Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 5.1: Gaussian ACF and Gaussian Low-Pass"
m (Text replacement - "rms value" to "standard deviation") |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<quiz display=simple> | <quiz display=simple> | ||
− | {What is the | + | {What is the standard deviation of the filter input signal? |
|type="{}"} | |type="{}"} | ||
σx = { 0.2 3% } V | σx = { 0.2 3% } V |
Latest revision as of 13:11, 17 February 2022
At the input of a low-pass filter with frequency response H(f), there is a Gaussian distributed mean-free noise signal x(t) with the following auto-correlation function (ACF):
- φx(τ)=σ2x⋅e−π(τ/∇τx)2.
This ACF is shown in the accompanying diagram above.
Let the filter be Gaussian with the DC gain H0 and the equivalent bandwidth Δf. Thus, for the frequency response, it can be written:
- H(f)=H0⋅e−π(f/Δf)2.
In the course of this task, the two filter parameters H0 and Δf are to be dimensioned so that the output signal y(t) has an ACF corresponding to the diagram below.
Notes:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter Stochastic System Theory.
- Reference is also made to the chapter Auto-Correlation Function.
- Consider the following Fourier correspondence:
- e−π(f/Δf)2∙−−∘Δf⋅e−π(Δf⋅t)2.
Questions
Solution
- From this follows \sigma_x\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 0.2 \ \rm V}.
(2) The equivalent ACF duration can be determined via the rectangle of equal area.
- According to the sketch, we obtain \nabla \tau_x\hspace{0.15cm}\underline {= 1 \ \rm µ s}.
(3) The PSD is the Fourier transform of the ACF.
- With the given Fourier correspondence holds:
- {\it \Phi}_{x}(f) = \sigma_x^2 \cdot {\rm \nabla} \tau_x \cdot {\rm e}^{- \pi ({\rm \nabla} \tau_x \hspace{0.03cm}\cdot \hspace{0.03cm}f)^2} .
- At frequency f = 0, we obtain:
- {\it \Phi}_{x}(f = 0) = \sigma_x^2 \cdot {\rm \nabla} \tau_x = \rm 0.04 \hspace{0.1cm} V^2 \cdot 10^{-6} \hspace{0.1cm} s \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 40 \cdot 10^{-9} \hspace{0.1cm} V^2 / Hz}.
(4) Solutions 1 and 3 are correct:
- In general, {\it \Phi}_{y}(f) = {\it \Phi}_{x}(f) \cdot |H(f)|^2. It follows:
- {\it \Phi}_{y}(f) = \sigma_x^2 \cdot {\rm \nabla} \tau_x \cdot {\rm e}^{- \pi ({\rm \nabla} \tau_x \cdot f)^2}\cdot H_{\rm 0}^2 \cdot{\rm e}^{- 2 \pi (f/ {\rm \Delta} f)^2} .
- By combining the two exponential functions, we obtain:
- {\it \Phi}_{y}(f) = \sigma_x^2 \cdot {\rm \nabla} \tau_x \cdot H_0^2 \cdot {\rm e}^{- \pi\cdot ({\rm \nabla} \tau_x^2 + 2/\Delta f^2 ) \hspace{0.1cm}\cdot f^2}.
- Also {\it \Phi}_{y}(f) is Gaussian and never wider than {\it \Phi}_{x}(f). For f \to \infty, the approximation {\it \Phi}_{y}(f) \approx {\it \Phi}_{x}(f) holds.
- As \Delta f gets smaller, {\it \Phi}_{y}(f) gets narrower (so the second statement is false).
- H_0 actually affects only the PSD height, but not the width of the PSD.
(5) Analogous to task (1), it can be written for the PSD of the output signal y(t):
- {\it \Phi}_{y}(f) = \sigma_y^2 \cdot {\rm \nabla} \tau_y \cdot {\rm e}^{- \pi \cdot {\rm \nabla} \tau_y^2 \cdot f^2 }.
- By comparing with the result from (4) we get:
- {{\rm \nabla} \tau_y^2} = {{\rm \nabla} \tau_x^2} + \frac {2}{{\rm \Delta} f^2}.
- Solving the equation for \Delta f and considering the values \nabla \tau_x {= 1 \ \rm µ s} as well as \nabla \tau_y {= 3 \ \rm µ s}, it follows:
- {\rm \Delta} f = \sqrt{\frac{2}{{\rm \nabla} \tau_y^2 - {\rm \nabla} \tau_x^2}} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{9 - 1}} \hspace{0.1cm}\rm MHz \hspace{0.15cm} \underline{= 0.5\hspace{0.1cm} MHz} .
(6) The condition \sigma_y = \sigma_x is equivalent to \varphi_y(\tau = 0)= \varphi_x(\tau = 0).
- Moreover, since \nabla \tau_y = 3 \cdot \nabla \tau_x is given, therefore {\it \Phi}_{y}(f= 0) = 3 \cdot {\it \Phi}_{x}(f= 0) must also hold.
- From this we obtain:
- H_{\rm 0} = \sqrt{\frac{\it \Phi_y (f \rm = 0)}{\it \Phi_x (f = \rm 0)}} = \sqrt {3}\hspace{0.15cm} \underline{=1.732}.