Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.12Z: 4-QAM Systems again"

From LNTwww
 
Line 65: Line 65:
 
===Solution===
 
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''   From   $10 · \lg E_{\rm B}/N_0 = 9 \ \rm dB$ ,   ${E_{\rm B}}/{N_0} = 10^{0.9}\approx 7.95 \hspace{0.05cm} follows.$   
+
'''(1)'''   From   $10 · \lg E_{\rm B}/N_0 = 9 \ \rm dB$   ⇒    ${E_{\rm B}}/{N_0} = 10^{0.9}\approx 7.95 \hspace{0.05cm}$  follows:$   
*With the given approximation, it further holds that:
+
*With the given approximation,  it further holds:
 
:$$p_{\rm B}  =  {1}/{2}\cdot {\rm erfc}\left ( \sqrt{{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0 }} \hspace{0.1cm}\right ) \approx \frac{1}{2 \cdot\sqrt{\pi \cdot{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{-{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0}}  =  {1}/{2 \cdot\sqrt{7.95 \cdot \pi }} \cdot {\rm e}^{-7.95}\approx \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {3.5 \cdot 10^{-5}\hspace{0.05cm}}.$$
 
:$$p_{\rm B}  =  {1}/{2}\cdot {\rm erfc}\left ( \sqrt{{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0 }} \hspace{0.1cm}\right ) \approx \frac{1}{2 \cdot\sqrt{\pi \cdot{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{-{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0}}  =  {1}/{2 \cdot\sqrt{7.95 \cdot \pi }} \cdot {\rm e}^{-7.95}\approx \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {3.5 \cdot 10^{-5}\hspace{0.05cm}}.$$
 
*The exact value  $p_{\rm B}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 3.3 · 10^{–5}}$  is only slightly smaller.
 
*The exact value  $p_{\rm B}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 3.3 · 10^{–5}}$  is only slightly smaller.
Line 72: Line 72:
  
  
'''(2)'''&nbsp;  <u>Answer 1</u> is correct:  
+
'''(2)'''&nbsp;  <u>Answer 1</u>&nbsp; is correct:  
*Due to a phase shift of &nbsp; $Δϕ_{\rm T} = 30^\circ$&nbsp;, the phase diagram was rotated, resulting in degradation.
+
*Due to a phase shift of &nbsp; $Δϕ_{\rm T} = 30^\circ$,&nbsp; the phase diagram was rotated,&nbsp; resulting in degradation.
*The two components &nbsp; $\rm I$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $\rm Q$&nbsp; influence each other, but there is no pulse interference as in system &nbsp;$\rm (C)$.
+
*The two components &nbsp; $\rm I$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $\rm Q$&nbsp; influence each other,&nbsp; but there is no intersymbol interference as in system &nbsp;$\rm (C)$.&nbsp;
*A "Nyquist system" never leads to pulse interference.
+
*A&nbsp; "Nyquist system"&nbsp; never leads to intersymbol interference.
  
  
  
'''(3)'''&nbsp;  <u>Answer 2</u> is correct:
 
*In particular, the nine crosses in each quadrant of the phase diagram &nbsp;$\rm (C)$, which mark the noise-free case, show the influence of impulse interference.
 
*Instead of the optimal receiver filter for a rectangular fundamental transmission pulse&nbsp; $g_s(t)$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; rectangular impulse response &nbsp; $h_{\rm E}(t)$&nbsp;, a [[Signal_Representation/Special_Cases_of_Pulses#Gaussian_pulse|Gaussian low-pass filter]] with (normalized) cutoff frequency &nbsp; $f_{\rm G} · T = 0.6$&nbsp; was used here.
 
*This causes pulse interference.  Even without noise, there are nine crosses in each quadrant indicating one leader and one follower per component.
 
  
 +
'''(3)'''&nbsp;  <u>Answer 2</u>&nbsp; is correct:
 +
*In particular,&nbsp; the nine crosses in each quadrant of the phase diagram &nbsp;$\rm (C)$,&nbsp; which mark the noise-free case,&nbsp; show the influence of intersymbol interference.
 +
*Instead of the optimal receiver filter for a rectangular basic transmission pulse&nbsp; $g_s(t)$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; rectangular impulse response &nbsp; $h_{\rm E}(t)$&nbsp;, a &nbsp; [[Signal_Representation/Special_Cases_of_Pulses#Gaussian_pulse|Gaussian low-pass filter]]&nbsp; with (normalized) cutoff frequency &nbsp; $f_{\rm G} · T = 0.6$&nbsp; was used here.
 +
*This causes intersymbol interference.&nbsp;  Even without noise,&nbsp; there are nine crosses in each quadrant indicating one leader and one follower per component.
  
  
'''(4)'''&nbsp;  <u>Answers 2 and 3</u> are correct:
+
 
 +
 
 +
'''(4)'''&nbsp;  <u>Answers 2 and 3</u>&nbsp; are correct:
 
*Systems &nbsp;$\rm (B)$&nbsp; and &nbsp;$\rm (C)$&nbsp; are not optimal.&nbsp; This already shows that statement 1 is not correct.
 
*Systems &nbsp;$\rm (B)$&nbsp; and &nbsp;$\rm (C)$&nbsp; are not optimal.&nbsp; This already shows that statement 1 is not correct.
* In contrast, Answer 2 is right.&nbsp; Every 4-QAM system, which follows the matched filter principle and additionally fulfills the first Nyquist criterion, has the error probability given above
+
* In contrast,&nbsp; Answer 2 is right.&nbsp; Every 4-QAM system,&nbsp; which follows the matched filter principle and additionally fulfills the first Nyquist criterion,&nbsp; has the error probability given above:
 
:$$p_{\rm B} = {\rm Q}\left ( \sqrt{{2 \cdot E_{\rm B}}/{N_0 }} \hspace{0.1cm}\right ) = {1}/{2}\cdot {\rm erfc}\left ( \sqrt{{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0 }} \hspace{0.1cm}\right ).$$
 
:$$p_{\rm B} = {\rm Q}\left ( \sqrt{{2 \cdot E_{\rm B}}/{N_0 }} \hspace{0.1cm}\right ) = {1}/{2}\cdot {\rm erfc}\left ( \sqrt{{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0 }} \hspace{0.1cm}\right ).$$
*Thus, the so-called "root-Nyquist configuration", which was treated for example in Exercise 4.12, has exactly the same error probability as system &nbsp;$\rm (A)$&nbsp; and also the same phase diagram at the detection times.  The transitions between the individual points are nevertheless different.
+
*Thus,&nbsp; the so-called&nbsp; "root-Nyquist configuration",&nbsp; which was treated for example in Exercise 4.12,&nbsp; has exactly the same error probability as system &nbsp;$\rm (A)$&nbsp; and also the same phase diagram at the detection times.&nbsp; The transitions between the individual points are nevertheless different.
*The third statement is also true.  One can already recognize incorrect decisions from the phase diagram of system &nbsp;$\rm (B)$&nbsp;, and this will always be the case when the points do not match the quadrants in terms of color.
+
*The third statement is also true.&nbsp; One can already recognize incorrect decisions from the phase diagram of system &nbsp;$\rm (B)$,&nbsp; and this will always be the case when the points do not match the quadrants in terms of color.
  
  

Latest revision as of 15:53, 19 April 2022

Phase diagrams for 4–QAM, ideal and with degradations

Graph  $\rm (A)$  shows the phase diagram of the 4-QAM after the matched filter,  where an optimal realization form was chosen in the case of AWGN noise under the constraint of  "peak limiting":

  • rectangular basic transmision pulse of symbol duration  $T$,
  • rectangular impulse response of the matched filter of the same width  $T$.


All phase diagrams presented here –  $\rm (A)$  and  $\rm (B)$  and  $\rm (C)$  – refer to the detection time points only.  Thus,  the transitions between the individual discrete-time points are not plotted in this phase diagram.

  • An AWGN channel with   $10 · \lg E_{\rm B}/N_0 = 9 \ \rm dB$   is present.
  • Accordingly,  for the bit error probability of the first system considered  $\rm (A)$ :
$$p_{\rm B} = {1}/{2}\cdot {\rm erfc}\left ( \sqrt{{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0 }} \hspace{0.1cm}\right )\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

The phase diagrams  $\rm (B)$  and  $\rm (C)$  belong to two systems where the 4-QAM was not optimally realized.  AWGN noise with  $10 · \lg E_{\rm B}/N_0 = 9 \ \rm dB$  is also assumed in each of these.



Hints:

  • This exercise belongs to the chapter  "Quadrature Amplitude Modulation".
  • Reference is also made to the page  "Phase offset between transmitter and receiver" in the book  "Digital Signal Transmission".
  • Causes and Effects of intersymbol interference are explained in the  section with the same name  of the book  "Digital Signal Transmission".
  • The crosses in the graphs mark possible points in the phase diagrams if no AWGN noise were present.
  • The point clouds due to the AWGN noise all have the same diameter.  The red cloud appears slightly smaller than the others only because  "red"  is harder to see on a black background.
  • As a sufficiently good approximation for the complementary Gaussian error integral,  you can use:
$${\rm erfc}(x) \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}\cdot x} \cdot {\rm e}^{-x^2}.$$


Questions

1

Using the given approximation,  calculate the bit error probability of system  $\rm (A)$.

System  $\rm (A):\ \ p_{\rm B} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot 10^{-5}$

2

What are the properties of system  $\rm (B)$ ?

There is a phase offset between transmitter and receiver.
The receiver filter results in intersymbol interference.
There is no degradation compared to system  $\rm (A)$.

3

What are the properties of system  $\rm (C)$ ?

There is a phase offset between transmitter and receiver.
The receiver filter results in intersymbol interference.
There is no degradation compared to system  $\rm (A)$.

4

Which statements about the error probabilities are correct ?

All three systems have the same bit error probability.
The error probability of system  $\rm (A)$  is the smallest.
System  $\rm (B)$  has a larger bit error probability than system  $\rm (C)$.


Solution

(1)  From   $10 · \lg E_{\rm B}/N_0 = 9 \ \rm dB$   ⇒   ${E_{\rm B}}/{N_0} = 10^{0.9}\approx 7.95 \hspace{0.05cm}$  follows:$ 

  • With the given approximation,  it further holds:
$$p_{\rm B} = {1}/{2}\cdot {\rm erfc}\left ( \sqrt{{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0 }} \hspace{0.1cm}\right ) \approx \frac{1}{2 \cdot\sqrt{\pi \cdot{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0}} } \cdot {\rm e}^{-{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0}} = {1}/{2 \cdot\sqrt{7.95 \cdot \pi }} \cdot {\rm e}^{-7.95}\approx \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {3.5 \cdot 10^{-5}\hspace{0.05cm}}.$$
  • The exact value  $p_{\rm B}\hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 3.3 · 10^{–5}}$  is only slightly smaller.


(2)  Answer 1  is correct:

  • Due to a phase shift of   $Δϕ_{\rm T} = 30^\circ$,  the phase diagram was rotated,  resulting in degradation.
  • The two components   $\rm I$  and  $\rm Q$  influence each other,  but there is no intersymbol interference as in system  $\rm (C)$. 
  • A  "Nyquist system"  never leads to intersymbol interference.



(3)  Answer 2  is correct:

  • In particular,  the nine crosses in each quadrant of the phase diagram  $\rm (C)$,  which mark the noise-free case,  show the influence of intersymbol interference.
  • Instead of the optimal receiver filter for a rectangular basic transmission pulse  $g_s(t)$   ⇒   rectangular impulse response   $h_{\rm E}(t)$ , a   Gaussian low-pass filter  with (normalized) cutoff frequency   $f_{\rm G} · T = 0.6$  was used here.
  • This causes intersymbol interference.  Even without noise,  there are nine crosses in each quadrant indicating one leader and one follower per component.



(4)  Answers 2 and 3  are correct:

  • Systems  $\rm (B)$  and  $\rm (C)$  are not optimal.  This already shows that statement 1 is not correct.
  • In contrast,  Answer 2 is right.  Every 4-QAM system,  which follows the matched filter principle and additionally fulfills the first Nyquist criterion,  has the error probability given above:
$$p_{\rm B} = {\rm Q}\left ( \sqrt{{2 \cdot E_{\rm B}}/{N_0 }} \hspace{0.1cm}\right ) = {1}/{2}\cdot {\rm erfc}\left ( \sqrt{{E_{\rm B}}/{N_0 }} \hspace{0.1cm}\right ).$$
  • Thus,  the so-called  "root-Nyquist configuration",  which was treated for example in Exercise 4.12,  has exactly the same error probability as system  $\rm (A)$  and also the same phase diagram at the detection times.  The transitions between the individual points are nevertheless different.
  • The third statement is also true.  One can already recognize incorrect decisions from the phase diagram of system  $\rm (B)$,  and this will always be the case when the points do not match the quadrants in terms of color.


The error probabilities of system  $\rm (B)$  and system  $\rm (C)$  are derived in the book "Digital Signal Transmission". The results of a system simulation confirm the above statements:

  • System  $\rm (A)$:     $p_{\rm B} ≈ 3.3 · 10^{–5}$ (see Question 1),
  • System  $\rm (B)$:     $p_{\rm B} ≈ 3.5 · 10^{–2}$,
  • System  $\rm (C)$:     $p_{\rm B} ≈ 2.4 · 10^{–4}$.