Exercise 2.12: Run–Length Coding and Run–Length Limited Coding

Table on Run-Length Coding

We consider a binary source with the symbol set $\rm A$ and $\rm B$, where $\rm B$ however, occurs only very rarely.

Without source coding, exactly one bit would be needed per source symbol, and accordingly, for a source symbol sequence of length $N$ would also apply to the coder symbol sequence $N_\text{bits} = N$.
Entropy coding makes little sense here without further measures (example: combining several symbols into a tuple) because of the unfavourable symbol probabilities.
The remedy is Run-Length Coding $(\rm RLC)$, which is described in the theory section under the link mentioned. For example, for the symbol sequence $\rm ABAABAAAABBAAB\text{...}$ the corresponding output of "Run–Length Coding": $ 2; \ 3; \ 5; \ 1; \ 3; \text{...}$
Of course, the lengths $L_1 = 2$, $L_2 = 3$, ... of the individual substrings, each separated by $\rm B$ , must be represented in binary before transmission. If one uses $D = 3$ (bit) for all $L_i$ one obtains the RLC binary symbol sequence

$$010\hspace{0.05cm}\text{'}\hspace{0.05cm}011\hspace{0.05cm}\text{'}\hspace{0.05cm}101\hspace{0.05cm}\text{'}\hspace{0.05cm}001\hspace{0.05cm}\text{'}\hspace{0.05cm}011\hspace{0.05cm}\text{'}\hspace{0.05cm}\text{...}$$

The graph shows the RLC result to be analysed. Columns 2 and 3 show the substring lengths $L_i$ in binary and decimal, respectively, and column 4 shows them in cumulative form (values from column 3 added up).

One problem of "Run-Length Coding" $\rm (RLC)$ is the unlimited range of values of the quantities $L_i$. With $D = 3$, no value $L_i > 7$ can be represented and with $D = 2$, the restriction is $1 \le L_i \le 3$.

The problem is circumvented with "Run–Length Limited Coding" $\rm (RLLC)$. If a value is $L_i \ge 2^D$, one replaces $L_i$ with a special character S and the difference $L_i - 2^D +1$. With the RLLC decoder, this special character S is expanded again.

Hints:

This exercise belongs to the chapter Further source coding methods.
In particular, reference is made to the page Run-Length Coding.

$\text{RLLC Example}$: We again assume the above sequence and the parameter $D = 2$ :

Source symbol sequence: $\rm ABAABAAAABBAAB$...
RLC decimal sequence: 2; 3; 5; 1; 3; ...
RLLC decimal sequence: 2; 3; S; 2; 1; 3; ...
RLLC binary sequence: 10′11′ 00′10′01′11′...

You can see:

The special character S is binary-coded here as 00 . This is only an example – it does not have to be like this.
Since with $D = 2$ for all real RLC values $1 \le L_i \le 3$ , the decoder recognizes the special character 00.
It replaces this again with $2^D -1$ (three in the example) $\rm A$–symbols.

Questions

$N_\text{Bit} \ = \ $

$h_{\rm B}\ = \ $

$\ \%$

$N_\text{Bit} \ = \ $

	Yes.
	No.

$N_\text{Bit} \ = \ $

Solution

(1) The binary sequence consists of $N = 1250$ binary symbols (can be read from the last column in the table). This means that the same number of bits is needed without coding:

$$N_\text{Bit}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 1250}.$$

(2) The entire symbol sequence of length $N = 1250$ contains $N_{\rm B} = 25$ symbols ${\rm B}$ and thus $N_{\rm A} = 1225$ symbols ${\rm A}$.

The number $N_{\rm B}$ der Symbole ${\rm B}$ ist dabei gleich der Zeilenzahl in der vorne angegebenen Tabelle.
Thus the following applies to the relative frequency of ${\rm B}$:

$$h_{\rm B} = \frac{N_{\rm B}}{N} = \frac{25}{1250} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.02} = 2\%\hspace{0.05cm}. $$

(3) We now consider Run–Length Coding $\rm (RLC)$, where each distance between two ${\rm B}$–symbols is represented by eight bits $(D = 8)$.

Thus, with $N_{\rm B} = 25$, we get::

$$N_{\rm Bit} = N_{\rm B} \cdot 8 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 200} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

(4) $\rm RLC$ with $D = 7$ only allows values between $1$ und $2^7-1 =127$ for $L_i$ .

However, the entry "226" in line 19 is greater ⇒ NO.

(5) Even with Run–Length Limited Coding $\rm (RLLC)$ , only values up to $127$&nbsp are permitted for the "real" distances $L_i$ with $D = 7$ ;.

The entry "226" in line 19 is replaced by the following for $\rm RLLC$

Line 19a: S = 0000000 ⇒ special character, stands for "+ 127",

Line 19b: 1100011 ⇒ decimal 99.

This gives a total of $26$ words of seven bits each:

$$N_{\rm Bit} = 26 \cdot 7 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 182} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

(6) Now the following changes have to be made in $\rm RLLC$ compared to $\rm RLC$ (see table):

Zeile 1: $122 = 1 · 63 + 59$ (one word more),

Zeile 6: $70 = 1 · 63 + 7$ (one word more),

Zeile 7: $80 = 1 · 63 + 17$ (one word more),

Zeile 12: $79 = 1 · 63 + 18$ (one word more),

Zeile 13: $93 = 1 · 63 + 30$ (one word more),

Zeile 19: $226 = 3 · 63 + 37$ (one word more),

Zeile 25: $97 = 1 · 63 + 34$ (one word more).

This gives a total of $34$ words of six bits each:

$$N_{\rm Bit} = 34 \cdot 6 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 204} \hspace{0.05cm},$$

i.e. a worse result than with seven bits according to subtask (5).