Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 3.14: Error Probability Bounds"

From LNTwww
 
Line 59: Line 59:
 
$\varepsilon = 10^{-4} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} \ = \ ${ 3.33 3% } $\ \cdot 10^{–9}$
 
$\varepsilon = 10^{-4} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} \ = \ ${ 3.33 3% } $\ \cdot 10^{–9}$
  
{What is the viterbi bound?
+
{What is the Viterbi bound?
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
$\varepsilon = 10^{-2} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} {\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \ = \ ${ 8.61 3% } $\ \cdot 10^{–4}$
 
$\varepsilon = 10^{-2} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} {\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \ = \ ${ 8.61 3% } $\ \cdot 10^{–4}$
Line 71: Line 71:
 
===Solution===
 
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''  The Bhattacharyya parameter results for the BSC model with $\varepsilon = 0.01$ to
+
'''(1)'''  The Bhattacharyya parameter results for the BSC model with  $\varepsilon = 0.01$  to
 
:$$\beta = 2 \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon \cdot (1- \varepsilon)} = 2 \cdot \sqrt{0.01 \cdot 0.99} \hspace{0.2cm}\underline {\approx 0.199}
 
:$$\beta = 2 \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon \cdot (1- \varepsilon)} = 2 \cdot \sqrt{0.01 \cdot 0.99} \hspace{0.2cm}\underline {\approx 0.199}
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
For even smaller corruption probabilities $\varepsilon$ can be written approximately:
+
*For even smaller falsification probabilities  $\varepsilon$  can be written approximately:
 
:$$\beta \approx 2 \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon } \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \varepsilon = 10^{-4}\hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.2cm} \beta \hspace{0.2cm}\underline {\approx 0.02}
 
:$$\beta \approx 2 \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon } \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \varepsilon = 10^{-4}\hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.2cm} \beta \hspace{0.2cm}\underline {\approx 0.02}
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
  
'''(2)'''  It holds ${\rm Pr(Burst\:error)} ≤ {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)}$ with ${\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} = T(X = \beta)$.  
+
'''(2)'''  It holds  ${\rm Pr(burst\:error)} ≤ {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)}$  with  ${\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} = T(X = \beta)$.  
*For the considered convolutional code of rate 1/2, memory $m = 2$ and $\mathbf{G}(D) = (1 + D + D^2, \ 1 + D^2)$, the path weighting enumerator function is:
+
*For the considered convolutional code of rate 1/2,  memory $m = 2$  and  $\mathbf{G}(D) = (1 + D + D^2, \ 1 + D^2)$,  the path weighting enumerator function is:
 
:$$T(X) = \frac{X^5 }{1- 2X} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}
 
:$$T(X) = \frac{X^5 }{1- 2X} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}
 
{\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} = T(X = \beta) = \frac{\beta^5 }{1- 2\beta}$$
 
{\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} = T(X = \beta) = \frac{\beta^5 }{1- 2\beta}$$
Line 90: Line 90:
  
  
'''(3)'''  To calculate the Viterbi bound, we assume the extended path weighting enumerator function:
+
'''(3)'''  To calculate the Viterbi bound,  we assume the  "extended path weighting enumerator function":
 
:$$T_{\rm enh}(X, U) =  \frac{U  X^5}{1- 2UX}  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$T_{\rm enh}(X, U) =  \frac{U  X^5}{1- 2UX}  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
* The derivative of this function with respect to the input parameter $U$ is:
+
* The derivative of this function with respect to the input parameter  $U$ gives:
 
:$$\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}U}\hspace{0.1cm}T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = \frac{(1- 2UX) \cdot X^5 - U  X^5 \cdot (-2X)}{(1- 2UX)^2}
 
:$$\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}U}\hspace{0.1cm}T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = \frac{(1- 2UX) \cdot X^5 - U  X^5 \cdot (-2X)}{(1- 2UX)^2}
 
  =  \frac{ X^5}{(1- 2UX)^2}
 
  =  \frac{ X^5}{(1- 2UX)^2}
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
* This equation provides the Viterbi bound for $U = 1$ and $X = \beta$:
+
* This equation provides the Viterbi bound for  $U = 1$  and  $X = \beta$:
 
:$$\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}U}\hspace{0.1cm}T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = \frac{(1- 2UX) \cdot X^5 - U  X^5 \cdot (-2X)}{(1- 2UX)^2}
 
:$$\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}U}\hspace{0.1cm}T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = \frac{(1- 2UX) \cdot X^5 - U  X^5 \cdot (-2X)}{(1- 2UX)^2}
 
  =  \frac{U  X^5}{(1- 2UX)^2}
 
  =  \frac{U  X^5}{(1- 2UX)^2}
Line 109: Line 109:
 
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}U}\hspace{0.1cm}T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = X^5 + 4\hspace{0.05cm}U X^6 + 12\hspace{0.05cm}U^2 X^7 + 32\hspace{0.05cm}U^3 X^8 + \text{...} $$
 
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}U}\hspace{0.1cm}T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = X^5 + 4\hspace{0.05cm}U X^6 + 12\hspace{0.05cm}U^2 X^7 + 32\hspace{0.05cm}U^3 X^8 + \text{...} $$
  
*Setting $U = 1$ and $X = \beta$ we get again the Viterbi bound:
+
*Setting  $U = 1$  and  $X = \beta$  we get again the Viterbi bound:
 
:$${\rm Pr(Viterbi)}  \hspace{-0.15cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} \beta^5 + 4\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^6 + 12\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^7 + 32\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^8 +\text{...}
 
:$${\rm Pr(Viterbi)}  \hspace{-0.15cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} \beta^5 + 4\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^6 + 12\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^7 + 32\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^8 +\text{...}
 
= \beta^5 \cdot (1+ 4\hspace{0.05cm}\beta + 12\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^2 + 32\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^3 + ... )\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
 
= \beta^5 \cdot (1+ 4\hspace{0.05cm}\beta + 12\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^2 + 32\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^3 + ... )\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
  
*For $\varepsilon = 10^{–2} \ \Rightarrow \ \beta = 0.199$ is obtained by truncating the infinite sum after the $\beta^3$–term:
+
*For  $\varepsilon = 10^{–2} \ \Rightarrow \ \beta = 0.199$  is obtained by truncating the infinite sum after the  $\beta^3$  term:
 
:$${\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \approx 3.12 \cdot 10^{-4} \cdot (1 + 0.796 + 0.475 + 0.252) = 7.87 \cdot 10^{-4}
 
:$${\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \approx 3.12 \cdot 10^{-4} \cdot (1 + 0.796 + 0.475 + 0.252) = 7.87 \cdot 10^{-4}
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
*The termination error – related to $8.61 \cdot 10^{–4}$ – here is about $8.6\%$. For $\varepsilon = 10^{–4} \ \Rightarrow \ \beta = 0.02$ the termination error is even smaller:
+
*The termination error  $($related to  $8.61 \cdot 10^{–4})$  is here about  $8.6\%$.  For $\varepsilon = 10^{–4} \ \Rightarrow \ \beta = 0.02$ the termination error is even smaller:
 
:$${\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \approx 3.20 \cdot 10^{-9} \cdot (1 + 0.086 + 0.0048 + 0.0003) = 3.47 \cdot 10^{-9}
 
:$${\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \approx 3.20 \cdot 10^{-9} \cdot (1 + 0.086 + 0.0048 + 0.0003) = 3.47 \cdot 10^{-9}
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
  
  [[File:EN_KC_A_3_14c.png|right|frame|Bhattacharyya and the Viterbi bound in the BSC model (full table).]]
+
  [[File:EN_KC_A_3_14c.png|right|frame|Bhattacharyya and Viterbi bound in the BSC model  $($full table$)$.]]
'''(4)'''  For $\beta = 0.5$ both bounds result in the value "infinite".  
+
'''(4)'''  For  $\beta = 0.5$  both bounds result in the value  "infinite".  
  
*For even larger $\beta$–values, the Bhattacharyya bound becomes negative and the result for the Viterbi bound is then also not applicable. It follows:
+
*For even larger  $\beta$  values,  the Bhattacharyya bound becomes negative and the result for the Viterbi bound is then also not applicable.  It follows:
 
:$$\beta_0 = 2 \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon_0 \cdot (1- \varepsilon_0)} = 0.5$$
 
:$$\beta_0 = 2 \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon_0 \cdot (1- \varepsilon_0)} = 0.5$$
 
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\varepsilon_0 \cdot (1- \varepsilon_0)} = 0.25^2 = 0.0625$$
 
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\varepsilon_0 \cdot (1- \varepsilon_0)} = 0.25^2 = 0.0625$$

Latest revision as of 19:15, 22 November 2022

Bhattacharyya and Viterbi bound with the BSC model  $($incomplete table$)$.

For the frequently used convolutional code with

  • the code rate  $R = 1/2$,
  • the memory  $m = 2$,  and
  • the transfer function matrix
$${\boldsymbol{\rm G}}(D) = \big ( 1 + D + D^2\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.1cm} 1 + D^2 \hspace{0.05cm}\big ), $$

the  "extended path weighting enumerator function" is:

$$T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = \frac{UX^5}{1- 2 \hspace{0.05cm}U \hspace{-0.05cm}X} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

With the series expansion   $1/(1 \, –x) = 1 + x + x^2 + \text{...} \ $   can also be written for this purpose:

$$T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = U X^5 \cdot \left [ 1 + (2 \hspace{0.05cm}U \hspace{-0.05cm}X) + (2 \hspace{0.05cm}U\hspace{-0.05cm}X)^2 + (2 \hspace{0.05cm}U\hspace{-0.05cm}X)^3 +\text{...} \hspace{0.10cm} \right ] \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The  "simple path weighting enumerator function"  $T(X)$  results from setting the second variable  $U = 1$ .

Using these two functions,  error probability bounds can be specified:

  • The  "burst error probability"  is limited by the  Bhattacharyya bound:
$${\rm Pr(burst\:error)} \le {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} = T(X = \beta) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • In contrast,  the  "bit error probability"  is always less than  $($or equal to$)$  the  Viterbi bound:
\[{\rm Pr(bit\:error)} \le {\rm Pr(Viterbi)} = \left [ \frac {\rm d}{ {\rm d}U}\hspace{0.2cm}T_{\rm enh}(X, U) \right ]_{\substack{X=\beta \\ U=1} } \hspace{0.05cm}.\]



Hints:

  • The Bhattacharyya parameter for BSC is:   $\beta = 2 \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon \cdot (1- \varepsilon)}$.
  • In the table,  for some values of the BSC parameter  $\varepsilon$  are given:
  •   the Bhattacharyya parameter  $\beta$,
  •   the Bhattacharyya bound  ${\rm Pr}(\rm Bhattacharyya)$,  and
  •   the Viterbi bound  $\rm Pr(Viterbi)$.
  • Throughout this exercise,  you are to compute the corresponding quantities for  $\varepsilon = 10^{-2}$  and  $\varepsilon = 10^{-4}$.
  • You can find the complete table in the sample solution.



Questions

1

What Bhattacharyya parameter results for the BSC model?

$\varepsilon = 10^{–2} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} \beta \ = \ $

$\varepsilon = 10^{–4} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} \beta \ = \ $

2

What is the Bhattacharyya bound?

$\varepsilon = 10^{-2} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot 10^{–4}$
$\varepsilon = 10^{-4} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot 10^{–9}$

3

What is the Viterbi bound?

$\varepsilon = 10^{-2} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} {\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot 10^{–4}$
$\varepsilon = 10^{-4} \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} {\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot 10^{–9}$

4

For which values  $\varepsilon < \varepsilon_0$  are both bounds not applicable?

$\varepsilon_0 \ = \ $


Solution

(1)  The Bhattacharyya parameter results for the BSC model with  $\varepsilon = 0.01$  to

$$\beta = 2 \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon \cdot (1- \varepsilon)} = 2 \cdot \sqrt{0.01 \cdot 0.99} \hspace{0.2cm}\underline {\approx 0.199} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • For even smaller falsification probabilities  $\varepsilon$  can be written approximately:
$$\beta \approx 2 \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon } \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \varepsilon = 10^{-4}\hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.2cm} \beta \hspace{0.2cm}\underline {\approx 0.02} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  It holds  ${\rm Pr(burst\:error)} ≤ {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)}$  with  ${\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} = T(X = \beta)$.

  • For the considered convolutional code of rate 1/2,  memory $m = 2$  and  $\mathbf{G}(D) = (1 + D + D^2, \ 1 + D^2)$,  the path weighting enumerator function is:
$$T(X) = \frac{X^5 }{1- 2X} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} = T(X = \beta) = \frac{\beta^5 }{1- 2\beta}$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\varepsilon = 10^{-2}\hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.1cm} {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} \hspace{-0.15cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} \frac{0.199^5 }{1- 2\cdot 0.199} \hspace{0.2cm}\underline {\approx 5.18 \cdot 10^{-4}}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$\hspace{0.85cm} \varepsilon = 10^{-4}\hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.1cm} {\rm Pr(Bhattacharyya)} \hspace{-0.15cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} \frac{0.02^5 }{1- 2\cdot 0.02} \hspace{0.38cm}\underline {\approx 3.33 \cdot 10^{-9}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(3)  To calculate the Viterbi bound,  we assume the  "extended path weighting enumerator function":

$$T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = \frac{U X^5}{1- 2UX} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The derivative of this function with respect to the input parameter  $U$ gives:
$$\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}U}\hspace{0.1cm}T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = \frac{(1- 2UX) \cdot X^5 - U X^5 \cdot (-2X)}{(1- 2UX)^2} = \frac{ X^5}{(1- 2UX)^2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This equation provides the Viterbi bound for  $U = 1$  and  $X = \beta$:
$$\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}U}\hspace{0.1cm}T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = \frac{(1- 2UX) \cdot X^5 - U X^5 \cdot (-2X)}{(1- 2UX)^2} = \frac{U X^5}{(1- 2UX)^2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\varepsilon = 10^{-2}\hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.1cm} {\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \hspace{-0.15cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} \frac{0.199^5 }{(1- 2\cdot 0.199)^2} = \hspace{0.2cm}\underline {\approx 8.61 \cdot 10^{-4}}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$\hspace{0.85cm} \varepsilon = 10^{-4}\hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.1cm} {\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \hspace{-0.15cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} \frac{0.02^5 }{(1- 2\cdot 0.02)^2} = \hspace{0.2cm}\underline {\approx 3.47 \cdot 10^{-9}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • We check the result using the following approximation:
$$T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = U X^5 + 2\hspace{0.05cm}U^2 X^6 + 4\hspace{0.05cm}U^3 X^7 + 8\hspace{0.05cm}U^4 X^8 + \text{...} $$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac {\rm d}{{\rm d}U}\hspace{0.1cm}T_{\rm enh}(X, U) = X^5 + 4\hspace{0.05cm}U X^6 + 12\hspace{0.05cm}U^2 X^7 + 32\hspace{0.05cm}U^3 X^8 + \text{...} $$
  • Setting  $U = 1$  and  $X = \beta$  we get again the Viterbi bound:
$${\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \hspace{-0.15cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.15cm} \beta^5 + 4\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^6 + 12\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^7 + 32\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^8 +\text{...} = \beta^5 \cdot (1+ 4\hspace{0.05cm}\beta + 12\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^2 + 32\hspace{0.05cm}\beta^3 + ... )\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
  • For  $\varepsilon = 10^{–2} \ \Rightarrow \ \beta = 0.199$  is obtained by truncating the infinite sum after the  $\beta^3$  term:
$${\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \approx 3.12 \cdot 10^{-4} \cdot (1 + 0.796 + 0.475 + 0.252) = 7.87 \cdot 10^{-4} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The termination error  $($related to  $8.61 \cdot 10^{–4})$  is here about  $8.6\%$.  For $\varepsilon = 10^{–4} \ \Rightarrow \ \beta = 0.02$ the termination error is even smaller:
$${\rm Pr(Viterbi)} \approx 3.20 \cdot 10^{-9} \cdot (1 + 0.086 + 0.0048 + 0.0003) = 3.47 \cdot 10^{-9} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Bhattacharyya and Viterbi bound in the BSC model  $($full table$)$.

(4)  For  $\beta = 0.5$  both bounds result in the value  "infinite".

  • For even larger  $\beta$  values,  the Bhattacharyya bound becomes negative and the result for the Viterbi bound is then also not applicable.  It follows:
$$\beta_0 = 2 \cdot \sqrt{\varepsilon_0 \cdot (1- \varepsilon_0)} = 0.5$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\varepsilon_0 \cdot (1- \varepsilon_0)} = 0.25^2 = 0.0625$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \varepsilon_0^2 - \varepsilon_0 + 0.0625 = 0$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \varepsilon_0 = 0.5 \cdot (1 - \sqrt{0.75}) \hspace{0.15cm} \underline {\approx 0.067}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$