Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 1.16Z: Bounds for the Gaussian Error Function"

From LNTwww
Line 50: Line 50:
 
<quiz display=simple>
 
<quiz display=simple>
  
{Welche Werte liefern die obere und die untere Schranke für&nbsp; $x = 4$?
+
{What values do the upper and lower bounds for&nbsp; $x = 4$ provide?
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
${\rm Q_{o}}(x = 4) \ = \ $ { 3.346 3% }$\ \cdot 10^{-5} $
 
${\rm Q_{o}}(x = 4) \ = \ $ { 3.346 3% }$\ \cdot 10^{-5} $
 
${\rm Q_{u}}(x = 4) \ = \ $ { 3.137 3% }$\ \cdot 10^{-5} $
 
${\rm Q_{u}}(x = 4) \ = \ $ { 3.137 3% }$\ \cdot 10^{-5} $
  
{Welche Aussagen gelten für die Funktionen&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)$&nbsp; und&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{u}}(x)$?
+
{What statements hold for the functions&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)$&nbsp; and&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{u}}(x)$?
 
|type="[]"}
 
|type="[]"}
+ Für&nbsp; $x ≥ 2$&nbsp; sind die beiden Schranken brauchbar.
+
+ For&nbsp; $x ≥ 2$&nbsp; the two bounds are usable.
+ Für&nbsp; $x < 1$&nbsp; ist&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{u}}(x)$&nbsp; unbrauchbar&nbsp; $($wegen&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{u}}(x)< 0)$.
+
+ For&nbsp; $x < 1$&nbsp; is&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{u}}(x)$&nbsp; unusable&nbsp; $($because&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{u}}(x)< 0)$.
- Für&nbsp; $x < 1$&nbsp; ist&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)$&nbsp; unbrauchbar&nbsp; $($wegen&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)> 1)$.
+
- For&nbsp; $x < 1$&nbsp; is&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)$&nbsp; unusable&nbsp; $($because&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)> 1)$.
  
  
{Um welchen Faktor liegt die Chernoff–Rubin–Schranke oberhalb von&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)$?
+
{By what factor is the Chernoff-Rubin bound above&nbsp; ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)$?
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x = 2)/{\rm Q_{o}}(x = 2 )  \ = \ $ { 5 3% }
 
${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x = 2)/{\rm Q_{o}}(x = 2 )  \ = \ $ { 5 3% }
Line 68: Line 68:
 
${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x = 6)/{\rm Q_{o}}(x = 6 )  \ = \  $ { 15 3% }
 
${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x = 6)/{\rm Q_{o}}(x = 6 )  \ = \  $ { 15 3% }
  
{Bestimmen Sie&nbsp; $K$&nbsp; so, dass&nbsp; $K \cdot {\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$&nbsp; möglichst nahe bei&nbsp; ${\rm Q}(x)$&nbsp; liegt und gleichzeitig&nbsp; ${\rm Q}(x) ≤ K · {\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$&nbsp; für alle &nbsp;$x > 0$&nbsp; eingehalten wird.
+
{Determine&nbsp; $K$&nbsp; such that&nbsp; $K \cdot {\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$&nbsp; as close as possible to&nbsp; ${\rm Q}(x)$&nbsp; and at the same time&nbsp; ${\rm Q}(x) ≤ K · {\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$&nbsp; is observed for all &nbsp;$x > 0$&nbsp;.
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
$K \ = \ $ { 0.5 3% }
 
$K \ = \ $ { 0.5 3% }
 
</quiz>
 
</quiz>
  
===Musterlösung===
+
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Die obere Schranke lautet:
+
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The upper bound is:
  
 
:$${\rm Q_o}(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}\cdot x}\cdot {\rm e}^{-x^{\rm 2}/\rm 2} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm Q_o}(4 )=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}\cdot 4}\cdot {\rm e}^{-8 }\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 3.346 \cdot 10^{-5}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$${\rm Q_o}(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}\cdot x}\cdot {\rm e}^{-x^{\rm 2}/\rm 2} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm Q_o}(4 )=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}\cdot 4}\cdot {\rm e}^{-8 }\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 3.346 \cdot 10^{-5}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
   
 
   
*Die untere Schranke kann wie folgt umgewandelt werden:
+
The lower bound can be converted as follows:
 
   
 
   
 
:$${\rm Q_u}( x)=(1-1/x^2) \cdot {\rm Q_o}(x) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm Q_u}(4 ) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 3.137 \cdot 10^{-5}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$${\rm Q_u}( x)=(1-1/x^2) \cdot {\rm Q_o}(x) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm Q_u}(4 ) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 3.137 \cdot 10^{-5}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
*Die relativen Abweichungen gegenüber dem „echten” Wert ${\rm Q}(4) = 3.167 · 10^{–5}$ sind $+5\%$ bzw. $–1\%$.
+
*The relative deviations from the "real" value ${\rm Q}(4) = 3.167 · 10^{–5}$ sind $+5\%$ bzw. $–1\%$.
  
  
  
'''(2)'''&nbsp; Richtig sind die <u>Lösungsvorschläge  1 und 2</u>:  
+
'''(2)'''&nbsp; Correct are the <u>solutions 1 and 2</u>:  
*Für $x = 2$ wird der tatsächliche Funktionswert ${\rm Q}(x) = 2.275 · 10^{–2}$ begrenzt durch ${\rm Q_{o}}(x) = 2.7 · 10^{–2}$ bzw. ${\rm Q_u}(x) = 2.025 · 10^{–2}$.  
+
*For $x = 2$, the actual function value ${\rm Q}(x) = 2.275 - 10^{-2}$ is bounded by ${\rm Q_{o}}(x) = 2.7 - 10^{-2}$ and ${\rm Q_u}(x) = 2.025 - 10^{-2}$, respectively.  
*Die relativen Abweichungen betragen demzufolge  $18.7\%$ bzw. $–11\%.$
+
*The relative deviations are therefore $18.7\%$ and $-11\%,$ respectively.
*Die letzte Aussage ist falsch: &nbsp; Erst für $x < 0.37$ gilt ${\rm Q_o}(x) > 1.$
+
*The last statement is wrong: &nbsp; Only for $x < 0.37$ ${\rm Q_o}(x) > 1$ is valid.
  
  
  
  
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Für den Quotienten aus ${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ und ${\rm Q_o}(x)$ gilt nach den vorgegebenen Gleichungen:
+
'''(3)'''&nbsp; For the quotient of ${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ and ${\rm Q_o}(x)$, according to the given equations:
  
 
:$$q(x) = \frac{{\rm Q_{CR}}(x)}{{\rm Q_{o}}(x)} = \frac{{\rm exp}(-x^2/2)}{{\rm exp}(-x^2/2)/({\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot x})} = {\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot x}$$
 
:$$q(x) = \frac{{\rm Q_{CR}}(x)}{{\rm Q_{o}}(x)} = \frac{{\rm exp}(-x^2/2)}{{\rm exp}(-x^2/2)/({\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot x})} = {\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot x}$$
Line 101: Line 101:
 
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} q(x) \approx 2.5 \cdot x \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} q(x =2) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=5}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}q(x =4)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=10}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}q(x =6) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=15}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} q(x) \approx 2.5 \cdot x \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} q(x =2) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=5}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}q(x =4)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=10}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}q(x =6) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=15}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
*Je größer der Abszissenwert $x$ ist, um so ungenauer wird ${\rm Q}(x)$ durch ${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ angenähert.  
+
*The larger the abscissa value $x$ is, the more inaccurately ${\rm Q}(x)$ is approximated by ${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$.  
*Bei Betrachtung der Grafik auf der Angabenseite hat man (hatte ich) den Eindruck, dass ${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ sich aus ${\rm Q}(x)$ durch Verschieben nach unten bzw. Verschieben nach oben ergibt. Das ist aber nur eine optische Täuschung und entspricht nicht dem Sachverhalt.
+
*When looking at the graph on the information page, one has (I had) the impression that ${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ results from ${\rm Q}(x)$ by shifting down or shifting up. But this is only an optical illusion and does not correspond to the facts.
  
  
  
  
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Mit $\underline{K = 0.5}$ stimmt die neue Schranke $0.5 · {\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ für $x = 0$ exakt mit ${\rm Q}(x=0) = 0.500$ überein.  
+
'''(4)'''&nbsp; With $\underline{K = 0.5}$ the new bound $0.5 - {\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ for $x = 0$ agrees exactly with ${\rm Q}(x=0) = 0.500$.  
*Für größere Abszissenwerte wird damit auch die Verfälschung $q \approx 1.25 · x$ nur halb so groß.
+
*For larger abscissa values, the corruption $q \approx 1.25 - x$ thus also becomes only half as large.
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
  

Revision as of 20:23, 30 July 2022

${\rm Q}(x)$  and related functions

The probability that a zero mean Gaussian random variable  $n$  with standard deviation  $\sigma$   ⇒   variance  $\sigma^2$  is greater in amount than a given value  $A$ is equal to

$${\rm Pr}(n > A) = {\rm Pr}(n < -A) ={\rm Q}(A/\sigma) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Here is used one of the most important functions for communications engineering (drawn in red in the diagram):  
the  "complementary Gaussian error function"

$${\rm Q} (x) = \frac{\rm 1}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}}\int_{\it x}^{+\infty}\rm e^{\it -u^{\rm 2}/\rm 2}\,d \it u \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

${\rm Q}(x)$ is a monotonically decreasing function with ${\rm Q}(0) = 0.5$. For very large values of $x$, ${\rm Q}(x) tends \to 0$.


The integral of the ${\rm Q}$ function is not analytically solvable and is usually given in tabular form. From the literature, however, manageable approximations or bounds for positive $x$ values are known:

  • the upper bound $($upper blue curve in adjacent graph, only valid for  $x > 0)$:
$$ {\rm Q_o}(x)=\frac{\rm 1}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}\cdot x}\cdot {\rm e}^{-x^{\rm 2}/\rm 2}\hspace{0.15cm} \ge \hspace{0.15cm} {\rm Q} (x) \hspace{0.05cm},$$
  • the lower bound $($lower blue curve in the graph, only valid for  $x > 1)$:
$$ {\rm Q_u}(x)=\frac{\rm 1-{\rm 1}/{\it x^{\rm 2}}}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}\cdot x}\cdot \rm e^{-x^{\rm 2}/\rm 2} \hspace{0.15cm} \le \hspace{0.15cm} {\rm Q} (x) \hspace{0.05cm},$$
  • the Chernoff-Rubin bound $($green curve in the graph, drawn for  $K = 1)$:
$${\rm Q_{CR}}(x)=K \cdot {\rm e}^{-x^{\rm 2}/\rm 2} \hspace{0.15cm} \ge \hspace{0.15cm} {\rm Q} (x) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

In the exercise it is to be investigated to what extent these bounds can be used as approximations for  ${\rm Q}(x)$  and what corruptions result.




Hints:



Questions

1

What values do the upper and lower bounds for  $x = 4$ provide?

${\rm Q_{o}}(x = 4) \ = \ $

$\ \cdot 10^{-5} $
${\rm Q_{u}}(x = 4) \ = \ $

$\ \cdot 10^{-5} $

2

What statements hold for the functions  ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)$  and  ${\rm Q_{u}}(x)$?

For  $x ≥ 2$  the two bounds are usable.
For  $x < 1$  is  ${\rm Q_{u}}(x)$  unusable  $($because  ${\rm Q_{u}}(x)< 0)$.
For  $x < 1$  is  ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)$  unusable  $($because  ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)> 1)$.

3

By what factor is the Chernoff-Rubin bound above  ${\rm Q_{o}}(x)$?

${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x = 2)/{\rm Q_{o}}(x = 2 ) \ = \ $

${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x = 4)/{\rm Q_{o}}(x = 4 ) \ = \ $

${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x = 6)/{\rm Q_{o}}(x = 6 ) \ = \ $

4

Determine  $K$  such that  $K \cdot {\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$  as close as possible to  ${\rm Q}(x)$  and at the same time  ${\rm Q}(x) ≤ K · {\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$  is observed for all  $x > 0$ .

$K \ = \ $


Solution

(1)  The upper bound is:

$${\rm Q_o}(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}\cdot x}\cdot {\rm e}^{-x^{\rm 2}/\rm 2} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm Q_o}(4 )=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\rm 2\pi}\cdot 4}\cdot {\rm e}^{-8 }\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 3.346 \cdot 10^{-5}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The lower bound can be converted as follows:

$${\rm Q_u}( x)=(1-1/x^2) \cdot {\rm Q_o}(x) \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm Q_u}(4 ) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 3.137 \cdot 10^{-5}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The relative deviations from the "real" value ${\rm Q}(4) = 3.167 · 10^{–5}$ sind $+5\%$ bzw. $–1\%$.


(2)  Correct are the solutions 1 and 2:

  • For $x = 2$, the actual function value ${\rm Q}(x) = 2.275 - 10^{-2}$ is bounded by ${\rm Q_{o}}(x) = 2.7 - 10^{-2}$ and ${\rm Q_u}(x) = 2.025 - 10^{-2}$, respectively.
  • The relative deviations are therefore $18.7\%$ and $-11\%,$ respectively.
  • The last statement is wrong:   Only for $x < 0.37$ ${\rm Q_o}(x) > 1$ is valid.



(3)  For the quotient of ${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ and ${\rm Q_o}(x)$, according to the given equations:

$$q(x) = \frac{{\rm Q_{CR}}(x)}{{\rm Q_{o}}(x)} = \frac{{\rm exp}(-x^2/2)}{{\rm exp}(-x^2/2)/({\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot x})} = {\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot x}$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} q(x) \approx 2.5 \cdot x \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} q(x =2) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=5}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}q(x =4)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=10}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}q(x =6) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=15}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The larger the abscissa value $x$ is, the more inaccurately ${\rm Q}(x)$ is approximated by ${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$.
  • When looking at the graph on the information page, one has (I had) the impression that ${\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ results from ${\rm Q}(x)$ by shifting down or shifting up. But this is only an optical illusion and does not correspond to the facts.



(4)  With $\underline{K = 0.5}$ the new bound $0.5 - {\rm Q}_{\rm CR}(x)$ for $x = 0$ agrees exactly with ${\rm Q}(x=0) = 0.500$.

  • For larger abscissa values, the corruption $q \approx 1.25 - x$ thus also becomes only half as large.