Aufgaben:Exercise 2.2: Distortion Power: Difference between revisions

From LNTwww
Nabil (talk | contribs)
Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „ {{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Lineare zeitinvariante Systeme/Klassifizierung der Verzerrungen }} right| :Am Eingang eines Nachrich…“
 
Fix interlanguage link: resolve redirect chain
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Lineare zeitinvariante Systeme/Klassifizierung der Verzerrungen
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Classification_of_the_Distortions
}}
}}


[[File:P_ID883__LZI_A_2_2.png|right|]]
[[File:P_ID883__LZI_A_2_2.png|right|frame|Input signal and output signals]]
:Am Eingang eines Nachrichtensystems <i>S</i><sub>1</sub> wird ein Rechteckimpuls <i>x</i>(<i>t</i>) mit der Amplitude 1 V und der Dauer 4 ms angelegt. Am Systemausgang wird dann der Impuls <i>y</i><sub>1</sub>(<i>t</i>) gemessen, dessen Signalparameter der mittleren Skizze entnommen werden können.
A rectangular pulse&nbsp;$x(t)$&nbsp; with amplitude&nbsp;$1 \hspace{0.08cm} \rm  V$&nbsp; and duration&nbsp;$4 \hspace{0.08cm} \rm  ms$&nbsp; is applied to the input of a communication system. Then, the pulse&nbsp;$y_1(t)$&nbsp;, whose signal parameters can be taken from the middle sketch, is measured at the system output.


:Am Ausgang eines anderen Systems <i>S</i><sub>2</sub> stellt sich bei gleichem Eingangssignal <i>x</i>(<i>t</i>) das in dem unteren Bild dargestellte Signal <i>y</i><sub>2</sub>(<i>t</i>) ein.
At the output of another system&nbsp; $S_2$&nbsp;, the signal&nbsp;$y_2(t)$&nbsp; shown in the lower sketch is obtained with the same input signal&nbsp;$x(t)$&nbsp;.


:Für das in dieser Aufgabe verwendete Fehlersignal gelte folgende Definition:
Let the following definition apply to the error signal used in this task:
:$$\varepsilon(t) = y(t) - \alpha \cdot x(t - \tau) .$$
:$$\varepsilon(t) = y(t) - \alpha \cdot x(t - \tau) .$$
The parameters&nbsp;$\alpha$&nbsp; and &nbsp;$\tau$&nbsp; are to be determined such that the distortion power (the mean squared error) is minimal. For this, the following holds:
:$$P_{\rm V}  = \overline{\varepsilon^2(t)} = \frac{1}{T_{\rm M}} \cdot \int\limits_{ ( T_{\rm M})}{\varepsilon^2(t) }\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm d}t$$


:Die Parameter <i>&alpha;</i> und <i>&tau;</i> sind so zu bestimmen, dass die Verzerrungsleistung (der mittlere quadratische Fehler)
These definitions already take into account that a frequency-independent damping just as a runtime which is constant for all frequencies does not contribute to the distortion.
:$$P_{\rm V}  = \overline{\varepsilon^2(t)} = \frac{1}{T_{\rm M}} \cdot \int\limits_{ ( T_{\rm M})}
{\varepsilon^2(t) }\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm d}t$$


:minimal ist. Bei diesen Definitionen ist bereits berücksichtigt, dass eine frequenzunabhängige Dämpfung ebenso wie eine für alle Frequenzen konstante Laufzeit nicht zur Verzerrung beiträgt.
The integration interval has to be chosen appropriately in each case:  
*Use the interval&nbsp; $0$ ... $4 \hspace{0.08cm} \rm ms$&nbsp; for&nbsp;$y_1(t)$&nbsp; and the interval&nbsp; $1 \hspace{0.08cm} {\rm ms}$ ... $5 \hspace{0.08cm} \rm ms$ for&nbsp; &nbsp;$y_2(t)$&nbsp;.
*Thus, the measurement time is&nbsp;$T_{\rm M} = 4 \hspace{0.08cm} \rm ms$ in both cases.
*It is obvious that with respect to&nbsp;$y_1(t)$&nbsp; the parameters &nbsp;$\alpha = 1$&nbsp; and &nbsp;$\tau = 0$&nbsp; respectively result in the minimum distortion power.


:Das Integrationsintervall ist jeweils geeignet zu wählen. Benutzen Sie für <i>y</i><sub>1</sub>(<i>t</i>) den Bereich von 0 ... 4 ms und für <i>y</i><sub>2</sub>(<i>t</i>) das Intervall 1 ms ... 5 ms. <i>T</i><sub>M</sub> ist in beiden Fällen gleich 4 ms. Es ist offensichtlich, dass bezüglich <i>y</i><sub>1</sub>(<i>t</i>) die Parameter <i>&alpha;</i> = 1 und <i>&tau;</i> = 0 jeweils zur minimalen Verzerrungsleistung führen.


:Das so genannte Signal&ndash;zu&ndash;Verzerrungs&ndash;Leistungsverhältnis berechnet sich im allgemeinen Fall zu
In general, the so-called signal&ndash;to&ndash;distortion&ndash;power ratio is given by the following formula
:$$\rho_{\rm V} = \frac{ \alpha^2 \cdot P_{x}}{P_{\rm V}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
:$$\rho_{\rm V} = \frac{ \alpha^2 \cdot P_{x}}{P_{\rm V}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


:Hierbei gibt <i>P<sub>x</sub></i> die Leistung des Signals <i>x</i>(<i>t</i>) an und <i>&alpha;</i><sup>2</sup> &middot; <i>P<sub>x</sub></i> die Leistung von <i>y</i>(<i>t</i>) = <i>&alpha;</i> &middot; <i>x</i>(<i>t</i> &ndash; <i>&tau;</i>), die sich bei Abwesenheit von Verzerrungen ergeben würde. Meist &ndash; so auch in dieser Aufgabe &ndash; wird dieses S/N-Verhältnis <i>&rho;</i><sub>V</sub> logarithmisch in dB angegeben.
Here,
*$P_x$&nbsp; denotes the power of the signal&nbsp;$x(t)$, and
*$\alpha^2 \cdot P_x$&nbsp; denotes the power of&nbsp;$y(t) = \alpha \cdot x(t - \tau)$, that would arise as aresult in the absence of distortion.  




===Fragebogen===
Usually, &ndash; as also in this task&ndash; this S/N-ratio&nbsp; $\rho_{\rm V}$&nbsp; is given logarithmically in&nbsp; $\rm dB$&nbsp;.
 
 
 
 
 
 
''Please note:''
*The exercise belongs to the chapter&nbsp;  [[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Classification_of_the_Distortions|Classification of the Distortions]].
*In particular, consider the pages&nbsp;
::[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Classification_of_the_Distortions#Quantitative_measure_for_the_signal_distortions|Quantitative measure for the signal distortions]] &nbsp;and also &nbsp;
::[[Linear_and_Time_Invariant_Systems/Classification_of_the_Distortions#Ber.C3.BCcksichtigung_von_D.C3.A4mpfung_und_Laufzeit|Berücksichtigung von Dämpfung und Laufzeit]].
 
 
===Questions===


<quiz display=simple>
<quiz display=simple>
{Ermitteln Sie die Verzerrungsleistung des Systems <i>S</i><sub>1</sub>.
{Determine the distortion power of the system&nbsp; $S_1$.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$P_\text{V1}$ = { 0.005 1% } $V^2$
$P_{\rm V1} \ = \ $ { 5 3% } $\ \cdot 10^{-3} \ {\rm V}^2$




{Berechnen Sie das Signal&ndash;zu&ndash;Verzerrungs&ndash;Leistungsverhältnis für System <i>S</i><sub>1</sub>.
{Compute the signal&ndash;to&ndash;distortion&ndash;power ratio for system&nbsp; $S_1$.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$10 \cdot lg \ \rho_\text{V1}$ = { 23.01 1% } $dB$
$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \ \rho_\text{V1} \ = \ $ { 23.01 3% } $\ \rm dB$




{Welche Parameter <i>&alpha;</i> und <i>&tau;</i> sollten zur Berechnung der Verzerrungsleistung des Systems <i>S</i><sub>2</sub> herangezogen werden? Begründen Sie Ihr Ergebnis.
{What parameters&nbsp; $\alpha$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $\tau$&nbsp; should be used to calculate the distortion power of the system&nbsp; $S_2$&nbsp;? <br>Justify your result.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$\alpha$ = { 0.5 1% }
$\alpha \ = \ $ { 0.5 3% }
$\tau$ = { 1 1% } $ms$
$\tau \ = \ $ { 1 3% } $\ \rm ms$




{Ermitteln Sie die Verzerrungsleistung des Systems <i>S</i><sub>2</sub>.
{Determine the distortion power of the system&nbsp; $S_2$.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$P_\text{V2}$ = { 0.005 1% } $V^2$
$P_{\rm V2} \ = \ $ { 5 3% } $\ \cdot 10^{-3} \ {\rm V}^2$




{Berechnen Sie das Signal&ndash;zu&ndash;Verzerrungs&ndash;Leistungsverhältnis für das System <i>S</i><sub>2</sub>. Interpretieren Sie die unterschiedlichen Ergebnisse.
{Compute the signal&ndash;to&ndash;distortion&ndash;power ratio for the system&nbsp; $S_2$. <br>Interpret the different results.
|type="{}"}
|type="{}"}
$10 \cdot lg \ \rho_\text{V2}$ = { 16.99 1% } $dB$
$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \ \rho_\text{V2} \ = \ $ { 16.99 3% } $\ \rm dB$




Line 57: Line 76:
</quiz>
</quiz>


===Musterlösung===
===Solution===
{{ML-Kopf}}
{{ML-Kopf}}
[[File:P_ID915__LZI_A_2_2_a.png|right|]]
[[File:P_ID915__LZI_A_2_2_a.png|right|frame|Resulting error signals]]
:<b>1.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Mit den gegebenen Parametern <i>&alpha;</i> = 1 und <i>&tau;</i> = 0 erhält man das in der Grafik dargestellte Fehlersignal <i>&epsilon;</i><sub>1</sub>(<i>t</i>). Die Verzerrungsleistung ist somit gleich:
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The error signal&nbsp; $\varepsilon_1(t)$ shown in the graph is obtained with the given parameters&nbsp;$\alpha = 1$&nbsp; and &nbsp;$\tau= 0$&nbsp;. The distortion power is thus equal to:
:$$P_{\rm V1}  =  \frac{ {1 \, \rm ms}}{4 \, \rm ms} \cdot \left[ ({0.1 \, \rm V})^2  +
:$$P_{\rm V1}  =  \frac{ {1 \, \rm ms}}{4 \, \rm ms} \cdot \big[ ({0.1 \, \rm V})^2  +({-0.1 \, \rm V})^2\big]\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}P_{\rm V1} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =  5 \cdot 10^{-3} \, \rm  V^2}. $$
  ({-0.1 \, \rm V})^2\right] $$
 
:$$\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow P_{\rm V1} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =  {0.005 \, \rm  V^2}}.$$
 


:<b>2.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Die Leistung des Eingangssignals beträgt:
'''(2)'''&nbsp; The power of the input signal is:
:$$P_{x}  =  \frac{1}{4 \, \rm ms} \cdot ({1 \, \rm V})^2 \cdot {4 \, \rm ms}\hspace{0.15cm}{ = {1 \, \rm  V^2}}.$$
:$$P_{x}  =  \frac{1}{4 \, \rm ms} \cdot ({1 \, \rm V})^2 \cdot {4 \, \rm ms}\hspace{0.15cm}{ = {1 \, \rm  V^2}}.$$


:Mit dem Ergebnis aus 1) erhält man somit für das Signal&ndash;zu&ndash;Verzerrungs&ndash;Leistungsverhältnis:
*The following is obtained for the signal&ndash;to&ndash;distortion&ndash;power ratio with the result from&nbsp; '''(1)'''&nbsp;:
:$$\rho_{\rm V1} = \frac{  P_{x}}{P_{\rm V1}}= \frac{  {1 \, \rm
$$\rho_{\rm V1} = \frac{  P_{x}}{P_{\rm V1}}= \frac{  {1 \, \rm V^2}}{0.005 \,  \rm V^2}\hspace{0.05cm}\rm = 200\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\rho_{\rm V1}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = {23.01 \, \rm dB}}.$$
  V^2}}{0.005 \,  \rm V^2}\hspace{0.05cm}\rm = 200\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}
 
  10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\rho_{\rm V1}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = {23.01 \, \rm dB}}.$$
 


:<b>3.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Die Skizze auf dem Angabenblatt macht deutlich, dass sich auch ohne die auftretenden Verzerrungen, sondern allein durch Dämpfung und Laufzeit, das Signal <i>y</i>(<i>t</i>) von <i>x</i>(<i>t</i>) deutlich unterscheiden würde. Es würde sich <i>y</i>(<i>t</i>) = 0.5 &middot; <i>x</i>(<i>t</i> &ndash; 1 ms) ergeben.
'''(3)'''&nbsp; The sketch on the information sheet makes it clear that even without the distortions occuring &ndash; but due to attenuation and runtime alone &ndash; the signal&nbsp;$y(t)$&nbsp; would differ significantly from&nbsp;$x(t)$&nbsp;.  
*The following would arise as a result: &nbsp;$y(t) = 0.5 \cdot x(t-1\ {\rm ms}) $&nbsp;.


:Wenn jemand diese Parameterwerte nicht sofort aus der Grafik erkennt, so müsste er für sehr (unendlich) viele <i>&alpha;</i>&ndash; und <i>&tau;</i>&ndash;Werte zunächst das Fehlersignal
*If someone does not immediately perceive these values from the graph, then first the error signal
:$$\varepsilon_2(t) = y_2(t) - \alpha \cdot x(t - \tau)$$
:$$\varepsilon_2(t) = y_2(t) - \alpha \cdot x(t - \tau)$$


:und anschließend den mitteleren quadratischen Fehler ermitteln, wobei das Integrationsintervall jeweils an <i>&tau;</i> anzupassen ist. Auch dann würde man das kleinstmögliche Ergebnis für <u><i>&alpha;</i> = 0.5 und <i>&tau;</i> = 1 ms</u> erhalten. Für diese Optimierung von <i>&alpha;</i> und <i>&tau;</i> sollte man sich allerdings schon ein Computerprogramm gönnen.
:and afterwards the mean squared error for very (infinitely) many&nbsp;$\alpha$&ndash;&nbsp; and &nbsp;$\tau$&ndash;values would have to be determined, in doing so the integration interval is to be adjusted to&nbsp;$\tau$&nbsp; in each case.  
*Then, the smallest possible result would also be obtained for&nbsp;$\alpha \; \underline{= 0.5}$&nbsp; and &nbsp;$\tau \; \underline{= 1 \ \rm ms}$&nbsp;. However, for this optimization of&nbsp;$\alpha$&nbsp; and &nbsp;$\tau$&nbsp; the useage of a computer program should be granted.
 
 
 
'''(4)'''&nbsp; The above sketch shows that&nbsp;$\varepsilon_2(t)$&nbsp; is equal to the error signal&nbsp;$\varepsilon_1(t)$&nbsp; except for a shift by&nbsp;$1 \ \rm ms$&nbsp;. Considering the integration interval&nbsp;$1 \ {\rm ms}$ ... $5 \ {\rm ms}$&nbsp; the same distortion power is obtained:
:$$P_{\rm V2}  =  P_{\rm V1} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ =  5 \cdot 10^{-3} \, \rm  V^2}.$$
 


:<b>4.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Die obige Skizze zeigt, dass <i>&epsilon;</i><sub>2</sub>(<i>t</i>) bis auf eine Verschiebung um 1 ms gleich dem Fehlersignal <i>&epsilon;</i><sub>1</sub>(<i>t</i>) ist. Mit dem Integrationsintervall 1 ms ... 5 ms ergibt sich somit auch die gleiche Verzerrungsleistung:
:$$P_{\rm V2}  =  P_{\rm V1} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{=  {0.005 \, \rm  V^2}}.$$


:<b>5.</b>&nbsp;&nbsp; Entsprechend dem Angabenblatt gilt:
'''(5)'''&nbsp; According to the information sheet the following holds:
:$$\rho_{\rm V2} = \frac{ \alpha^2 \cdot P_{x}}{P_{\rm V2}}= \frac{ 0.5^2 \cdot {1 \, \rm
:$$\rho_{\rm V2} = \frac{ \alpha^2 \cdot P_{x}}{P_{\rm V2}}= \frac{ 0.5^2 \cdot {1 \, \rm V^2}}{0.005 \,  \rm V^2}\hspace{0.05cm}\rm = 50\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\rho_{\rm V2} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= {16.99 \, \rm dB}}.$$
  V^2}}{0.005 \,  \rm V^2}\hspace{0.05cm}\rm = 50\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}
  10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\rho_{\rm V2} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= {16.99 \, \rm dB}}.$$


:Trotz gleicher Verzerrungsleistung ist 10 &middot; lg <i>&rho;</i><sub>V2</sub> gegenüber 10 &middot; lg <i>&rho;</i><sub>V1</sub> um etwa 6 dB geringer. Das Signal <i>y</i><sub>2</sub>(<i>t</i>) ist also hinsichtlich des SNR deutlich ungünstiger als <i>y</i><sub>1</sub>(<i>t</i>). Hierbei ist berücksichtigt, dass nun wegen <i>&alpha;</i> = 0.5 die Leistung des Ausgangssignals nur noch ein Viertel der Eingangsleistung beträgt.
*Despite the same distortion power&nbsp;$10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\rho_{\rm V2}$&nbsp; is less than &nbsp;$10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\rho_{\rm V1}$&nbsp; by about&nbsp;$6 \ \rm dB$&nbsp;.  
*The signal&nbsp;$y_2(t)$&nbsp; is thus significantly less favourable in terms of SNR than&nbsp;$y_1(t)$.
*It is considered that now the power of the output signal is only a quarter of the input power due to &nbsp;$\alpha = 0.5$&nbsp;.
*If this attenuation at the output was to be compensated by amplifying it by $1/\alpha$, the distortion power would indeed increase by $\alpha^2$.  


:Würde man diese Dämpfung am Ausgang durch eine Verstärkung um 1/<i>&alpha;</i> kompensieren, so würde zwar die Verzerrungsleistung um <i>&alpha;</i>&sup2; größer. Das Signal-zu-Verzerrungs-Leistungsverhältnis <i>&rho;</i><sub>V2</sub> bliebe jedoch erhalten, weil auch das &bdquo;Nutzsignal&rdquo; um den gleichen Betrag angehoben wird.
*The signal-to-distortion-power ratio $\rho_{\rm V2}$ would, however, remain the same because the "useful signal" would also be increased by the same value.
{{ML-Fuß}}
{{ML-Fuß}}






[[Category:Aufgaben zu Lineare zeitinvariante Systeme|^2.1 Klassifizierung der Verzerrungen^]]
[[Category:Linear and Time-Invariant Systems: Exercises|^2.1 Classification of the Distortions^]]
[[de:Aufgaben:Aufgabe 2.2: Verzerrungsleistung]]

Latest revision as of 17:56, 16 March 2026

Input signal and output signals

A rectangular pulse $x(t)$  with amplitude $1 \hspace{0.08cm} \rm V$  and duration $4 \hspace{0.08cm} \rm ms$  is applied to the input of a communication system. Then, the pulse $y_1(t)$ , whose signal parameters can be taken from the middle sketch, is measured at the system output.

At the output of another system  $S_2$ , the signal $y_2(t)$  shown in the lower sketch is obtained with the same input signal $x(t)$ .

Let the following definition apply to the error signal used in this task:

$$\varepsilon(t) = y(t) - \alpha \cdot x(t - \tau) .$$

The parameters $\alpha$  and  $\tau$  are to be determined such that the distortion power (the mean squared error) is minimal. For this, the following holds:

$$P_{\rm V} = \overline{\varepsilon^2(t)} = \frac{1}{T_{\rm M}} \cdot \int\limits_{ ( T_{\rm M})}{\varepsilon^2(t) }\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm d}t$$

These definitions already take into account that a frequency-independent damping just as a runtime which is constant for all frequencies does not contribute to the distortion.

The integration interval has to be chosen appropriately in each case:

  • Use the interval  $0$ ... $4 \hspace{0.08cm} \rm ms$  for $y_1(t)$  and the interval  $1 \hspace{0.08cm} {\rm ms}$ ... $5 \hspace{0.08cm} \rm ms$ for   $y_2(t)$ .
  • Thus, the measurement time is $T_{\rm M} = 4 \hspace{0.08cm} \rm ms$ in both cases.
  • It is obvious that with respect to $y_1(t)$  the parameters  $\alpha = 1$  and  $\tau = 0$  respectively result in the minimum distortion power.


In general, the so-called signal–to–distortion–power ratio is given by the following formula

$$\rho_{\rm V} = \frac{ \alpha^2 \cdot P_{x}}{P_{\rm V}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

Here,

  • $P_x$  denotes the power of the signal $x(t)$, and
  • $\alpha^2 \cdot P_x$  denotes the power of $y(t) = \alpha \cdot x(t - \tau)$, that would arise as aresult in the absence of distortion.


Usually, – as also in this task– this S/N-ratio  $\rho_{\rm V}$  is given logarithmically in  $\rm dB$ .




Please note:

Quantitative measure for the signal distortions  and also  
Berücksichtigung von Dämpfung und Laufzeit.


Questions

1 Determine the distortion power of the system  $S_1$.

$P_{\rm V1} \ = \ $ $\ \cdot 10^{-3} \ {\rm V}^2$

2 Compute the signal–to–distortion–power ratio for system  $S_1$.

$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \ \rho_\text{V1} \ = \ $ $\ \rm dB$

3 What parameters  $\alpha$  and  $\tau$  should be used to calculate the distortion power of the system  $S_2$ ?
Justify your result.

$\alpha \ = \ $
$\tau \ = \ $ $\ \rm ms$

4 Determine the distortion power of the system  $S_2$.

$P_{\rm V2} \ = \ $ $\ \cdot 10^{-3} \ {\rm V}^2$

5 Compute the signal–to–distortion–power ratio for the system  $S_2$.
Interpret the different results.

$10 \cdot {\rm lg} \ \rho_\text{V2} \ = \ $ $\ \rm dB$


Solution

Resulting error signals

(1)  The error signal  $\varepsilon_1(t)$ shown in the graph is obtained with the given parameters $\alpha = 1$  and  $\tau= 0$ . The distortion power is thus equal to:

$$P_{\rm V1} = \frac{ {1 \, \rm ms}}{4 \, \rm ms} \cdot \big[ ({0.1 \, \rm V})^2 +({-0.1 \, \rm V})^2\big]\hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}P_{\rm V1} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 5 \cdot 10^{-3} \, \rm V^2}. $$


(2)  The power of the input signal is:

$$P_{x} = \frac{1}{4 \, \rm ms} \cdot ({1 \, \rm V})^2 \cdot {4 \, \rm ms}\hspace{0.15cm}{ = {1 \, \rm V^2}}.$$
  • The following is obtained for the signal–to–distortion–power ratio with the result from  (1) :

$$\rho_{\rm V1} = \frac{ P_{x}}{P_{\rm V1}}= \frac{ {1 \, \rm V^2}}{0.005 \, \rm V^2}\hspace{0.05cm}\rm = 200\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\rho_{\rm V1}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = {23.01 \, \rm dB}}.$$


(3)  The sketch on the information sheet makes it clear that even without the distortions occuring – but due to attenuation and runtime alone – the signal $y(t)$  would differ significantly from $x(t)$ .

  • The following would arise as a result:  $y(t) = 0.5 \cdot x(t-1\ {\rm ms}) $ .
  • If someone does not immediately perceive these values from the graph, then first the error signal
$$\varepsilon_2(t) = y_2(t) - \alpha \cdot x(t - \tau)$$
and afterwards the mean squared error for very (infinitely) many $\alpha$–  and  $\tau$–values would have to be determined, in doing so the integration interval is to be adjusted to $\tau$  in each case.
  • Then, the smallest possible result would also be obtained for $\alpha \; \underline{= 0.5}$  and  $\tau \; \underline{= 1 \ \rm ms}$ . However, for this optimization of $\alpha$  and  $\tau$  the useage of a computer program should be granted.


(4)  The above sketch shows that $\varepsilon_2(t)$  is equal to the error signal $\varepsilon_1(t)$  except for a shift by $1 \ \rm ms$ . Considering the integration interval $1 \ {\rm ms}$ ... $5 \ {\rm ms}$  the same distortion power is obtained:

$$P_{\rm V2} = P_{\rm V1} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 5 \cdot 10^{-3} \, \rm V^2}.$$


(5)  According to the information sheet the following holds:

$$\rho_{\rm V2} = \frac{ \alpha^2 \cdot P_{x}}{P_{\rm V2}}= \frac{ 0.5^2 \cdot {1 \, \rm V^2}}{0.005 \, \rm V^2}\hspace{0.05cm}\rm = 50\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\rho_{\rm V2} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= {16.99 \, \rm dB}}.$$
  • Despite the same distortion power $10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\rho_{\rm V2}$  is less than  $10 \cdot {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}\rho_{\rm V1}$  by about $6 \ \rm dB$ .
  • The signal $y_2(t)$  is thus significantly less favourable in terms of SNR than $y_1(t)$.
  • It is considered that now the power of the output signal is only a quarter of the input power due to  $\alpha = 0.5$ .
  • If this attenuation at the output was to be compensated by amplifying it by $1/\alpha$, the distortion power would indeed increase by $\alpha^2$.
  • The signal-to-distortion-power ratio $\rho_{\rm V2}$ would, however, remain the same because the "useful signal" would also be increased by the same value.