Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Exercise 2.1: Two-Dimensional Impulse Response

From LNTwww
Revision as of 14:23, 15 April 2020 by Javier (talk | contribs)

Two-dimensional impulse response

The two-dimensional impulse response h(τ,t)=Mm=1zm(t)δ(ττm)

is to be analyzed according to the adjoining diagram. The two axes are time-discrete:

  • τ  is the  delay  and can take values between  0  and  6 \ {\rm µ s}  in the example.
  • The (absolute) time  t  is related to the frequency of snapshots and characterizes the variation of the channel over time. We have  t = n \cdot T, where  T \gg \tau_{\rm max} .


The arrows in the graphic mark different Dirac functions with weights  1  (red),  1/2  (blue) and  1/4  (green). This means that the delay  \tau  is also discrete here.

When measuring the impulse responses at different times  t  at intervals of one second, the resolution of the  \tau axis was   2  microseconds (\delta \tau = 2 \ \rm µ s). The echoes were not localized more precisely.

In this task the following quantities are also referred to:

  • the time-variant transfer function  according to the definition
H(f,\hspace{0.05cm} t) \hspace{0.2cm} \stackrel {f,\hspace{0.05cm}\tau}{\bullet\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\!-\!\!\circ} \hspace{0.2cm} h(\tau,\hspace{0.05cm}t) \hspace{0.05cm},


  • the approximation of the coherence bandwidth  as the reciprocal of the maximal duration of the delay profile   h(\tau, t):
B_{\rm K} \hspace{0.01cm}' = \frac{1}{\tau_{\rm max} - \tau_{\rm min}} \hspace{0.05cm}.




Notes:

  • This task belongs to the chapter  Allgemeine Beschreibung zeitvarianter Systeme.
  • More detailed information on various definitions for the coherence bandwidth can be found in chapter  Das GWSSUS–Kanalmodell, especially in the sample solution for the  Exercise 2.7Z.
  • It should be noted that this is a constructed task. According to the above graph, the 2D impulse response changes significantly during the time span  T . Therefore  T  is to be interpreted here as very large, for example one hour.
  • In mobile radio,  h(\tau, t)  changes in the millisecond range taking into account the Doppler effect, but the changes during this time are rather moderate.



Questionnaire

1

What restriction does the specification  \Delta \tau = 2 \rm µ s  impose on the maximum bandwidth  B_{\rm max}  of the message signal to be examined?

B_{\rm max} \ = \

\ \ \rm kHz

2

At what time  t_2  is the channel ideal, characterized by  H(f, t_{\rm 2}) = 1?

t_{\rm 2} \ = \

\ \cdot T

3

From what time  t_{\rm 3}  does this channel cause distortion?

t_{\rm 3} \ = \

\ \cdot T

4

Calculate the coherence bandwidth for  t = 3Tt = 4T  and  t = 5T:

t = 3T \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} B_{\rm K} \hspace{0.01cm}' \ = \

\ \ \rm kHz
t = 4T \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} B_{\rm K} \hspace{0.01cm}' \ = \

\ \ \rm kHz
t = 5T \text{:} \hspace{0.4cm} B_{\rm K} \hspace{0.01cm}' \ = \

\ \ \rm kHz

5

From what time  t_{\rm 5}  could this channel be considered as time invariant?

t_{\rm 5} \ = \

\ \cdot T

6

For which of the mentioned  values of T does working with the  \rm 2D–impulse response make sense?

A (slow) channel change occurs approximately after  T = 1 \ \rm µ s.
A (slow) channel change takes place approximately after  T = 1 \ \rm s.


Sample solution

(1)  The message signal described in the equivalent low-pass band shall not have a bandwidth greater than B_{\rm max} = 1/\delta \tau \ \underline {= 500 \ \rm kHz}.

  • This mathematical (two-sided) bandwidth of the low pass–signal is also the maximum physical (one-sided) bandwidth of the corresponding bandpass–signal.


(2)  H(f, t_{\rm 2}) = 1 means in the time domain h(\tau, t_{\rm 2}) = \delta(\tau).

  • Only then the channel is ideal.
  • You can see from the graph that this only applies to the time t_{\rm 2} \ \underline {= 0}.

(3)  Distortions occur if at time t the impulse response is composed of two or more Dirac functions   ⇒   t ≥ t_{\rm 3} \ \underline {= 3T}.

  • At time t = T the signal s(t) is delayed only by 2 \ \rm µ s.
  • At t = 2T the amplitude is additionally reduced by 50 \% (6 \ \ \rm dB loss).


(4)  At time t = 3T the two Dirac functions occur at \tau_{\rm min} = 0 and \tau_{\rm max} = 4 \ \rm µ s.

  • The (simple approximation for the) coherence bandwidth is the reciprocal of this

$$B_{\rm K}\hspace{0.01cm}' = \frac{1}{4\,\,{\,}{\rm µ s} \hspace{0.25cm} \underline{ = 250\,\,\,{\rm kHz}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$

  • As even at the time t = 4T the Dirac functions are 4 \ \rm µ s apart, you also get B_{\rm K} here \hspace{0.01cm}' = \underline {250 \ \rm kHz}.
  • At t = 5T the impulse response has an extension of 6 \ \ \rm µ s \ \ \Rightarrow \ {\it B}_{\rm K} \hspace{0.01cm}' \ \underline {\approx 166.7 \ \rm kHz}.


(5)  The impulse responses are identical at the times 5T, 6T and 7T and consist of 3 diracs each.

  • Assuming that nothing changes in this respect for t ≥ 8T, you get t_{\rm 5} \ \ \underline {= 5T}.


(6)  Correct is the solution 2:

  • The temporal change of the impulse response, whose dynamics is expressed by the parameter T, must be slow in comparison to the maximum expansion of h(\tau, t), which in this task equals \tau_{\rm max} = 6 \ \rm µ s: &e.g;

T \gg \dew_{\rm max}.