Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Exercise 1.5: Reconstruction of the Jakes Spectrum

From LNTwww
Revision as of 13:54, 11 August 2020 by Guenter (talk | contribs)

Considered Jakes spectrum

In a mobile radio system, the  Doppler effect  is also noticeable in the power density spectrum of the Doppler frequency  fD .

This results in the so-called  Jakes spectrum, which is shown in the graph for the maximum Doppler frequency  fD, max=100 Hz. Φz(fD)  has only portions within the range  ±fD, max, where Φz(fD)=2σ2πfD,max1(fD/fD,max)2.

What is expressed in the frequency domain by the power spectral density (PSD) is described in the time domain by the autocorrelation function (ACF). The ACF is the   Φz(fD)  by the  checkLink:_Buch_1 ⇒ inverse Fourier transform of the PSD.

With the Bessel function of the first kind and zero order  (J0)  you get

φz(Δt)=2σ2J0(2πfD,maxΔt).

To take into account the Doppler effect and thus a relative movement between transmitter and receiver in a system simulation, two digital filters are inserted in the  Rayleigh channel model, each with the frequency response  HDF(fD).

The dimensioning of these filters is part of this task.

  • We restrict ourselves here to the branch for generating the real part  x(t). The ratios derived here are also valid for the imaginary part  y(t).
  • At the input of the left digital filter of the   Rayleigh channel model , there is white Gaussian noise  n(t)  with variance  σ2=0.5.
  • The real component is then obtained from the following convolution
x(t)=n(t)hDF(t).


Notes:



Questions

1

What is the value of the Jakes, spectrum of the real part at the Doppler frequency  fD=0?

Φx(fD=0) = 

\ \cdot 10^{\rm –3} \ 1/{\rm Hz}

2

Which dimensioning is correct, where  K  is an appropriately chosen constant?

It holds  H_{\rm DF}(f_{\rm D}) = K \cdot {\it \Phi}_x(f_{\rm D}).
It applies  |H_{\rm DF}(f_{\rm D})|^2 = K \cdot {\it \Phi}_x(f_{\rm D})

3

From which condition can the constant  K  be determined?

K  can be selected as desired.
The integral over  |H_{\rm DF}(f_{\rm D})|  must equal  1 .
The integral over  |H_{\rm DF}(f_{\rm D})|^2  must be  1 .

4

Is  H_{\rm DF}(f)  unambiguously defined by the two conditions according to (2) and (3)'?

Yes.
No.


Solutions

(1)  The Jakes spectrum of the real part is half the resulting spectrum {\it \Phi}_z(f):

{\it \Phi}_x(f_{\rm D} = 0) = {\it \Phi}_y(f_{\rm D} = 0) = \frac{{\it \Phi}_z(f_{\rm D} = 0)}{2}= \frac{\sigma^2}{\pi \cdot f_{\rm D, \hspace{0.05cm} max}} = \frac{0.5}{\pi \cdot 100\,\,{\rm Hz}} \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{ = 1.59 \cdot 10^{-3}\,\,{\rm Hz^{-1}}} \hspace{0.05cm}.


(2)  Solution 2 is correct:

  • The input signal n(t) has a white (constant) LDS {\it \Phi}_n(f_{\rm D}).
  • The PSD at the output is then

{\it \Phi}_x(f_{\rm D}) = {\it \Phi}_n(f_{\rm D}) \cdot | H_{\rm DF}(f_{\rm D}|^2 \hspace{0.05cm}.


(3)  Solution 3 is correct.

  • Only if this condition is fulfilled, the signal x(t) has the same variance \sigma^2 as the noise signal n(t).


(4)  No:

  • The two conditions after subtasks (2) and (3) only refer to the magnitude of the digital filter.
  • There is no constraint for the phase of the digital filter.
  • This phase can be chosen arbitrarily. Usually it is chosen in such a way that a minimum phase network results.
  • In this case, the impulse response h_{\rm DF}(t) then has the lowest possible duration.


The graph shows the result of the approximation. The red curves were determined simulatively over 100\hspace{0.05cm}000 samples. You can see:

Approximation of the Jakes spectrum and ACF


  • The Jakes power spectral density (left graph) can only be reproduced very inaccurately due to the vertical drop at ± f_{\rm D, \ max}.
  • For the time domain, this means that the ACF decreases much faster than theory suggests.
  • For small values of \delta t, however, the approximation is very good (right graph).