Mobile Communications/Probability Density of Rayleigh Fading

1. Mobile Communications
2. {{{Untermenü}}}
3. Probability Density of Rayleigh Fading

• [[Mobile Communications/{{{Vorherige Seite}}} | Previous page]]
• [[Mobile Communications/{{{Nächste Seite}}} | Next page]]

• [[Mobile Communications/{{{Vorherige Seite}}} | Previous page]]
• [[Mobile Communications/{{{Nächste Seite}}} | Next page]]

A very general description of the mobile communication channel

To simplify the notation, the addition "TP" is omitted in the following.  Thus the real signal  $s(t) = 1$  is present at the input of the mobile radio channel and the output signal  $r(t)$  is complex-valued.  Additional noise processes are excluded.

The radio signal  $s(t)$  can reach the receiver via a large number of paths, whereby the individual signal components are attenuated in different ways and delayed for different lengths.  In general, it is possible to express the low-pass–received signal without taking thermal noise into account as it follows:

\[r(t)= \sum_{k=1}^{K} \alpha_{k}(t) \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j}\hspace{0.02cm}\cdot \hspace{0.02cm} \phi_{k}(t)} \cdot s(t - \tau_{k}) \hspace{0.05cm}.\]

The following designations are used here:

• The time dependent attenuation factor on the  $k$– th path is  $\alpha_k(t)$.
  

• The time dependent phase progression on the  $k$– th path is  $\phi_k(t)$.
  

• The time dependent runtime on the  $k$– th path is  $\tau_k(t)$.
  
  

The number  $K$  of (at least slightly) different paths is usually very large and unsuitable for direct modeling.

• The model can be simplified considerably by combining paths with approximately equal delays.
• So you only distinguish between  $M$  main paths, which are characterized by large differences in distance and thus noticeable differences in delay:

\[r(t)= \sum_{m=1}^{M} \hspace{0.1cm} \sum_{n=1}^{N_m} \alpha_{m,\hspace{0.04cm}n}(t) \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j}\hspace{0.02cm}\cdot \hspace{0.02cm} \phi_{m,\hspace{0.04cm}n}(t)} \cdot s(t - \tau_{m,\hspace{0.04cm}n}) \hspace{0.05cm}.\]

The two equations given so far are identical.  A simplification results only if one replaces for each main path  $m \in \{1, \hspace{0.04cm}\text{...}\hspace{0.04cm}, M\}$  the  $N_m$  delays, which differ slightly due to reflections at fine structures as well as possibly due to diffraction– and refraction phenomena, by a mean delay:

\[\tau_{m} = \frac{1}{N_m} \cdot \sum_{n=1}^{N_m} \tau_{m,\hspace{0.04cm}n} \hspace{0.05cm}.\]

$\text{Conclusion:}$  This gives the following intermediate result for mobile radio:   The  Received signal in the equivalent low pass range   can be represented as

\[r(t)= \sum_{m=1}^{M} z_m(t) \cdot s(t - \tau_{m}) \hspace{0.5cm} {\rm mit} \hspace{0.5cm} z_m(t) = \sum_{n=1}^{N_m} \alpha_{m,\hspace{0.04cm}n}(t) \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \phi_{m,\hspace{0.04cm}n}(t)} \hspace{0.05cm}.\]

Frequency-selective fading vs. non-frequency-selective fading

Based on the equation just derived

\[r(t)= \sum_{m=1}^{M} z_m(t) \cdot s(t - \tau_{m}) \hspace{0.5cm} {\rm mit} \hspace{0.5cm} z_m(t) = \sum_{n=1}^{N_m} \alpha_{m,\hspace{0.04cm}n}(t) \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \phi_{m,\hspace{0.04cm}n}(t)} \hspace{0.05cm}\]

two important special cases can be derived:

• If there is more than one main path  $(M \ge 2)$, one speaks of  multipath propagation.   As will be shown in the second main chapter   ⇒   Frequency-Selective Transmission Channels  then  –  depending on the frequency  –  constructive or destructive overlaps up to complete extinction occur.
• For some frequencies, multipath propagation proves to be favourable, for others, very unfavourable.  This effect is called  frequency selective fading.
  

• With only one main path  $(M = 1)$  the above equation is simplified as follows  $($in this case the index "$m = 1$" will be omited$)$:

\[r(t)= z(t) \cdot s(t - \tau) \hspace{0.05cm}.\]

• The delay  $\tau$  causes here a constant trasmition time for all frequencies, which does not need to be considered further.

$\text{Conclusion:}$  For  $M=1$  there is no superposition of signal components with noticeable differences in propagation time, thus also no frequency dependence of the total signal: 

\[r(t)= z(t) \cdot s(t) \hspace{0.5cm} {\rm mit} \hspace{0.5cm} z(t) = \sum_{n=1}^{N} \alpha_{n}(t) \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j}\hspace{0.02cm}\cdot \hspace{0.02cm} \phi_{n}(t)} \hspace{0.05cm}. \]

One speaks in this case

• of  non-frequency selective fading  
• or  Flat–Fading 
• or  Rayleigh–Fading.

Modeling of non-frequency selective fading

The figure shows the model for generating non-frequency selective fading   ⇒   Rayleigh–Fading.

• The receive signal  $r(t)$  is obtained by multiplying the transmit signal  $s(t)$  by the time function  $z(t)$ .
• It should again be remembered that all signals or time functions  $s(t)$,  $z(t)$  and  $r(t)$  refer to the equivalent low-pass range.

Rayleigh–Fading–Kanalmodell

We now look at the multiplicative error  $z(t)$  according to this Rayleigh–model more precisely.  For the complex coefficient applies according to the last page:

\[z(t) = \sum_{n=1}^{N} \alpha_{n}(t) \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm j}\hspace{0.04cm}\cdot \hspace{0.04cm} \phi_{n}(t) }= \sum_{n=1}^{N} \alpha_{n}(t) \cdot \cos\hspace{-0.1cm}\big [ \phi_{n}( t) \big ] + {\rm j}\cdot \sum_{n=1}^{N} \alpha_{n}(t) \cdot \sin\hspace{-0.1cm}\big [ \phi_{n}( t)\big ] \hspace{0.05cm}. \]

It should be noted about this equation and the above graph:

• The time dependent attenuation  $\alpha_{n}(t)$  and the time dependent phase  $\phi_{n}(t)$  depend on the environmental conditions.
• $\phi_{n}(t)$  captures the slightly different delays on the  $N$  paths and the  Doppler effect  due to the movement.

• The time function  $z(t)$  is a complex quantity whose real and imaginary part denoted in the following as  $x(t)$  and  $y(t)$ ;
• A deterministic description of the random variable  $z(t) = x(t) + {\rm j}\cdot y(t)$  is not possible.  Rather, the time functions  $x(t)$  and  $y(t)$ must be modeled by stochastic processes.

• If the number  $N$  the  (slightly)  of different delays is sufficiently large, then according to the  central limit theorem  for this   Gaussian Random Variables.

• The two components  $x(t)$  and  $y(t)$  are each mean-free and have the same variance  $\sigma^2$:

\[{\rm E}[x(t)] = {\rm E}\big[y(t)\big] = 0\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.8cm}{\rm E}\big[x^2(t)\big] = {\rm E}\big[y^2(t)\big] = \sigma^2 \hspace{0.05cm}.\]

• We observe the orthogonality of the real part and the imaginary part  (both cosine and sine of the same argument).  Thus the two components are also uncorrelated.  Only in the case of Gaussian random variables does the statistical independence of  $x(t)$  and  $y(t)$ follow from this.

• Because of the Doppler effect, however, there are statistical bonds within the real part  $x(t)$  and within the imaginary part  $y(t)$.  These two quantities are created in the above model by two Digital Filters .

Sample signal characteristics with Rayleigh fading

The following graphs show signal characteristics of  $\text{100 ms}$  Duration and the corresponding density functions.  These are screen shots of the Windows–program "mobile radio channel" from the (former) practical course Simulation of digital transmission systems at the TU Munich:

• Windows–Program MFK   ⇒   Link refers to the ZIP version of the program and
• Internship guide   ⇒   Link refers to the PDF version (58 pages).

$\text{Example 1:}$  In the following, exemplary signal curves for Rayleigh fading and the corresponding probability density functions are shown.  These time curve representations can be interpreted as follows:

Real part, imaginary part and phase response with Rayleigh fading

• The real part is gaussian distributed  (see upper right graph), as shown in the time signal  $x(t)$    Red is the Gaussian WDF $f_x(x)$ and blue is the histogram obtained by simulation over  $10\hspace{0.05cm}000$  Samples

• The parameter used was a  maximum Doppler frequency  of  $f_{\rm D, \ max} = 100 \ \rm Hz$.  Therefore there are statistical bindings within the functions  $x(t)$  and  $y(t)$.  More details about the Doppler effect can be found in the next chapter.

• The PDF  $f_y(y)$  of the imaginary part is identical to  $f_x(x)$.  The variance is  $\sigma_x^2 =\sigma_y^2 = 0. 5 \ (=\sigma^2)$.  Between  $x(t)$  and  $y(t)$  there are no statistical bonds;  the signals are orthogonal.

• The phase  $\phi(t)$  is equally distributed between  $\pm\pi$.  As can be guessed from the jump points in the phase progression,  $\phi(t)$  can also assume larger values.  During the creation of the histogram, however, the ranges  $(2k+1)\cdot \pi$  were set to the value range of n $-\pi$ ... $+\pi$  projected  $(k$  integer$)$.

• The equally distributed phase can be understood by means of the (not shown) 2D–PDF.  This is rotationally symmetrical and accordingly there is no preferred direction:

\[f_{x,\hspace{0.02cm}y}(x, y) = \frac{1}{2\pi \cdot \sigma^2} \cdot {\rm e}^{ -(x^2 + y^2)/(2\sigma^2)} .\]

Real part, imaginary part, absolute value and square of absolute value for Rayleigh fading

$\text{Example 2}$ continuation of $\text{Example 1}$

This graphic shows

• the real part  $x(t)$  and the imaginary part  $y(t)$  of  $z(t)$  (left) and
• the PDF $f_x(x)$(right);  the PDF $f_y(y)$ has exactly the same form.

Underneath it are the gradient and PDF

• of the amount  $a(t) =\vert z(t)\vert$  and
• of the square  $p(t) =a^2(t) =\vert z(t)\vert^2$.
  

From these descriptions it is clear:

• The amount  $a(t) =\vert z(t)\vert$  has a  Rayleigh–PDF  ⇒  hence the name „Rayleigh–Fading”:

\[f_a(a) = \left\{ \begin{array}{c} a/\sigma^2 \cdot {\rm e}^{-a^2/(2\sigma^2)} \\ 0 \end{array} \right.\hspace{0.15cm} \begin{array}{*{1}c} {\rm f\ddot{u}r}\hspace{0.1cm} a\hspace{-0.05cm} \ge \hspace{-0.05cm}0, \\ {\rm f\ddot{u}r}\hspace{0.1cm} a \hspace{-0.05cm}<\hspace{-0.05cm} 0. \\ \end{array} \]

• For the moments of first or second order and the variance of the absolute value function  $a(t)$  applies:

\[{\rm E}\big [a \big] = \sigma \cdot \sqrt {{\pi}/{2}}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.5cm}{\rm E}\big[a^2 \big] = 2 \cdot \sigma^2\]

\[ \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm Var}\big[a \big] = \sigma_a^2 = \sigma^2 \cdot \left ( 2 - {\pi}/{2}\right ) \hspace{0.05cm}. \]

• The PDF of the absolute value square  $p(t)$  is given by  nonlinear transformation  the PDF $f_a(a)$   ⇒   $f_p(p)$  is exponentially distributed:

\[f_p(p) \hspace{-0.05cm}=\hspace{-0.05cm} \left\{ \begin{array}{c} (2\sigma^2)^{-1} \hspace{-0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{-0.05cm} {\rm e}^{-p^2\hspace{-0.05cm}/(2\sigma^2)} \\ 0 \end{array} \right.\hspace{0.05cm} \begin{array}{*{1}c} {\rm f\ddot{u}r}\hspace{0.05cm} p \hspace{-0.05cm}\ge \hspace{-0.05cm}0, \\ {\rm f\ddot{u}r}\hspace{0.15cm} p\hspace{-0.05cm} < \hspace{-0.05cm}0. \\ \end{array} \]

Further information about the  Rayleigh–Fading  can be found in the  Excercise 1.3  and the  Excercise 1.3Z.

Excercises to chapter

Excercise 1.3: Rayleigh–Fading