Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.7: Copper Twin Wire 0.5 mm"

From LNTwww
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 64: Line 64:
 
{Calculate the phase delay  $\tau_P$,  related to the symbol duration  $T$.
 
{Calculate the phase delay  $\tau_P$,  related to the symbol duration  $T$.
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
$\tau_{{\rm P}/T} \ = \ $ { 73 3% }
+
$\tau_{\rm P}/T \ = \ $ { 73 3% }
  
  
Line 121: Line 121:
 
*The partial impulse response   $h_1(t ) \star h_2(t )$  takes into account the influence of  $\alpha_1$,  $\alpha_2$  and  $\beta_2$  and thus all terms leading to distortions.
 
*The partial impulse response   $h_1(t ) \star h_2(t )$  takes into account the influence of  $\alpha_1$,  $\alpha_2$  and  $\beta_2$  and thus all terms leading to distortions.
 
*In contrast,   $\alpha_0$  leads only to a frequency-independent attenuation and  $\beta_1$  only to a constant running time for all frequencies.
 
*In contrast,   $\alpha_0$  leads only to a frequency-independent attenuation and  $\beta_1$  only to a constant running time for all frequencies.
*Solution 2 does not apply:    First  (for small  $t$–values)    $h_1(t ) \star h_2(t )$  is smaller than  $h_2(t )$.  Then, for large  $t$–values, the blue curve lies above the red one.
+
*Solution 2 does not apply:    First  (for small  $t$–values)    $h_1(t ) \star h_2(t )$  is smaller than  $h_2(t )$.   
 +
*Then, for large  $t$–values, the blue curve lies above the red one.
 
*This means:   $\alpha_1$  and thus also  $h_1(t )$  actually cause additional distortions,  even when they are not very significant.
 
*This means:   $\alpha_1$  and thus also  $h_1(t )$  actually cause additional distortions,  even when they are not very significant.
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
 
{{ML-Fuß}}

Latest revision as of 13:52, 24 November 2021

Impulse response of the copper twin wire

The time response of a copper twin wire with diameter  $d = 0.5 \ \rm mm$  is to be analyzed.

  • The frequency response with the line length  $l = 1.5 \ \rm km$  and the bit rate  $R = 10 \ \rm Mbit/s$:
$$H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-{\rm a}_0 } \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} 2 \pi \cdot f \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.01cm}\tau_{\rm P}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm a}_1 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.02cm}2f/R}\cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm a}_2 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}\sqrt{2f/R}}\cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} b_2 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}\sqrt{2f/R}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The following quantities are used,  which can be derived from the attenuation and phase function per unit length:
$${\rm a}_0 = \alpha_0 \cdot l\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm with} \hspace{0.15cm}\alpha_0 = 0.5066\,\, \frac{\rm Np}{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$ \tau_{\rm P} = \frac{\beta_1 \cdot l}{2 \pi} \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm with} \hspace{0.15cm}\beta_1 = 30.6\,\, \frac{\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot MHz}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$ {\rm a}_1 = \alpha_1 \cdot l \cdot {{R}/{2}}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm with} \hspace{0.15cm} \alpha_1 = 0.136\,\, \frac{\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot MHz}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$ {\rm a}_2 = \alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot \sqrt{{R}/{2}}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm with} \hspace{0.15cm} \alpha_2 = 1.1467\,\, \frac{\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
$$ {b}_2 = \beta_2 \cdot l \cdot \sqrt{{R}/{2}}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm with} \hspace{0.15cm} \beta_2 = 1.1467\,\, \frac{\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The impulse response can thus be expressed in the form
$$h_{\rm K}(t ) = K \cdot \big [ \delta(t - \tau_{\rm P})\star h_{1}(t) \star h_{2}(t) \big ]$$

where

  • the partial impulse response  $h_1(t)$  is due to the third term in the frequency domain equation,  and
  • $h_2(t)$  indicates the joint time-domain representation of the last two terms.


The graph shows as red curve the part  $h_2(t)$  of the impulse response and the convolution product  $h_1(t) \star h_2(t)$  ⇒   blue curve).
Here  $h_2(t)$  is equal to the  coaxial cable impulse response  with the characteristic cable attenuation  ${\rm a}_\star = {\rm a}_2$.





Notes:

  • The parameters  $\alpha_0$,  $\alpha_1$ and  $\alpha_2$ were converted from the  $k$–parameters as shown in  Exercise 4.6.
  • The phase function parameter  $\beta_2$  was set here numerically equal to the attenuation function parameter  $\alpha_2$. 
  • Therefore,  the attenuation component  ${\rm a}_2$  and the phase component  ${b}_2$  differ only in units.
  • On the page  Discussion of the approximate solution found,  it is explained why this measure is necessary.
  • You can use the  (German language)  interactive SWF applet  "Zeitverhalten von Kupferkabeln"   ⇒   "Time behavior of copper cables"  to check your results.



Questions

1

Calculate the constant  $K$  of the impulse response  $h_{\rm K}(t )$.

$K \ = \ $

2

Calculate the phase delay  $\tau_P$,  related to the symbol duration  $T$.

$\tau_{\rm P}/T \ = \ $

3

What is the characteristic attenuation  $a_\star$  of the comparable coaxial cable?

${\rm a}_\star \ = \ $

$\ \rm dB$

4

What are the characteristics of the partial impulse response  $h_{\rm 1}(t )$?

$h_{\rm 1}(t )$  is an even function.
The maximum of  $h_{\rm 1}(t )$  is at  $t = 0$.
The integral over  $h_{\rm 1}(t )$  gives the value  $2$.

5

Which properties can you recognize in the function  $h_1(t ) \star h_2(t )$?

$h_1(t ) \star h_2(t )$  completely reproduces the distortions of  $h_{\rm K}(t )$. 
$h_1(t ) \star h_2(t )$  differs from  $h_{\rm K}(t )$  only by one factor.


Solution

(1)  With  ${\rm a}_0 = \alpha_0 \cdot l \approx 0.76 \ \rm Np$,  for the constant  $K$,  which indicates the influence of the coefficient  $ \alpha_0$  on the impulse response,  we obtain:

$$K = {\rm e}^{-{\rm a}_0 }= {\rm e}^{-0.76} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.468} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  For the phase delay,  using the given equation:

$$\tau_{\rm P} = \frac{\beta_1 \cdot l}{2 \pi}= \frac{30.6 \cdot 1.5}{2 \pi}\, {\rm µ s}\approx 7.31\, {\rm µ s}\hspace{0.05cm},$$

and related to the symbol duration  $T = 0.1 \ µ \rm s$:   

$${\tau_{\rm P}}/{T} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ \approx 73}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(3)  The impulse response of a coaxial cable is approximately equal to  $h_2(t)$,  if the cable has the following characteristic cable attenuation:

$${\rm a}_\star ={\rm a}_2 = \alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot \sqrt{{R}/{2}} = 1.1467\,\, \frac{\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{MHz}} \cdot 1.5\,{\rm km} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{10\,{\rm MHz}}{2}} = 2.93\,{\rm Np} = 2.93\,{\rm Np} \cdot8.686\,\frac {\rm dB}{\rm Np} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =25.5\,{\rm dB}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(4)  Statements 1 and 2  are correct:

  • The Fourier transform  $H_1(f) = {\rm e}^{-A \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} |f|}$  with  $A = 2 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {a}_1/R$  is real and even,  so  $h_1(t)$  is also real and even.
  • Due to the low–pass characteristic of  $H_1(f)$,  the maximum is at  $t = 0$.
  • The last statement,  on the other hand,  is incorrect:   The integral over  $h_1(t)$  in the entire time domain  $ \pm \infty$  is equal to  $H_1(f=0) = 1$.



(5)  Only solution 1  is correct:

  • The partial impulse response  $h_1(t ) \star h_2(t )$  takes into account the influence of  $\alpha_1$,  $\alpha_2$  and  $\beta_2$  and thus all terms leading to distortions.
  • In contrast,   $\alpha_0$  leads only to a frequency-independent attenuation and  $\beta_1$  only to a constant running time for all frequencies.
  • Solution 2 does not apply:   First  (for small  $t$–values)    $h_1(t ) \star h_2(t )$  is smaller than  $h_2(t )$. 
  • Then, for large  $t$–values, the blue curve lies above the red one.
  • This means:   $\alpha_1$  and thus also  $h_1(t )$  actually cause additional distortions,  even when they are not very significant.