Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 3.11: Viterbi Path Finding"

From LNTwww
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
[[File:P_ID2694__KC_A_3_11.png|right|frame|Evaluated trellis diagram]]
 
[[File:P_ID2694__KC_A_3_11.png|right|frame|Evaluated trellis diagram]]
One result of  [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.10:_Metric_Calculation| "Exercise 3.10"]]  was adjacent trellis evaluation in terms of metrics  ${\it \Lambda}_i(S_{\mu})$. At all decoding steps  $i$  the (in general)  $2^m = 4$  metrics were determined, selecting for each node the larger of two comparison values. The branch with the lower value was discarded. One can recognize discarded branches in the graph by dotted lines.
+
One result of  [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.10:_Metric_Calculation| $\text{Exercise 3.10}$]]  was adjacent trellis evaluation in terms of metrics  ${\it \Lambda}_i(S_{\mu})$. 
 +
*At all decoding steps  $i$  the  $($in general$)$  $2^m = 4$  metrics were determined,  selecting for each node the larger of two comparison values. 
  
Otherwise, the same conditions apply as for  [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.10:_Metric_Calculation| "Exercise 3.10"]]. For example, also in the adjacent graph, a red arrow indicates the information bit  $u_i = 0$  and a blue arrow stands for  $u_i = 1$.
+
*The branch with the lower value was discarded. One can recognize discarded branches in the graph by dotted lines.
  
In the present exercise we consider the second and important part of the Viterbi–algorithm, namely the search for the "surviving" paths  ${\it \Phi}_i(S_{\mu})$. These are at time  $i$  in state  $S_{\mu}$  with $\mu \in 1, 2, 3, 4$. The search is best organized in the backward direction (i.e., from bottom to top in the graph).
 
  
At the end time (in the example  $i = 7$)  there is only one surviving path  ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$ due to termination. From this it is possible to extract:
+
Otherwise,  the same conditions apply as for  [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.10:_Metric_Calculation| $\text{Exercise 3.10}$]].  For example,  also in the adjacent graph,  a red arrow indicates the information bit  $u_i = 0$  and a blue arrow stands for  $u_i = 1$.
* the code sequence selected by the decoder  $\underline{z}$   ⇒   highest possible probability  ${\rm Pr}(\underline{z} = \underline{x})$,
+
 
 +
In the present exercise we consider the second and important part of the Viterbi algorithm,  namely the search for the  "surviving paths"  ${\it \Phi}_i(S_{\mu})$.  These are at time  $i$  in state  $S_{\mu}$  with $\mu \in \{1,\ 2,\ 3,\ 4 \}$.  The search is best organized in the backward direction  $($i.e.,  from bottom to top in the graph$)$.
 +
 
 +
At the end time  $($in the example  $i = 7)$  there is only one surviving path  ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$ due to termination.  From this it is possible to extract:
 +
* the sequence  $\underline{z}$   selected by the decoder  $($short:  "decoder sequence"$)$   ⇒   highest possible probability  ${\rm Pr}(\underline{z} = \underline{x})$,
 +
 
 
* the associated information sequence  $\underline{v}$  with the greatest possible probability  ${\rm Pr}(\underline{v} = \underline{u})$.
 
* the associated information sequence  $\underline{v}$  with the greatest possible probability  ${\rm Pr}(\underline{v} = \underline{u})$.
  
  
A decision at an earlier time, for example at  $i = 5$, does not always satisfy the maximum likelihood criterion. Here there are four surviving paths  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_0), \hspace{0.05cm}\text{ ...} \hspace{0.1cm} , \ {\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$, which at time  $i = 5$ are in states  $S_0, \hspace{0.05cm}\text{ ...} \hspace{0.1cm} , \ S_3$  end.  
+
A decision at an earlier time,  for example at  $i = 5$,  does not always satisfy the maximum likelihood criterion.  Here there are four surviving paths  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_0), \hspace{0.05cm}\text{ ...} \hspace{0.1cm} , \ {\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$, which at time  $i = 5$  are in states  $S_0, \hspace{0.05cm}\text{ ...} \hspace{0.1cm} , \ S_3$.  
*One of these four paths is certainly part of the maximum likelihood path, which is the best possible path for  $i → ∞$  $($at termination significantly earlier, here at  $i = 7)$  .  
+
*One of these four paths is certainly part of the maximum likelihood path,  which is the best possible path for  $i → ∞$  $($at termination significantly earlier,  here at  $i = 7)$.  
*But if a constraint decision is to be made already at time  $i = 5$  one usually chooses the path  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_{\mu})$  with the largest metric at that time  ${\it \Lambda}_5(S_{\mu})$.
+
 
 +
*But if a constraint decision is to be made already at time  $i = 5$,  one usually chooses the path  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_{\mu})$  with the largest metric at that time  ${\it \Lambda}_5(S_{\mu})$.
  
  
Line 21: Line 27:
  
  
Hints:
+
<u>Hints:</u>
 
*This exercise belongs to the chapter&nbsp; [[Channel_Coding/Decoding_of_Convolutional_Codes| "Decoding of Convolutional Codes"]].
 
*This exercise belongs to the chapter&nbsp; [[Channel_Coding/Decoding_of_Convolutional_Codes| "Decoding of Convolutional Codes"]].
*Reference is made in particular to the page&nbsp; [[Channel_Coding/Decoding_of_Convolutional_Codes#Evaluating_the_trellis_in_the_error-free_case_.E2.80.93_Path_finding|"Evaluating the trellis in the error-free case &ndash;Path finding"]].
+
 
 +
*Reference is made in particular to the section&nbsp; [[Channel_Coding/Decoding_of_Convolutional_Codes#Evaluating_the_trellis_in_the_error-free_case_.E2.80.93_Path_search|"Evaluating the trellis in the error-free case &ndash; Path finding"]].
 
   
 
   
  
Line 31: Line 38:
 
===Questions===
 
===Questions===
 
<quiz display=simple>
 
<quiz display=simple>
{For which code sequence&nbsp; $\underline{z}$&nbsp; does the decision fall at time&nbsp; $i = 7$?
+
{For which estimated sequence&nbsp; $\underline{z}$&nbsp; $($for the encoded sequence&nbsp; $\underline{z})$&nbsp; does the decision fall at time&nbsp; $i = 7$?  
 
|type="()"}
 
|type="()"}
 
- $\underline{z} = (11, \, 10, \, 00, \, 01, \, 01, \, 11, \, 00)$,
 
- $\underline{z} = (11, \, 10, \, 00, \, 01, \, 01, \, 11, \, 00)$,
Line 37: Line 44:
 
- $\underline{z} = (00, \, 11, \, 01, \, 01, \, 00, \, 10, \, 11)$.
 
- $\underline{z} = (00, \, 11, \, 01, \, 01, \, 00, \, 10, \, 11)$.
  
{How many transmission errors (at least) have occurred?
+
{How many transmission errors have occurred&nbsp;  $($at least$)$?
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
$N_{\rm Bit\:error} \ = \ ${ 3 3% }  
+
$N_{\rm bit\:error} \ = \ ${ 3 3% }  
  
 
{Which information sequence&nbsp; $\underline{v}$&nbsp; does the Viterbi decoder choose?
 
{Which information sequence&nbsp; $\underline{v}$&nbsp; does the Viterbi decoder choose?
Line 47: Line 54:
 
- $\underline{v} = (0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0)$.
 
- $\underline{v} = (0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0)$.
  
{Would a final (and correct) decision have been possible already at&nbsp; $i = 6$&nbsp;?
+
{Would a final&nbsp; $($and correct$)$&nbsp; decision have been possible already at&nbsp; $i = 6$?
 
|type="()"}
 
|type="()"}
 
- Yes.
 
- Yes.
Line 59: Line 66:
 
+ $S_0 &#8594; S_0 &#8594; S_1 &#8594; S_2 &#8594; S_1 &#8594; S_3$.
 
+ $S_0 &#8594; S_0 &#8594; S_1 &#8594; S_2 &#8594; S_1 &#8594; S_3$.
  
{Which path would you choose at time&nbsp; $i = 5$&nbsp;?
+
{Which path would you choose at time&nbsp; $i = 5$?
 
|type="()"}
 
|type="()"}
 
- $S_0 &#8594; S_0 &#8594; S_1 &#8594; S_3 &#8594; S_2 &#8594; S_0$,
 
- $S_0 &#8594; S_0 &#8594; S_1 &#8594; S_3 &#8594; S_2 &#8594; S_0$,
Line 76: Line 83:
 
===Solution===
 
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Correct is the <u>proposed solution 2</u>:
+
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Correct is the&nbsp; <u>proposed solution 2</u>:
*Unambiguously find the surviving path by searching backwards, i.e., from node ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$ to node ${\it \Lambda}_0(S_0)$.  
+
*Unambiguously find the surviving path by searching backwards,&nbsp; i.e.,&nbsp; from node&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$&nbsp; to node&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_0(S_0)$.
*Using the code sequences $(00, \, 01, \, 10$ or $11)$ given at the transitions, we obtain in the forward direction the result according to <u>Proposition 2</u> &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$:
+
 +
*Using the 2-bit sequences&nbsp; $(00, \, 01, \, 10$ or $11)$&nbsp; given at the transitions,&nbsp; we obtain in the forward direction the result according to&nbsp; <u>proposition 2</u>:
 
:$$\underline{z} = \big (00\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 10\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big ) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$\underline{z} = \big (00\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 10\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big ) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
*Do not reach the final node ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$ along the other paths.
+
*One  not reach the final node&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$&nbsp; along other paths.
  
  
  
'''(2)'''&nbsp; By comparing the code sequence $\underline{z}$ selected in subtask (1) with the received sequence  
+
'''(2)'''&nbsp; By comparing the decoder sequence&nbsp; $\underline{z}$&nbsp; selected in subtask&nbsp; '''(1)'''&nbsp; with the received sequence  
:$$\underline{y} = \big (01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big )$$
+
:$$\underline{y} = \big (01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big ),$$
  
one detects <u>three bit errors</u> at positions 2, 5, and 8.  
+
one detects&nbsp; <u>three bit errors</u>&nbsp; at positions&nbsp; '''2''',&nbsp; '''5''',&nbsp; and&nbsp; '''8'''.
*If a code sequence $\underline{x} &ne; \underline{z}$ was sent, there can of course be more.  
+
*Because of the final value ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0) = 8$ or ${\it \Gamma}_7(S_0) = 3$ &ndash; see [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.10:_Metric_Calculation| "Exercise 3.10"]] &ndash; but one can assume that a correct decision &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; $\underline{z} = \underline{x}$ has been made.
+
*If a encoded sequence&nbsp; $\underline{x} &ne; \underline{z}$&nbsp; was sent,&nbsp; there can of course be more.
 +
 +
*Because of the final value&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0) = 8$&nbsp; or&nbsp; ${\it \Gamma}_7(S_0) = 3$&nbsp; &ndash; see [[Aufgaben:Exercise_3.10:_Metric_Calculation|$\text{Exercise 3.10}$]]&nbsp; &ndash; but one can assume that a correct decision &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; $\underline{z} = \underline{x}$&nbsp; has been made.
  
  
 
[[File:P_ID2697__KC_A_3_11_ML_neu.png|right|frame|Viterbi path finding]]  
 
[[File:P_ID2697__KC_A_3_11_ML_neu.png|right|frame|Viterbi path finding]]  
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Correct is <u>proposed solution 1</u>:
+
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Correct is the&nbsp; <u>proposed solution 1</u>:
*From the colors of the surviving path &ndash; red represents $u_i = 0$ and blue represents $u_i = 1$ &ndash; one can see the correctness of <u>solution proposal 1</u>: red &ndash; blue &ndash; red &ndash; blue &ndash; blue &ndash; red &ndash; red.  
+
*From the colors of the surviving path&nbsp; &ndash; red represents&nbsp; $u_i = 0$&nbsp; and blue represents&nbsp; $u_i = 1$&nbsp; &ndash;&nbsp; one can see the correctness of&nbsp; <u>solution proposal 1</u>:&nbsp; red &ndash; blue &ndash; red &ndash; blue &ndash; blue &ndash; red &ndash; red.
*It should be noted that the actual information sequence $\underline{u}$ is only of length $L = 5$.  
+
*Only by termination one arrives at the total length $L' = L + m = 7$.
+
*It should be noted that the actual information sequence&nbsp; $\underline{u}$&nbsp; is only of length&nbsp; $L = 5$.&nbsp; Only by termination one arrives at the total length&nbsp; $L' = L + m = 7$.
 +
 
  
 +
'''(4)'''&nbsp; At time&nbsp; $i = 6$&nbsp; there are still two surviving paths.&nbsp;
 +
*A decision could be forcibly made based on the larger metric.&nbsp;
  
'''(4)'''&nbsp; At time $i = 6$ there are still two surviving paths. A decision could be forcibly made based on the larger metric. However, because of ${\it \Lambda}_6(S_0) = {\it \Lambda}_6(S_2) = 6$ this is not possible in our example &nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp; <u>No</u>.
+
*However,&nbsp; because of&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_6(S_0) = {\it \Lambda}_6(S_2) = 6$&nbsp; this is not possible in our example &nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp; <u>No</u>.
  
  
'''(5)'''&nbsp; The graph shows that <u>all proposed solutions</u> are correct. The paths are labeled ${\it \Phi}_5(S_0)$, ...  , ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$.
+
'''(5)'''&nbsp; The graph shows that&nbsp; <u>all proposed solutions</u>&nbsp; are correct.&nbsp; The paths are labeled&nbsp; ${\it \Phi}_5(S_0)$, ...  , ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$.
  
  
'''(6)'''&nbsp; The constraint decision at time $i = 5$ would select the path with the largest metric ${\it \Lambda}_5(S_{\mu})$, i.e., the path ${\it \Phi}_5(S_2)$ corresponding to <u>proposition 3</u>.
+
'''(6)'''&nbsp; The constraint decision at&nbsp; time $i = 5$&nbsp; would select the path with the largest metric&nbsp; ${\it \Lambda}_5(S_{\mu})$, <br>i.e.,&nbsp; the path&nbsp; ${\it \Phi}_5(S_2)$&nbsp; corresponding to&nbsp; <u>proposition 3</u>.
  
  
'''(7)'''&nbsp; Based on our solution to subtask (1), the path ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$ according to <u>proposition 4</u> would have been the better choice.  
+
'''(7)'''&nbsp; Based on our solution to subtask&nbsp; '''(1)''',&nbsp; the path&nbsp; ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$&nbsp; according to&nbsp; <u>proposition 4</u>&nbsp; would have been the better choice.&nbsp; This is part of the path to&nbsp; ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$.
*This is part of the path ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$.  
+
*At the time $i = 5$, however, there is still nothing in favor of this choice.  
+
*At time&nbsp; $i = 5$,&nbsp; however,&nbsp; there is still nothing in favor of this choice.
*The (ultimately correct) path is only highlighted by the two termination bits.
+
 +
*The&nbsp; (ultimately correct)&nbsp; path is only highlighted by the two termination bits.
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
  

Latest revision as of 17:06, 19 November 2022

Evaluated trellis diagram

One result of  $\text{Exercise 3.10}$  was adjacent trellis evaluation in terms of metrics  ${\it \Lambda}_i(S_{\mu})$. 

  • At all decoding steps  $i$  the  $($in general$)$  $2^m = 4$  metrics were determined,  selecting for each node the larger of two comparison values. 
  • The branch with the lower value was discarded. One can recognize discarded branches in the graph by dotted lines.


Otherwise,  the same conditions apply as for  $\text{Exercise 3.10}$.  For example,  also in the adjacent graph,  a red arrow indicates the information bit  $u_i = 0$  and a blue arrow stands for  $u_i = 1$.

In the present exercise we consider the second and important part of the Viterbi algorithm,  namely the search for the  "surviving paths"  ${\it \Phi}_i(S_{\mu})$.  These are at time  $i$  in state  $S_{\mu}$  with $\mu \in \{1,\ 2,\ 3,\ 4 \}$.  The search is best organized in the backward direction  $($i.e.,  from bottom to top in the graph$)$.

At the end time  $($in the example  $i = 7)$  there is only one surviving path  ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$ due to termination.  From this it is possible to extract:

  • the sequence  $\underline{z}$   selected by the decoder  $($short:  "decoder sequence"$)$  ⇒   highest possible probability  ${\rm Pr}(\underline{z} = \underline{x})$,
  • the associated information sequence  $\underline{v}$  with the greatest possible probability  ${\rm Pr}(\underline{v} = \underline{u})$.


A decision at an earlier time,  for example at  $i = 5$,  does not always satisfy the maximum likelihood criterion.  Here there are four surviving paths  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_0), \hspace{0.05cm}\text{ ...} \hspace{0.1cm} , \ {\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$, which at time  $i = 5$  are in states  $S_0, \hspace{0.05cm}\text{ ...} \hspace{0.1cm} , \ S_3$.

  • One of these four paths is certainly part of the maximum likelihood path,  which is the best possible path for  $i → ∞$  $($at termination significantly earlier,  here at  $i = 7)$.
  • But if a constraint decision is to be made already at time  $i = 5$,  one usually chooses the path  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_{\mu})$  with the largest metric at that time  ${\it \Lambda}_5(S_{\mu})$.



Hints:



Questions

1

For which estimated sequence  $\underline{z}$  $($for the encoded sequence  $\underline{z})$  does the decision fall at time  $i = 7$?

$\underline{z} = (11, \, 10, \, 00, \, 01, \, 01, \, 11, \, 00)$,
$\underline{z} = (00, \, 11, \, 10, \, 00, \, 01, \, 01, \, 11)$,
$\underline{z} = (00, \, 11, \, 01, \, 01, \, 00, \, 10, \, 11)$.

2

How many transmission errors have occurred  $($at least$)$?

$N_{\rm bit\:error} \ = \ $

3

Which information sequence  $\underline{v}$  does the Viterbi decoder choose?

$\underline{v} = (0, \, 1, \, 0, \, 1, \, 1, \, 0, \, 0)$,
$\underline{v} = (1, \, 0, \, 1, \, 1, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0)$,
$\underline{v} = (0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0, \, 0)$.

4

Would a final  $($and correct$)$  decision have been possible already at  $i = 6$?

Yes.
No.

5

What surviving paths exist at time  $i = 5$?

$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_0$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_1$,
$S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3$.

6

Which path would you choose at time  $i = 5$?

$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_0$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_1$,
$S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3$.

7

But which of the paths would probably be the right one?

$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_0$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2 → S_1$,
$S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3 → S_2$,
$S_0 → S_0 → S_1 → S_2 → S_1 → S_3$.


Solution

(1)  Correct is the  proposed solution 2:

  • Unambiguously find the surviving path by searching backwards,  i.e.,  from node  ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$  to node  ${\it \Lambda}_0(S_0)$.
  • Using the 2-bit sequences  $(00, \, 01, \, 10$ or $11)$  given at the transitions,  we obtain in the forward direction the result according to  proposition 2:
$$\underline{z} = \big (00\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 10\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big ) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • One not reach the final node  ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0)$  along other paths.


(2)  By comparing the decoder sequence  $\underline{z}$  selected in subtask  (1)  with the received sequence

$$\underline{y} = \big (01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.05cm}, 00\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 01\hspace{0.05cm}, 11\hspace{0.03cm} \big ),$$

one detects  three bit errors  at positions  25,  and  8.

  • If a encoded sequence  $\underline{x} ≠ \underline{z}$  was sent,  there can of course be more.
  • Because of the final value  ${\it \Lambda}_7(S_0) = 8$  or  ${\it \Gamma}_7(S_0) = 3$  – see $\text{Exercise 3.10}$  – but one can assume that a correct decision   ⇒   $\underline{z} = \underline{x}$  has been made.


Viterbi path finding

(3)  Correct is the  proposed solution 1:

  • From the colors of the surviving path  – red represents  $u_i = 0$  and blue represents  $u_i = 1$  –  one can see the correctness of  solution proposal 1:  red – blue – red – blue – blue – red – red.
  • It should be noted that the actual information sequence  $\underline{u}$  is only of length  $L = 5$.  Only by termination one arrives at the total length  $L' = L + m = 7$.


(4)  At time  $i = 6$  there are still two surviving paths. 

  • A decision could be forcibly made based on the larger metric. 
  • However,  because of  ${\it \Lambda}_6(S_0) = {\it \Lambda}_6(S_2) = 6$  this is not possible in our example  ⇒  No.


(5)  The graph shows that  all proposed solutions  are correct.  The paths are labeled  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_0)$, ... , ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$.


(6)  The constraint decision at  time $i = 5$  would select the path with the largest metric  ${\it \Lambda}_5(S_{\mu})$,
i.e.,  the path  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_2)$  corresponding to  proposition 3.


(7)  Based on our solution to subtask  (1),  the path  ${\it \Phi}_5(S_3)$  according to  proposition 4  would have been the better choice.  This is part of the path to  ${\it \Phi}_7(S_0)$.

  • At time  $i = 5$,  however,  there is still nothing in favor of this choice.
  • The  (ultimately correct)  path is only highlighted by the two termination bits.