Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.1Z: Other Basis Functions"

From LNTwww
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
With  $M$  transmitted signals  $s_i(t)$,  already fewer basis functions  $\varphi_{\it j}(t)$  can suffice,  namely  $N$.  Thus,  in general,  $N ≤ M$.
 
With  $M$  transmitted signals  $s_i(t)$,  already fewer basis functions  $\varphi_{\it j}(t)$  can suffice,  namely  $N$.  Thus,  in general,  $N ≤ M$.
  
These are exactly the same energy-limited signals  $s_i(t)$  as in  [[Aufgaben:Aufgabe_4.1:_Zum_Gram-Schmidt-Verfahren|"Exercise 4.1"]]:  
+
These are exactly the same energy-limited signals  $s_i(t)$  as in  [[Aufgaben:Exercise_4.1:_About_the_Gram-Schmidt_Process|"Exercise 4.1"]]:  
 
*The difference is the different order of the signals  $s_i(t)$.
 
*The difference is the different order of the signals  $s_i(t)$.
 
   
 
   
Line 58: Line 58:
 
===Solution===
 
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''  The only difference to Exercise 4.1 is the different numbering of the signals $s_i(t)$.  
+
'''(1)'''  The only difference to Exercise 4.1 is the different numbering of the signals  $s_i(t)$.  
*Thus it is obvious that $\underline {N = 3}$ must hold here as well.
+
*Thus it is obvious that  $\underline {N = 3}$  must hold here as well.
  
  
'''(2)'''  The 2–norm gives the root of the signal energy and is comparable to the rms value for power-limited signals.
+
'''(2)'''  The  "2–norm"  gives the root of the signal energy and is comparable to the  "rms value"  for power-limited signals.
*The first three signals all have the 2–norm
+
*The first three signals all have the same 2–norm:
 
:$$||s_1(t)|| = ||s_2(t)|| = ||s_3(t)|| = \sqrt{A^2 \cdot T}\hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {  = 10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$||s_1(t)|| = ||s_2(t)|| = ||s_3(t)|| = \sqrt{A^2 \cdot T}\hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {  = 10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
*The norm of the last signal is larger by a factor of $\sqrt{2}$:
+
*The norm of the last signal is larger by a factor of  $\sqrt{2}$:
 
:$$||s_4(t)|| \hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 1.414 \cdot 10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$||s_4(t)|| \hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 1.414 \cdot 10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
''' Basisfunktionssatz'''
+
 
'''(3)'''&nbsp; The <u>first and last statements are true</u> in contrast to statements 2 and 3:
+
'''(3)'''&nbsp; The&nbsp; <u>first and last statements are true</u>&nbsp; in contrast to statements 2 and 3:
* It would be completely illogical if the basis functions found should no longer hold when the signals $s_i(t)$ are sorted differently.
+
* It would be completely illogical if the basis functions found should no longer hold when the signals&nbsp; $s_i(t)$&nbsp; are sorted differently.
* The Gram&ndash;Schmidt process yields only one possible set $\{\varphi_{\it j}(t)\}$ of basis functions. A different sorting (possibly) yields a different one.
+
 
*The number of permutations of &nbsp;$M = 4$&nbsp; signals is &nbsp;$4! = 24$. In any case, there cannot be more basis function sets &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; solution 2 is wrong.
+
* The Gram&ndash;Schmidt process yields only one possible set&nbsp; $\{\varphi_{\it j}(t)\}$&nbsp; of basis functions.&nbsp; A different sorting&nbsp; (possibly)&nbsp; yields a different basis function.
*However, there are probably (because of $N = 3$) only $3! = 6$ possible sets of basis functions. As can be seen from the sample [[Aufgaben:Eercise_4.1:_About_the_Gram-Schmidt_Method|"solution"]] to Exercise 4.1, the same basis functions will result with the order $s_1(t), s_2(t), s_4(t), s_3(t)$ as with $s_1(t), s_2(t), s_3(t), s_4(t)$. However, this is only a conjecture of the authors; we have not checked it.
+
 
* Statement 3 cannot be true simply because of the different units of $s_i(t)$ and $\varphi_{\it j}(t)$. Like $A$, the signals have the unit $\sqrt{\rm W}$, the basis functions the unit $\sqrt{\rm 1/s}$.
+
*The number of permutations of &nbsp; $M = 4$ &nbsp; signals is &nbsp; $4! = 24$.&nbsp; In any case,&nbsp; there cannot be more basis function sets &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; solution 2 is wrong.
* Thus, the last solution is correct, where for $K$ holds:
+
 
 +
*However,&nbsp; there are probably&nbsp; $($because of&nbsp; $N = 3)$&nbsp; only&nbsp; $3! = 6$&nbsp; possible sets of basis functions.&nbsp;
 +
 
 +
*As can be seen from the&nbsp; [[Aufgaben:Exercise_4.1:_About_the_Gram-Schmidt_Process|"solution"]]&nbsp; to&nbsp; "Exercise 4.1",&nbsp; the same basis functions will result with the order&nbsp; $s_1(t),\ s_2(t),\ s_4(t),\ s_3(t)$&nbsp; as with&nbsp; $s_1(t),\ s_2(t),\ s_3(t),\ s_4(t)$.&nbsp; However,&nbsp; this is only a conjecture of the authors;&nbsp; we have not checked it.
 +
 
 +
* Statement 3 cannot be true simply because of the different units of&nbsp; $s_i(t)$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $\varphi_{\it j}(t)$.&nbsp; Like&nbsp; $A$,&nbsp; the signals have the unit&nbsp; $\sqrt{\rm W}$,&nbsp; the basis functions the unit $\sqrt{\rm 1/s}$.
 +
 
 +
* Thus,&nbsp; the last solution is correct,&nbsp; where for&nbsp; $K$&nbsp; holds:
 
:$$K = ||s_1(t)|| = ||s_2(t)|| = ||s_3(t)|| = 10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$K = ||s_1(t)|| = ||s_2(t)|| = ||s_3(t)|| = 10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
''' Ende Basisfunktionssatz'''
+
 
  
 
'''(4)'''&nbsp; From the comparison of the diagrams in the specification section we can see:
 
'''(4)'''&nbsp; From the comparison of the diagrams in the specification section we can see:

Latest revision as of 10:36, 12 August 2022

Energy-limited signals

This exercise pursues exactly the same goal as  "Exercise 4.1":

For  $M = 4$  energy-limited signals  $s_i(t)$  with  $i = 1, \ \text{...} \ , 4$,  the  $N$  required orthonormal basis functions  $\varphi_{\it j}(t)$  are to be found,  which must satisfy the following condition:

$$< \hspace{-0.1cm} \varphi_j(t), \hspace{0.1cm}\varphi_k(t) \hspace{-0.1cm} > \hspace{0.1cm} \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\varphi_j(t) \cdot \varphi_k(t)\, {\rm d} t = {\rm \delta}_{jk} = \left\{ \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ 0 \end{array} \right.\quad \begin{array}{*{1}c} j = k \\ j \ne k \\ \end{array} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

With  $M$  transmitted signals  $s_i(t)$,  already fewer basis functions  $\varphi_{\it j}(t)$  can suffice,  namely  $N$.  Thus,  in general,  $N ≤ M$.

These are exactly the same energy-limited signals  $s_i(t)$  as in  "Exercise 4.1":

  • The difference is the different order of the signals  $s_i(t)$.
  • In this exercise,  these are sorted in such a way that the basis functions can be found without using the more cumbersome  "Gram-Schmidt process"



Notes:

  • For numerical calculations,  use  $A = 1 \sqrt{\rm W} , \hspace{0.2cm} T = 1\,{\rm µ s} \hspace{0.05cm}. $


Questions

1

In Exercise 4.1,  the Gram-Schmidt process resulted in  $N = 3$  basis functions.  How many basis functions are needed here?

$N \ = \ $

2

Give the 2–norm of all these signals:

$||s_1(t)|| \ = \ $

$\ \cdot \ 10^{\rm –3} \ \rm \sqrt{Ws}$
$||s_2(t)|| \ = \ $

$\ \cdot \ 10^{\rm –3} \ \rm \sqrt{Ws}$
$||s_3(t)|| \ = \ $

$\ \cdot \ 10^{\rm –3} \ \rm \sqrt{Ws}$
$||s_4(t)|| \ = \ $

$\ \cdot \ 10^{\rm –3} \ \rm \sqrt{Ws}$

3

Which statements are true for the basis functions  $\varphi_1(t)$,  $\varphi_2(t)$  and  $\varphi_3(t)$?

The basis functions computed in  "Exericse 4.1"  are also appropriate here.
There are infinitely many possibilities for  $\{\varphi_1(t),\ \varphi_2(t),\ \varphi_3(t)\}$.
A possible set is  $\{\varphi_{\it j}(t)\} = \{s_{\it j}(t)\}$,  with  $j = 1,\ 2,\ 3$.
A possible set is  $\{\varphi_{\it j}(t)\} = \{s_{\it j}(t)/K\}$,  with  $j = 1,\ 2,\ 3$.

4

What are the coefficients of the signal  $s_4(t)$  with respect to the basis functions  $\{\varphi_{\it j}(t)\} = \{s_{\it j}(t)/K\}$, with  $j = 1,\ 2,\ 3$?

$s_{\rm 41} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot \ 10^{\rm –3} \ \rm \sqrt{Ws}$
$s_{\rm 42} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot \ 10^{\rm –3} \ \rm \sqrt{Ws}$
$s_{\rm 43} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot \ 10^{\rm –3} \ \rm \sqrt{Ws}$


Solution

(1)  The only difference to Exercise 4.1 is the different numbering of the signals  $s_i(t)$.

  • Thus it is obvious that  $\underline {N = 3}$  must hold here as well.


(2)  The  "2–norm"  gives the root of the signal energy and is comparable to the  "rms value"  for power-limited signals.

  • The first three signals all have the same 2–norm:
$$||s_1(t)|| = ||s_2(t)|| = ||s_3(t)|| = \sqrt{A^2 \cdot T}\hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The norm of the last signal is larger by a factor of  $\sqrt{2}$:
$$||s_4(t)|| \hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 1.414 \cdot 10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(3)  The  first and last statements are true  in contrast to statements 2 and 3:

  • It would be completely illogical if the basis functions found should no longer hold when the signals  $s_i(t)$  are sorted differently.
  • The Gram–Schmidt process yields only one possible set  $\{\varphi_{\it j}(t)\}$  of basis functions.  A different sorting  (possibly)  yields a different basis function.
  • The number of permutations of   $M = 4$   signals is   $4! = 24$.  In any case,  there cannot be more basis function sets   ⇒   solution 2 is wrong.
  • However,  there are probably  $($because of  $N = 3)$  only  $3! = 6$  possible sets of basis functions. 
  • As can be seen from the  "solution"  to  "Exercise 4.1",  the same basis functions will result with the order  $s_1(t),\ s_2(t),\ s_4(t),\ s_3(t)$  as with  $s_1(t),\ s_2(t),\ s_3(t),\ s_4(t)$.  However,  this is only a conjecture of the authors;  we have not checked it.
  • Statement 3 cannot be true simply because of the different units of  $s_i(t)$  and  $\varphi_{\it j}(t)$.  Like  $A$,  the signals have the unit  $\sqrt{\rm W}$,  the basis functions the unit $\sqrt{\rm 1/s}$.
  • Thus,  the last solution is correct,  where for  $K$  holds:
$$K = ||s_1(t)|| = ||s_2(t)|| = ||s_3(t)|| = 10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(4)  From the comparison of the diagrams in the specification section we can see:

$$s_{4}(t) = s_{1}(t) - s_{2}(t) = K \cdot \varphi_1(t) - K \cdot \varphi_2(t)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • Furthermore holds:
$$s_{4}(t) = s_{41}\cdot \varphi_1(t) + s_{42}\cdot \varphi_2(t) + s_{43}\cdot \varphi_3(t)$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}s_{41} = K \hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws}}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}s_{42} = -K \hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= -10^{-3}\sqrt{\rm Ws}}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}s_{43} \hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 0}\hspace{0.05cm}. $$