Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 1.7: Coding for Broadband ISDN"

From LNTwww
m (Text replacement - "[[Beispiele_von_Nachrichtensystemen" to "[[Examples_of_Communication_Systems")
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Beispiele von Nachrichtensystemen/Weiterentwicklungen von ISDN
+
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Further_Developments_of_ISDN
 
}}
 
}}
  
[[File:P_ID1630__Bei_A_1_7.png|right|frame|HDB3- und 1T2B-Codierung]]
+
[[File:EN_Bei_A_1_7_neu.png|right|frame|HDB3 and 1T2B coding]]
Bei herkömmlichem ISDN über Kupferleitungen wird der HDB3–Code verwendet – siehe  [[Aufgaben:Aufgabe_1.5:_HDB3–Codierung|Aufgabe 1.5]]:  
+
For conventional ISDN over copper lines the  $\rm HDB3$  ("High Definition Bipolar")  code is used – see  [[Aufgaben:Exercise_1.5:_HDB3_Coding|$\text{Exercise 1.5}$]]:  
  
Dieser wurde vom so genannten  AMI–Code abgeleitet,
+
This was derived from the so-called  "AMI code",
*ist wie dieser ein Pseudoternärcode,
+
*vermeidet aber mehr als drei aufeinander folgende  „$0$”–Symbole,  
+
*is like the latter a pseudo-ternary code,
*indem die strengere AMI–Codierregel bei längeren Nullfolgen bewusst verletzt wird.
 
  
 +
*but avoids more than three consecutive  "$0$"  symbols,
  
Die Grafik zeigt das HDB3–codierte Signal  $c(t)$, das sich aus dem binären redundanzfreien Quellensignal  $q(t)$  ergibt. Da im Quellensignal nicht mehr als drei aufeinanderfolgende Nullen auftreten, ist  $c(t)$  identisch mit dem AMI–codierten Signal.
+
*by deliberately violating the stricter AMI coding rule for longer zero sequences.
  
Das Ende der 1990–Jahre geplante Breitband–ISDN sollte Datenraten bis 155 Mbit/s bereitstellen im Vergleich zu 144 kbit/s des herkömmlichen ISDN mit zwei B–Kanälen und einem D–Kanal. Um diese höhere Datenrate zu erreichen, musste
 
*zum einen eine neuere Technik (ATM) verwendet werden,
 
*zum zweiten aber auch das Übertragungsmedium gewechselt werden, von der Kupferleitung zur Glasfaser.
 
  
 +
The graph shows the HDB3 encoded signal  $c(t)$  resulting from the binary redundancy-free source signal  $q(t)$.  Since there are no more than three consecutive zeros in the source signal,  $c(t)$  is identical to the AMI-encoded signal.
  
Da das HDB3–codierte Signal  $c(t) ∈ \{–1, \ 0, +1\}$  aber mittels Licht nicht übertragen werden kann, war eine zweite Codierung erforderlich. Der hierfür vorgesehene  '''1T2B–Code'''  ersetzt jedes Ternärsymbol durch zwei Binärsymbole. Das untere Diagramm zeigt beispielhaft das Binärsignal  $b(t) ∈ \{0, 1\}$, das sich nach dieser 1T2B–Codierung aus dem Signal  $c(t)$  ergibt.
+
The broadband ISDN planned for the late 1990s was to provide data rates of up to  $\text{155 Mbit/s}$  compared with  $\text{144 kbit/s}$  of conventional ISDN with two bearer channels and one data channel.  To achieve this higher data rate,  it was necessary that
 +
*newer technology  $\rm (ATM)$  had to be used,
  
Gehen Sie bei dieser Aufgabe davon aus, dass die Bitrate des redundanzfreien Quellensignals  $q(t)$  gleich  $R_{q} = 2.048 \ \rm Mbit/s$  beträgt. Die jeweiligen Symboldauern der Signale  $q(t),  c(t)$  und  $b(t)$  werden mit  $T_{q}$,  $T_{c}$  und  $T_{b}$  bezeichnet.
+
*secondly,  the transmission medium had to be changed from copper to fiber optics.
  
Die äquivalente Bitrate des pseudoternären Signals  $c(t)$  ist  $R_{c} = {\rm log_2}(3)/T_{c}$, woraus mit der Bitrate  $R_{q} = 1/T_{q}$  des Quellensignals die relative Redundanz des AMI– bzw. des HDB3–Codes berechnet werden kann:
+
 
 +
However,  since the HDB3-encoded signal  $c(t) ∈ \{–1, \ 0, +1\}$  cannot be transmitted by means of light,  a second encoding was required. 
 +
#The  '''1T2B code'''  provided for this purpose replaces each ternary symbol with two binary symbols. 
 +
#The lower  diagram shows an example of the binary signal  $b(t) ∈ \{0, 1\}$,  which results from the signal  $c(t)$  after this 1T2B coding.
 +
#For this exercise,  assume that the bit rate of the redundancy-free source signal  $q(t)$  is equal to  $R_{q} = 2.048 \ \rm Mbit/s$. 
 +
#The respective symbol durations of the signals  $q(t),  c(t)$  and  $b(t)$  are denoted by  $T_{q}$,  $T_{c}$  and  $T_{b}$. 
 +
#The equivalent bit rate of the pseudo-ternary signal  $c(t)$  is  $R_{c} = {\rm log_2}(3)/T_{c}$,  from which the bit rate  $R_{q} = 1/T_{q}$  of the source signal can be used to calculate the relative redundancy of the AMI or HDB3 code:
 
:$$r_{\rm HDB3} = \frac{R_c - R_q}{R_c}= 1 - \frac{T_c \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_q)}{T_q \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_c)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$r_{\rm HDB3} = \frac{R_c - R_q}{R_c}= 1 - \frac{T_c \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_q)}{T_q \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_c)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
Für den 1T2B–Code kann eine ähnliche Gleichung aufgestellt werden, ebenso wie für die beiden Codes in Kombination.
+
A similar equation can be established for the 1T2B code,  as well as for the two codes in combination.
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
 +
Notes:
  
''Hinweise:''
+
*The exercise belongs to the chapter   [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Further_Developments_of_ISDN|"Further Developments of ISDN"]].
  
*Die Aufgabe gehört zum Kapitel   [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Weiterentwicklungen_von_ISDN|Weiterentwicklungen von ISDN]].
+
* Redundancy is defined and illustrated with examples in the chapter  [[Digital_Signal_Transmission/Basics_of_Coded_Transmission|"Basics of Coded Transmission"]]  of the book "Digital Signal Transmission".
* Die Redundanz wird im Kapitel  [[Digital_Signal_Transmission/Grundlagen_der_codierten_Übertragung|Grundlagen der codierten Übertragung]]  des Buches „Digitalsignalübertragung” definiert und an Beispielen verdeutlicht.
 
 
   
 
   
  
  
===Fragebogen===
+
===Questions===
  
 
<quiz display=simple>
 
<quiz display=simple>
{Welche Zuordnung hat der hier verwendete&nbsp; '''1T2B'''–Code?
+
{What is the assignment of the&nbsp; '''1T2B''' code?
 
|type="()"}
 
|type="()"}
 
- $c(t) = +1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 10, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = 0 \Rightarrow b(t) = 00, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = -1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 01,$
 
- $c(t) = +1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 10, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = 0 \Rightarrow b(t) = 00, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = -1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 01,$
Line 50: Line 53:
 
- $c(t) = +1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 01, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = 0 \Rightarrow b(t) = 11, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = -1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 10.$
 
- $c(t) = +1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 01, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = 0 \Rightarrow b(t) = 11, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = -1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 10.$
  
{Wie groß sind die Symboldauern von&nbsp; $q(t),&nbsp; c(t)$&nbsp; und&nbsp; $b(t)$?
+
{What are the symbol durations of&nbsp; $q(t), &nbsp; c(t)$&nbsp; and &nbsp; $b(t)$?
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
$T_{q} \ = \ $ { 0.488 3% } $\ \rm &micro; s$
 
$T_{q} \ = \ $ { 0.488 3% } $\ \rm &micro; s$
Line 56: Line 59:
 
$T_{b} \ = \ $ { 0.244 3% } $\ \rm &micro; s$
 
$T_{b} \ = \ $ { 0.244 3% } $\ \rm &micro; s$
  
{Berechnen Sie die relative Redundanz des&nbsp; '''HDB3'''–Codes.
+
{Calculate the relative redundancy of the&nbsp; '''HDB3''' code.
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
$r_{\rm HDB3} \ = \ $ { 36.9 3% } $\ \%$
 
$r_{\rm HDB3} \ = \ $ { 36.9 3% } $\ \%$
  
{Berechnen Sie die relative Redundanz des&nbsp; '''1T2B'''–Codes.
+
{Calculate the relative redundancy of the&nbsp; '''1T2B''' code.
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
$r_{\rm 1T2B} \ = \ $ { 20.7 3% } $\ \%$
 
$r_{\rm 1T2B} \ = \ $ { 20.7 3% } $\ \%$
  
{Welche relative Redundanz besitzt das Signal&nbsp; $b(t)$, also die&nbsp; '''Kombination'''&nbsp; aus HDB3–Code und 1T2B–Code?
+
{What is the relative redundancy of the signal&nbsp; $b(t)$, i.e. the&nbsp; '''combination'''&nbsp; of HDB3 code and 1T2B code?
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
 
$r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B} \ = \ $ { 50 3% } $\ \%$
 
$r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B} \ = \ $ { 50 3% } $\ \%$
Line 70: Line 73:
 
</quiz>
 
</quiz>
  
===Musterlösung===
+
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
  
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Richtig ist <u>Lösungsvorschlag 2</u>, wie ein Vergleich der Signalverläufe $c(t)$ und $b(t)$ zeigt.
+
'''(1)'''&nbsp; <u>Solution 2</u>&nbsp; is correct,&nbsp; as a comparison of the signal characteristics&nbsp; $c(t)$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $b(t)$&nbsp; shows.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''(2)'''&nbsp; The symbol duration&nbsp; $(=$ bit duration$)$&nbsp; of&nbsp; $q(t)$&nbsp; is &nbsp; $T_{q} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 1/R_{q} = 0.488 \ \rm &micro; s}$.
  
 +
*The symbol duration of the AMI code&nbsp; (and the HDB3 code)&nbsp; is exactly the same: &nbsp; $T_{c} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.488 \ \rm &micro; s}$.
  
'''(2)'''&nbsp; Die Symboldauer (Bitdauer) von $q(t)$ beträgt &nbsp; $T_{q} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 1/R_{q} = 0.488 \ \rm &micro; s}$.
+
*In contrast,&nbsp; the symbol duration&nbsp; $(=$ bit duration$)$&nbsp; after the 1T2B encoding is only half as large:&nbsp; $T_{b} = T_{c}/2 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.244 \ \rm &micro; s}$.
*Die Symboldauer des AMI–Codes (und des HDB3–Codes) ist genau so groß: &nbsp; $T_{c} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.488 \ \rm &micro; s}$.
 
*Dagegen ist die Symboldauer (Bitdauer) nach der 1T2B–Codierung nur halb so groß: $T_{b} = T_{c}/2 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.244 \ \rm &micro; s}$.
 
  
  
  
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Mit der angegebenen Gleichung ergibt sich mit $M_{q} = 2, M_{c} = 3$ und $T_{c} = T_{q}$:
+
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Using the given equation,&nbsp; with&nbsp; $M_{q} = 2, \hspace{0.15cm} M_{c} = 3$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $T_{c} = T_{q}$,&nbsp; we get:
 
:$$r_{\rm HDB3} = 1 - \frac{T_c \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_q)}{T_q \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_c)} = 1 - \frac{1}{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 36.9\,\%} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$r_{\rm HDB3} = 1 - \frac{T_c \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_q)}{T_q \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_c)} = 1 - \frac{1}{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 36.9\,\%} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
  
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Passt man die Gleichung an den 1T2B&ndash;Code an, so erhält man mit $M_{c} = 3, M_{b} = 2, T_{b} = T_{c}/2$:
+
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Fitting the equation to the 1T2B code,&nbsp; we obtain with&nbsp; $M_{c} = 3, \hspace{0.15cm} M_{b} = 2,&nbsp; T_{b} = T_{c}/2$:
 
:$$r_{\rm 1T2B} = 1 - \frac{T_b \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_c)}{T_c \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_b)} = 1 - \frac{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)}{2} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 20.7\,\%} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$r_{\rm 1T2B} = 1 - \frac{T_b \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_c)}{T_c \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_b)} = 1 - \frac{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)}{2} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 20.7\,\%} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
  
'''(5)'''&nbsp; Die resultierende Redundanz beider Codes erhält man, wenn man die angegebene Gleichung auf das Eingangssignal $q(t)$ und das Ausgangssignal $c(t)$ bezieht. Mit $M_{q} = M_{b} = 2$ und $T_{b} = T_{q}/2$ folgt daraus:
+
'''(5)'''&nbsp; The resulting redundancy of both codes is obtained by relating the given equation to the input signal&nbsp; $q(t)$&nbsp; and the output signal&nbsp; $c(t)$.
 +
*With&nbsp; $M_{q} = M_{b} = 2$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $T_{b} = T_{q}/2$&nbsp; it follows:
 
:$$r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B} = 1 - \frac{T_b \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_q)}{T_q \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_b)} = 1 - \frac{T_b}{T_q} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 50\,\%} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B} = 1 - \frac{T_b \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_q)}{T_q \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_b)} = 1 - \frac{T_b}{T_q} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 50\,\%} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Zum gleichen Ergebnis kommt man über die Rechnung
+
*The same result is obtained by the calculation
 
:$$1-r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B} \ = \ (1-r_{\rm HDB3}) \cdot (1-r_{\rm 1T2B}) =(1- 1 +\frac{1}{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)}) \cdot (1-1+ \frac{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)}{2}) = 50\,\% \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$1-r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B} \ = \ (1-r_{\rm HDB3}) \cdot (1-r_{\rm 1T2B}) =(1- 1 +\frac{1}{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)}) \cdot (1-1+ \frac{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)}{2}) = 50\,\% \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B}= 50\,\% \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B}= 50\,\% \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Line 100: Line 106:
  
  
[[Category:Aufgaben zu Beispiele von Nachrichtensystemen|^1.4 Weiterentwicklungen von ISDN^]]
+
[[Category:Examples of Communication Systems: Exercises|^1.4 Further Developments of ISDN^]]

Latest revision as of 12:14, 10 November 2022

HDB3 and 1T2B coding

For conventional ISDN over copper lines the  $\rm HDB3$  ("High Definition Bipolar")  code is used – see  $\text{Exercise 1.5}$:

This was derived from the so-called  "AMI code",

  • is like the latter a pseudo-ternary code,
  • but avoids more than three consecutive  "$0$"  symbols,
  • by deliberately violating the stricter AMI coding rule for longer zero sequences.


The graph shows the HDB3 encoded signal  $c(t)$  resulting from the binary redundancy-free source signal  $q(t)$.  Since there are no more than three consecutive zeros in the source signal,  $c(t)$  is identical to the AMI-encoded signal.

The broadband ISDN planned for the late 1990s was to provide data rates of up to  $\text{155 Mbit/s}$  compared with  $\text{144 kbit/s}$  of conventional ISDN with two bearer channels and one data channel.  To achieve this higher data rate,  it was necessary that

  • newer technology  $\rm (ATM)$  had to be used,
  • secondly,  the transmission medium had to be changed from copper to fiber optics.


However,  since the HDB3-encoded signal  $c(t) ∈ \{–1, \ 0, +1\}$  cannot be transmitted by means of light,  a second encoding was required. 

  1. The  1T2B code  provided for this purpose replaces each ternary symbol with two binary symbols. 
  2. The lower diagram shows an example of the binary signal  $b(t) ∈ \{0, 1\}$,  which results from the signal  $c(t)$  after this 1T2B coding.
  3. For this exercise,  assume that the bit rate of the redundancy-free source signal  $q(t)$  is equal to  $R_{q} = 2.048 \ \rm Mbit/s$. 
  4. The respective symbol durations of the signals  $q(t),  c(t)$  and  $b(t)$  are denoted by  $T_{q}$,  $T_{c}$  and  $T_{b}$. 
  5. The equivalent bit rate of the pseudo-ternary signal  $c(t)$  is  $R_{c} = {\rm log_2}(3)/T_{c}$,  from which the bit rate  $R_{q} = 1/T_{q}$  of the source signal can be used to calculate the relative redundancy of the AMI or HDB3 code:
$$r_{\rm HDB3} = \frac{R_c - R_q}{R_c}= 1 - \frac{T_c \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_q)}{T_q \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_c)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

A similar equation can be established for the 1T2B code,  as well as for the two codes in combination.



Notes:


Questions

1

What is the assignment of the  1T2B code?

$c(t) = +1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 10, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = 0 \Rightarrow b(t) = 00, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = -1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 01,$
$c(t) = +1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 11, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = 0 \Rightarrow b(t) = 01, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = -1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 00,$
$c(t) = +1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 01, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = 0 \Rightarrow b(t) = 11, \hspace{1cm}c(t) = -1 \Rightarrow b(t) = 10.$

2

What are the symbol durations of  $q(t),   c(t)$  and   $b(t)$?

$T_{q} \ = \ $

$\ \rm µ s$
$T_{c} \ = \ $

$\ \rm µ s$
$T_{b} \ = \ $

$\ \rm µ s$

3

Calculate the relative redundancy of the  HDB3 code.

$r_{\rm HDB3} \ = \ $

$\ \%$

4

Calculate the relative redundancy of the  1T2B code.

$r_{\rm 1T2B} \ = \ $

$\ \%$

5

What is the relative redundancy of the signal  $b(t)$, i.e. the  combination  of HDB3 code and 1T2B code?

$r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B} \ = \ $

$\ \%$


Solution

(1)  Solution 2  is correct,  as a comparison of the signal characteristics  $c(t)$  and  $b(t)$  shows.


(2)  The symbol duration  $(=$ bit duration$)$  of  $q(t)$  is   $T_{q} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 1/R_{q} = 0.488 \ \rm µ s}$.

  • The symbol duration of the AMI code  (and the HDB3 code)  is exactly the same:   $T_{c} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.488 \ \rm µ s}$.
  • In contrast,  the symbol duration  $(=$ bit duration$)$  after the 1T2B encoding is only half as large:  $T_{b} = T_{c}/2 \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 0.244 \ \rm µ s}$.


(3)  Using the given equation,  with  $M_{q} = 2, \hspace{0.15cm} M_{c} = 3$  and  $T_{c} = T_{q}$,  we get:

$$r_{\rm HDB3} = 1 - \frac{T_c \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_q)}{T_q \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_c)} = 1 - \frac{1}{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 36.9\,\%} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(4)  Fitting the equation to the 1T2B code,  we obtain with  $M_{c} = 3, \hspace{0.15cm} M_{b} = 2,  T_{b} = T_{c}/2$:

$$r_{\rm 1T2B} = 1 - \frac{T_b \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_c)}{T_c \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_b)} = 1 - \frac{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)}{2} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 20.7\,\%} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(5)  The resulting redundancy of both codes is obtained by relating the given equation to the input signal  $q(t)$  and the output signal  $c(t)$.

  • With  $M_{q} = M_{b} = 2$  and  $T_{b} = T_{q}/2$  it follows:
$$r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B} = 1 - \frac{T_b \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_q)}{T_q \cdot {\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(M_b)} = 1 - \frac{T_b}{T_q} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 50\,\%} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The same result is obtained by the calculation
$$1-r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B} \ = \ (1-r_{\rm HDB3}) \cdot (1-r_{\rm 1T2B}) =(1- 1 +\frac{1}{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)}) \cdot (1-1+ \frac{{\rm log_2}\hspace{0.1cm}(3)}{2}) = 50\,\% \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}r_{\rm HDB3+1T2B}= 50\,\% \hspace{0.05cm}.$$