Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 3.1Z: Hilbert Transform"

From LNTwww
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
[[File:P_ID1756__LZI_Z_3_1.png|right|frame|Considered impulse responses]]
 
[[File:P_ID1756__LZI_Z_3_1.png|right|frame|Considered impulse responses]]
The relation between the real and the imaginary part of the transfer function of realizable causal systems is described by the Hilbert transformation. Here, the following holds:
+
The relation between the real part and the imaginary part of the transfer function of realizable causal systems is described by the Hilbert transformation.  Here, the following holds:
 
:$${\rm Im} \left\{ H(f) \right \} =  - \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{-\infty}^{
 
:$${\rm Im} \left\{ H(f) \right \} =  - \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{-\infty}^{
 
+\infty}
 
+\infty}
Line 19: Line 19:
 
{\rm Re} \left\{ H(f) \right \}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
{\rm Re} \left\{ H(f) \right \}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
Since the transformation and its inverse differ only by the sign, one equation is sufficient. Here, the following applies:
+
Since the transformation and its inverse differ only by the sign,  one equation is sufficient.  Here, the following applies:
  
 
* To compute the operand marked by the arrow the positive sign is used.
 
* To compute the operand marked by the arrow the positive sign is used.
  
* In contrast to this, the minus sign is taken into account for the computation of the operand marked by the circle.
+
* In contrast to this,  the minus sign is taken into account for the computation of the operand marked by the circle.
  
  
The Hilbert transformation pertains much more generally than only to the case of application described here. For example, it is also used to determine the (complex) analytical signal corresponding to a real band-pass signal.
+
The Hilbert transformation pertains much more generally than only to the case of application described here.  For example,  it is also used to determine the (complex) analytical signal corresponding to a real band-pass signal.
  
In this exercise, the corresponding frequency responses  $H(f)$  are to be determined for the causal impulse responses  $h(t)$  given in the diagram according to the inverse Fourier transformation.  
+
In this exercise,  the corresponding frequency responses  $H(f)$  are to be determined for the causal impulse responses  $h(t)$  given in the diagram according to the inverse Fourier transformation.  
  
If  $H(f)$  is decomposed into in real and imaginary parts respectively, then Hilbert correspondences can be derived from it.
+
If  $H(f)$  is decomposed into real and imaginary parts respectively,  then Hilbert correspondences can be derived from it.
  
  
Line 37: Line 37:
  
  
 
+
Please note:  
 
 
 
 
''Please note:''
 
 
*The exercise belongs to the chapter   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Conclusions_from_the_Allocation_Theorem|Conclusions from the Allocation Theorem]].
 
*The exercise belongs to the chapter   [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Conclusions_from_the_Allocation_Theorem|Conclusions from the Allocation Theorem]].
*In particular, reference is made to the theory page  [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Conclusions_from_the_Allocation_Theorem#Hilbert transformation|Hilbert transformation]].
+
*In particular, reference is made to the theory page  [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Conclusions_from_the_Allocation_Theorem#Hilbert_transform|Hilbert transform]].
 
   
 
   
  
Line 80: Line 77:
 
===Solution===
 
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The <u>second proposed solution</u> is correct:
+
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The&nbsp; <u>second proposed solution</u>&nbsp; is correct:
 
*The Fourier transform of&nbsp; $h_1(t) = \alpha \cdot \delta(t)$&nbsp; is:
 
*The Fourier transform of&nbsp; $h_1(t) = \alpha \cdot \delta(t)$&nbsp; is:
 
:$$H_1(f) = \alpha \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm Re} \left\{ H_1(f) \right \}  = \alpha ,
 
:$$H_1(f) = \alpha \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm Re} \left\{ H_1(f) \right \}  = \alpha ,
Line 87: Line 84:
  
  
'''(2)'''&nbsp; The <u>last proposed solution</u> is correct:
+
'''(2)'''&nbsp; The&nbsp; <u>last proposed solution</u>&nbsp; is correct:
*Mit dem&nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_Theorems#Shifting Theorem|shifting theorem]]&nbsp; and dem&nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Calculating_With_Complex_Numbers#Representation by magnitude and phase|Euler's theorem]]&nbsp; erhält man für die Impulsantwort&nbsp; $h_2(t)$&nbsp; den Frequenzgang:
+
*The following frequency response is obtained for the impulse response&nbsp; $h_2(t)$&nbsp; considering the&nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_Theorems#Shifting Theorem|shifting theorem]]&nbsp; and&nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Calculating_With_Complex_Numbers#Representation by magnitude and phase|Euler's theorem]]&nbsp;:
 
:$$H_2(f) ={\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f \tau} = \cos (2\pi
 
:$$H_2(f) ={\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f \tau} = \cos (2\pi
 
f \tau) - {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pi
 
f \tau) - {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pi
 
f \tau)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
f \tau)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
*Daraus ergibt sich  die Hilbert&ndash;Korrespondenz
+
*This results in the Hilbert correspondence
 
:$$\cos (2\pi f \tau) \hspace{0.3cm}
 
:$$\cos (2\pi f \tau) \hspace{0.3cm}
 
\leftarrow\hspace{-0.05cm}\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\bullet\hspace{0.3cm}
 
\leftarrow\hspace{-0.05cm}\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\bullet\hspace{0.3cm}
-\sin (2\pi f \tau)\hspace{0.7cm}{\rm oder}\hspace{0.7cm}
+
-\sin (2\pi f \tau)\hspace{0.7cm}{\rm or}\hspace{0.7cm}
 
\cos (2\pi f \tau)  \hspace{0.3cm}
 
\cos (2\pi f \tau)  \hspace{0.3cm}
 
\bullet\hspace{-0.05cm}\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!-\!\hspace{-0.1cm}\rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}
 
\bullet\hspace{-0.05cm}\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!-\!\hspace{-0.1cm}\rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}
Line 104: Line 101:
  
  
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Richtig sind <u>beide Lösungsvorschläge</u>:
+
'''(3)'''&nbsp; <u>Both proposed solutions</u>&nbsp; are correct:
*Für die rechteckförmige Impulsantwort&nbsp; $h_3(t)$&nbsp; mit Breite&nbsp; $T$&nbsp; und Höhe&nbsp; $1/T$&nbsp; erhält man die Spektralfunktion gemäß dem&nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_and_Its_Inverse#Das_erste_Fourierintegral|ersten Fourierintegral]]:
+
*For the rectangular impulse response&nbsp; $h_3(t)$&nbsp; of width&nbsp; $T$&nbsp; and height&nbsp; $1/T$&nbsp; the spectral function is obtained according to the&nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_and_Its_Inverse#The_first_Fourier_integral|first Fourier integral]]:
 
:$$H_3(f) =    \int_{-\infty}^{
 
:$$H_3(f) =    \int_{-\infty}^{
 
+\infty}
 
+\infty}
Line 121: Line 118:
 
T}}{{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
T}}{{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
*Mit dem&nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Calculating_With_Complex_Numbers#Darstellung_nach_Betrag_und_Phase|Eulerschen Satz]]&nbsp; kann hierfür auch geschrieben werden:
+
*Using&nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Calculating_With_Complex_Numbers#Representation by magnitude and phase|Euler's theorem]]&nbsp; this can also be rewritten as follows:
 
:$$H_3(f) = \frac{1-\cos (2\pi
 
:$$H_3(f) = \frac{1-\cos (2\pi
 
f T) + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pi f
 
f T) + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pi f
Line 128: Line 125:
 
T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
*Weiter gilt mit der Umformung&nbsp; $1 - \cos(\alpha) = 2 \cdot \sin^2(\alpha/2)$:
+
*Furthermore, the following holds considering the transformation&nbsp; $1 - \cos(\alpha) = 2 \cdot \sin^2(\alpha/2)$:
 
:$${\rm Re}\hspace{-0.05cm} \left\{ H_3(f) \right \}  =  {\rm si} (2\pi f T)\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm si}(x)= {\rm sin}(x)/x
 
:$${\rm Re}\hspace{-0.05cm} \left\{ H_3(f) \right \}  =  {\rm si} (2\pi f T)\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm si}(x)= {\rm sin}(x)/x
 
  \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.5cm}
 
  \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.5cm}
Line 137: Line 134:
  
  
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Richtig ist <u>Nein</u>:  
+
'''(4)'''&nbsp; <u>No</u> is correct:  
*Die Impulsantwort&nbsp; $h_4(t)$&nbsp; ist nicht kausal, so dass aus dem dazugehörigen Fourier&ndash;Spektrum&nbsp; $H_4(f)$&nbsp; keine Hilbert&ndash;Korrespondenz abgeleitet werden kann.
+
*The impulse response &nbsp; $h_4(t)$&nbsp; is not causal so that no Hilbert correspondence can be derived from the associated Fourier spectrum&nbsp; $H_4(f)$&nbsp;.
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
  

Latest revision as of 16:45, 9 October 2021

Considered impulse responses

The relation between the real part and the imaginary part of the transfer function of realizable causal systems is described by the Hilbert transformation.  Here, the following holds:

$${\rm Im} \left\{ H(f) \right \} = - \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{-\infty}^{ +\infty} { \frac{{\rm Re} \left\{ H(\nu) \right \}}{f - \nu}}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm d}\nu \hspace{0.05cm},$$
$${\rm Re} \left\{ H(f) \right \} = \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{-\infty}^{ +\infty} { \frac{{\rm Im} \left\{ H(\nu) \right \}}{f - \nu}}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm d}\nu \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The following is used as a common abbreviation for these two integral transformations:

$${\rm Im} \left\{ H(f) \right \} \quad \bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\hspace{-0.05cm}\rightarrow\quad {\rm Re} \left\{ H(f) \right \}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Since the transformation and its inverse differ only by the sign,  one equation is sufficient.  Here, the following applies:

  • To compute the operand marked by the arrow the positive sign is used.
  • In contrast to this,  the minus sign is taken into account for the computation of the operand marked by the circle.


The Hilbert transformation pertains much more generally than only to the case of application described here.  For example,  it is also used to determine the (complex) analytical signal corresponding to a real band-pass signal.

In this exercise,  the corresponding frequency responses  $H(f)$  are to be determined for the causal impulse responses  $h(t)$  given in the diagram according to the inverse Fourier transformation.

If  $H(f)$  is decomposed into real and imaginary parts respectively,  then Hilbert correspondences can be derived from it.




Please note:


Questions

1

Determine the Hilbert transform of a constant  $\alpha$ beginning with  $h_1(t) = \alpha \cdot \delta(t)$ .
Which statements are true?

The Hilbert transform of a constant  $\alpha$  is also  $\alpha$.
The Hilbert transform of a constant  $\alpha$  is zero.
The Hilbert transform of a constant  $\alpha$  is sinusoidal.

2

Determine the Hilbert transform of a cosine function beginning with  $h_2(t) = \delta(t- \tau)$ .
Which statements are true?

The Hilbert transform of a cosine is a constant.
The Hilbert transform of a cosine function is zero.
The Hilbert transform of a cosine is sinusoidal.

3

Determine the Hilbert transform of the function  ${\rm si}(2 \pi fT) = {\rm sin}(2 \pi fT)/(2 \pi fT)$ beginning with the rectangular  $h_3(t)$ .
Which statements are true?

The Hilbert transform is  ${\rm sin}^2\hspace{-0.05cm}(\pi fT)/(\pi fT)$.
The Hilbert transform is  ${\rm sin}( \pi fT) \cdot {\rm si}( \pi fT)$.

4

Can a Hilbert correspondence be derived from the impulse response  $h_4(t)$ ?

Yes.
No.


Solution

(1)  The  second proposed solution  is correct:

  • The Fourier transform of  $h_1(t) = \alpha \cdot \delta(t)$  is:
$$H_1(f) = \alpha \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm Re} \left\{ H_1(f) \right \} = \alpha , \hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Im} \left\{ H_1(f) \right \} = 0\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  The  last proposed solution  is correct:

$$H_2(f) ={\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f \tau} = \cos (2\pi f \tau) - {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pi f \tau)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This results in the Hilbert correspondence
$$\cos (2\pi f \tau) \hspace{0.3cm} \leftarrow\hspace{-0.05cm}\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\bullet\hspace{0.3cm} -\sin (2\pi f \tau)\hspace{0.7cm}{\rm or}\hspace{0.7cm} \cos (2\pi f \tau) \hspace{0.3cm} \bullet\hspace{-0.05cm}\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!-\!\hspace{-0.1cm}\rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm} \sin (2\pi f \tau) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(3)  Both proposed solutions  are correct:

  • For the rectangular impulse response  $h_3(t)$  of width  $T$  and height  $1/T$  the spectral function is obtained according to the  first Fourier integral:
$$H_3(f) = \int_{-\infty}^{ +\infty} { h_3(t) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f t}}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm d}t \hspace{0.05cm} = \frac{1}{T} \cdot \int_{0}^{ T} { {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f t}}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm d}t = \left [\frac{1}{-{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f\hspace{0.05cm} t} \right ]_{0}^{T} = \frac{1-{\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f\hspace{0.05cm} T}}{{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
$$H_3(f) = \frac{1-\cos (2\pi f T) + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pi f T)}{{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} = \frac{\sin (2\pi f T)}{ 2\pi f T} - {\rm j}\cdot \frac{1 - \cos (2\pi f T)}{ 2\pi f T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • Furthermore, the following holds considering the transformation  $1 - \cos(\alpha) = 2 \cdot \sin^2(\alpha/2)$:
$${\rm Re}\hspace{-0.05cm} \left\{ H_3(f) \right \} = {\rm si} (2\pi f T)\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm si}(x)= {\rm sin}(x)/x \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.5cm} {\rm Im} \hspace{-0.05cm}\left\{ H_3(f) \right \} = -\frac{\sin^2 (\pi f T)}{ \pi f T}= - {\rm si} (\pi f T) \cdot {\rm sin} (\pi f T) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(4)  No is correct:

  • The impulse response   $h_4(t)$  is not causal so that no Hilbert correspondence can be derived from the associated Fourier spectrum  $H_4(f)$ .