Exercise 4.9: Higher-Level Modulation

Some channel capacity curves

The graph shows AWGN channel capacity curves over the $10 \cdot \lg (E_{\rm S}/{N_0})$:

$C_\text{Gaussian}$: Shannon's boundary curve,
$C_\text{BPSK}$: valid for "Binary Phase Shift Keying".

The two other curves $C_\text{red}$ and $C_\text{brown}$ should be analyzed and assigned to possible modulation schemes in subtasks (3) and (4).

Hints:

The task belongs to the chapter AWGN channel capacity with discrete value input.
Reference is made in particular to the page Channel capacity $C$ as a function of $E_{\rm S}/{N_0}$.
Since the results are to be given in "bit" ⇒ "log" ⇒ "log₂" is used in the equations.
The modulation methods mentioned in the questions are described in terms of their signal space constellation
(see lower graph).

Proposed signal space constellations

Notes on nomenclature:

In the literature, "BPSK" is sometimes also referred to as "2–ASK":

$$x ∈ X = \{+1,\ -1\}.$$

In contrast, in our learning tutorial we understand as "ASK" the unipolar case:

$$x ∈ X = \{0,\ 1 \}.$$

Therefore, according to our nomenclature:

$$C_\text{ASK} < C_\text{BPSK}$$

But: This fact is irrelevant for the solution of the present problem.

Questions

Solution

(1) Proposition 2 is correct, as shown by the calculation for $10 \cdot \lg (E_{\rm S}/{N_0}) = 15 \ \rm dB$ ⇒ $E_{\rm S}/{N_0} = 31.62$ zeigt:

$$C_2(15\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm dB}) = {1}/{2} \cdot {\rm log}_2 \hspace{0.1cm} ( 1 + 2 \cdot 31.62 ) = {1}/{2} \cdot {\rm log}_2 \hspace{0.1cm} ( 64.25 ) \approx 3\,{\rm bit/Kanalzugriff}\hspace{0.05cm}. $$

The other two proposed solutions provide the following numerical values:

$$C_3(15\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm dB}) \ = \ {\rm log}_2 \hspace{0.1cm} ( 1 + 31.62 ) \approx 5.03\,{\rm bit/Kanalzugriff}\hspace{0.05cm},$$

$$ C_1(15\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm dB}) \ = \ C_3/2 \approx 2.51\,{\rm bit/Kanalzugriff}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The proposed solution 3 corresponds to the case of two independent Gaussian channels with half transmit power per channel.

(2) Proposed solutions 1, 2 and 4 are correct:

If one would replace $E_{\rm S}$ by $E_{\rm B}$ , then also the statement 3 would be correct.
For $E_{\rm B}/{N_0} < \ln (2)$ $C_{\rm Gauß} ≡ 0$ is valid and therefore also $C_{\rm BPSK} ≡ 0$ .

(3) Statements 2, 3 and 5 are correct::

The red curve $C_{\rm red}$ is always above $C_{\rm BPSK}$ , but below $C_{\rm brown}$ and the Shannon boundary curve $C_{\rm Gauß}$.
The statements also hold if for certain $E_{\rm S}/{N_0}$ values curves are indistinguishable within the character precision.
From the limit $C_{\rm red}= 2 \ \rm bit/channel use$ for $E_{\rm S}/{N_0} → ∞$ , the symbol range $M_X = |X| = 4$.
Thus, the red curve describes the 4–ASK. $M_X = |X| = 2$ would apply to the BPSK.
The 4–QAM leads exactly to the same final value "2 bit/channel use". For small $E_{\rm S}/{N_0}$ values, however, the channel capacity $C_{\rm 4–QAM}$ is above the red curve, since $C_{\rm red}$ is bounded by the Gaussian boundary curve $C_2$ , but $C_{\rm 4–QAM}$ is bounded by $C_3$.

The designations $C_2$ and $C_3$ here refer to subtask (1).

Channel capacity limits for
BPSK, 4–ASK and 8–ASK

(4) Proposed solutions 1, 2 and 5 are correct:

From the brown curve, one can see the correctness of the first two statements.
The 8–PSK with I– and Q–components – i.e. with $K = 2$ dimensions – lies slightly above the brown curve for small $E_{\rm S}/{N_0}$ values ⇒ the answer 3 is incorrect.

In the graph, the two 8–ASK–systems are also drawn as dots according to propositions 4 and 5.

The purple dot is above the $C_{\rm 8–ASK}$ curve ⇒ $R = 2.5$ and $10 \cdot \lg (E_{\rm S}/{N_0}) = 10 \ \rm dB$ are not enough to decode the 8–ASK without errors ⇒ $R > C$ ⇒ the channel coding theorem is not satisfied ⇒ answer 4 is wrong.
However, if we reduce the code rate to $R = 2 < C_{\rm 8–ASK}$ according to the yellow dot for the same $10 \cdot \lg (E_{\rm S}/{N_0}) = 10 \ \rm dB$, the channel coding theorem is satisfied ⇒ Answer 5 is correct.

	$C_{\rm BPSK}$ cannot be given in closed form.
	$C_{\rm BPSK}$ is greater than zero if $E_{\rm S}/{N_0} > 0$ is assumed.
	For $E_{\rm S}/{N_0} < \ln (2)$ ⇒ $C_{\rm BPSK} ≡ 0$.
	In the whole range $C_{\rm BPSK} < C_{\rm Gaussian} $ is valid.

	For the associated random variable $X$ holds $M_X = \|X\| = 2$.
	For the associated random variable $X$ holds $M_X = \|X\| = 4$.
	$C_{\rm red}$ is simultaneously the channel capacity of the "4–ASK".
	$C_{\rm red}$ is simultaneously the channel capacity of the "4–QAM".
	For all $E_{\rm S}/{N_0} > 0$ $C_{\rm red}$ is between "green" and "brown".

	For the associated random variable $X$ ⇒ $M_X = \|X\| = 8$.
	$C_{\rm brown}$ is simultaneously the channel capacity of the "8–ASK".
	$C_{\rm brown}$ is simultaneously the channel capacity of the "8–PSK".
	$p_{\rm B} ≡ 0$ is possible with "8–ASK", $R = 2.5$ and $10 \cdot \lg (E_{\rm S}/{N_0}) = 10 \ \rm dB$.
	$p_{\rm B} ≡ 0$ is possible with "8–ASK", $R = 2.0$ and $10 \cdot \lg (E_{\rm S}/{N_0}) = 10 \ \rm dB$ .

	$C_{\rm Gaussian} = C_1= {1}/{2} \cdot {\rm log}_2 \hspace{0.1cm} ( 1 + E_{\rm S}/{N_0})$ ,
	$C_{\rm Gaussian} = C_2= {1}/{2} \cdot {\rm log}_2 \hspace{0.1cm} ( 1 + 2 \cdot E_{\rm S}/{N_0})$ ,
	$C_{\rm Gaussian} = C_3= {\rm log}_2 \hspace{0.1cm} ( 1 + E_{\rm S}/{N_0})$ .