Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.2: Channel Log Likelihood Ratio at AWGN"

From LNTwww
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Kanalcodierung/Soft–in Soft–out Decoder}}
+
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Channel_Coding/Soft-in_Soft-Out_Decoder}}
  
[[File:P_ID2980__KC_A_4_2_v2.png|right|frame|Bedingte Gaußfunktionen]]
+
[[File:P_ID2980__KC_A_4_2_v2.png|right|frame|Conditional Gaussian functions]]
Wir betrachten zwei Kanäle A und B, jeweils mit
+
We consider two channels  $\rm A$  and  $\rm B$,  each with
* binärem bipolaren Eingang $x ∈ \{+1, \, –1\}$, und
+
* binary bipolar input  $x ∈ \{+1, \, -1\}$,  and
* wertkontinuierlichem Ausgang $y ∈ {\rm IR}$ (reelle Zahl).
 
  
 +
* continuous-valued output  $y ∈ {\rm \mathcal{R}}$  (real number).
  
Die Grafik zeigt für beide Kanäle A und B
 
* als blaue Kurve die Dichtefunktionen $f_{y|x=+1}$,
 
* als rote Kurve die Dichtefunktionen $f_{y|x=–1}$.
 
  
 +
The graph shows for both channels
 +
* as blue curve the probability density functions  $f_{y\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x=+1}$,
  
Im [[Kanalcodierung/Soft%E2%80%93in_Soft%E2%80%93out_Decoder#Zuverl.C3.A4ssigkeitsinformation_.E2.80.93_Log_Likelihood_Ratio| Theorieteil]] wurde für diese AWGN&ndash;Konstellation der Kanal&ndash;$L$&ndash;Wert (englisch: <i>Channel Log Likelihood Ratio</i>, oder kurz <i>Channel LLR</i>) wie folgt hergeleitet:
+
* as red curve the probability  density functions&nbsp; $f_{y\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x=-1}$.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
In the &nbsp; [[Channel_Coding/Soft-in_Soft-Out_Decoder#Reliability_information_-_Log_Likelihood_Ratio| "theory section"]]&nbsp; the channel&nbsp; $($German:&nbsp; "Kanal" &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; subscript:&nbsp; "K"$)$&nbsp; log likelihood ratio was derived for this AWGN constellation as follows:
 
:$$L_{\rm K}(y) = L(y\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x) =  {\rm ln} \hspace{0.15cm} \frac{{\rm Pr}(y \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x=+1) }{{\rm Pr}(y \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x = -1)}
 
:$$L_{\rm K}(y) = L(y\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x) =  {\rm ln} \hspace{0.15cm} \frac{{\rm Pr}(y \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x=+1) }{{\rm Pr}(y \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x = -1)}
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
Wertet man diese Gleichung analytisch aus, so erhält man mit der Proportionalitätskonstanten $K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2$:
+
Evaluating this equation analytically,&nbsp; we obtain with the proportionality constant&nbsp; $K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2$:
 
:$$L_{\rm K}(y) =
 
:$$L_{\rm K}(y) =
 
K_{\rm L} \cdot y
 
K_{\rm L} \cdot y
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
''Hinweis:''
 
* Die Aufgabe gehört zum Themengebiet des Kapitels [[Kanalcodierung/Soft%E2%80%93in_Soft%E2%80%93out_Decoder| Soft&ndash;in Soft&ndash;out Decoder]].
 
  
  
  
===Fragebogen===
+
 
 +
<u>Hints:</u>
 +
* This exercise belongs to the chapter&nbsp; [[Channel_Coding/Soft-in_Soft-Out_Decoder| "Soft&ndash;in Soft&ndash;out Decoder"]].
 +
 
 +
* Reference is made in particular to the sections&nbsp;
 +
:*[[Channel_Coding/Soft-in_Soft-Out_Decoder#Reliability_information_-_Log_Likelihood_Ratio|"Reliability Information &ndash; Log Likelihood Ratio"]],&nbsp;
 +
 
 +
:* [[Channel_Coding/Channel_Models_and_Decision_Structures#AWGN_channel_at_Binary_Input|"AWGN&ndash;Channel at Binary Input"]].
 +
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
===Questions===
 
<quiz display=simple>
 
<quiz display=simple>
{Welche Eigenschaften weisen die in der Grafik dargestellten Kanäle auf?
+
{What are the characteristics of the channels shown in the diagram?
 
|type="[]"}
 
|type="[]"}
+ Sie beschreiben die Binärübertragung bei Gaußscher Störung.
+
+ They describe the binary transmission under Gaussian noise.
+ Die Bitfehlerwahrscheinlichkeit ohne Codierung ist ${\rm Q}(1/\sigma)$.
+
+ The bit error probability without coding is&nbsp; ${\rm Q}(1/\sigma)$.
+ Das Kanal&ndash;LLR ist als $L_{\rm K}(y) = K_{\rm L} \cdot y$ darstellbar.
+
+ The channel log likelihood ratio is given as&nbsp; $L_{\rm K}(y) = K_{\rm L} \cdot y$.
  
{Welche Konstante $K_{\rm L}$ kennzeichnet den Kanal A?
+
{Which constant&nbsp; $K_{\rm L}$&nbsp; characterizes the channel&nbsp; $\rm A$?
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
${\rm Kanal \ A} \text{:} \hspace{0.2cm} K_{\rm L} \ = \ ${ 2 3% }  
+
$K_{\rm L} \ = \ ${ 2 3% }  
  
{Welche Informationen liefern bei <b>Kanal A</b> die Empfangswerte $y_1 = 1, \ y_2 = 0.5$ und $y_3 = \, &ndash;1.5$ über die gesendeten Binärsymbole $x_1, \ x_2$ bzw. $x_3$?
+
{For channel&nbsp; $\rm A$&nbsp; what information do the received values&nbsp; $y_1 = 1, \ y_2 = 0.5$,&nbsp; $y_3 = \, -1.5$&nbsp; provide about the transmitted binary symbols&nbsp; $x_1, \ x_2$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $x_3$?
 
|type="[]"}
 
|type="[]"}
+ $y_1 = 1.0$ sagt aus, dass wahrscheinlich $x_1 = +1$ gesendet wurde.
+
+ $y_1 = 1.0$&nbsp; states that probably&nbsp; $x_1 = +1$&nbsp; was sent.
+ $y_2 = 0.5$ sagt aus, dass wahrscheinlich $x_2 = +1$ gesendet wurde.
+
+ $y_2 = 0.5$&nbsp; states that probably&nbsp; $x_2 = +1$&nbsp; was sent.
+ $y_3 = \, &ndash;1.5$ sagt aus, dass wahrscheinlich $x_3 = \, &ndash;1$ gesendet wurde.
+
+ $y_3 = \, -1.5$&nbsp; states that probably&nbsp; $x_3 = \, -1$&nbsp; was sent.
+ Die Entscheidung &bdquo;$y_1 &#8594; x_1$&rdquo; ist sicherer als &bdquo;$y_2 &#8594; x_2$&rdquo;.
+
+ The decision&nbsp; "$y_1 &#8594; x_1$"&nbsp; is safer than&nbsp; "$y_2 &#8594; x_2$".
- Die Entscheidung &bdquo;$y_1 &#8594; x_1$&rdquo; ist sicherer als &bdquo;$y_3 &#8594; x_3$&rdquo;.
+
- The decision&nbsp; "$y_1 &#8594; x_1$"&nbsp; is safer than&nbsp; "$y_3 &#8594; x_3$".
  
{Welche $K_{\rm L}$ kennzeichnet den Kanal B?
+
{Which&nbsp; $K_{\rm L}$&nbsp; identifies the channel&nbsp; $\rm B$?
 
|type="{}"}
 
|type="{}"}
${\rm Kanal \ B} \text{:} \hspace{0.2cm} K_{\rm L} \ = \ ${ 8 3% }
+
$K_{\rm L} \ = \ ${ 8 3% }
  
{Welche Informationen liefern bei <b>Kanal B</b> die Empfangswerte $y_1 = 1, \ y_2 = 0.5$ und $y_3 = \, &ndash;1.5$ über die gesendeten Binärsymbole $x_1, \ x_2$ bzw. $x_3$?
+
{What information does channel&nbsp; $\rm B$&nbsp; provide about the received values&nbsp; $y_1 = 1, \ y_2 = 0.5$,&nbsp; $y_3 = -1.5$&nbsp; about the transmitted binary symbols&nbsp; $x_1, \ x_2$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $x_3$?
 
|type="[]"}
 
|type="[]"}
+ Für $x_1, \ x_2, \ x_3$ wird gleich entschieden wie bei Kanal A.
+
+ For&nbsp; $x_1, \ x_2, \ x_3$&nbsp; is decided the same as for channel&nbsp; $\rm A$.
+ Die Schätzung &bdquo;$x_2 = +1$&rdquo; ist viermal sicherer als bei Kanal A.
+
+ The estimate&nbsp; "$x_2 = +1$"&nbsp; is four times more certain than for channel&nbsp; $\rm A$.
- Die Schätzung &bdquo;$x_3 = \, &ndash;1$&rdquo; bei Kanal A ist zuverlässiger als die Schätzung &bdquo;$x_2 = +1$&rdquo; bei Kanal B.
+
- The estimate&nbsp; "$x_3 = \, -1$"&nbsp; at channel&nbsp; $\rm A$&nbsp; is more reliable than the estimate&nbsp; "$x_2 = +1$"&nbsp; at channel&nbsp; $\rm B$.
 
</quiz>
 
</quiz>
  
===Musterlösung===
+
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; <u>Alle Lösungsvorschläge</u> sind richtig:
+
'''(1)'''&nbsp; <u>All proposed solutions</u>&nbsp; are correct:
* Die Übergangsgleichung lautet stets $y = x + n$, wobei $x &#8712; \{+1, \, &ndash;1\}$ gilt und $n$ eine Gaußsche Zufallsgröße mit Streuung $\sigma$ &nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp; Varianz $\sigma^2$ angibt &nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp; [[AWGN&ndash;Kanal]].
+
* The transfer equation is always&nbsp; $y = x + n$,&nbsp; with&nbsp; $x &#8712; \{+1, \, -1\}$.&nbsp;
* Die [[AWGN&ndash;Bitfehlerwahrscheinlichkeit]] berechnet sich mit der Streuung $\sigma$ zu ${\rm Q}(1/\sigma)$ wobei ${\rm Q}(x)$ die [[komplementäre Gaußsche Fehlerfunktion]] bezeichnet.  
+
 
* Für jeden AWGN&ndash;Kanal ergibt sich entsprechend dem [[Theorieteil]] das Kanal&ndash;LLR stets $L_{\rm K}(y) = L(y|x) = K_{\rm L} \cdot y$. Die Konstante $K_{\rm L}$ ist für die beiden Kanäle unterschiedlich.
+
*The variable&nbsp; $n$&nbsp; is a Gaussian random variable with standard deviation&nbsp; $\sigma$ &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; variance&nbsp; $\sigma^2$ &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; [[Channel_Coding/Channel_Models_and_Decision_Structures#AWGN_channel_at_Binary_Input| "AWGN Channel"]].
 +
 
 +
* The&nbsp; [[Digital_Signal_Transmission/Error_Probability_for_Baseband_Transmission#Error_probability_with_Gaussian_noise|"AWGN bit error probability"]]&nbsp; is calculated using the standard deviation &nbsp; $\sigma$ &nbsp; to &nbsp; ${\rm Q}(1/\sigma)$ &nbsp; where&nbsp; ${\rm Q}(x)$&nbsp; denotes the&nbsp; [[Theory_of_Stochastic_Signals/Gaussian_Distributed_Random_Variables#Exceedance_probability|"complementary Gaussian error function"]].
 +
 +
* For each AWGN channel,&nbsp; according to the&nbsp; [[Channel_Coding/Soft-in_Soft-Out_Decoder#Reliability_information_-_Log_Likelihood_Ratio|"theory section"]],&nbsp; the channel log likelihood ratio always results in&nbsp; $L_{\rm K}(y) = L(y|x) = K_{\rm L} \cdot y$.
 +
 +
*The constant&nbsp; $K_{\rm L}$&nbsp; is different for the two channels.
  
  
'''(2)'''&nbsp; Beim AWGN&ndash;Kanal gilt $L_{\rm K}(y) = K_{\rm L} \cdot y$ mit der Konstanten $K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2$. Die Streuung $\sigma$ kann aus der Grafik auf der Angabenseite als der Abstand der Wendepunkte innerhalb der Gaußkurven von ihren jeweiligen Mittelpunkten abgelesen werden. Beim Kanal A ergibt sich $\sigma = 1$.  
+
'''(2)'''&nbsp; For the AWGN channel &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; $L_{\rm K}(y) = K_{\rm L} \cdot y$ &nbsp; with constant &nbsp; $K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2$.  
 +
*The standard deviation&nbsp; $\sigma$&nbsp; can be read from the graph on the data page as the distance of the inflection points within the Gaussian curves from their respective midpoints.&nbsp; For '''channel A''' &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp;  $\sigma = 1$&nbsp; results.  
  
Zum gleichen Ergebnis kommt man durch Auswertung der Gaußfunktion
+
*The same result is obtained by evaluating the Gaussian function
 
:$$\frac{f_{\rm G}( y = \sigma)}{f_{\rm G}( y = 0)} = {\rm e} ^{ -  y^2/(2\sigma^2) } \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.05cm} y \hspace{0.05cm} = \hspace{0.05cm} \sigma} = {\rm e} ^{ -0.5} \approx 0.6065\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$\frac{f_{\rm G}( y = \sigma)}{f_{\rm G}( y = 0)} = {\rm e} ^{ -  y^2/(2\sigma^2) } \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.05cm} y \hspace{0.05cm} = \hspace{0.05cm} \sigma} = {\rm e} ^{ -0.5} \approx 0.6065\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
Das bedeutet: Beim Abszissenwert $y = \sigma$ ist die mittelwertfreie Gaußfunktion $f_{\rm G}(y)$ auf $60.65\%$ ihres Maximalwertes abgeklungen. Somit gilt für die Konstante beim <u>Kanal A</u>: $K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2 \ \underline{= 2}$.
+
*This means:&nbsp; At the abscissa value&nbsp; $y = \sigma$&nbsp; the mean-free Gaussian function&nbsp; $f_{\rm G}(y)$&nbsp; has decayed to&nbsp; $60.65\%$&nbsp; of its maximum value.&nbsp;
 +
 
 +
*Thus,&nbsp; for the constant at&nbsp; '''channel A''': &nbsp; $K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2 \ \underline{= 2}$.
 +
 
  
  
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Wir geben zunächst die jeweiligen $L$&ndash;Werte von Kanal A an:
+
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Correct are the&nbsp; <u>solutions 1 to 4</u>:
 +
*We first give the respective log likelihood ratios of&nbsp; '''Channel A''':
 
:$$L_{\rm K}(y_1 = +1.0) = +2\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
 
:$$L_{\rm K}(y_1 = +1.0) = +2\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
 
L_{\rm K}(y_2 = +0.5) = +1\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
 
L_{\rm K}(y_2 = +0.5) = +1\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm}
 
L_{\rm K}(y_3 = -1.5) = -3\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
 
L_{\rm K}(y_3 = -1.5) = -3\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
 +
*This results in the following consequences:
 +
# The decision for the&nbsp; $($most probable$)$&nbsp; code bit&nbsp; $x_i$&nbsp; is based on the sign of&nbsp; $L_{\rm K}(y_i)$: <br> &nbsp; &nbsp; $x_1 = +1, \ x_2 = +1, \ x_3 = \, -1$ &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; the&nbsp; <u>proposed solutions 1, 2 and 3</u>&nbsp; are correct.
 +
# The decision&nbsp; "$x_1 = +1$"&nbsp; is more reliable than the decision&nbsp; "$x_2 = +1$" &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; <u>Proposition 4</u>&nbsp; is also correct.
 +
# However,&nbsp; the decision&nbsp; "$x_1 = +1$"&nbsp; is less reliable than the decision&nbsp; "$x_3 = \, &ndash;1$"&nbsp; because&nbsp; $|L_{\rm K}(y_1)<|L_{\rm K}(y_3)|$ &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; proposed solution 5 is incorrect.
 +
 +
*This can also be interpreted as follows:&nbsp; The quotient between the red and the blue PDF value at&nbsp; $y_3 = \, -1.5$&nbsp; is larger than the quotient between the blue and the red PDF value at&nbsp; $y_1 = +1$.
 +
 +
  
Daraus ergeben sich folgende Konsequenzen:
+
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Following the same considerations as in subtask&nbsp; '''(2)''',&nbsp; the standard deviation of&nbsp; '''channel B'''&nbsp; is given by: &nbsp;  
* Die Entscheidung für das (wahrscheinlichste) Codebit $x_i$ wird aufgrund des Vorzeichens von $L_{\rm K}(y_i)$ getroffen: $x_1 = +1, \ x_2 = +1, \ x_3 = \, &ndash;1$ &nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp; die <u>Lösungsvorschläge 1, 2 und 3</u> sind richtig.
+
:$$\sigma = 1/2 \ \Rightarrow \ K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2 \ \underline{= 8}.$$
* Die Entscheidung &bdquo;$x_1 = +1$&rdquo; ist wegen $|L_{\rm K}(y_1)| > |L_{\rm K}(y_3)|$ zuverlässiger als die Entscheidung &bdquo;$x_2 = +1$&rdquo; &nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp; <u>Lösungsvorschlag 4</u> ist ebenfalls richtig.
 
* Die
 
  
  
'''(4)'''&nbsp;
 
  
 +
'''(5)'''&nbsp; For&nbsp; '''channel B''',&nbsp; the following applies: &nbsp;
 +
:$$L_{\rm K}(y_1 = +1.0) = +8, \ L_{\rm K}(y_2 = +0.5) = +4, \ L_{\rm K}(y_3 = \, -1.5) = \, -12.$$
  
'''(5)'''&nbsp;
+
*It is obvious that&nbsp; <u>the first two proposed solutions</u>&nbsp; are true,&nbsp; but not the third,&nbsp; because
 +
:$$|L_{\rm K}(y_3 = -1.5, {\rm channel\hspace{0.15cm} A)}| = 3
 +
\hspace{0.2cm} <\hspace{0.2cm}
 +
|L_{\rm K}(y_2 = 0.5, {\rm channel\hspace{0.15cm} B)}| = 4\hspace{0.05cm} . $$
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
  
  
  
[[Category:Aufgaben zu  Kanalcodierung|^4.1 Soft–in Soft–out Decoder^]]
+
[[Category:Channel Coding: Exercises|^4.1 Soft–in Soft–out Decoder^]]

Latest revision as of 15:21, 29 November 2022

Conditional Gaussian functions

We consider two channels  $\rm A$  and  $\rm B$,  each with

  • binary bipolar input  $x ∈ \{+1, \, -1\}$,  and
  • continuous-valued output  $y ∈ {\rm \mathcal{R}}$  (real number).


The graph shows for both channels

  • as blue curve the probability density functions  $f_{y\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x=+1}$,
  • as red curve the probability density functions  $f_{y\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x=-1}$.


In the   "theory section"  the channel  $($German:  "Kanal"   ⇒   subscript:  "K"$)$  log likelihood ratio was derived for this AWGN constellation as follows:

$$L_{\rm K}(y) = L(y\hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x) = {\rm ln} \hspace{0.15cm} \frac{{\rm Pr}(y \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x=+1) }{{\rm Pr}(y \hspace{0.05cm}|\hspace{0.05cm}x = -1)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Evaluating this equation analytically,  we obtain with the proportionality constant  $K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2$:

$$L_{\rm K}(y) = K_{\rm L} \cdot y \hspace{0.05cm}.$$



Hints:

  • Reference is made in particular to the sections 



Questions

1

What are the characteristics of the channels shown in the diagram?

They describe the binary transmission under Gaussian noise.
The bit error probability without coding is  ${\rm Q}(1/\sigma)$.
The channel log likelihood ratio is given as  $L_{\rm K}(y) = K_{\rm L} \cdot y$.

2

Which constant  $K_{\rm L}$  characterizes the channel  $\rm A$?

$K_{\rm L} \ = \ $

3

For channel  $\rm A$  what information do the received values  $y_1 = 1, \ y_2 = 0.5$,  $y_3 = \, -1.5$  provide about the transmitted binary symbols  $x_1, \ x_2$  and  $x_3$?

$y_1 = 1.0$  states that probably  $x_1 = +1$  was sent.
$y_2 = 0.5$  states that probably  $x_2 = +1$  was sent.
$y_3 = \, -1.5$  states that probably  $x_3 = \, -1$  was sent.
The decision  "$y_1 → x_1$"  is safer than  "$y_2 → x_2$".
The decision  "$y_1 → x_1$"  is safer than  "$y_3 → x_3$".

4

Which  $K_{\rm L}$  identifies the channel  $\rm B$?

$K_{\rm L} \ = \ $

5

What information does channel  $\rm B$  provide about the received values  $y_1 = 1, \ y_2 = 0.5$,  $y_3 = -1.5$  about the transmitted binary symbols  $x_1, \ x_2$  and  $x_3$?

For  $x_1, \ x_2, \ x_3$  is decided the same as for channel  $\rm A$.
The estimate  "$x_2 = +1$"  is four times more certain than for channel  $\rm A$.
The estimate  "$x_3 = \, -1$"  at channel  $\rm A$  is more reliable than the estimate  "$x_2 = +1$"  at channel  $\rm B$.


Solution

(1)  All proposed solutions  are correct:

  • The transfer equation is always  $y = x + n$,  with  $x ∈ \{+1, \, -1\}$. 
  • The variable  $n$  is a Gaussian random variable with standard deviation  $\sigma$   ⇒   variance  $\sigma^2$   ⇒   "AWGN Channel".
  • For each AWGN channel,  according to the  "theory section",  the channel log likelihood ratio always results in  $L_{\rm K}(y) = L(y|x) = K_{\rm L} \cdot y$.
  • The constant  $K_{\rm L}$  is different for the two channels.


(2)  For the AWGN channel   ⇒   $L_{\rm K}(y) = K_{\rm L} \cdot y$   with constant   $K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2$.

  • The standard deviation  $\sigma$  can be read from the graph on the data page as the distance of the inflection points within the Gaussian curves from their respective midpoints.  For channel A   ⇒   $\sigma = 1$  results.
  • The same result is obtained by evaluating the Gaussian function
$$\frac{f_{\rm G}( y = \sigma)}{f_{\rm G}( y = 0)} = {\rm e} ^{ - y^2/(2\sigma^2) } \Bigg |_{\hspace{0.05cm} y \hspace{0.05cm} = \hspace{0.05cm} \sigma} = {\rm e} ^{ -0.5} \approx 0.6065\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This means:  At the abscissa value  $y = \sigma$  the mean-free Gaussian function  $f_{\rm G}(y)$  has decayed to  $60.65\%$  of its maximum value. 
  • Thus,  for the constant at  channel A:   $K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2 \ \underline{= 2}$.


(3)  Correct are the  solutions 1 to 4:

  • We first give the respective log likelihood ratios of  Channel A:
$$L_{\rm K}(y_1 = +1.0) = +2\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm} L_{\rm K}(y_2 = +0.5) = +1\hspace{0.05cm},\hspace{0.3cm} L_{\rm K}(y_3 = -1.5) = -3\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
  • This results in the following consequences:
  1. The decision for the  $($most probable$)$  code bit  $x_i$  is based on the sign of  $L_{\rm K}(y_i)$:
        $x_1 = +1, \ x_2 = +1, \ x_3 = \, -1$   ⇒   the  proposed solutions 1, 2 and 3  are correct.
  2. The decision  "$x_1 = +1$"  is more reliable than the decision  "$x_2 = +1$"   ⇒   Proposition 4  is also correct.
  3. However,  the decision  "$x_1 = +1$"  is less reliable than the decision  "$x_3 = \, –1$"  because  $|L_{\rm K}(y_1)<|L_{\rm K}(y_3)|$   ⇒   proposed solution 5 is incorrect.
  • This can also be interpreted as follows:  The quotient between the red and the blue PDF value at  $y_3 = \, -1.5$  is larger than the quotient between the blue and the red PDF value at  $y_1 = +1$.


(4)  Following the same considerations as in subtask  (2),  the standard deviation of  channel B  is given by:  

$$\sigma = 1/2 \ \Rightarrow \ K_{\rm L} = 2/\sigma^2 \ \underline{= 8}.$$


(5)  For  channel B,  the following applies:  

$$L_{\rm K}(y_1 = +1.0) = +8, \ L_{\rm K}(y_2 = +0.5) = +4, \ L_{\rm K}(y_3 = \, -1.5) = \, -12.$$
  • It is obvious that  the first two proposed solutions  are true,  but not the third,  because
$$|L_{\rm K}(y_3 = -1.5, {\rm channel\hspace{0.15cm} A)}| = 3 \hspace{0.2cm} <\hspace{0.2cm} |L_{\rm K}(y_2 = 0.5, {\rm channel\hspace{0.15cm} B)}| = 4\hspace{0.05cm} . $$