Difference between revisions of "Signal Representation/Analytical Signal and its Spectral Function"

From LNTwww
Line 16: Line 16:
 
X(f) \; \hspace{0.2cm}\rm for\hspace{0.2cm} {\it f} > 0, \atop {\,\,\,\, \rm 0 \; \hspace{0.9cm}\rm for\hspace{0.2cm} {\it f} < 0.} }\right.$$
 
X(f) \; \hspace{0.2cm}\rm for\hspace{0.2cm} {\it f} > 0, \atop {\,\,\,\, \rm 0 \; \hspace{0.9cm}\rm for\hspace{0.2cm} {\it f} < 0.} }\right.$$
  
The&nbsp; $\text{signum function}$&nbsp; is for positive $f$&ndash;values equal to&nbsp; $+1$&nbsp; and for negative&nbsp; $f$-values equal to&nbsp; $-1$.  
+
The&nbsp; $\text{sign function}$&nbsp; is for positive $f$&ndash;values equal to&nbsp; $+1$&nbsp; and for negative&nbsp; $f$-values equal to&nbsp; $-1$.  
 
*The (double sided) limit value returns&nbsp; $\sign(0) = 0$.  
 
*The (double sided) limit value returns&nbsp; $\sign(0) = 0$.  
 
*The index "+" should make clear that&nbsp; $X_+(f)$&nbsp; has only parts at positive frequencies.
 
*The index "+" should make clear that&nbsp; $X_+(f)$&nbsp; has only parts at positive frequencies.
Line 75: Line 75:
 
==Representation with Hilbert transform==
 
==Representation with Hilbert transform==
 
<br>
 
<br>
At this point it is necessary to briefly discuss a further spectral transformation, which is dealt thoroughly in the book [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Folgerungen_aus_dem_Zuordnungssatz#Hilbert.E2.80.93Transformation|Linear and Time Invariant Systems Systeme]]&nbsp;.
+
At this point it is necessary to briefly discuss a further spectral transformation, which is dealt thoroughly in the book [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Folgerungen_aus_dem_Zuordnungssatz#Hilbert.E2.80.93Transformation|Linear and Time-invariant Systems]]&nbsp;.
 
{{BlaueBox|TEXT=   
 
{{BlaueBox|TEXT=   
$\text{Definition:}$&nbsp; FFor the&nbsp; '''Hilbert transformed''' &nbsp; $ {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\}$&nbsp; a time function&nbsp; $x(t)$&nbsp; applies:
+
$\text{Definition:}$&nbsp; For the&nbsp; $\text{Hilbert transform}$&nbsp; $ {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\}$&nbsp; of a time function&nbsp; $x(t)$&nbsp; applies:
 
   
 
   
 
:$$y(t) = {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\} = \frac{1}{ {\rm \pi} } \cdot
 
:$$y(t) = {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\} = \frac{1}{ {\rm \pi} } \cdot
Line 83: Line 83:
 
\tau} }\hspace{0.15cm} {\rm d}\tau.$$
 
\tau} }\hspace{0.15cm} {\rm d}\tau.$$
  
*This particular integral cannot be solved in a simple, conventional way, but must be evaluated using the&nbsp; [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_principal_value principal value of Cauchy]&nbsp;.
+
*This particular integral cannot be solved in a simple, conventional way, but must be evaluated using the&nbsp; [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_principal_value "Principal Value of Cauchy"].
  
 
*Correspondingly valid in the frequency domain:
 
*Correspondingly valid in the frequency domain:
Line 95: Line 95:
 
:$$x_+(t) = x(t)+{\rm j} \cdot {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\} .$$
 
:$$x_+(t) = x(t)+{\rm j} \cdot {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\} .$$
  
*The Hilbert transformed&nbsp; $\text{H}\{x(t)\}$&nbsp; disappears only in the case of&nbsp; $x(t) = \rm const.$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; DC signal With all other signal forms the analytic signal&nbsp; $x_+(t)$&nbsp; is therefore always complex.
+
*The Hilbert transform&nbsp; $\text{H}\{x(t)\}$&nbsp; disappears only in the case of&nbsp; $x(t) = \rm const.$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; DC signal.&nbsp; With all other signal forms the analytic signal&nbsp; $x_+(t)$&nbsp; is always complex.
 
*From the analytical signal&nbsp; $x_+(t)$&nbsp; the real band-pass signal can be easily determined by real part formation:
 
*From the analytical signal&nbsp; $x_+(t)$&nbsp; the real band-pass signal can be easily determined by real part formation:
 
:$$x(t) = {\rm Re}\left\{x_+(t)\right\} .$$
 
:$$x(t) = {\rm Re}\left\{x_+(t)\right\} .$$
  
 
{{GraueBox|TEXT=   
 
{{GraueBox|TEXT=   
$\text{Example 2:}$&nbsp; The principle of the Hilbert transformation is illustrated again by the following diagram:  
+
$\text{Example 2:}$&nbsp; The principle of the Hilbert transformation is illustrated here by the following diagram:  
**According to the left representation&nbsp; $\rm (A)$&nbsp; ,one gets an analytical signal&nbsp; $x_+(t)$ from the physical signal&nbsp; $x(t)$&nbsp;  by adding an imaginary part &nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot y(t)$&nbsp;.  
+
*According to the left representation&nbsp; $\rm (A)$,&nbsp; one gets the analytical signal&nbsp; $x_+(t)$&nbsp; from the physical signal&nbsp; $x(t)$&nbsp;  by adding an imaginary part &nbsp; ${\rm j} \cdot y(t)$.  
*Here &nbsp; $y(t) = {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\}$&nbsp; is a real time function, which can be calculated easily in the spectral range by multiplying the spectrum&nbsp; $X(f)$&nbsp; with&nbsp; $- {\rm j} \cdot \sign(f)$&nbsp;.
+
*Here &nbsp; $y(t) = {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\}$&nbsp; is a real time function, which can be calculated easily in the spectral range by multiplying the spectrum&nbsp; $X(f)$&nbsp; with&nbsp; $- {\rm j} \cdot \sign(f)$.
  
[[File:P_ID2729__Sig_T_4_2_S2b_neu.png|center|frame|On the Illustration of the Hilbert Transformed]]
+
[[File:P_ID2729__Sig_T_4_2_S2b_neu.png|right|frame|Illustration of the Hilbert Transform]]
 +
 
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
The right representation&nbsp; $\rm (B)$&nbsp; is equivalent to&nbsp; $\rm (A)$:
 +
*With the imaginary function&nbsp; $z(t)$&nbsp; one obtains:
 +
:$$x_+(t) = x(t) + z(t).$$
 +
*A comparison of both models shows that it is indeed true:
 +
:$$z(t) = {\rm j} \cdot y(t).$$}}
  
The right representation&nbsp; $\rm (B)$&nbsp; is equivalent to&nbsp; $\rm (A)$:
 
*Now applies&nbsp; $x_+(t) = x(t) + z(t)$&nbsp; with the purely imaginary function&nbsp; $z(t)$.
 
*A comparison of the two images shows that actually&nbsp; $z(t) = {\rm j} \cdot y(t)$&nbsp; is valid.}
 
  
  
Line 130: Line 134:
 
This equation describes a rotating pointer with constant angular velocity&nbsp; $\omega_{\rm T} = 2\pi f_{\rm T}$&nbsp;.
 
This equation describes a rotating pointer with constant angular velocity&nbsp; $\omega_{\rm T} = 2\pi f_{\rm T}$&nbsp;.
 
{{GraueBox|TEXT=   
 
{{GraueBox|TEXT=   
$\text{Example 3:}$&nbsp; For illustrative reasons the coordinate system in the following figure is rotated to the left (real part up, imaginary part to the left), contrary to the usual representation by&nbsp; $90^\circ$&nbsp.
+
$\text{Example 3:}$&nbsp; For illustrative reasons the coordinate system here is rotated (real part upwards, imaginary part to the left), contrary to the usual representation by&nbsp; $90^\circ$.
  
[[File:P_ID712__Sig_T_4_2_S3.png|center|frame|Vector Diagram of a Harmonic Oscillation]]
+
[[File:P_ID712__Sig_T_4_2_S3.png|right|frame|Vector diagram of a harmonic oscillation]]
  
Anhand dieser Grafik sind folgende Aussagen möglich:
 
 
On the basis of this diagram the following statements are possible:
 
On the basis of this diagram the following statements are possible:
*At the start time&nbsp; $t = 0$&nbsp; the pointer of length&nbsp; $A$&nbsp; (signal amplitude) lies with angle&nbsp; $-\varphi$&nbsp; in the complex plane. In the drawn example,&nbsp; $\varphi = 45^\circ$.
+
*At the start time&nbsp; $t = 0$&nbsp; the pointer of length&nbsp; $A$&nbsp; (amplitude) lies with angle&nbsp; $-\varphi$&nbsp; in the complex plane.&nbsp; In the drawn example,&nbsp; $\varphi = 45^\circ$.
*For the times&nbsp; $t > 0$&nbsp; the pointer rotates with constant angular velocity (angular frequency)&nbsp; $\omega_{\rm T}$&nbsp; in mathematically positive direction, i.e. counterclockwise.
+
*For the times&nbsp; $t > 0$&nbsp; the pointer rotates with constant angular velocity (circular frequency)&nbsp; $\omega_{\rm T}$&nbsp; in mathematically positive direction, i.e. counterclockwise.
*The top of the pointer thus always lies on a circle with radius&nbsp; $A$&nbsp; and requires exactly the time&nbsp; $T_0$, i.e. the period of the harmonic oscillation&nbsp; $x(t)$ for one rotation.
+
*The top of the pointer thus always lies on a circle with radius&nbsp; $A$&nbsp; and requires exactly the time&nbsp; $T_0$, i.e. the period duration of the harmonic oscillation&nbsp; $x(t)$&nbsp; for one rotation.
 
*The projection of the analytical signal&nbsp; $x_+(t)$&nbsp; onto the real axis, marked by red dots, provides the instantaneous values of&nbsp; $x(t)$.}}
 
*The projection of the analytical signal&nbsp; $x_+(t)$&nbsp; onto the real axis, marked by red dots, provides the instantaneous values of&nbsp; $x(t)$.}}
  
Line 146: Line 149:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
For further description we assume the following spectrum for the analytical signal:
 
For further description we assume the following spectrum for the analytical signal:
 +
 +
[[File:P_ID715__Sig_T_4_2_S4.png|right|frame|Vector diagram  of a sum of three oscillations]]
 
   
 
   
 
:$$X_+(f) = \sum_{i=1}^{I}A_i \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm}
 
:$$X_+(f) = \sum_{i=1}^{I}A_i \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm}
 
\varphi_i}\cdot\delta (f - f_{i}) .$$
 
\varphi_i}\cdot\delta (f - f_{i}) .$$
  
The left image shows such a spectrum for the example&nbsp; $I = 3$. If one chooses&nbsp; $I$&nbsp; relatively large and the distance between adjacent spectral lines correspondingly small, then (frequency&ndash;) continuous spectral functions&nbsp; $X_+(f)$&nbsp; can also be approximated with the above equation.
+
The left graphic shows such a spectrum for the example&nbsp; $I = 3$.&nbsp; If one chooses&nbsp; $I$&nbsp; relatively large and the distance between adjacent spectral lines correspondingly small, then (frequency&ndash;) continuous spectral functions&nbsp; $X_+(f)$&nbsp; can also be approximated with the above equation.
 
 
[[File:P_ID715__Sig_T_4_2_S4.png|center|frame|Vector Diagram  of a Sum of 3 Oscillations]]
 
  
In the right picture the corresponding time function is indicated. This is in general:
+
In the right graphic the corresponding time function is indicated.&nbsp; This is in general:
 
   
 
   
 
:$$x_+(t) = \sum_{i=1}^{I}A_i \cdot {\rm e}^{ {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm}(\omega_i
 
:$$x_+(t) = \sum_{i=1}^{I}A_i \cdot {\rm e}^{ {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm}(\omega_i
Line 161: Line 164:
 
To note about this graphic:
 
To note about this graphic:
 
*The sketch shows the initial position of the pointers at the start time&nbsp; $t = 0$&nbsp; corresponding to the amplitudes&nbsp; $A_i$&nbsp; and the phase positions&nbsp; $\varphi_i$.
 
*The sketch shows the initial position of the pointers at the start time&nbsp; $t = 0$&nbsp; corresponding to the amplitudes&nbsp; $A_i$&nbsp; and the phase positions&nbsp; $\varphi_i$.
*The tip of the resulting pointer compound is marked by the violet cross. One obtains by vectorial addition of the three individual pointers for the time&nbsp; $t = 0$:
+
*The tip of the resulting pointer compound is marked by the violet cross.&nbsp; One obtains by vectorial addition of the three individual pointers for the time&nbsp; $t = 0$:
 
:$$x_+(t= 0) = \big [1 \cdot \cos(60^\circ) - 1  \cdot {\rm j} \cdot \sin(60^\circ) \big ]+ 2 \cdot \cos(0^\circ)+1 \cdot \cos(180^\circ) = 1.500 - {\rm j} \cdot 0.866.$$
 
:$$x_+(t= 0) = \big [1 \cdot \cos(60^\circ) - 1  \cdot {\rm j} \cdot \sin(60^\circ) \big ]+ 2 \cdot \cos(0^\circ)+1 \cdot \cos(180^\circ) = 1.500 - {\rm j} \cdot 0.866.$$
 
*For times&nbsp; $t > 0$&nbsp; the three pointers rotate at different angular speeds&nbsp; $\omega_i = 2\pi f_i$. The red hand rotates faster than the green hand, but slower than the blue hand.
 
*For times&nbsp; $t > 0$&nbsp; the three pointers rotate at different angular speeds&nbsp; $\omega_i = 2\pi f_i$. The red hand rotates faster than the green hand, but slower than the blue hand.
*Since all hands rotate counterclockwise, the resulting hand&nbsp; $x_+(t)$&nbsp; will also tend to move in this direction. At time&nbsp; $t = 1\,&micro;\text {s}$&nbsp; the peak of the resulting pointer for the given parameter values is
+
*Since all hands rotate counterclockwise, the resulting hand&nbsp; $x_+(t)$&nbsp; will also tend to move in this direction.&nbsp; At time&nbsp; $t = 1\,&micro;\text {s}$&nbsp; the peak of the resulting pointer for the given parameter values is
  
 
:$$ \begin{align*}x_+(t = 1 {\rm \hspace{0.05cm}&micro; s}) & =  1 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm
 
:$$ \begin{align*}x_+(t = 1 {\rm \hspace{0.05cm}&micro; s}) & =  1 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm

Revision as of 15:00, 6 May 2021

Definition in the Frequency Domain


We consider a real band-pass signal  $x(t)$  with the corresponding band-pass spectrum  $X(f)$, which has an even real and an odd imaginary part with respect to the frequency zero point.  It is assumed that the carrier frequency  $f_{\rm T}$  is much larger than the bandwidth of the band-pass signal  $x(t)$.

$\text{Definition:}$  The  $\text{analytical signal}$  $x_+(t)$  belonging to the physical signal  $x(t)$  is that time function, whose spectrum fulfills the following property:

Analytical signal in the frequency domain
$$X_+(f)=\big[1+{\rm sign}(f)\big] \cdot X(f) = \left\{ {2 \cdot X(f) \; \hspace{0.2cm}\rm for\hspace{0.2cm} {\it f} > 0, \atop {\,\,\,\, \rm 0 \; \hspace{0.9cm}\rm for\hspace{0.2cm} {\it f} < 0.} }\right.$$

The  $\text{sign function}$  is for positive $f$–values equal to  $+1$  and for negative  $f$-values equal to  $-1$.

  • The (double sided) limit value returns  $\sign(0) = 0$.
  • The index "+" should make clear that  $X_+(f)$  has only parts at positive frequencies.


From the graphic you can see the calculation rule for  $X_+(f)$:

The actual band-pass spectrum  $X(f)$  will

  • be doubled at the positive frequencies, and
  • set to zero at the negative frequencies.


Spectrum  $X(f)$  and Spectrum  $X_{+}(f)$  of the analytical signal

$\text{Example 1:}$ 

The graphic

  • on the left shows the (discrete and complex) spectrum  $X(f)$  of the  "physical band-pass signal"
$$x(t) = 4\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm V} \cdot {\cos} ( 2 \pi f_{\rm u} \hspace{0.03cm}t) + 6\hspace{0.05cm}{\rm V} \cdot {\sin} ( 2 \pi f_{\rm o} \hspace{0.03cm}t),$$
  • on the right the (also discrete and complex) spectrum  $X_{+}(f)$  of the corresponding  "analytical signal"  $x_{+}(t)$.


General calculation rule in the time domain


Now we will take a closer look at the spectrum  $X_+(f)$  of the analytical signal and divide it with respect to  $f = 0$  into

For a clear explanation of the analytical signal
  • an even  (German:  "gerade"   ⇒   $\rm g$)  part  $X_{\rm +g}(f)$,  and
  • an odd   (German:  "ungerade"   ⇒   $\rm u$)  part  $X_{\rm +u}(f)$:
$$X_+(f) = X_{\rm +g}(f) + X_{\rm +u}(f).$$

All these spectra are generally complex.

If one considers the  Assignment Theorem  of the Fourier transform, then the following statements are possible on basis of the graphic:

  • The even part  $X_{\rm +g}(f)$  of  $X_{+}(f)$  leads after the Fourier transform to a real time signal, and the odd part  $X_{\rm +u}(f)$  to an imaginary one.


  • It is obvious that  $X_{\rm +g}(f)$  is equal to the physical Fourier spectrum  $X(f)$  and thus the real part of  $x_{\rm +g}(t)$  is equal to the given physical signal  $x(t)$  with band-pass properties.


  • If we denote the imaginary part with  $y(t)$, the analytical signal is:
$$x_+(t)= x(t) + {\rm j} \cdot y(t) .$$
  • According to the generally valid laws of Fourier transform corresponding to the  Assignment Theorem,  the following applies to the spectral function of the imaginary part:
$${\rm j} \cdot Y(f) = X_{\rm +u}(f)= {\rm sign}(f) \cdot X(f) \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}Y(f) = \frac{{\rm sign}(f)}{ {\rm j}}\cdot X(f).$$
  • After transforming this equation into the time domain, the multiplication becomes the  "convolution",  and one gets:
$$y(t) = \frac{1}{ {\rm \pi} t} \hspace{0.05cm}\star \hspace{0.05cm}x(t) = \frac{1}{ {\rm \pi}} \cdot \hspace{0.03cm}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{x(\tau)}{ {t - \tau}}\hspace{0.15cm} {\rm d}\tau.$$

Representation with Hilbert transform


At this point it is necessary to briefly discuss a further spectral transformation, which is dealt thoroughly in the book Linear and Time-invariant Systems .

$\text{Definition:}$  For the  $\text{Hilbert transform}$  $ {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\}$  of a time function  $x(t)$  applies:

$$y(t) = {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\} = \frac{1}{ {\rm \pi} } \cdot \hspace{0.03cm}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{x(\tau)}{ {t - \tau} }\hspace{0.15cm} {\rm d}\tau.$$
  • This particular integral cannot be solved in a simple, conventional way, but must be evaluated using the  "Principal Value of Cauchy".
  • Correspondingly valid in the frequency domain:
$$Y(f) = - {\rm j} \cdot {\rm sign}(f) \cdot X(f) \hspace{0.05cm} .$$


The result of the last page can be summarized with this definition as follows:

  • You get from the real, physical band-pass signal  $x(t)$  the analytic signal  $x_+(t)$ by adding to  $x(t)$  an imaginary part according to the Hilbert transform:
$$x_+(t) = x(t)+{\rm j} \cdot {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\} .$$
  • The Hilbert transform  $\text{H}\{x(t)\}$  disappears only in the case of  $x(t) = \rm const.$   ⇒   DC signal.  With all other signal forms the analytic signal  $x_+(t)$  is always complex.
  • From the analytical signal  $x_+(t)$  the real band-pass signal can be easily determined by real part formation:
$$x(t) = {\rm Re}\left\{x_+(t)\right\} .$$

$\text{Example 2:}$  The principle of the Hilbert transformation is illustrated here by the following diagram:

  • According to the left representation  $\rm (A)$,  one gets the analytical signal  $x_+(t)$  from the physical signal  $x(t)$  by adding an imaginary part   ${\rm j} \cdot y(t)$.
  • Here   $y(t) = {\rm H}\left\{x(t)\right\}$  is a real time function, which can be calculated easily in the spectral range by multiplying the spectrum  $X(f)$  with  $- {\rm j} \cdot \sign(f)$.
Illustration of the Hilbert Transform




The right representation  $\rm (B)$  is equivalent to  $\rm (A)$:

  • With the imaginary function  $z(t)$  one obtains:
$$x_+(t) = x(t) + z(t).$$
  • A comparison of both models shows that it is indeed true:
$$z(t) = {\rm j} \cdot y(t).$$


Vector diagram representation of the harmonic oscillation


The spectral function  $X(f)$  of a harmonic oscillation  $x(t) = A \cdot \text{cos}(2\pi f_{\rm T}t - \varphi)$  consists of two Dirac functions at the frequencies

  • $+f_{\rm T}$  with the complex weight   $A/2 \cdot \text{e}^{-\text{j}\hspace{0.05cm}\varphi}$,
  • $-f_{\rm T}$  with the complex weight   $A/2 \cdot \text{e}^{+\text{j}\hspace{0.05cm}\varphi}$.


Thus, the spectrum of the analytical signal is  $($without the Dirac function at the frequency  $f =-f_{\rm T})$:

$$X_+(f) = A \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\varphi}\cdot\delta (f - f_{\rm T}) .$$

The corresponding time function is obtained by applying the  Shifting Theorem:

$$x_+(t) = A \cdot {\rm e}^{\hspace{0.05cm} {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm}( 2 \pi f_{\rm T} t \hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.05cm} \varphi)}.$$

This equation describes a rotating pointer with constant angular velocity  $\omega_{\rm T} = 2\pi f_{\rm T}$ .

$\text{Example 3:}$  For illustrative reasons the coordinate system here is rotated (real part upwards, imaginary part to the left), contrary to the usual representation by  $90^\circ$.

Vector diagram of a harmonic oscillation

On the basis of this diagram the following statements are possible:

  • At the start time  $t = 0$  the pointer of length  $A$  (amplitude) lies with angle  $-\varphi$  in the complex plane.  In the drawn example,  $\varphi = 45^\circ$.
  • For the times  $t > 0$  the pointer rotates with constant angular velocity (circular frequency)  $\omega_{\rm T}$  in mathematically positive direction, i.e. counterclockwise.
  • The top of the pointer thus always lies on a circle with radius  $A$  and requires exactly the time  $T_0$, i.e. the period duration of the harmonic oscillation  $x(t)$  for one rotation.
  • The projection of the analytical signal  $x_+(t)$  onto the real axis, marked by red dots, provides the instantaneous values of  $x(t)$.


Vector diagram of a sum of harmonic oscillations


For further description we assume the following spectrum for the analytical signal:

Vector diagram of a sum of three oscillations
$$X_+(f) = \sum_{i=1}^{I}A_i \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm} \varphi_i}\cdot\delta (f - f_{i}) .$$

The left graphic shows such a spectrum for the example  $I = 3$.  If one chooses  $I$  relatively large and the distance between adjacent spectral lines correspondingly small, then (frequency–) continuous spectral functions  $X_+(f)$  can also be approximated with the above equation.

In the right graphic the corresponding time function is indicated.  This is in general:

$$x_+(t) = \sum_{i=1}^{I}A_i \cdot {\rm e}^{ {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm}(\omega_i \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot\hspace{0.05cm} t \hspace{0.05cm}-\hspace{0.05cm} \varphi_i)}.$$

To note about this graphic:

  • The sketch shows the initial position of the pointers at the start time  $t = 0$  corresponding to the amplitudes  $A_i$  and the phase positions  $\varphi_i$.
  • The tip of the resulting pointer compound is marked by the violet cross.  One obtains by vectorial addition of the three individual pointers for the time  $t = 0$:
$$x_+(t= 0) = \big [1 \cdot \cos(60^\circ) - 1 \cdot {\rm j} \cdot \sin(60^\circ) \big ]+ 2 \cdot \cos(0^\circ)+1 \cdot \cos(180^\circ) = 1.500 - {\rm j} \cdot 0.866.$$
  • For times  $t > 0$  the three pointers rotate at different angular speeds  $\omega_i = 2\pi f_i$. The red hand rotates faster than the green hand, but slower than the blue hand.
  • Since all hands rotate counterclockwise, the resulting hand  $x_+(t)$  will also tend to move in this direction.  At time  $t = 1\,µ\text {s}$  the peak of the resulting pointer for the given parameter values is
$$ \begin{align*}x_+(t = 1 {\rm \hspace{0.05cm}µ s}) & = 1 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}60^\circ}\cdot {\rm e}^{{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}2 \pi \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.1cm}40 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.1cm} 0.001} + 2\cdot {\rm e}^{{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}2 \pi \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.1cm}50 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.1cm} 0.001}- 1\cdot {\rm e}^{{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}2 \pi \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.1cm}60 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.1cm} 0.001} = \\ & = 1 \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}45.6^\circ} + 2\cdot {\rm e}^{{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}18^\circ}- 1\cdot {\rm e}^{{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}21.6^\circ} \approx 1.673- {\rm j} \cdot 0.464.\end{align*}$$
  • The resulting pointer tip does not lie on a circle like a single oscillation, but a complicated geometric figure is created.


The interactive applet  Physical Signal & Analytical Signal  illustrates  $x_+(t)$  for the sum of three harmonic oscillations.

Exercises for the chapter


Exercise 4.3: Vector Diagram Representation

Exercise 4.3Z: Hilbert Transformator

Exercise 4.4: Vector Diagram for DSB-AM

Exercise 4.4Z: Vector Diagram for DSB-AM