Exercise 4.08Z: Error Probability with Three Symbols
The diagram shows exactly the same signal space constellation as in "Exercise 4.8":
- the M=3 possible transmitted signals, viz.
- \boldsymbol{ s }_0 = (-1, \hspace{0.1cm}1)\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm} \boldsymbol{ s }_1 = (1, \hspace{0.1cm}2)\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm} \boldsymbol{ s }_2 = (2, \hspace{0.1cm}-1)\hspace{0.05cm}.
- the M = 3 decision boundaries
- G_{01}\text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} y \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} 1.5 - 2 \cdot x\hspace{0.05cm},
- G_{02}\text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} y \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} -0.75 +1.5 \cdot x\hspace{0.05cm},
- G_{12}\text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} y \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} x/3\hspace{0.05cm}.
The two axes of the two-dimensional signal space are simplistically denoted here as x and y; actually, \varphi_1(t)/\sqrt {E} and \varphi_2(t)/\sqrt {E} should be written for these, respectively.
These decision boundaries are optimal under the two conditions:
- equal probability symbol probabilities,
- circularly–symmetric PDF of the noise (e.g. AWGN).
In contrast, in this exercise we consider a two–dimensional uniform distribution for the noise PDF:
- \boldsymbol{ p }_{\boldsymbol{ n }} (x,\hspace{0.15cm} y) = \left\{ \begin{array}{c} K\\ 0 \end{array} \right.\quad \begin{array}{*{1}c}{\rm for} \hspace{0.15cm}|x| <A, \hspace{0.15cm} |y| <A \hspace{0.05cm}, \\ {\rm else} \hspace{0.05cm}.\\ \end{array}
- Such an amplitude-limited noise is admittedly without any practical meaning.
- However, it allows an error probability calculation without extensive integrals, from which the principle of the procedure can be seen.
Notes:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter "Approximation of the Error Probability".
- To simplify the notation, the following is used:
- x = {\varphi_1(t)}/{\sqrt{E}}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm} y = {\varphi_2(t)}/{\sqrt{E}}\hspace{0.05cm}.
Questions
Solution
(1) The volume of the two-dimensional PDF must give p_n(x, y) =1, that is:
- 2A \cdot 2A \cdot K = 1 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} K = \frac{1}{4A^2}\hspace{0.05cm}.
- With A = 0.75 ⇒ 2A = 3/2, we get K = 4/9 \ \underline {=0.444}.
(2) In the accompanying graph, the noise component \boldsymbol{n} is plotted by the squares of edge length 1.5 around the signal space points \boldsymbol{s}_i.
- It can be seen that no decision boundary is exceeded by noise components.
- It follows: The symbol error probability is p_{\rm S}\ \underline { \equiv 0} under the conditions given here.
(3) Statements 2 and 4 are correct, as can be seen from the second graph:
- The message m_2 cannot be falsified because the square around \boldsymbol{s}_2 lies entirely in the lower right quadrant and thus in the decision region I_2.
- Likewise, m_2 was sent with certainty if the received value lies in decision region I_2.
The reason: None of the squares around \boldsymbol{s}_0 and \boldsymbol{s}_1 extends into the region I_2.
- m_0 can only be falsified to m_1. The (conditional) falsification probability is equal to the ratio of the areas of the small yellow triangle (area 1/16) and the square (area 4):
- {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_0 ) = \frac{1/2 \cdot 1/2 \cdot 1/4}{4}= {1}/{64} \hspace{0.05cm}.
- For symmetry reasons, equally:
- {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_1 ) = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_0 )={1}/{64} \hspace{0.05cm}.
(4) For equal probability symbols, we obtain for the (average) error probability:
- p_{\rm S} = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E} ) = {1}/{3} \cdot \big [{\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_0 ) + {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_1 )+{\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_2 )\big ]
- \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} p_{\rm S} = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E} ) = {1}/{3} \cdot \left [{1}/{64} + {1}/{64} + 0 )\right ]= \frac{2}{3 \cdot 64} = {1}/{96}\hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 1.04 \%} \hspace{0.05cm}.
(5) Now we obtain a smaller average error probability, viz.
- p_{\rm S} = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E} ) = {1}/{4} \cdot {1}/{64} + {1}/{4} \cdot {1}/{64}+ {1}/{2} \cdot0 = {1}/{128}\hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.78 \% } \hspace{0.05cm}.
(6) Correct is YES:
- For example, I_1: first quadrant, I_0: second quadrant, I_2 \text{:} \ y < 0 would give zero error probability.
- This means that the given bounds are optimal only in the case of circularly symmetric PDF of the noise, for example, the AWGN model.