Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.10: Union Bound"
From LNTwww
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Digital_Signal_Transmission/Approximation_of_the_Error_Probability}} | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Digital_Signal_Transmission/Approximation_of_the_Error_Probability}} | ||
− | [[File: | + | [[File:EN_Dig_A_4_10.png|right|frame|Signal space constellations with $N=2$ and $M=3$]] |
The so-called "Union Bound" gives an upper bound for the error probability of a non-binary transmission system $(M > 2)$. | The so-called "Union Bound" gives an upper bound for the error probability of a non-binary transmission system $(M > 2)$. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:13, 6 September 2022
The so-called "Union Bound" gives an upper bound for the error probability of a non-binary transmission system $(M > 2)$.
- The actual (average) error probability is generally given as follows:
- $${\rm Pr}({ \cal E}) \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} \sum\limits_{i = 0 }^{M-1} {\rm Pr}(m_i) \cdot {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_i ) \hspace{0.05cm},$$
- $$ {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_i ) \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm Pr} \left [ \bigcup_{k \ne i} { \cal E}_{ik}\right ] \hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm}{ \rm where}\hspace{0.2cm} { \cal E}_{ik}\text{:} \ \ \boldsymbol{ r }{\rm \hspace{0.15cm}is \hspace{0.15cm}closer \hspace{0.15cm}to \hspace{0.15cm}}\boldsymbol{ s }_k {\rm \hspace{0.15cm}than \hspace{0.15cm}to \hspace{0.15cm}the \hspace{0.15cm}setpoint \hspace{0.15cm}}\boldsymbol{ s }_i \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- The simpler "Union Bound" $\rm (UB)$ provides an upper bound on the falsification probability assuming that message $m_i$ $($or signal $\boldsymbol{s}_i)$ was sent:
- $$p_{{\rm UB}\hspace{0.05cm}| \hspace{0.05cm}\boldsymbol{ s }_i} \hspace{-0.1cm} \ \ge \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} \boldsymbol{ s }_i ) = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm} m_i )\hspace{0.05cm},\ $$
- $$ p_{{\rm UB}\hspace{0.05cm}| \hspace{0.05cm}\boldsymbol{ s }_i} \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.2cm}\sum\limits_{k = 0 ,\hspace{0.1cm} k \ne i}^{M-1}\hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}_{ik}) = \hspace{-0.1cm}\sum\limits_{k = 0, \hspace{0.1cm} k \ne i}^{M-1}\hspace{-0.1cm}{\rm Q} \left ( \frac{d_{ik}/2}{\sigma_n} \right )\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
The following abbreviations are used:
- ${\rm Q}(x)$ is the complementary Gaussian error function;
- $d_{ik}$ denotes the distance between the signal points $\boldsymbol{s}_i$ and $\boldsymbol{s}_k$;
- $\sigma_n$ is the rms value (⇒ root of the variance) of the additive white Gaussian noise.
⇒ By averaging over all possible signals $\boldsymbol{s}_i$, we then arrive at the actual "Union Bound":
- $$p_{\rm UB} = \sum\limits_{i = 0 }^{M-1} {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s }_i) \cdot p_{{\rm UB}\hspace{0.05cm}| \hspace{0.05cm}\boldsymbol{ s }_i} \ge {\rm Pr}({ \cal E}) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- The graph shows three different signal space constellations,
each with $M = 3$ signal space points $\boldsymbol{s}_0$, $\boldsymbol{s}_1$ and $\boldsymbol{s}_2$ in two-dimensional space $(N = 2)$.
- The basis functions $\varphi_1(t)$ and $\varphi_2(t)$ are suitably normalized.
- Thus, the signal space coordinates are also pure numerical values without unit:
- $$\boldsymbol{ s }_1 = (-1, \hspace{0.1cm}+1)\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm} \boldsymbol{ s }_2 = (+1, \hspace{0.1cm}+1)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- The signal space point $\boldsymbol{s}_0$ in configuration $\rm A$ is located such that $\boldsymbol{s}_0$, $\boldsymbol{s}_1$, $\boldsymbol{s}_2$ describe an equilateral triangle.
- In contrast, in configurations $\rm B$ and $\rm C$, $\boldsymbol{s}_0 = (0,\ 0)$ resp. $\boldsymbol{s}_0 = (0, \ –1)$.
Notes:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter "Approximation of the Error Probability".
- Use the AWGN rms value $\sigma_n = 0.5$ for all calculations.
- Given the following values of the complementary Gaussian error function:
- $${\rm Q}(1) \hspace{-0.1cm} \ \approx \ \hspace{-0.1cm} 0.159\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Q}(\sqrt{2}) \approx 0.079\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.23cm}{\rm Q}(\sqrt{3}) \approx 0.042\hspace{0.05cm},$$
- $${\rm Q}(2) \hspace{-0.1cm} \ \approx \ \hspace{-0.1cm} 0.023\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Q}(2.14) \approx 0.016\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.1cm}{\rm Q}(\sqrt{5}) \approx 0.013 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Questions
Solution
(1) Points $\boldsymbol{s}_1$ and $\boldsymbol{s}_2$ are the same for all configurations.
- The smallest error probability occurs when $\boldsymbol{s}_0$ is farthest from $\boldsymbol{s}_1$ and $\boldsymbol{s}_2$.
- This is the case for configuration $\rm C$ ⇒ solution 3.
(2) For configuration $\rm A$, the distance between all points is the same: $d_{01} = d_{02} = d_{12} = 2$.
- Therefore, to calculate the "Union Bound", it is not necessary to average over all symbols.
- And it is valid since e.g. $\boldsymbol{s}_0$ is distorted into symbol $\boldsymbol{s}_1$ or $\boldsymbol{s}_2$ with equal probability:
- $${\rm Pr}({ \cal E}) \le p_{\rm UB} = 2 \cdot {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{d_{ik}/2}{\sigma_n} \right ) = 2 \cdot {\rm Q}(2) \approx 2 \cdot 0.023 \hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 4.6\%} \hspace{0.05cm}. $$
(3) Here, the falsification probabilities differ for each symbol.
- If $\boldsymbol{s}_0$ was sent, with $d_{01} = d_{02} = 2^{0.5}$ and $\sigma = 0.5$:
- $$p_{{\rm UB}\hspace{0.05cm}| \hspace{0.05cm}\boldsymbol{ s }_0} = 2 \cdot {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{\sqrt{2}/2}{0.5} \right ) = 2 \cdot {\rm Q}(\sqrt{2}) = 2 \cdot 0.079 = 0.158 \hspace{0.05cm}. $$
- In contrast, the other two conditional probabilities are smaller:
- $$p_{{\rm UB}\hspace{0.05cm}| \hspace{0.05cm}\boldsymbol{ s }_1} = p_{{\rm UB}\hspace{0.05cm}| \hspace{0.05cm}\boldsymbol{ s }_2} \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{{2}/2}{0.5} \right )+{\rm Q} \left ( \frac{\sqrt{2}/2}{0.5} \right )= {\rm Q}(2) +{\rm Q}(\sqrt{2}) = 0.023 + 0.079 = 0.102 \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- By averaging, we obtain for the Union Bound considering the different distances:
- $$p_{\rm UB} \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {1}/{3} \cdot \left [ p_{{\rm UB}\hspace{0.05cm}| \hspace{0.05cm}\boldsymbol{ s }_0} + p_{{\rm UB}\hspace{0.05cm}| \hspace{0.05cm}\boldsymbol{ s }_1} +p_{{\rm UB}\hspace{0.05cm}| \hspace{0.05cm}\boldsymbol{ s }_2}\right ]= {1}/{3} \cdot \left [ 2 \cdot {\rm Q}(\sqrt{2})+ 2 \cdot ({\rm Q}({2}) + {\rm Q}(\sqrt{2})) \right ] = {1}/{3} \cdot \left [ 4 \cdot {\rm Q}(\sqrt{2})+ 2 \cdot {\rm Q}({2}) \right ] $$
- $$ \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} p_{\rm UB} = {1}/{3} \cdot \big [ 4 \cdot 0.079+ 2 \cdot 0.023 \big ] \hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.12cm}\underline {\approx 12.1\% } \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} p_{\rm UB}\ge {\rm Pr}({ \cal E})\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(4) This configuration is described by the following equations:
- $$d_{01} = d_{02} = \sqrt{2^2 + 1^2}= \sqrt{5} \approx 2.24\hspace{0.2cm}, d_{12} = 2$$
- $$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} p_{\rm UB} = {1}/{3} \cdot \big [ 4 \cdot {\rm Q}(\sqrt{5})+ 2 \cdot {\rm Q}({2}) \big ] = {1}/{3} \cdot \big [ 4 \cdot 0.013+ 2 \cdot 0.023 \big ]\hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 3.2\%} \hspace{0.05cm}. $$
(5) Let it be:
- $$p_{\rm UB} = 2 \cdot {\rm Q}\left ( {1}/{\sigma_n} \right ) = 0.032 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {\rm Q}\left ( {1}/{\sigma_n} \right ) = 0.016\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {1}/{\sigma_n} \approx 2.14 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\hspace{0.1cm}\hspace{0.15cm}\sigma_n \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.467}\hspace{0.05cm}. $$