Exercise 4.15Z: Statements of the Covariance Matrix

From LNTwww
Revision as of 13:20, 15 March 2022 by Noah (talk | contribs)

Are the random signals correlated?

Let be given the two Gaussian random variables  $u$  and  $v$, each zero mean and with variance  $\sigma^2 = 1$.

From these, three new random variables are formed by linear combination:

$$x_1 = A_1 \cdot u + B_1 \cdot v,$$
$$x_2 = A_2 \cdot u + B_2 \cdot v,$$
$$x_3 = A_3 \cdot u + B_3 \cdot v.$$

Assuming that in all cases considered  $(i = 1, 2, 3)$  holds:

$$A_i^2 + B_i^2 =1.$$

The graph shows the signals $x_1(t)$, $x_2(t)$ and $x_3(t)$ for the case to be considered in the subtask  (3)  :

  • $A_1 = B_2 = 1$,
  • $A_2 = B_2 = 0$,
  • $A_3 = 0.8, \ B_3 = 0.6$,


The correlation coefficient  $\rho_{ij}$  between the random variables  $x_i$  and  $x_j$  is given as follows:

$$\rho_{ij} = \frac{A_i \cdot A_j + B_i \cdot B_j}{\sqrt{(A_i^2 + B_i^2)(A_j^2 + B_j^2)}} = A_i \cdot A_j + B_i \cdot B_j.$$

Under the assumption implicit here  $\sigma_1^2 = \sigma_2^2 = \sigma_3^2 = 1$  the covariance matrix  $\mathbf{K}$ is:

$${\mathbf{K}} =\left[ K_{ij} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 1 & \rho_{12} & \rho_{13} \\ \rho_{12} & 1 & \rho_{23} \\ \rho_{13} & \rho_{23} & 1 \end{array} \right] .$$

This is identical to the correlation matrix  $\mathbf{R}$ for zero mean random variables.





Hints:



Questions

1

Which of the following statements are true? Give reasons for your findings.

$\mathbf{K}$  can be a diagonal matrix with a suitable choice of  $A_1$, ... , $B_3$  be a diagonal matrix.  Or in other words,   $\rho_{12} = \rho_{13} = \rho_{23} = 0$  is possible.
With appropriate choice of parameters  $A_1$, ... , $B_3$  exactly one of the correlation coefficients  $\rho_{ij} = 0$  can be.
With appropriate choice of parameters  $A_1$, ... , $B_3$  exactly two of the correlation coefficients  $\rho_{ij} = 0$  can be.
With appropriate choice of parameters  $A_1$, ... , $B_3$  all three correlation coefficients  $\rho_{ij} \ne be 0$  .

2

What are the matrix elements of  $\mathbf{K}$  with  $A_1 = A_2 = - A_3$  and  $B_1 = B_2 = - B_3$ ?

$\rho_{12} \ = \ $

$\rho_{13} \ = \ $

$\rho_{23} \ = \ $

3

Calculate the coefficients  $\rho_{ij}$  for the case shown in the graph:  $A_1 = 1$,  $B_1 = 0$,  $A_2 = 0$,  $B_2 = 1$,  $A_3 = 0.8$,  $B_3 = 0.6$.

$\rho_{12} \ = \ $

$\rho_{13} \ = \ $

$\rho_{23} \ = \ $


Solution

(1)  Only the second and the last statement are true:

  • Statement 2 describes the case considered in the graph where two quantities  $($here:   $x_1$  and  $x_2)$  are uncorrelated, while  $x_3$  has statistical bindings with respect to  $x_1$  $($about the quantity  $u)$  and also with respect to  $x_3$  $($due to the random variable $v)$ .
  • On the other hand, the combination  $\rho_{12} = \rho_{13} = \rho_{23} = 0$   is not possible with the structure given here.   For this, one would need a third statistically independent random variable  $w$  and, for example,  $x_1 = k_1 \cdot u$ ,  $x_2 = k_2 \cdot v$  and  $x_3 = k_3 \cdot w$  would have to hold.
  • The third statement is also not true:  If  $x_1$  and  $x_2$  are uncorrelated and at the same time also  $x_1$  and  $x_3$, then no statistical bindings can exist between  $x_2$  and  $x_3$  either.
  • In general, however, both  $\rho_{12}$  and  $\rho_{13}$  will be different from zero.
  • A very simple example of this is considered in the subtask  (2) .


(2)  In this case, the quantities  $x_1 = x_2$  are completely  $($to  $100\%)$  correlated.

  • With  $A_2 = A_1$  and  $B_2 = B_1$  we obtain for the joint correlation coefficient:
$$\rho_{12} = A_1 \cdot A_2 + B_1 \cdot B_2 = A_1^2 + B_1^2 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=1}.$$
  • In the same way, with  $A_3 = -A_1$  and  $B_3 = -B_1$:
$$\rho_{13} = A_1 \cdot A_3 + B_1 \cdot B_3 = -(A_1^2 + B_1^2) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=-1 \hspace{0.1cm}(= \rho_{23})}.$$


(3)  With this set of parameters,  $x_1$  is identical to the random variable  $u$, while  $x_2 = v$  holds.

  • Since  $u$  and  $v$  are statistically independent of each other, we get  $\rho_{12} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0}.$
  • In contrast, for the other two correlation coefficients:
$$\rho_{13} = A_1 \cdot A_3 + B_1 \cdot B_3 = 1 \cdot 0.8 + 0 \cdot 0.6 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.8},$$
$$\rho_{23} = A_2 \cdot A_3 + B_2 \cdot B_3 = 0 \cdot 0.8 + 1 \cdot 0.6 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.6}.$$
  • For a (very well) trained eye, it can be seen from the graph on the information page that the signal  $x_3(t)$  has more similarities with  $x_1(t)$  than with  $x_2(t)$.
  • This fact is also expressed by the calculated correlation coefficients.
  • Don't be frustrated, however, if you don't recognize the different correlation in the signal courses.