Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 2.2: Modulation Depth"

From LNTwww
m
Line 89: Line 89:
  
 
'''(2)'''&nbsp; <u>Answers 1 and 3</u> are correct:
 
'''(2)'''&nbsp; <u>Answers 1 and 3</u> are correct:
*In diesem Fall ist&nbsp; $A_{\rm T} = 0$, das heißt, es liegt tatsächlich eine&nbsp; „ZSB–AM ohne Träger”&nbsp; vor.
+
*In this case,&nbsp; $A_{\rm T} = 0$, which means it is indeed "DSB-AM without a carrier".
*Der Modulationsgrad&nbsp; $m = A_{\rm N}/A_{\rm T}$&nbsp; ist unendlich groß.  
+
*The modulation depth&nbsp; $m = A_{\rm N}/A_{\rm T}$&nbsp; is infinitely large.  
  
  
  
  
[[File:P_ID990__Mod_A_2_2_c.png|right|frame|Spektrum: Analytisches Signal]]
+
[[File:P_ID990__Mod_A_2_2_c.png|right|frame|Spectrum: analytical signal]]
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Das Spektrum&nbsp; $S_+(f)$&nbsp; setzt sich für jeden Modulationsgrad&nbsp; $m$&nbsp; aus drei Diraclinien  zusammen mit folgenden Gewichten:  
+
'''(3)'''&nbsp; The spectrum&nbsp; $S_+(f)$&nbsp; is composed of three Dirac lines for each modulation depth &nbsp; $m$&nbsp; with the following weights:  
*$A_{\rm T}$&nbsp; $($bei&nbsp; $f = f_{\rm T})$,
+
*$A_{\rm T}$&nbsp; $($at&nbsp; $f = f_{\rm T})$,
* $m/2 · A_{\rm T}$&nbsp; $($bei&nbsp; $f = f_{\rm T} ± f_{\rm N})$.  
+
* $m/2 · A_{\rm T}$&nbsp; $($at&nbsp; $f = f_{\rm T} ± f_{\rm N})$.  
  
  
Für $m = 1$ ergeben sich die Gewichte entsprechend der Skizze:  
+
For $m = 1$, the weights are obtained according to the graph:  
 
*$S_+(f_{\rm T}) = 1\ \rm V$,  
 
*$S_+(f_{\rm T}) = 1\ \rm V$,  
 
*$S_+(f_{\rm T} ± f_{\rm T}) = 0.5\ \rm V$.  
 
*$S_+(f_{\rm T} ± f_{\rm T}) = 0.5\ \rm V$.  
Line 108: Line 108:
  
  
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Die auf den Widerstand&nbsp; $1 \ Ω$&nbsp; bezogene Leistung&nbsp; (Quadrat des Effektivwertes)&nbsp; einer harmonischen Schwingung mit der Amplitude&nbsp; $A_{\rm T} = 1 \ \rm V$&nbsp; beträgt:
+
'''(4)'''&nbsp; The power (root mean square) of a harmonic oscillation with amplitude &nbsp; $A_{\rm T} = 1 \ \rm V$&nbsp; referenced to the &nbsp; $1 \ Ω$&nbsp; resistor is:
 
:$$P_{\rm T} ={A_{\rm T}^2}/{2} = 0.5\,{\rm V}^2 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$P_{\rm T} ={A_{\rm T}^2}/{2} = 0.5\,{\rm V}^2 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*In gleicher Weise erhält man für die Leistungen des unteren und des oberen Seitenbandes:
+
*In the same way, for the powers of the lower and the upper sideband we obtain:
 
:$$P_{\rm USB} = P_{\rm OSB} =({A_{\rm N}}/{2})^2/2 = 0.125\,{\rm V}^2 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$P_{\rm USB} = P_{\rm OSB} =({A_{\rm N}}/{2})^2/2 = 0.125\,{\rm V}^2 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*Das gesuchte Verhältnis ist somit für&nbsp; $m=1$:
+
*Thus, for&nbsp; $m=1$, the ratio we are looking for is:
 
:$${P_{\rm T}}/{P_{\rm S}}= \frac{P_{\rm T}}{P_{\rm USB} + P_{\rm T}+ P_{\rm OSB}}= \frac{0.5\,{\rm V}^2}{0.125\,{\rm V}^2 + 0.5\,{\rm V}^2+ 0.125\,{\rm V}^2}= 2/3\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.667}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$${P_{\rm T}}/{P_{\rm S}}= \frac{P_{\rm T}}{P_{\rm USB} + P_{\rm T}+ P_{\rm OSB}}= \frac{0.5\,{\rm V}^2}{0.125\,{\rm V}^2 + 0.5\,{\rm V}^2+ 0.125\,{\rm V}^2}= 2/3\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.667}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
  
  
'''(5)'''&nbsp; Mit den Diracgewichten&nbsp; $m/2 · A_{\rm T}$&nbsp; der beiden Seitenbänder entsprechend der Teilaufgabe&nbsp; '''(3)'''&nbsp; erhält man:
+
'''(5)'''&nbsp; Using the Dirac weights&nbsp; $m/2 · A_{\rm T}$&nbsp; of the two sidebands corresponding to subtask&nbsp; '''(3)'''&nbsp;, we get:
 
:$${P_{\rm T}}/{P_{\rm S}}= \frac{A_{\rm T}^2/2}{A_{\rm T}^2/2 + 2 \cdot (m/2)^2 \cdot A_{\rm T}^2/2}= \frac{2}{2 + m^2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$${P_{\rm T}}/{P_{\rm S}}= \frac{A_{\rm T}^2/2}{A_{\rm T}^2/2 + 2 \cdot (m/2)^2 \cdot A_{\rm T}^2/2}= \frac{2}{2 + m^2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*Dies führt zu den Zahlenwerten&nbsp; $8/9 = 0.889$&nbsp; $($für&nbsp; $m = 0.5)$, &nbsp; &nbsp; $2/11 = 0.182$&nbsp; $($für&nbsp; $m = 3)$&nbsp; und  &nbsp; &nbsp; $0$&nbsp;  $($für&nbsp; $m \to ∞$).
+
*This leads to the numerical values &nbsp; $8/9 = 0.889$&nbsp; $($for&nbsp; $m = 0.5)$, &nbsp; &nbsp; $2/11 = 0.182$&nbsp; $($for&nbsp; $m = 3)$&nbsp; und  &nbsp; &nbsp; $0$&nbsp;  $($for&nbsp; $m \to ∞$).
  
  
  
'''(6)'''&nbsp; <u>Beide Aussagen</u> treffen zu:
+
'''(6)'''&nbsp; <u>Both statements</u> are true:
*Die Zusetzung des Trägers macht nur Sinn, um den einfacheren Hüllkurvendemodulator verwenden zu können.&nbsp; Dies geht nur für&nbsp; $m \le 1$.  
+
*The addition of the carrier only makes sense in order to use the simpler envelope demodulator. This is only possible for&nbsp; $m \le 1$.  
*Ist dagegen der Modulationsgrad&nbsp; $m > 1$&nbsp; und somit der Einsatz eines Synchrondemodulators erforderlich, sollte man aus energetischen Gründen auf den Träger (fast) ganz verzichten.  
+
*However, should the modulation depth be&nbsp; $m > 1$&nbsp; and the use of a synchronous demodulator therefore be required, the carrier should be (almost) completely omitted for energy reasons.  
*Ebenso ist bei Anwendung eines Hüllkurvendemodulators aus energetischen Gründen ein möglichst großer Modulationsgrad&nbsp; $m < 1$&nbsp;  &nbsp; &rArr;  &nbsp; $m \to 1$&nbsp; anzustreben.  
+
*Similarly due to energy concerns, if an envelope demodulator is used, the largest possible modulation depth&nbsp; $m < 1$&nbsp;  &nbsp; &rArr;  &nbsp; $m \to 1$&nbsp; should be aimed for.  
*Allerdings kann durch einen kleinen Restträger die Trägerrückgewinnung erleichtert werden, die beim Synchrondemodulator zur Frequenz&ndash; und Phasensynchronisation benötigt wird.&nbsp; Die zweite Aussage ist somit nur bedingt als richtig zu bewerten.
+
*However, a small residual carrier can facilitate carrier recovery, which is needed in a synchronous demodulator for frequency and phase synchronization. Thus, the second statement is only conditionally correct.
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
  

Revision as of 14:07, 24 November 2021

Modulationsgrad-Definition bei ZSB–AM

The graph shows DSB amplitude-modulated signals  $s_1(t)$  to  $s_4(t)$  with differing modulation depth  $m$. Let message signal  $q(t)$  and carrier signal  $z(t)$  each be cosine:

$$q(t) = A_{\rm N} \cdot \cos (2 \pi f_{\rm N} t),\hspace{0.2cm} f_{\rm N} = 4\,{\rm kHz}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$ z(t) = \hspace{0.2cm}1 \hspace{0.15cm} \cdot \cos (2 \pi f_{\rm T} t),\hspace{0.2cm} f_{\rm T} = 50\,{\rm kHz}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The modulated signal (transmitted signal) with the DC component added in the modulator is  $A_{\rm T}$:

$$s(t ) = A(t) \cdot z(t), \hspace{0.2cm} A(t) = q(t) + A_{\rm T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

In the graphs, the chosen normalization was:

$$A_{\rm T}+ A_{\rm N} = 2\,{\rm V}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • If the modulation depth is  $m ≤ 1$, then  $A(t)= q(t) + A_{\rm T}$  is equal to the envelope  $a(t)$.
  • In contrast, for a modulation depth  $m > 1$:
$$a(t ) = |A(t)|\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The cosine curve  $A(t)$  varies between  $A_{\rm max}$  and  $A_{\rm min}$; because of normalization,  $A_{\rm max} = 2 \ \rm V$ is always the case.
  • The minimum values of  $A(t)$  occur at half the period of the source signal $($i.e., for  $t = 125 \ \rm µ s)$ :
$$A_{\rm min} = q(T_0/2)+ A_{\rm T} = A_{\rm T}-A_{\rm N}.$$
  • The numerical values are given in the graph.






Hints:


Questions

1

Determine the modulation depth for each of the signals  $s_1(t)$,  $s_2(t)$,  $s_3(t)$ .

$m_1 \ = \ $

$m_2 \ = \ $

$m_3 \ = \ $

2

Which statements are true for the signal  $s_4(t)$ ?

This is a case of "DSB–AM without a carrier".
The modulation depth is  $m = 0$.
The modulation depth  $m$  is infinite.

3

Let  $A_{\rm T} = A_{\rm N} = 1\ \rm V$, so  $m = 1$.  What is the spectrum  $S_+(f)$  of the analytical signal?
Which Dirac weights occur at  $f_{\rm T}$  as well as at  $f_{\rm T}± f_{\rm N}$ ?

$S_+(f_{\rm T}) \ = \ $

$\ \text{V}$
$S_+(f_{\rm T} ± f_{\rm N}) \ = \ $

$\ \text{V}$

4

Now let  $m = 1$.  Which fraction  $P_{\rm T}/P_{\rm S}$  of the total transmission power  $P_{\rm S}$  is due to the carrier alone, and thus cannot be used for demodulation??

$P_{\rm T}/P_{\rm S} \ = \ $

5

Generalize the result from   (4)  for an arbitrary modulation depth $m$.
What are the power ratios for  $m = 0.5$,  $m = 3$  and  $m → ∞$ ?

$m = 0.5\text{:}\hspace{0.3cm} P_{\rm T}/P_{\rm S} \ = \ $

$m = 3.0\text{:}\hspace{0.3cm} P_{\rm T}/P_{\rm S} \ = \ $

$m → ∞ \text{:}\hspace{0.3cm} P_{\rm T}/P_{\rm S} \ = \ $

6

Based on the calculations so far, which of the following assessments seem reasonable to you?

$m ≈ 1$  s more favorable than a small  $m$ for energy reasons.
The carrier is only useful for envelope demodulation.


Solution

(1)  From the two equations

$$ A_{\rm max} = A_{\rm T}+A_{\rm N}=2\,\,{\rm V},\hspace{0.3cm} A_{\rm min} = A_{\rm T}-A_{\rm N}\hspace{0.05cm}$$

directly follows:

$$A_{\rm N} = (A_{\rm max} - A_{\rm min})/2,\hspace{0.3cm} A_{\rm T} = (A_{\rm max} + A_{\rm min})/2\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • Thus, the modulation depth is
$$m = \frac{A_{\rm max} - A_{\rm min}}{A_{\rm max} + A_{\rm min}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • With the given numerical values, one obtains:

$$ m_1 = \frac{2\,{\rm V} - 0.667\,{\rm V}}{2\,{\rm V} + 0.667\,{\rm V}} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.5}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.5cm} m_2 = \frac{2\,{\rm V} - 0\,{\rm V}}{2\,{\rm V} + 0\,{\rm V}} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 1.0}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.5cm} m_3 = \frac{2\,{\rm V} -(-1\,{\rm V})}{2\,{\rm V} + (-1\,{\rm V})} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=3.0}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  Answers 1 and 3 are correct:

  • In this case,  $A_{\rm T} = 0$, which means it is indeed "DSB-AM without a carrier".
  • The modulation depth  $m = A_{\rm N}/A_{\rm T}$  is infinitely large.



Spectrum: analytical signal

(3)  The spectrum  $S_+(f)$  is composed of three Dirac lines for each modulation depth   $m$  with the following weights:

  • $A_{\rm T}$  $($at  $f = f_{\rm T})$,
  • $m/2 · A_{\rm T}$  $($at  $f = f_{\rm T} ± f_{\rm N})$.


For $m = 1$, the weights are obtained according to the graph:

  • $S_+(f_{\rm T}) = 1\ \rm V$,
  • $S_+(f_{\rm T} ± f_{\rm T}) = 0.5\ \rm V$.



(4)  The power (root mean square) of a harmonic oscillation with amplitude   $A_{\rm T} = 1 \ \rm V$  referenced to the   $1 \ Ω$  resistor is:

$$P_{\rm T} ={A_{\rm T}^2}/{2} = 0.5\,{\rm V}^2 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • In the same way, for the powers of the lower and the upper sideband we obtain:
$$P_{\rm USB} = P_{\rm OSB} =({A_{\rm N}}/{2})^2/2 = 0.125\,{\rm V}^2 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • Thus, for  $m=1$, the ratio we are looking for is:
$${P_{\rm T}}/{P_{\rm S}}= \frac{P_{\rm T}}{P_{\rm USB} + P_{\rm T}+ P_{\rm OSB}}= \frac{0.5\,{\rm V}^2}{0.125\,{\rm V}^2 + 0.5\,{\rm V}^2+ 0.125\,{\rm V}^2}= 2/3\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0.667}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(5)  Using the Dirac weights  $m/2 · A_{\rm T}$  of the two sidebands corresponding to subtask  (3) , we get:

$${P_{\rm T}}/{P_{\rm S}}= \frac{A_{\rm T}^2/2}{A_{\rm T}^2/2 + 2 \cdot (m/2)^2 \cdot A_{\rm T}^2/2}= \frac{2}{2 + m^2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This leads to the numerical values   $8/9 = 0.889$  $($for  $m = 0.5)$,     $2/11 = 0.182$  $($for  $m = 3)$  und     $0$  $($for  $m \to ∞$).


(6)  Both statements are true:

  • The addition of the carrier only makes sense in order to use the simpler envelope demodulator. This is only possible for  $m \le 1$.
  • However, should the modulation depth be  $m > 1$  and the use of a synchronous demodulator therefore be required, the carrier should be (almost) completely omitted for energy reasons.
  • Similarly due to energy concerns, if an envelope demodulator is used, the largest possible modulation depth  $m < 1$    ⇒   $m \to 1$  should be aimed for.
  • However, a small residual carrier can facilitate carrier recovery, which is needed in a synchronous demodulator for frequency and phase synchronization. Thus, the second statement is only conditionally correct.