Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.5: Coaxial Cable - Impulse Response"

From LNTwww
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
[[File:P_ID1814__LZI_A_4_5.png|right|frame|Impulse response of a coaxial cable]]
 
[[File:P_ID1814__LZI_A_4_5.png|right|frame|Impulse response of a coaxial cable]]
The frequency response of a coaxial cable of length  $l$  can be represented by the following formula:
+
The frequency response of a coaxial cable  (German:  "Koaxialkabel"   ⇒   subscipt  "K")  of length  $l$  can be represented by the following formula:
 
:$$H_{\rm K}(f)  = {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l}
 
:$$H_{\rm K}(f)  = {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l}
 
   \cdot   
 
   \cdot   
Line 9: Line 9:
 
   {\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}
 
   {\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}
 
     \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
     \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
The first term of this equation is due to the ohmic losses, the second term to the transverse losses. Dominant, however, is the skin effect, which is expressed by the third term.
+
The first term of this equation is due to the ohmic losses,  the second term to the transverse losses.  Dominant,  however,  is the skin effect,  which is expressed by the third term.
  
With the coefficients valid for a "standard coaxial cable"  $\text{(2.6 mm}$  core diameter,  $\text{9.5 mm}$  outer diameter$)$   
+
With the coefficients valid for the  "standard coaxial cable"  $\text{(2.6 mm}$  core diameter,  $\text{9.5 mm}$  outer diameter$)$   
 
:$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}
 
:$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}
 
   \hspace{0.05cm},
 
   \hspace{0.05cm},
Line 22: Line 22:
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}}
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}}
 
     \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
     \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
⇒   Attenuation curve  ${a}_{\rm K}(f)$  and phase curve  $b_{\rm K}(f)$  are identical except for the pseudo units "Np" and "rad", respectively.
+
That means:  
 +
 
 +
Attenuation curve  ${a}_{\rm K}(f)$  and phase curve  $b_{\rm K}(f)$  are identical except for the pseudo units  "Np"  and  "rad",  respectively.
  
  
Line 28: Line 30:
 
:$${a}_{\rm \star} = {a}_{\rm K}(f ={R}/{2})
 
:$${a}_{\rm \star} = {a}_{\rm K}(f ={R}/{2})
 
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-
 
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-
{a}_{\rm \star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {a}_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}
+
{a}_{\rm \star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {a}_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*The corresponding  $\rm dB$–value is greater by a factor of  $8.686$  größer. 
+
*The corresponding  $\rm dB$  value is greater by a factor of  $8.686$.  
*For a binary system,  $R = 1/T$ holds, so that the characteristic cable attenuation refers to the frequency  $f = 1/(2T)$ .
+
*For a binary system,  $R = 1/T$ holds,  so that the characteristic cable attenuation refers to the frequency  $f = 1/(2T)$.
  
  
The  [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_and_Its_Inverse#Fouriertransformation|Fourier transform]]  of  $H_{\rm K}(f)$  yields the impulse response  $h_{\rm K}(t)$, which can be specified in closed-analytic form for a coaxial cable using the approximations described here. For a binary system holds:
+
The  [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_and_Its_Inverse#Fouriertransformation|Fourier transform]]  of  $H_{\rm K}(f)$  yields the impulse response  $h_{\rm K}(t)$,  which can be specified in closed-analytic form for a coaxial cable using the approximations described here.  For a binary system holds:
 
:$$h_{\rm K}(t) =  \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot
 
:$$h_{\rm K}(t) =  \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot
 
   {\rm e}^{  - {{a}_{\rm \star}^2}/(2 \hspace{0.05cm} \pi  \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t/T)}
 
   {\rm e}^{  - {{a}_{\rm \star}^2}/(2 \hspace{0.05cm} \pi  \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t/T)}
 
   \hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\rm \star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}
 
   \hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\rm \star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Subtask  '''(5)'''  refers to the basic receiver  $g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t)$, where  $g_s(t)$  is assumed to be a rectangle with height  $s_0$  and duration  $T$ .
+
Subtask  '''(5)'''  refers to the basic reception pulse  $g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t)$, where the basic transmission pulse  $g_s(t)$  is assumed to be a rectangle  $($height  $s_0$,  duration  $T)$.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
''Notes:''
+
Notes:  
 
*The exercise belongs to the chapter   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Eigenschaften_von_Koaxialkabeln|Properties of Coaxial Cables]].
 
*The exercise belongs to the chapter   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Eigenschaften_von_Koaxialkabeln|Properties of Coaxial Cables]].
 
   
 
   
*You can use the interactive applet  [[Applets:Zeitverhalten_von_Kupferkabeln|Zeitverhalten von Kupferkabeln]]  to check your results.
+
*You can use the  (German language)  interactive SWF applet  [[Applets:Zeitverhalten_von_Kupferkabeln|"Zeitverhalten von Kupferkabeln"]]   ⇒   "Time behavior of copper cables"  to check your results.
  
  
Line 57: Line 56:
  
 
<quiz display=simple>
 
<quiz display=simple>
{Wie groß ist die Länge &nbsp;$l$&nbsp; eines Normalkoaxialkabels, wenn sich für die Bitrate &nbsp;$R = 140 \ \rm Mbit/s$&nbsp; die charakteristische Kabeldämpfung &nbsp;${a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; ergibt?
+
{What is the length &nbsp;$l$&nbsp; of a standard coaxial cable if the characteristic cable attenuation is &nbsp;${a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; for the bit rate &nbsp;$R = 140 \ \rm Mbit/s$&nbsp;?
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
$l \ =\ $  { 3 3% } $\ \rm km$
 
$l \ =\ $  { 3 3% } $\ \rm km$
  
  
{Zu welcher Zeit &nbsp;$t_{\rm max}$&nbsp; besitzt &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$&nbsp; sein Maximum? Es gelte weiter &nbsp;${a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$.
+
{At which time &nbsp;$t_{\rm max}$&nbsp; does &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$&nbsp; have its maximum? Let &nbsp;${a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$.
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
  $t_{\rm max} \ = \ $ { 5 3% } $\ \cdot T$
 
  $t_{\rm max} \ = \ $ { 5 3% } $\ \cdot T$
  
  
{Wie groß ist der Maximalwert der Impulsantwort?
+
{What is the maximum value of the impulse response?
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
${\rm Max}\, \big [h_{\rm K}(t)\big ] \ = \ $ { 0.03 3% } $\ \cdot 1/T$
 
${\rm Max}\, \big [h_{\rm K}(t)\big ] \ = \ $ { 0.03 3% } $\ \cdot 1/T$
  
  
{Ab welcher Zeit &nbsp;$t_{\rm 5\%}$&nbsp; ist &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$&nbsp; kleiner als &nbsp;$5\%$&nbsp; des Maximums?&nbsp; Berücksichtigen Sie als Näherung nur den ersten Term der angegebenen Formel.
+
{From which time &nbsp;$t_{\rm 5\%}$&nbsp; is &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$&nbsp; less than &nbsp;$5\%$&nbsp; of the maximum?&nbsp; As an approximation, consider only the first term of the given formula.
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
$t_{\rm 5\%} \ = \ $  { 103.5 3% } $\ \cdot T$
 
$t_{\rm 5\%} \ = \ $  { 103.5 3% } $\ \cdot T$
  
  
{Welche Aussagen treffen für den Empfangsgrundimpuls &nbsp;$g_r(t)$&nbsp; zu?
+
{Which statements are true for the basic reception pulse &nbsp;$g_r(t)$&nbsp;?
 
|type="[]"}
 
|type="[]"}
- $g_r(t)$&nbsp; ist doppelt so breit wie &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$.
+
- $g_r(t)$&nbsp; is twice as wide as &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$.
+ Es gilt näherungsweise &nbsp;$g_r(t) = s_0 \cdot T \cdot h_{\rm K}(t)$.
+
+ It is approximated &nbsp;$g_r(t) = s_0 \cdot T \cdot h_{\rm K}(t)$.
- $g_r(t)$&nbsp; kann durch einen Gaußimpuls angenähert werden.
+
- $g_r(t)$&nbsp; can be approximated by a Gaussian pulse.
  
  
Line 89: Line 88:
 
===Solution===
 
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Die charakteristische Kabeldämpfung&nbsp; ${a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; entspricht in etwa&nbsp; $6.9\ \rm  Np$. Deshalb muss gelten:
+
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The characteristic cable attenuation&nbsp; ${a}_{\rm \star}  = 60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; corresponds approximately to&nbsp; $6.9\ \rm  Np$. Therefore the following must hold:
 
:$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rm
 
:$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rm
 
Np}
 
Np}
Line 98: Line 97:
  
  
'''(2)'''&nbsp; Mit den Substitutionen
+
'''(2)'''&nbsp; With the substitutions
 
:$$x =  \frac{ t}{  T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{\sqrt{2  \pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm}
 
:$$x =  \frac{ t}{  T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{\sqrt{2  \pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm}
 
   K_2 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}^2}{2  \pi}$$
 
   K_2 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}^2}{2  \pi}$$
kann die Impulsantwort wie folgt beschrieben werden:  
+
the impulse response can be described as follows:  
 
:$$h_{\rm K}(x) =  K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}
 
:$$h_{\rm K}(x) =  K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*Durch Nullsetzen der Ableitung folgt daraus:
+
*By setting the derivative to zero:
 
:$$- {3}/{2} \cdot  K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm
 
:$$- {3}/{2} \cdot  K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm
 
   e}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0
 
   e}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0
Line 112: Line 111:
 
  x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot  K_2 = \frac{{a}_{\rm \star}^2}{3  \pi}
 
  x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot  K_2 = \frac{{a}_{\rm \star}^2}{3  \pi}
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*Daraus ergibt sich für&nbsp; $60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; Kabeldämpfung&nbsp; $({a}_{\rm \star}  \approx 6.9 \ \rm Np)$:
+
*This results in the following for&nbsp; $60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; cable attenuation&nbsp; $({a}_{\rm \star}  \approx 6.9 \ \rm Np)$:
 
:$$x_{\rm max} =  { t_{\rm max}}/{  T}= { 6.9^2}/{(3\pi)}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 5 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$x_{\rm max} =  { t_{\rm max}}/{  T}= { 6.9^2}/{(3\pi)}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 5 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
  
  
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Setzt man das Ergebnis in die vorgegebene Gleichung ein, so erhält man (zur Vereinfachung verwenden wir "${a}$"anstelle von "${a}_{\rm \star}$"):
+
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Substituting the result into the given equation, we get (for simplicity, we use "${a}$"instead of "${a}_{\rm \star}$"):
 
:$$h_{\rm K}(t_{\rm max})  =  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{ {a}}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot {{a}^6}/{(3\pi)^3}}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot
 
:$$h_{\rm K}(t_{\rm max})  =  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{ {a}}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot {{a}^6}/{(3\pi)^3}}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot
 
   {\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{{a}^2}{2\pi} \cdot
 
   {\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{{a}^2}{2\pi} \cdot
Line 125: Line 124:
 
  }{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2} \approx  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{{a}^2}
 
  }{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2} \approx  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{{a}^2}
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*Mit&nbsp; $a = 6.9$&nbsp; kommt man somit zum Endergebnis:
+
*With&nbsp; $a = 6.9$&nbsp; we obtain the final result:
 
:$${\rm Max}\,[h_{\rm K}(t)]  = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx  0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}}
 
:$${\rm Max}\,[h_{\rm K}(t)]  = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx  0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}}
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
   \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
  
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Mit dem Ergebnis aus&nbsp; '''(3)'''&nbsp; lautet die geeignete Bestimmungsgleichung:
+
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Using the result from&nbsp; '''(3)'''&nbsp;, the appropriate equation of determination is:
 
:$$\frac{ {a}/T}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 {1}/{T}
 
:$$\frac{ {a}/T}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 {1}/{T}
 
\hspace{0.15cm}{= 0.0015  \cdot {1}/{T}}
 
\hspace{0.15cm}{= 0.0015  \cdot {1}/{T}}
Line 137: Line 136:
 
   \hspace{0.3cm}
 
   \hspace{0.3cm}
 
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{t_{5\%}/T \approx 103.5} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{t_{5\%}/T \approx 103.5} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*Dieser Wert ist etwas zu groß, da der zweite Term&nbsp; ${\rm e}^{-0.05}\approx 0.95$&nbsp; vernachlässigt wurde.  
+
*This value is a bit too large, because the second term&nbsp; ${\rm e}^{-0.05}\approx 0.95$&nbsp; was neglected.
*Die exakte Berechnung liefert&nbsp; $t_{\rm 5\%}/T \approx 97$.
+
*The exact calculation gives&nbsp; $t_{\rm 5\%}/T \approx 97$.
  
  
  
'''(5)'''&nbsp; Richtig ist <u>der zweite Lösungsvorschlag</u>:
+
'''(5)'''&nbsp; <u>The second solution</u> is correct:
*Allgemein gilt:
+
*In general:
 
:$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot
 
:$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot
 
\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$
 
\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$
*Da sich die Kanalimpulsantwort $h_{\rm K}(t)$ innerhalb einer Symboldauer nur unwesentlich ändert, kann auch geschrieben werden:
+
*Since the channel pulse response $h_{\rm K}(t)$ changes only insignificantly within a symbol duration, it can also be written:
 
:$$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T.$$   
 
:$$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T.$$   
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
 
{{ML-Fuß}}

Latest revision as of 10:42, 18 November 2021

Impulse response of a coaxial cable

The frequency response of a coaxial cable  (German:  "Koaxialkabel"   ⇒   subscipt  "K")  of length  $l$  can be represented by the following formula:

$$H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l} \cdot {\rm e}^{- (\alpha_1 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_1) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot f \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot {\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The first term of this equation is due to the ohmic losses,  the second term to the transverse losses.  Dominant,  however,  is the skin effect,  which is expressed by the third term.

With the coefficients valid for the  "standard coaxial cable"  $\text{(2.6 mm}$  core diameter,  $\text{9.5 mm}$  outer diameter$)$ 

$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}} \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm} \beta_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac {\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}$$

this frequency response can also be represented as follows:

$$H_{\rm K}(f) \approx {\rm e}^{- 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

That means:  

Attenuation curve  ${a}_{\rm K}(f)$  and phase curve  $b_{\rm K}(f)$  are identical except for the pseudo units  "Np"  and  "rad",  respectively.


If one defines the characteristic cable attenuation  ${a}_{\rm *}$  at half the bit rate  $($i.e., at  $R/2)$  and normalizes the frequency to  $R$,  one can treat digital systems of different bit rate and length uniformly:

$${a}_{\rm \star} = {a}_{\rm K}(f ={R}/{2}) \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{- {a}_{\rm \star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {a}_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The corresponding  $\rm dB$  value is greater by a factor of  $8.686$.
  • For a binary system,  $R = 1/T$ holds,  so that the characteristic cable attenuation refers to the frequency  $f = 1/(2T)$.


The  Fourier transform  of  $H_{\rm K}(f)$  yields the impulse response  $h_{\rm K}(t)$,  which can be specified in closed-analytic form for a coaxial cable using the approximations described here.  For a binary system holds:

$$h_{\rm K}(t) = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot {\rm e}^{ - {{a}_{\rm \star}^2}/(2 \hspace{0.05cm} \pi \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} t/T)} \hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}{a}_{\rm \star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Subtask  (5)  refers to the basic reception pulse  $g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t)$, where the basic transmission pulse  $g_s(t)$  is assumed to be a rectangle  $($height  $s_0$,  duration  $T)$.



Notes:

  • You can use the  (German language)  interactive SWF applet  "Zeitverhalten von Kupferkabeln"   ⇒   "Time behavior of copper cables"  to check your results.


Questions

1

What is the length  $l$  of a standard coaxial cable if the characteristic cable attenuation is  ${a}_{\rm \star} = 60 \ \rm dB$  for the bit rate  $R = 140 \ \rm Mbit/s$ ?

$l \ =\ $

$\ \rm km$

2

At which time  $t_{\rm max}$  does  $h_{\rm K}(t)$  have its maximum? Let  ${a}_{\rm \star} = 60 \ \rm dB$.

$t_{\rm max} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot T$

3

What is the maximum value of the impulse response?

${\rm Max}\, \big [h_{\rm K}(t)\big ] \ = \ $

$\ \cdot 1/T$

4

From which time  $t_{\rm 5\%}$  is  $h_{\rm K}(t)$  less than  $5\%$  of the maximum?  As an approximation, consider only the first term of the given formula.

$t_{\rm 5\%} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot T$

5

Which statements are true for the basic reception pulse  $g_r(t)$ ?

$g_r(t)$  is twice as wide as  $h_{\rm K}(t)$.
It is approximated  $g_r(t) = s_0 \cdot T \cdot h_{\rm K}(t)$.
$g_r(t)$  can be approximated by a Gaussian pulse.


Solution

(1)  The characteristic cable attenuation  ${a}_{\rm \star} = 60 \ \rm dB$  corresponds approximately to  $6.9\ \rm Np$. Therefore the following must hold:

$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rm Np} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} l = \frac{6.9\,\,{\rm Np}}{0.2722 \,\, {\rm Np}/({\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}) \cdot \sqrt{70\,\,{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 3\,\,{\rm km}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  With the substitutions

$$x = \frac{ t}{ T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}/T}{\sqrt{2 \pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_2 = \frac{ {a}_{\rm \star}^2}{2 \pi}$$

the impulse response can be described as follows:

$$h_{\rm K}(x) = K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • By setting the derivative to zero:
$$- {3}/{2} \cdot K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {3}/{2} \cdot x^{-5/2} = K_2 \cdot x^{-7/2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot K_2 = \frac{{a}_{\rm \star}^2}{3 \pi} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This results in the following for  $60 \ \rm dB$  cable attenuation  $({a}_{\rm \star} \approx 6.9 \ \rm Np)$:
$$x_{\rm max} = { t_{\rm max}}/{ T}= { 6.9^2}/{(3\pi)}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 5 }\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(3)  Substituting the result into the given equation, we get (for simplicity, we use "${a}$"instead of "${a}_{\rm \star}$"):

$$h_{\rm K}(t_{\rm max}) = \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{ {a}}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot {{a}^6}/{(3\pi)^3}}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot {\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{{a}^2}{2\pi} \cdot \frac{3\pi}{{\rm a}^2}\hspace{0.1cm}\right] = \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1}{{a}^2}\cdot \sqrt{\frac{27 \pi }{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2} \approx \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{{a}^2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • With  $a = 6.9$  we obtain the final result:
$${\rm Max}\,[h_{\rm K}(t)] = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{\approx 0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(4)  Using the result from  (3) , the appropriate equation of determination is:

$$\frac{ {a}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 {1}/{T} \hspace{0.15cm}{= 0.0015 \cdot {1}/{T}} \hspace{0.2cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.2cm} (t_{5\%}/T)^{3/2} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi \cdot 0.0015}\approx 1036 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{t_{5\%}/T \approx 103.5} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This value is a bit too large, because the second term  ${\rm e}^{-0.05}\approx 0.95$  was neglected.
  • The exact calculation gives  $t_{\rm 5\%}/T \approx 97$.


(5)  The second solution is correct:

  • In general:
$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot \int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$
  • Since the channel pulse response $h_{\rm K}(t)$ changes only insignificantly within a symbol duration, it can also be written:
$$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T.$$