Exercise 3.9: Conditional Mutual Information
We assume statistically independent random variables $X$, $Y$ and $Z$ with the following properties:
- $$X \in \{1,\ 2 \} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.35cm} Y \in \{1,\ 2 \} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.35cm} Z \in \{1,\ 2 \} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.35cm} P_X(X) = P_Y(Y) = \big [ 1/2, \ 1/2 \big ]\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.35cm}P_Z(Z) = \big [ p, \ 1-p \big ].$$
From $X$, $Y$ and $Z$ we form the new random variable $W = (X+Y) \cdot Z$.
- It is obvious that there are statistical dependencies between $X$ and $W$ ⇒ mutual information $I(X; W) ≠ 0$.
- Furthermore, $I(Y; W) ≠ 0$ as well as $I(Z; W) ≠ 0$ will also apply, but this will not be discussed in detail in this exercise.
Three different definitions of mutual information are used in this exercise:
- the conventional mutual information zwischen $X$ and $W$:
- $$I(X;W) = H(X) - H(X|\hspace{0.05cm}W) \hspace{0.05cm},$$
- the conditional mutual information between $X$ and $W$ with a given fixed value $Z = z$:
- $$I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z = z) = H(X\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z = z) - H(X|\hspace{0.05cm}W ,\hspace{0.05cm} Z = z) \hspace{0.05cm},$$
- the conditional mutual information between $X$ and $W$ for a given random variable $Z$:
- $$I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z ) = H(X\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z ) - H(X|\hspace{0.05cm}W \hspace{0.05cm} Z ) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
The relationship between the last two definitions is:
- $$I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z ) = \sum_{z \hspace{0.1cm}\in \hspace{0.1cm}{\rm supp} (P_{Z})} \hspace{-0.2cm} P_Z(z) \cdot I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z = z)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Hints:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter Different entropies of two-dimensional random variables.
- In particular, reference is made to the page Conditional mutual information.
Questions
Solution
(1) The upper graph is valid for $Z = 1$ ⇒ $W = X + Y$.
- Under the conditions $P_X(X) = \big [1/2, \ 1/2 \big]$ as well as $P_Y(Y) = \big [1/2, \ 1/2 \big]$ the joint probabilities $P_{ XW|Z=1 }(X, W)$ thus result according to the right graph (grey background).
- Thus the following applies to the mutual information under the fixed condition $Z = 1$:
- $$I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z = 1) \hspace{-0.05cm} = \hspace{-1.1cm}\sum_{(x,w) \hspace{0.1cm}\in \hspace{0.1cm}{\rm supp} (P_{XW}\hspace{0.01cm}|\hspace{0.01cm} Z\hspace{-0.03cm} =\hspace{-0.03cm} 1)} \hspace{-1.1cm} P_{XW\hspace{0.01cm}|\hspace{0.01cm} Z\hspace{-0.03cm} =\hspace{-0.03cm} 1} (x,w) \cdot {\rm log}_2 \hspace{0.1cm} \frac{P_{XW\hspace{0.01cm}|\hspace{0.01cm} Z\hspace{-0.03cm} =\hspace{-0.03cm} 1} (x,w) }{P_X(x) \cdot P_{W\hspace{0.01cm}|\hspace{0.01cm} Z\hspace{-0.03cm} =\hspace{-0.03cm} 1} (w) }$$
- $$I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z = 1) = 2 \cdot \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\rm log}_2 \hspace{0.1cm} \frac{1/4}{1/2 \cdot 1/4} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\rm log}_2 \hspace{0.1cm} \frac{1/4}{1/2 \cdot 1/2} $$
- $$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z = 1) \hspace{0.15cm} \underline {=0.5\,{\rm (bit)}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- The first term summarises the two horizontally shaded fields in the graph, the second term the vertically shaded fields.
- The second term do not contribute because of $\log_2 (1) = 0$ .
(2) For $Z = 2$, $W = \{4,\ 6,\ 8\}$ is valid, but nothing changes with respect to the probability functions compared to subtask (1).
- Consequently, the same conditional mutual information is obtained:
- $$I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z = 2) = I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z = 1) \hspace{0.15cm} \underline {=0.5\,{\rm (bit)}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(3) The equation is for $Z = \{1,\ 2\}$ with ${\rm Pr}(Z = 1) =p$ and ${\rm Pr}(Z = 2) =1-p$:
- $$I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z) = p \cdot I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z = 1) + (1-p) \cdot I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z = 2)\hspace{0.15cm} \underline {=0.5\,{\rm (bit)}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- It is considered that according to subtasks (1) and (2) the conditional mutual information for given $Z = 1$ and given $Z = 2$ are equal.
- Thus $I(X; W|Z)$, i.e. under the condition of a stochastic random variable $Z = \{1,\ 2\}$ with $P_Z(Z) = \big [p, \ 1 – p\big ]$ is independent of $p$.
- In particular, the result is also valid for $\underline{p = 1/2}$ and $\underline{p = 3/4}$.
(4) The joint probability $P_{ XW }$ depends on the $Z$–probabilites $p$ and $1 – p$ .
- For $Pr(Z = 1) = Pr(Z = 2) = 1/2$ the scheme sketched on the right results.
- Again, only the two horizontally shaded fields contribute to the mutual information:
- $$ I(X;W) = 2 \cdot \frac{1}{8} \cdot {\rm log}_2 \hspace{0.1cm} \frac{1/8}{1/2 \cdot 1/8} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline {=0.25\,{\rm (bit)}} \hspace{0.35cm} < \hspace{0.35cm} I(X;W \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} Z) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
The result $I(X; W|Z) > I(X; W)$ is true for this example, but also for many other applications:
- If I know $Z$, I know more about the 2D random variable $XW$ than without this knowledge..
- However, one must not generalise this result:
- Sometimes $I(X; W) > I(X; W|Z)$, actually applies, as in Example 4 in the theory section.