Aufgaben:Exercise 3.1Z: Hilbert Transform: Difference between revisions
Add German interlanguage link |
Join split $$ formula lines for correct rendering |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[File:P_ID1756__LZI_Z_3_1.png|right|frame|Considered impulse responses]] | [[File:P_ID1756__LZI_Z_3_1.png|right|frame|Considered impulse responses]] | ||
The relation between the real part and the imaginary part of the transfer function of realizable causal systems is described by the Hilbert transformation. Here, the following holds: | The relation between the real part and the imaginary part of the transfer function of realizable causal systems is described by the Hilbert transformation. Here, the following holds: | ||
:$${\rm Im} \left\{ H(f) \right \} = - \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{-\infty}^{ | :$${\rm Im} \left\{ H(f) \right \} = - \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{ \frac{{\rm Re} \left\{ H(\nu) \right \}}{f - \nu}}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rmd}\nu \hspace{0.05cm},$$ | ||
+\infty} | :$${\rm Re} \left\{ H(f) \right \} = \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{ \frac{{\rm Im} \left\{ H(\nu) \right \}}{f - \nu}}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rmd}\nu \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
:$${\rm Re} \left\{ H(f) \right \} = \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{-\infty}^{ | |||
+\infty} | |||
The following is used as a common abbreviation for these two integral transformations: | The following is used as a common abbreviation for these two integral transformations: | ||
:$${\rm Im} \left\{ H(f) \right \} \quad | :$${\rm Im} \left\{ H(f) \right \} \quad\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\hspace{-0.05cm}\rightarrow\quad{\rm Re} \left\{ H(f) \right \}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\hspace{-0.05cm}\rightarrow\quad | |||
{\rm Re} \left\{ H(f) \right \}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | |||
Since the transformation and its inverse differ only by the sign, one equation is sufficient. Here, the following applies: | Since the transformation and its inverse differ only by the sign, one equation is sufficient. Here, the following applies: | ||
| Line 79: | Line 71: | ||
'''(1)''' The <u>second proposed solution</u> is correct: | '''(1)''' The <u>second proposed solution</u> is correct: | ||
*The Fourier transform of $h_1(t) = \alpha \cdot \delta(t)$ is: | *The Fourier transform of $h_1(t) = \alpha \cdot \delta(t)$ is: | ||
:$$H_1(f) = \alpha \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm Re} \left\{ H_1(f) \right \} = \alpha , | :$$H_1(f) = \alpha \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm Re} \left\{ H_1(f) \right \} = \alpha ,\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Im} \left\{ H_1(f) \right \} = 0\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
| Line 86: | Line 77: | ||
'''(2)''' The <u>last proposed solution</u> is correct: | '''(2)''' The <u>last proposed solution</u> is correct: | ||
*The following frequency response is obtained for the impulse response $h_2(t)$ considering the [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_Theorems#Shifting Theorem|shifting theorem]] and [[Signal_Representation/Calculating_With_Complex_Numbers#Representation by magnitude and phase|Euler's theorem]] : | *The following frequency response is obtained for the impulse response $h_2(t)$ considering the [[Signal_Representation/Fourier_Transform_Theorems#Shifting Theorem|shifting theorem]] and [[Signal_Representation/Calculating_With_Complex_Numbers#Representation by magnitude and phase|Euler's theorem]] : | ||
:$$H_2(f) ={\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f \tau} = \cos (2\ | :$$H_2(f) ={\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f \tau} = \cos (2\pif \tau) - {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pif \tau)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | ||
*This results in the Hilbert correspondence | *This results in the Hilbert correspondence | ||
| Line 116: | Line 105: | ||
2\pi | 2\pi | ||
f\hspace{0.05cm} | f\hspace{0.05cm} | ||
T}}{{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | T}}{{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$*Using [[Signal_Representation/Calculating_With_Complex_Numbers#Representation by magnitude and phase|Euler's theorem]] this can also be rewritten as follows::$$H_3(f) = \frac{1-\cos (2\pi | ||
*Using [[Signal_Representation/Calculating_With_Complex_Numbers#Representation by magnitude and phase|Euler's theorem]] this can also be rewritten as follows: | |||
:$$H_3(f) = \frac{1-\cos (2\pi | |||
f T) + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pi f | f T) + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pi f | ||
T)}{{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} = \frac{\sin (2\pi f T)}{ 2\pi | T)}{{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} = \frac{\sin (2\pi f T)}{ 2\pi | ||
f T} - {\rm j}\cdot \frac{1 - \cos (2\pi f T)}{ 2\pi f | f T} - {\rm j}\cdot \frac{1 - \cos (2\pi f T)}{ 2\pi f | ||
T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$ | T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$*Furthermore, the following holds considering the transformation $1 - \cos(\alpha) = 2 \cdot \sin^2(\alpha/2)$::$${\rm Re}\hspace{-0.05cm} \left\{ H_3(f) \right \} = {\rm si} (2\pi f T)\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm si}(x)= {\rm sin}(x)/x | ||
*Furthermore, the following holds considering the transformation $1 - \cos(\alpha) = 2 \cdot \sin^2(\alpha/2)$: | |||
:$${\rm Re}\hspace{-0.05cm} \left\{ H_3(f) \right \} = {\rm si} (2\pi f T)\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm si}(x)= {\rm sin}(x)/x | |||
\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.5cm} | \hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.5cm} | ||
{\rm Im} \hspace{-0.05cm}\left\{ H_3(f) \right \} = -\frac{\sin^2 (\pi f | {\rm Im} \hspace{-0.05cm}\left\{ H_3(f) \right \} = -\frac{\sin^2 (\pi f | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 16 March 2026

The relation between the real part and the imaginary part of the transfer function of realizable causal systems is described by the Hilbert transformation. Here, the following holds:
- $${\rm Im} \left\{ H(f) \right \} = - \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{ \frac{{\rm Re} \left\{ H(\nu) \right \}}{f - \nu}}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rmd}\nu \hspace{0.05cm},$$
- $${\rm Re} \left\{ H(f) \right \} = \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}{ \frac{{\rm Im} \left\{ H(\nu) \right \}}{f - \nu}}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rmd}\nu \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
The following is used as a common abbreviation for these two integral transformations:
- $${\rm Im} \left\{ H(f) \right \} \quad\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\hspace{-0.05cm}\rightarrow\quad{\rm Re} \left\{ H(f) \right \}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
Since the transformation and its inverse differ only by the sign, one equation is sufficient. Here, the following applies:
- To compute the operand marked by the arrow the positive sign is used.
- In contrast to this, the minus sign is taken into account for the computation of the operand marked by the circle.
The Hilbert transformation pertains much more generally than only to the case of application described here. For example, it is also used to determine the (complex) analytical signal corresponding to a real band-pass signal.
In this exercise, the corresponding frequency responses $H(f)$ are to be determined for the causal impulse responses $h(t)$ given in the diagram according to the inverse Fourier transformation.
If $H(f)$ is decomposed into real and imaginary parts respectively, then Hilbert correspondences can be derived from it.
Please note:
- The exercise belongs to the chapter Conclusions from the Allocation Theorem.
- In particular, reference is made to the theory page Hilbert transform.
Questions
Solution
- The Fourier transform of $h_1(t) = \alpha \cdot \delta(t)$ is:
- $$H_1(f) = \alpha \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}{\rm Re} \left\{ H_1(f) \right \} = \alpha ,\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm Im} \left\{ H_1(f) \right \} = 0\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(2) The last proposed solution is correct:
- The following frequency response is obtained for the impulse response $h_2(t)$ considering the shifting theorem and Euler's theorem :
- $$H_2(f) ={\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f \tau} = \cos (2\pif \tau) - {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pif \tau)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
- This results in the Hilbert correspondence
- $$\cos (2\pi f \tau) \hspace{0.3cm}
\leftarrow\hspace{-0.05cm}\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\bullet\hspace{0.3cm} -\sin (2\pi f \tau)\hspace{0.7cm}{\rm or}\hspace{0.7cm} \cos (2\pi f \tau) \hspace{0.3cm} \bullet\hspace{-0.05cm}\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!-\!\hspace{-0.1cm}\rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm} \sin (2\pi f \tau) \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(3) Both proposed solutions are correct:
- For the rectangular impulse response $h_3(t)$ of width $T$ and height $1/T$ the spectral function is obtained according to the first Fourier integral:
- $$H_3(f) = \int_{-\infty}^{
+\infty}
{ h_3(t) \hspace{0.05cm}\cdot \hspace{0.05cm} {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f t}}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm
d}t \hspace{0.05cm}
= \frac{1}{T} \cdot \int_{0}^{
T} { {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi f t}}\hspace{0.1cm}{\rm
d}t
= \left [\frac{1}{-{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} \cdot {\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi
f\hspace{0.05cm}
t} \right ]_{0}^{T} = \frac{1-{\rm e}^{-{\rm j}\hspace{0.05cm} 2\pi
f\hspace{0.05cm}
T}}{{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$*Using Euler's theorem this can also be rewritten as follows::$$H_3(f) = \frac{1-\cos (2\pi f T) + {\rm j} \hspace{0.05cm} \cdot \hspace{0.05cm} \sin (2\pi f T)}{{\rm j}\cdot 2\pi f T} = \frac{\sin (2\pi f T)}{ 2\pi f T} - {\rm j}\cdot \frac{1 - \cos (2\pi f T)}{ 2\pi f T}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$*Furthermore, the following holds considering the transformation $1 - \cos(\alpha) = 2 \cdot \sin^2(\alpha/2)$::$${\rm Re}\hspace{-0.05cm} \left\{ H_3(f) \right \} = {\rm si} (2\pi f T)\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.2cm}{\rm si}(x)= {\rm sin}(x)/x
\hspace{0.05cm}, \hspace{0.5cm}
{\rm Im} \hspace{-0.05cm}\left\{ H_3(f) \right \} = -\frac{\sin^2 (\pi f T)}{ \pi f T}= - {\rm si} (\pi f T) \cdot {\rm sin} (\pi f T)
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
(4) No is correct:
- The impulse response $h_4(t)$ is not causal so that no Hilbert correspondence can be derived from the associated Fourier spectrum $H_4(f)$ .