Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 3.2Z: Relationship between PDF and CDF"
From LNTwww
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite= | + | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Cumulative_Distribution_Function |
}} | }} | ||
− | [[File:P_ID117__Sto_Z_3_2.png|right|frame| | + | [[File:P_ID117__Sto_Z_3_2.png|right|frame|Given CDF $ F_x(r)$]] |
− | + | Given is the random variable $x$ with the cumulative distribution function $\rm (CDF)$. | |
− | :$$ F_x(r)=\left\{\begin{array}{*{4}{c}} 0.25\cdot {\rm e}^{2\it r} &\rm | + | :$$ F_x(r)=\left\{\begin{array}{*{4}{c}} 0.25\cdot {\rm e}^{2\it r} &\rm for\hspace{0.1cm}\it r<\rm 0, \\ 1-0.25\cdot {\rm e}^{-2\it r} & \rm for\hspace{0.1cm}\it r\ge\rm 0. \\\end{array}\right.$$ |
− | * | + | *This function is shown on the right. |
− | * | + | *It can be seen that at the unit step point $r = 0$ the right-hand side limit is valid. |
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
+ | Hints: | ||
+ | *The exercise belongs to the chapter [[Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Cumulative_Distribution_Function|Cumulative Distribution Function]]. | ||
+ | *Reference is made to the chapter [[Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Probability_Density_Function|Probability Density Function]]. | ||
+ | *The topic of this chapter is illustrated with examples in the (German language) learning video <br> [[Zusammenhang_zwischen_WDF_und_VTF_(Lernvideo)|"Zusammenhang zwischen WDF und VTF"]] $\Rightarrow$ "Relationship between PDF and CDF". | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | === | + | ===Questions=== |
<quiz display=simple> | <quiz display=simple> | ||
− | { | + | {What properties of the CDF hold when the random variable has no limits? |
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
− | + | + | + The CDF increases from $0$ to $1$ at least weakly monotonically. |
− | - | + | - The $F_x(r)$ values $0$ and $1$ are possible for finite $r$ values. |
− | + | + | +A horizontal section indicates that in this range the random size has no proportions. |
− | + | + | +Vertical sections are possible. |
− | { | + | {What is the probability that $x$ is positive? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
${\rm Pr}(x > 0) \ = \ $ { 0.25 3% } | ${\rm Pr}(x > 0) \ = \ $ { 0.25 3% } | ||
− | { | + | {What is the probability that $|\hspace{0.05cm}x\hspace{0.05cm}|$ is larger than $0.5$? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
− | ${\rm Pr}(|\hspace{0.05cm}x\hspace{0.05cm}| > 0.5) \ = | + | ${\rm Pr}(|\hspace{0.05cm}x\hspace{0.05cm}| > 0.5) \ = \ $ { 0.184 3% } |
− | { | + | {Specify the associated PDF $f_x(x)$ in general and the value for $x = 1$. |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
− | $f_x(x =1)\ = | + | $f_x(x =1)\ = \ $ { 0.0677 3% } |
− | { | + | {What is the probability that $x$ is exactly equal to $1$ ? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
− | ${\rm Pr}(x = 1)\ = | + | ${\rm Pr}(x = 1)\ = \ $ { 0. } |
− | { | + | {What is the probability that $x$ is exactly equal to $0$ ? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
− | ${\rm Pr}(x = 0)\ = | + | ${\rm Pr}(x = 0)\ = \ $ { 0.5 3% } |
− | |||
</quiz> | </quiz> | ||
− | === | + | ===Solution=== |
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
− | '''(1)''' | + | '''(1)''' The <u>statements 1, 3 and 4</u> are always correct: |
− | * | + | *A horizontal intercept in the CDF indicates that the random variable has no values in that region. |
− | * | + | *In contrast, a vertical intercept in the CDF indicates a Dirac delta function in the PDF $($at the same location $x_0)$. |
− | * | + | *This means that the random variable takes the value $x_0$ very frequently, namely with finite probability. |
− | * | + | *All other values occur exactly with probability $0$. |
− | + | *If, however $x$ is limited to the range from $x_{\rm min}$ to $x_{\rm max}$ then $F_x(r) = 0$ for $r < x_{\rm min}$ and $F_x(r) = 1$ for $r > x_{\rm max}$. | |
− | *In | + | *In this special case, the second statement would also be true. |
− | '''(2)''' | + | '''(2)''' The sought probability can be calculated from the difference of the CDF values at the boundaries: |
− | :$${\rm Pr}( x> 0)= | + | :$${\rm Pr}( x> 0)= F_x(\infty)- F_x(\rm 0) |
\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=\rm 0.25}.$$ | \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=\rm 0.25}.$$ | ||
− | '''(3)''' | + | '''(3)''' For the probability that $x$ is greater than $0.5$ holds: |
− | :$${\rm Pr}(x> 0.5)=1- | + | :$${\rm Pr}(x> 0.5)=1- F_x(0.5)=\rm 0.25\cdot e^{-1} |
\hspace{0.15cm}{\approx0.092}. $$ | \hspace{0.15cm}{\approx0.092}. $$ | ||
− | * | + | *For reasons of symmetry: ${\rm Pr}(x<- 0.5)$ is just as large. From this follows: |
:$${\rm Pr}( |\hspace{0.05cm} x\hspace{0.05cm}| >\rm 0.5) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= \rm 0.184}.$$ | :$${\rm Pr}( |\hspace{0.05cm} x\hspace{0.05cm}| >\rm 0.5) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= \rm 0.184}.$$ | ||
− | [[File: P_ID116__Sto_Z_3_2_c.png|right|frame| | + | [[File: P_ID116__Sto_Z_3_2_c.png|right|frame|PDF of Laplace distribution]] |
− | '''(4)''' | + | '''(4)''' The PDF is obtained from the corresponding CDF by differentiating the two areas. |
− | * | + | *The result is a two-sided exponential function as well as a Dirac delta function at $x = 0$: |
:$$f_x(x)=\rm 0.5\cdot \rm e^{-2\cdot |\hspace{0.05cm}\it x\hspace{0.05cm}|} + \rm 0.5\cdot\delta(\it x).$$ | :$$f_x(x)=\rm 0.5\cdot \rm e^{-2\cdot |\hspace{0.05cm}\it x\hspace{0.05cm}|} + \rm 0.5\cdot\delta(\it x).$$ | ||
− | * | + | *The numerical value we are looking for is $f_x(x = 1)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= \rm 0.0677}$. |
− | + | *Note: The two-sided exponential distribution is also called "Laplace distribution". | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | '''(5)''' In the range around $1$ describes $x$ a continuous valued random variable. | ||
+ | *The probability that $x$ has exactly the value $1$ is therefore ${\rm Pr}(x = 1)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= \rm 0}.$ | ||
− | |||
+ | '''(6)''' In $50\%$ of time $x = 0$ will hold: ${\rm Pr}(x = 0)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= \rm 0.5}.$ | ||
− | + | *The PDF of a speech signal is often described by a two-sided exponential function. | |
− | * | + | *The Dirac delta function at $x = 0$ mainly takes into account speech pauses – here in $50\%$ of all times. |
− | * | ||
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Theory of Stochastic Signals: Exercises|^3.2 Cumulative Distribution Function^]] |
Latest revision as of 15:39, 4 January 2022
Given is the random variable $x$ with the cumulative distribution function $\rm (CDF)$.
- $$ F_x(r)=\left\{\begin{array}{*{4}{c}} 0.25\cdot {\rm e}^{2\it r} &\rm for\hspace{0.1cm}\it r<\rm 0, \\ 1-0.25\cdot {\rm e}^{-2\it r} & \rm for\hspace{0.1cm}\it r\ge\rm 0. \\\end{array}\right.$$
- This function is shown on the right.
- It can be seen that at the unit step point $r = 0$ the right-hand side limit is valid.
Hints:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter Cumulative Distribution Function.
- Reference is made to the chapter Probability Density Function.
- The topic of this chapter is illustrated with examples in the (German language) learning video
"Zusammenhang zwischen WDF und VTF" $\Rightarrow$ "Relationship between PDF and CDF".
Questions
Solution
(1) The statements 1, 3 and 4 are always correct:
- A horizontal intercept in the CDF indicates that the random variable has no values in that region.
- In contrast, a vertical intercept in the CDF indicates a Dirac delta function in the PDF $($at the same location $x_0)$.
- This means that the random variable takes the value $x_0$ very frequently, namely with finite probability.
- All other values occur exactly with probability $0$.
- If, however $x$ is limited to the range from $x_{\rm min}$ to $x_{\rm max}$ then $F_x(r) = 0$ for $r < x_{\rm min}$ and $F_x(r) = 1$ for $r > x_{\rm max}$.
- In this special case, the second statement would also be true.
(2) The sought probability can be calculated from the difference of the CDF values at the boundaries:
- $${\rm Pr}( x> 0)= F_x(\infty)- F_x(\rm 0) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=\rm 0.25}.$$
(3) For the probability that $x$ is greater than $0.5$ holds:
- $${\rm Pr}(x> 0.5)=1- F_x(0.5)=\rm 0.25\cdot e^{-1} \hspace{0.15cm}{\approx0.092}. $$
- For reasons of symmetry: ${\rm Pr}(x<- 0.5)$ is just as large. From this follows:
- $${\rm Pr}( |\hspace{0.05cm} x\hspace{0.05cm}| >\rm 0.5) \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= \rm 0.184}.$$
(4) The PDF is obtained from the corresponding CDF by differentiating the two areas.
- The result is a two-sided exponential function as well as a Dirac delta function at $x = 0$:
- $$f_x(x)=\rm 0.5\cdot \rm e^{-2\cdot |\hspace{0.05cm}\it x\hspace{0.05cm}|} + \rm 0.5\cdot\delta(\it x).$$
- The numerical value we are looking for is $f_x(x = 1)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= \rm 0.0677}$.
- Note: The two-sided exponential distribution is also called "Laplace distribution".
(5) In the range around $1$ describes $x$ a continuous valued random variable.
- The probability that $x$ has exactly the value $1$ is therefore ${\rm Pr}(x = 1)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= \rm 0}.$
(6) In $50\%$ of time $x = 0$ will hold: ${\rm Pr}(x = 0)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= \rm 0.5}.$
- The PDF of a speech signal is often described by a two-sided exponential function.
- The Dirac delta function at $x = 0$ mainly takes into account speech pauses – here in $50\%$ of all times.