Aufgaben:Exercise 3.1: Impulse Response of the Coaxial Cable: Difference between revisions

From LNTwww
No edit summary
Fix interlanguage link: resolve redirect chain
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Digitalsignalübertragung/Ursachen_und_Auswirkungen_von_Impulsinterferenzen
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Digital_Signal_Transmission/Causes_and_Effects_of_Intersymbol_Interference
}}
}}


[[File:P_ID1370__Dig_A_3_1.png|right|frame|Impulsantwort eines Koaxialkabels]]
[[File:P_ID1370__Dig_A_3_1.png|right|frame|Impulse response of a coaxial cable]]
Der Frequenzgang eines Koaxialkabels der Länge $l$ ist durch folgende Formel darstellbar:
The frequency response of a coaxial cable of length  $l$  can be represented by the following formula:
:$$H_{\rm K}(f) \ = \ {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l}
:$$H_{\rm K}(f) \ = \ {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l}\cdot{\rm e}^{- (\alpha_1 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_1) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot f \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}  \cdot\ {\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  \cdot  
  {\rm e}^{- (\alpha_1 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_1) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot f \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}  \cdot
  \ {\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}
    \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Der erste Term dieser Gleichung ist auf die Ohmschen Verluste zurückzuführen, der zweite Term auf die Querverluste. Dominant ist jedoch der Skineffekt, der durch den dritten Term ausgedrückt wird.
*The first term of this equation is due to the ohmic losses.
* The second term is due to the transverse losses.  
*Dominant,  however,  is the skin effect,  which is expressed by the third term.


Mit den für ein so genanntes Normalkoaxialkabel ($2.6 \ \rm mm$ Kerndurchmesser und $9.5 \ \rm mm$ Außendurchmesser) gültigen Koeffizienten
:$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac{\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}
  \hspace{0.05cm},
  \hspace{0.2cm} \beta_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac{\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


lässt sich dieser Frequenzgang auch wie folgt darstellen:
With the coefficients valid for a so-called  "standard coaxial cable"  $(2.6 \ \rm mm$  core diameter and  $9.5 \ \rm mm$  outer diameter$)$
:$$H_{\rm K}(f) \approx {\rm e}^{- 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}
:$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac{\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm} \beta_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac{\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm},$$
  \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}
  0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}
  \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}}
    \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Das heißt, der Dämpfungsverlauf $a_{\rm K}(f)$ und der Phasenverlauf $b_{\rm K}(f)$ sind bis auf die Pseudoeinheiten „$\rm Np$” bzw. „$\rm rad$” identisch.
the frequency response can also be represented as follows:
:$$H_{\rm K}(f) \approx {\rm e}^{- 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Definiert man die charakteristische Kabeldämpfung $a_*$ bei der halben Bitrate ($R_{\rm B}/2$), so kann man Digitalsysteme unterschiedlicher Bitrate und Länge einheitlich behandeln:
That means: Attenuation curve  $a_{\rm K}(f)$  and phase curve  $b_{\rm K}(f)$  are identical except for the pseudo units  "$\rm Np$"  and  "$\rm rad$".
:$$a_{\star} = a_{\rm K}(f = {R_{\rm B}}/{2})
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-
a_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R_{\rm
  B}}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} a_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R_{\rm
  B}}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}a_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Der entsprechende $\rm dB$–Wert ist um den Faktor $8.688$ größer. Bei einem Binärsystem gilt $R_{\rm B} = 1/T$, so dass sich dann die charakteristische Kabeldämpfung auf die Frequenz $f = 1/(2T)$ bezieht.
If one defines the characteristic cable attenuation  $a_*$  at half the bit rate  $(R_{\rm B}/2)$,  one can treat digital systems of different bit rate and length uniformly:
:$$a_{\star} = a_{\rm K}(f = {R_{\rm B}}/{2})\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-a_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R_{\rm B}}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} a_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R_{\rm B}}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}a_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


The corresponding  $\rm dB$  value is larger by a factor of  $8.688$.  For a binary system,  $R_{\rm B} = 1/T$  applies,  so that the characteristic cable attenuation is then related to the frequency  $f = 1/(2T)$. 


Die Fouriertransformierte von $H_{\rm K}(f)$ liefert die Impulsantwort $h_{\rm K}(t)$, die für ein Koaxialkabel mit den hier beschriebenen Näherungen in geschlossen-analytischer Form angebbar ist. Für ein Binärsystem gilt:
:$$h_{\rm K}(t) =  \frac{ a_{\star}/T}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot
  {\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{a_{\star}^2}{2  \pi  \cdot t/T}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]
  \hspace{0.4cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}a_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Die Teilaufgabe (5) bezieht sich auf den Empfangsgrundimpuls $g_r(t) = g_s(t) * h_K(t)$, wobei für $g_s(t)$ ein Rechteckimpuls mit der Höhe $s_0$ und der Dauer $T$ angenommen werden soll.
The Fourier transform of  $H_{\rm K}(f)$  yields the impulse response  $h_{\rm K}(t)$,  which can be given in closed-analytic form for a coaxial cable with the approximations described here.  For a binary system holds:
:$$h_{\rm K}(t) =  \frac{ a_{\star}/T}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot{\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{a_{\star}^2}{2  \pi  \cdot t/T}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}a_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Subtask  '''(5)'''  is related to the basic receiver pulse  $g_r(t) = g_s(t) * h_K(t)$,  where  $g_s(t)$  should be assumed to be a rectangular pulse with height  $s_0$  and duration  $T$. 


''Hinweise:''
*Die Aufgabe gehört zum  Kapitel [[Digitalsignal%C3%BCbertragung/Ursachen_und_Auswirkungen_von_Impulsinterferenzen|Ursachen und Auswirkungen von Impulsinterferenzen]].
*Bezug genommen wird insbesondere auf den Abschnitt [[Digitalsignal%C3%BCbertragung/Signale,_Basisfunktionen_und_Vektorr%C3%A4ume|Signale, Basisfunktionen und Vektorräume]].
*Sollte die Eingabe des Zahlenwertes „0” erforderlich sein, so geben Sie bitte „0.” ein.






===Fragebogen===
 
Notes:
*The exercise belongs to the chapter  [[Digital_Signal_Transmission/Causes_and_Effects_of_Intersymbol_Interference|"Causes and Effects of Intersymbol Interference"]].
 
*Reference is made in particular to the section  [[Digital_Signal_Transmission/Signals,_Basis_Functions_and_Vector_Spaces|"Signals, Basis Functions and Vector Spaces"]].
 
 
 
===Questions===


<quiz display=simple>
<quiz display=simple>
{Wie groß ist die Länge $l$ eines Normalkoaxialkabels, wenn sich für die Bitrate $R_{\rm B} = 140 \ \rm Mbit/s$ die charakteristische Kabeldämpfung zu $a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$ ergibt?
{What is the length &nbsp;$l$&nbsp; of a standard coaxial cable,&nbsp; if for the bit rate &nbsp;$R_{\rm B} = 140 \ \rm Mbit/s$&nbsp; the characteristic cable attenuation is &nbsp;$a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$?&nbsp;
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$l \ = \ $ { 3 3% } $\ \rm km $
$l \ = \ $ { 3 3% } $\ \rm km $


{Zu welcher Zeit $t_{\rm max}$ besitzt $h_K(t)$ sein Maximum? Es gelte weiter $a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$.
{At what time &nbsp;$t_{\rm max}$&nbsp; does &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$&nbsp; have its maximum?&nbsp; Let &nbsp;$a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$ be further valid.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$t_{\rm max}/T= \ $ { 5 3% }  
$t_{\rm max}/T= \ $ { 5 3% }  


{Wie groß ist der Maximalwert der Impulsantwort?
{What is the maximum value of the impulse response?&nbsp; Let &nbsp;$a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; continue to hold.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
${\rm Max}\  [h_{\rm K}(t)]= \ $ { 0.03 3% } $\ \cdot 1/T $
${\rm Max}\  \big [h_{\rm K}(t)\big ]= \ $ { 0.03 3% } $\ \cdot 1/T $


{Ab welcher Zeit $t_{\rm 5\%}$ ist $h_{\rm K}(t)$ kleiner als $5\%$ des Maximums? Berücksichtigen Sie als Näherung nur den ersten Term der angegebenen Formel.
{At what time &nbsp;$t_{\rm 5\%}$&nbsp; is &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$&nbsp; less than &nbsp;$5\%$&nbsp; of the maximum?&nbsp; Consider only the first term of the given formula as an approximation.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$t_{\rm 5\%}/T= \ $ { 103.5 3% }   
$t_{\rm 5\%}/T= \ $ { 103.5 3% }   


{Welche Aussagen treffen für den Empfangsgrundimpuls $g_r(t)$ zu?
{Which statements are true for the basic receiver pulse &nbsp;$g_r(t)$?&nbsp;
|type="[]"}
|type="[]"}
- $g_r(t)$ ist doppelt so breit wie $h_{\rm K}(t)$.
- $g_r(t)$&nbsp; is twice as wide as &nbsp;$h_{\rm K}(t)$.
+ Es gilt näherungsweise $g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T$.
+ It is approximately &nbsp;$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T$.
- $g_r(t)$ kann durch einen Gaußimpuls angenähert werden.
- $g_r(t)$&nbsp; can be approximated by a Gaussian pulse.
</quiz>
</quiz>


===Musterlösung===
===Solution===
{{ML-Kopf}}
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Die charakteristische Kabeldämpfung $a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$ entspricht etwa $6.9 \ \rm Np$. Deshalb muss gelten:
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The characteristic cable attenuation&nbsp; $a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; corresponds to about&nbsp; $6.9 \ \rm Np$.&nbsp; Therefore,&nbsp; it must hold:
:$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R_{\rm B}}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rm
:$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R_{\rm B}}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rm Np}$$
Np}
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} l = \frac{6.9\,\,{\rm Np}}{0.2722\,\,\frac{\rm Np}{{\rm km} \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\cdot \sqrt{70\,\,{\rm MHz}}} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 3\,\,{\rm km}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} l = \frac{6.9\,\,{\rm
 
Np}}{0.2722\,\,\frac{\rm Np}{{\rm km} \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}
\cdot \sqrt{70\,\,{\rm MHz}}} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 3\,\,{\rm km}}
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


'''(2)'''&nbsp; Mit den Substitutionen
'''(2)'''&nbsp; With the substitutions
:$$x =  { t}/{  T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{a_*/T}{\sqrt{2\pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm}
:$$x =  { t}/{  T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{a_*/T}{\sqrt{2\pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm}K_2 = \frac{a_*^2}{2\pi}$$
  K_2 = \frac{a_*^2}{2\pi}$$


kann die Impulsantwort wie folgt beschrieben werden
the impulse response can be described as follows:
:$$h_{\rm K}(x) =  K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}
:$$h_{\rm K}(x) =  K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Durch Nullsetzen der Ableitung folgt daraus:
*By setting the derivative to zero,&nbsp; it follows:
:$$- {3}/{2} \cdot  K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm
:$$- {3}/{2} \cdot  K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0\hspace{0.05cm}$$
  e}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {3}/{2} \cdot x^{-5/2} = K_2 \cdot x^{-7/2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot  K_2 = { a_{\star}^2}/({3  \pi})\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  \hspace{0.05cm}$$
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {3}/{2} \cdot x^{-5/2} = K_2 \cdot
x^{-7/2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}
x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot  K_2 = { a_{\star}^2}/({3  \pi})
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Daraus ergibt sich für $60 \ \rm dB$ Kabeldämpfung($a_* &asymp; 6.9 \ \rm Np$)
*This gives for&nbsp; $60 \ \rm dB$&nbsp; cable attenuation&nbsp; $(a_* &asymp; 6.9 \ \rm Np)$:
:$$x_{\rm max} =  { t_{\rm max}}/{  T} \hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.2cm} { t_{\rm max}}/{  T} = { 6.9^2}/({3\pi})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 5} \hspace{0.2cm}.$$
:$$x_{\rm max} =  { t_{\rm max}}/{  T} \hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.2cm} { t_{\rm max}}/{  T} = { 6.9^2}/({3\pi})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 5} \hspace{0.2cm}.$$


'''(3)'''&nbsp; Setzt man das Ergebnis von (2) in die vorgegebene Gleichung ein, so erhält man (wir verwenden $a$ anstelle von $a_*$):
:$$h_{\rm K}(t_{\rm max})  \ = \  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{ a}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot \frac{a^6}{(3\pi)^3}}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot
  {\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{a^2}{2\pi} \cdot
  \frac{3\pi}{a^2}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]= \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1}{a^2}\cdot
  \sqrt{\frac{27 \pi
}{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2}\hspace{0.15cm}\approx  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{a^2}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Mit $a = 6.9$ kommt man somit zum Endergebnis:
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Substituting the result of&nbsp; '''(2)'''&nbsp; into the given equation,&nbsp; we obtain&nbsp; (using&nbsp; $a$&nbsp; instead of&nbsp; $a_*$):
:$${\rm Max} \ [h_{\rm K}(t)]  = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx  0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}}
:$$h_{\rm K}(t_{\rm max})  \ = \  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{ a}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot \frac{a^6}{(3\pi)^3}}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot{\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{a^2}{2\pi} \cdot\frac{3\pi}{a^2}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]= \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1}{a^2}\cdot\sqrt{\frac{27 \pi}{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2}\hspace{0.15cm}\approx  \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{a^2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
*Thus,&nbsp; with&nbsp; $a = 6.9$,&nbsp; we arrive at the final result:
:$${\rm Max} \ [h_{\rm K}(t)]  = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx  0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 


'''(4)'''&nbsp; Mit dem Ergebnis der Teilaufgabe (3) lautet die Bestimmungsgleichung:
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Using the result of subtask&nbsp; '''(3)''',&nbsp; the determining equation is:
:$$\frac{ a/T}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}= 0.0015  \cdot {1}/{T} \hspace{0.3cm}
:$$\frac{ a/T}{  \sqrt{2  \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}= 0.0015  \cdot {1}/{T} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}  (t_{5\%}/T)^{3/2} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi \cdot0.0015}\approx 1036 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}t_{5\%}/T \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 103.5}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}  (t_{5\%}/T)^{3/2} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi \cdot
  0.0015}\approx 1036 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow
  \hspace{0.3cm}t_{5\%}/T \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 103.5}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Dieser Wert ist etwas zu groß, da der zweite Term ${\rm e}^{\rm &ndash; 0.05} &asymp; 0.95$ vernachlässigt wurde. Die exakte Berechnung liefert $t_{\rm 5\%}/T &asymp; 97$.
*This value is slightly too large because the second term&nbsp; ${\rm e}^{\rm &ndash; 0.05} &asymp; 0.95$&nbsp; was neglected.  
*The exact calculation gives&nbsp; $t_{\rm 5\%}/T &asymp; 97$.




'''(5)'''&nbsp; Richtig ist der <u>zweite Lösungsvorschlag</u>. Allgemein gilt:
'''(5)'''&nbsp; The <u>second solution</u>&nbsp; is correct.&nbsp; In general:
:$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot
:$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$
\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$


Da sich die Kanalimpulsantwort $h_{\rm K}(t)$ innerhalb einer Symboldauer nur unwesentlich ändert, kann hierfür auch geschrieben werden:
*Since the channel impulse response&nbsp; $h_{\rm K}(t)$&nbsp; changes only insignificantly within a symbol duration,&nbsp; it can also be written for this purpose:
:$$g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T .$$
:$$g_r(t) \approx h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T .$$
{{ML-Fuß}}
{{ML-Fuß}}




[[Category:Aufgaben zu Digitalsignalübertragung|^3.1 Impulsinterferenzen^]]
[[Category:Digital Signal Transmission: Exercises|^3.1 Intersymbol Interference^]]
[[de:Aufgaben:Aufgabe 3.1: Impulsantwort des Koaxialkabels]]

Latest revision as of 17:57, 16 March 2026

Impulse response of a coaxial cable

The frequency response of a coaxial cable of length  $l$  can be represented by the following formula:

$$H_{\rm K}(f) \ = \ {\rm e}^{- \alpha_0 \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} l}\cdot{\rm e}^{- (\alpha_1 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_1) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot f \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l} \cdot\ {\rm e}^{- (\alpha_2 + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \beta_2) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f} \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The first term of this equation is due to the ohmic losses.
  • The second term is due to the transverse losses.
  • Dominant,  however,  is the skin effect,  which is expressed by the third term.


With the coefficients valid for a so-called  "standard coaxial cable"  $(2.6 \ \rm mm$  core diameter and  $9.5 \ \rm mm$  outer diameter$)$

$$\alpha_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac{\rm Np}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.2cm} \beta_2 = 0.2722 \hspace{0.15cm}\frac{\rm rad}{\rm km \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\hspace{0.05cm},$$

the frequency response can also be represented as follows:

$$H_{\rm K}(f) \approx {\rm e}^{- 0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}0.2722 \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm}l/{\rm km}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \sqrt{f/{\rm MHz}}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

That means: Attenuation curve  $a_{\rm K}(f)$  and phase curve  $b_{\rm K}(f)$  are identical except for the pseudo units  "$\rm Np$"  and  "$\rm rad$".

If one defines the characteristic cable attenuation  $a_*$  at half the bit rate  $(R_{\rm B}/2)$,  one can treat digital systems of different bit rate and length uniformly:

$$a_{\star} = a_{\rm K}(f = {R_{\rm B}}/{2})\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}H_{\rm K}(f) = {\rm e}^{-a_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R_{\rm B}}}\cdot {\rm e}^{- {\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} a_{\star} \cdot \sqrt{2f/R_{\rm B}}}\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}a_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The corresponding  $\rm dB$  value is larger by a factor of  $8.688$.  For a binary system,  $R_{\rm B} = 1/T$  applies,  so that the characteristic cable attenuation is then related to the frequency  $f = 1/(2T)$. 


The Fourier transform of  $H_{\rm K}(f)$  yields the impulse response  $h_{\rm K}(t)$,  which can be given in closed-analytic form for a coaxial cable with the approximations described here.  For a binary system holds:

$$h_{\rm K}(t) = \frac{ a_{\star}/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t/T)^3}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot{\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{a_{\star}^2}{2 \pi \cdot t/T}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]\hspace{0.4cm}{\rm with}\hspace{0.2cm}a_{\star}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm in}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Np}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Subtask  (5)  is related to the basic receiver pulse  $g_r(t) = g_s(t) * h_K(t)$,  where  $g_s(t)$  should be assumed to be a rectangular pulse with height  $s_0$  and duration  $T$. 



Notes:



Questions

1 What is the length  $l$  of a standard coaxial cable,  if for the bit rate  $R_{\rm B} = 140 \ \rm Mbit/s$  the characteristic cable attenuation is  $a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$? 

$l \ = \ $ $\ \rm km $

2 At what time  $t_{\rm max}$  does  $h_{\rm K}(t)$  have its maximum?  Let  $a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$ be further valid.

$t_{\rm max}/T= \ $

3 What is the maximum value of the impulse response?  Let  $a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$  continue to hold.

${\rm Max}\ \big [h_{\rm K}(t)\big ]= \ $ $\ \cdot 1/T $

4 At what time  $t_{\rm 5\%}$  is  $h_{\rm K}(t)$  less than  $5\%$  of the maximum?  Consider only the first term of the given formula as an approximation.

$t_{\rm 5\%}/T= \ $

5 Which statements are true for the basic receiver pulse  $g_r(t)$? 

$g_r(t)$  is twice as wide as  $h_{\rm K}(t)$.
It is approximately  $g_r(t) = h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T$.
$g_r(t)$  can be approximated by a Gaussian pulse.


Solution

(1)  The characteristic cable attenuation  $a_* = 60 \ \rm dB$  corresponds to about  $6.9 \ \rm Np$.  Therefore,  it must hold:

$$\alpha_2 \cdot l \cdot {R_{\rm B}}/{2} = 6.9\,\,{\rm Np}$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} l = \frac{6.9\,\,{\rm Np}}{0.2722\,\,\frac{\rm Np}{{\rm km} \cdot \sqrt{\rm MHz}}\cdot \sqrt{70\,\,{\rm MHz}}} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 3\,\,{\rm km}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(2)  With the substitutions

$$x = { t}/{ T}, \hspace{0.2cm} K_1 = \frac{a_*/T}{\sqrt{2\pi^2 }}, \hspace{0.2cm}K_2 = \frac{a_*^2}{2\pi}$$

the impulse response can be described as follows:

$$h_{\rm K}(x) = K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • By setting the derivative to zero,  it follows:
$$- {3}/{2} \cdot K_1 \cdot x^{-5/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}+ K_1 \cdot x^{-3/2}\cdot {\rm e}^{-K_2/x}\cdot (-K_2) \cdot (-x^{-2})= 0\hspace{0.05cm}$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {3}/{2} \cdot x^{-5/2} = K_2 \cdot x^{-7/2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}x_{\rm max} = {2}/{3} \cdot K_2 = { a_{\star}^2}/({3 \pi})\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This gives for  $60 \ \rm dB$  cable attenuation  $(a_* ≈ 6.9 \ \rm Np)$:
$$x_{\rm max} = { t_{\rm max}}/{ T} \hspace{-0.1cm}: \hspace{0.2cm} { t_{\rm max}}/{ T} = { 6.9^2}/({3\pi})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 5} \hspace{0.2cm}.$$


(3)  Substituting the result of  (2)  into the given equation,  we obtain  (using  $a$  instead of  $a_*$):

$$h_{\rm K}(t_{\rm max}) \ = \ \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{ a}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot \frac{a^6}{(3\pi)^3}}}\hspace{0.1cm} \cdot{\rm exp} \left[ - \frac{a^2}{2\pi} \cdot\frac{3\pi}{a^2}\hspace{0.1cm}\right]= \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1}{a^2}\cdot\sqrt{\frac{27 \pi}{2}} \cdot {\rm e}^{-3/2}\hspace{0.15cm}\approx \frac{1}{T} \cdot \frac{1.453}{a^2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • Thus,  with  $a = 6.9$,  we arrive at the final result:
$${\rm Max} \ [h_{\rm K}(t)] = \frac{1.453}{{6.9\,}^2} \cdot {1}/{T}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(4)  Using the result of subtask  (3),  the determining equation is:

$$\frac{ a/T}{ \sqrt{2 \pi^2 \cdot (t_{5\%}/T)^3}}= 0.05 \cdot 0.03 \cdot {1}/{T}= 0.0015 \cdot {1}/{T} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} (t_{5\%}/T)^{3/2} = \frac{a}{\sqrt{2} \cdot \pi \cdot0.0015}\approx 1036 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}t_{5\%}/T \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 103.5}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This value is slightly too large because the second term  ${\rm e}^{\rm – 0.05} ≈ 0.95$  was neglected.
  • The exact calculation gives  $t_{\rm 5\%}/T ≈ 97$.


(5)  The second solution  is correct.  In general:

$$g_r(t) = g_s(t) \star h_{\rm K}(t) = s_0 \cdot\int_{t-T/2}^{t+T/2} h_{\rm K}(\tau) \,{\rm d} \tau .$$
  • Since the channel impulse response  $h_{\rm K}(t)$  changes only insignificantly within a symbol duration,  it can also be written for this purpose:
$$g_r(t) \approx h_{\rm K}(t) \cdot s_0 \cdot T .$$