g_s(t)$ is assumed to be a rectangle $($height $s_0$, duration $T)$.
Notes:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter Properties of Coaxial Cables.
- You can use the (German language) interactive SWF applet "Zeitverhalten von Kupferkabeln" ⇒ "Time behavior of copper cables" to check your results.
Questions
Solution
- $$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rmNp}\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} l = \frac{6.9\,\,{\rmNp}}{0.2722 \,\, {\rm Np}/({\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}})\cdot \sqrt{70\,\,{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 3\,\,{\rm km}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(2) With the substitutions
- $$x = \frac{ t}{ T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{\sqrt{2 \pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm}K_2 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}^2}{2 \pi}$$
the impulse response can be described as follows:
- $$h_{\rm K}(x) = K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- By setting the derivative to zero:
- $$- {3}/{2} \cdot K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rme}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- $$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {3}/{2} \cdot x^{-5/2} = K_2 \cdotx^{-7/2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot K_2 = \frac{{a}_{\rm \star}^2}{3 \pi}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- This results in the following for $60 \ \rm dB$ cable attenuation $({a}_{\rm \star} \approx 6.9 \ \rm Np)$:
- $$x_{\rm max} = { t_{\rm max}}/{ T}= { 6.9^2}/{(3\pi)}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 5 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(3) Substituting the result into the given equation, we get (for simplicity, we use "${a}$"instead of "${a}_{\rm \star}$"):
- $$h_{\rm K}(t_{\rm max}) = \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{ {a}}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot {{a}^6}/{(3\pi)^3}}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot
{\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{{a}^2}{2\pi} \cdot
\frac{3\pi}{{\rm a}^2}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]
= \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1}{{a}^2}\cdot
\sqrt{\frac{27 \pi
}{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2} \approx \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{{a}^2}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$*With $a = 6.9$ we obtain the final result::$${\rm Max}\,[h_{\rm K}(t)] = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$(4) Using the result from (3) , the appropriate equation of determination is::$$\frac{ {a}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 {1}/{T}
\hspace{0.15cm}{= 0.0015 \cdot {1}/{T}} \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} (t_{5\%}/T)^{3/2} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi \cdot
0.0015}\approx 1036 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow
\hspace{0.3cm}
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{t_{5\%}/T \approx 103.5} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- This value is a bit too large, because the second term ${\rm e}^{-0.05}\approx 0.95$ was neglected.
- The exact calculation gives $t_{\rm 5\%}/T \approx 97$.
(5) The second solution is correct:
- In general:
- $$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$
- Since the channel pulse response $h_{\rm K}(t)$ changes only insignificantly within a symbol duration, it can also be written:
- $$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T.$$