Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Exercise 4.08Z: Error Probability with Three Symbols

From LNTwww

Decision regions with  M=3

The diagram shows exactly the same signal space constellation as in  "Exercise 4.8":

  • the  M=3  possible transmitted signals,  viz.
\boldsymbol{ s }_0 = (-1, \hspace{0.1cm}1)\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm} \boldsymbol{ s }_1 = (1, \hspace{0.1cm}2)\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm} \boldsymbol{ s }_2 = (2, \hspace{0.1cm}-1)\hspace{0.05cm}.
  • the  M = 3  decision boundaries
G_{01}\text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} y \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} 1.5 - 2 \cdot x\hspace{0.05cm},
G_{02}\text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} y \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} -0.75 +1.5 \cdot x\hspace{0.05cm},
G_{12}\text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} y \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} x/3\hspace{0.05cm}.


The two axes of the two-dimensional signal space are simplistically denoted here as  x  and  y;  actually,   \varphi_1(t)/\sqrt {E}  and  \varphi_2(t)/\sqrt {E}  should be written for these, respectively.

These decision boundaries are optimal under the two conditions:

  • equal probability symbol probabilities,
  • circularly–symmetric PDF of the noise  (e.g. AWGN).


In contrast,  in this exercise we consider a two–dimensional uniform distribution for the noise PDF:

\boldsymbol{ p }_{\boldsymbol{ n }} (x,\hspace{0.15cm} y) = \left\{ \begin{array}{c} K\\ 0 \end{array} \right.\quad \begin{array}{*{1}c}{\rm for} \hspace{0.15cm}|x| <A, \hspace{0.15cm} |y| <A \hspace{0.05cm}, \\ {\rm else} \hspace{0.05cm}.\\ \end{array}
  • Such an amplitude-limited noise is admittedly without any practical meaning.
  • However,  it allows an error probability calculation without extensive integrals,  from which the principle of the procedure can be seen.



Notes:

  • To simplify the notation, the following is used:
x = {\varphi_1(t)}/{\sqrt{E}}\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm} y = {\varphi_2(t)}/{\sqrt{E}}\hspace{0.05cm}.


Questions

1

What is the value of the constant  K  for  A = 0.75?

\boldsymbol{K} \ = \

2

What is the symbol error probability with  A = 0.75?

p_{\rm S} \ = \

\ \%

3

Which statements are true for  A = 1

All messages  m_i  are falsified in the same way.
Conditional error probability  {\rm Pr({ \cal E}} \hspace{0.05cm} | \hspace{0.05cm} {\it m}_0) = 1/64.
Conditional error probability  {\rm Pr({ \cal E}} \hspace{0.05cm} | \hspace{0.05cm} {\it m}_1) = 0.
Conditional error probability  {\rm Pr({ \cal E}} \hspace{0.05cm} | \hspace{0.05cm} {\it m}_2) = 0.

4

What is the error probability with  A=1  and  {\rm Pr}(m_0) = {\rm Pr}(m_1) = {\rm Pr}(m_2) = 1/3?

p_{\rm S} \ = \

\ \%

5

What is the error probability with  A=1  and  {\rm Pr}(m_0) = {\rm Pr}(m_1) = 1/4  and  {\rm Pr}(m_2) = 1/2?

p_{\rm S} \ = \

\ \%

6

Could a better result be obtained by specifying other regions?

Yes.
No.


Solution

Noise regions with  A = 0.75

(1)  The volume of the two-dimensional PDF must give  p_n(x, y) =1,  that is:

2A \cdot 2A \cdot K = 1 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} K = \frac{1}{4A^2}\hspace{0.05cm}.
  • With  A = 0.75   ⇒   2A = 3/2,  we get K = 4/9 \ \underline {=0.444}.


(2)  In the accompanying graph,  the noise component  \boldsymbol{n} is plotted by the squares of edge length  1.5  around the signal space points  \boldsymbol{s}_i.

  • It can be seen that no decision boundary is exceeded by noise components.
  • It follows:  The symbol error probability is  p_{\rm S}\ \underline { \equiv 0}  under the conditions given here.


Noise regions with  A = 1

(3)  Statements 2 and 4  are correct,  as can be seen from the second graph:

  • The message  m_2  cannot be falsified because the square around  \boldsymbol{s}_2  lies entirely in the lower right quadrant and thus in the decision region  I_2.
  • Likewise,  m_2  was sent with certainty if the received value lies in decision region  I_2.
    The reason:  None of the squares around  \boldsymbol{s}_0  and  \boldsymbol{s}_1  extends into the region  I_2.
  • m_0  can only be falsified to m_1.  The  (conditional)  falsification probability is equal to the ratio of the areas of the small yellow triangle  (area 1/16)  and the square  (area  4):
{\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_0 ) = \frac{1/2 \cdot 1/2 \cdot 1/4}{4}= {1}/{64} \hspace{0.05cm}.
  • For symmetry reasons,  equally:
{\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_1 ) = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_0 )={1}/{64} \hspace{0.05cm}.


(4)  For equal probability symbols,  we obtain for the  (average)  error probability:

p_{\rm S} = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E} ) = {1}/{3} \cdot \big [{\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_0 ) + {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_1 )+{\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_2 )\big ]
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} p_{\rm S} = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E} ) = {1}/{3} \cdot \left [{1}/{64} + {1}/{64} + 0 )\right ]= \frac{2}{3 \cdot 64} = {1}/{96}\hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 1.04 \%} \hspace{0.05cm}.


(5)  Now we obtain a smaller  average error probability, viz.

p_{\rm S} = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E} ) = {1}/{4} \cdot {1}/{64} + {1}/{4} \cdot {1}/{64}+ {1}/{2} \cdot0 = {1}/{128}\hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.78 \% } \hspace{0.05cm}.


(6)  Correct is YES:

  • For example,     I_1: first quadrant,     I_0: second quadrant,     I_2 \text{:} \ y < 0     would give zero error probability.
  • This means that the given bounds are optimal only in the case of circularly symmetric PDF of the noise,  for example, the AWGN model.