Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 2.5: Residual Redundancy with LZW Coding"

From LNTwww
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Informationstheorie/Komprimierung nach Lempel, Ziv und Welch
+
{{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Information_Theory/Compression_According_to_Lempel,_Ziv_and_Welch
 
}}
 
}}
  
[[File:P_ID2446__Inf_A_2_5_neu.png|right|frame|Residual redundancy  $r(N)$  & approximation   $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  of three binary sources]]
+
[[File:P_ID2446__Inf_A_2_5_neu.png|right|frame|Residual redundancy  $r(N)$  and approximation   $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  of three sources]]
We assume here a binary input sequence of length  $N$  and consider three different binary message sources:
+
We assume here a binary input sequence of length  $N$  and consider three different binary sources:
* $\rm BQ1$: &nbsp; Symbol probabilities&nbsp;  $p_{\rm A} = 0.89$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $p_{\rm B} = 0.11$, i.e. different<br> &nbsp;  &#8658; &nbsp; entropy &nbsp; $H = 0.5\text{ bit/source symbol}$ &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; the source is redundant.
+
* $\rm BQ1$: &nbsp; Symbol probabilities&nbsp;  $p_{\rm A} = 0.89$&nbsp; and&nbsp; $p_{\rm B} = 0.11$, i.e. different<br> &nbsp;  &#8658; &nbsp; entropy &nbsp; $H = 0.5\text{ bit/source&nbsp;symbol}$ &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; the source is redundant.
 
* $\rm BQ2$:  &nbsp; $p_{\rm A} = p_{\rm B} = 0.5$&nbsp; (equally probable)<br> &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; entropy &nbsp; $H = 1\text{ bit/source symbol}$ &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; the source is redundancy-free.
 
* $\rm BQ2$:  &nbsp; $p_{\rm A} = p_{\rm B} = 0.5$&nbsp; (equally probable)<br> &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; entropy &nbsp; $H = 1\text{ bit/source symbol}$ &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; the source is redundancy-free.
 
* $\rm BQ3$: &nbsp;  There is no concrete information on the statistics here.&nbsp; <br>In subtask&nbsp; '''(6)'''&nbsp; you are to estimate the entropy&nbsp; $H$&nbsp; of this source.
 
* $\rm BQ3$: &nbsp;  There is no concrete information on the statistics here.&nbsp; <br>In subtask&nbsp; '''(6)'''&nbsp; you are to estimate the entropy&nbsp; $H$&nbsp; of this source.
  
  
For these three sources, the respective <i>residual redundancy</i>&nbsp; $r(N)$&nbsp; was determined by simulation, which remains in the binary sequence after&nbsp; [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch#The_Lempel-Ziv-Welch_algorithm |Lempel&ndash;Ziv&ndash;Welch&ndash;coding]]&nbsp; in der Binärfolge verbleibt.&nbsp;  
+
For these three sources, the respective&nbsp; "residual redundancy"&nbsp; $r(N)$&nbsp; was determined by simulation, which remains in the binary sequence after&nbsp; [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch#The_Lempel-Ziv-Welch_algorithm |Lempel&ndash;Ziv&ndash;Welch coding]].&nbsp;  
  
 
The results are shown in the first column of the above table for the sources
 
The results are shown in the first column of the above table for the sources
Line 20: Line 20:
 
whereby we have restricted ourselves to sequence lengths&nbsp; $N &#8804; 50000$&nbsp; in the simulation.
 
whereby we have restricted ourselves to sequence lengths&nbsp; $N &#8804; 50000$&nbsp; in the simulation.
  
The <i>relative redundancy of the output sequence</i> &ndash; simplified called <i>residual redundancy</i> &ndash;  can be calculated from  
+
The&nbsp; "relative redundancy of the output sequence" &ndash; simplified called&nbsp; "residual redundancy" &ndash;  can be calculated from  
 
* the length&nbsp;  $N$&nbsp;  of the input sequence,
 
* the length&nbsp;  $N$&nbsp;  of the input sequence,
 
* the length&nbsp;  $L(N)$&nbsp;  of the output sequence and
 
* the length&nbsp;  $L(N)$&nbsp;  of the output sequence and
Line 26: Line 26:
  
  
can be calculated in the following way:
+
in the following way:
 
:$$r(N) = \frac{L(N) - N \cdot H}{L(N)}= 1 -  \frac{ N \cdot H}{L(N)}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$r(N) = \frac{L(N) - N \cdot H}{L(N)}= 1 -  \frac{ N \cdot H}{L(N)}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
 
This takes into account that with perfect source coding the length of the output sequence could be lowered to the value&nbsp;  $L_{\rm min} = N &middot; H$&nbsp;.
 
This takes into account that with perfect source coding the length of the output sequence could be lowered to the value&nbsp;  $L_{\rm min} = N &middot; H$&nbsp;.
*With non-perfect source coding,&nbsp;  $L(n) - N &middot; H$&nbsp;  gives the remaining redundancy (with the pseudo&ndash;unit "bit").  
+
*With non-perfect source coding,&nbsp;  $L(n) - N &middot; H$&nbsp;  gives the remaining redundancy&nbsp; (with the pseudo&ndash;unit&nbsp; "bit").  
*After dividing by&nbsp;  $L(n)$&nbsp;  , one obtains the relative redundancy&nbsp;  $r(n)$&nbsp;  with the value range between zero and one; $r(n)$ should be as small as possible.
+
*After dividing by&nbsp;  $L(n)$,&nbsp;  one obtains the relative redundancy&nbsp;  $r(n)$&nbsp;  with the value range between zero and one;&nbsp; $r(n)$&nbsp; should be as small as possible.
  
  
A second parameter for measuring the efficiency of LZW coding is the&nbsp;  <i>compression factor</i>&nbsp;  $K(N)$, which should also be small as the quotient of the lengths of the output and input sequences:
+
A second parameter for measuring the efficiency of LZW coding is the&nbsp;  "compression factor"&nbsp;  $K(N)$&nbsp; as the quotient of the lengths of the output and input sequences, which should also be very small:
  
 
:$$K(N) = {L(N) }/{N} \hspace{0.05cm},$$
 
:$$K(N) = {L(N) }/{N} \hspace{0.05cm},$$
  
In the&nbsp;  [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch#Quantitative_statements_on_asymptotic_optimality|theory section]]&nbsp;  it was shown that the residual redundancy&nbsp;  $r(n)$&nbsp;  is often given by the function
+
In the&nbsp;  [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch#Quantitative_statements_on_asymptotic_optimality|theory section]]&nbsp;  it was shown that the residual redundancy&nbsp;  $r(n)$&nbsp;  is well approximated by the function
 
:$$r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) =\frac {A}{{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}(N)}
 
:$$r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) =\frac {A}{{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}(N)}
 
\hspace{0.5cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.5cm} A = 4 \cdot {r(N = 10000)}  
 
\hspace{0.5cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.5cm} A = 4 \cdot {r(N = 10000)}  
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
is well approximated.
+
 
  
 
*This approximation&nbsp;  $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$&nbsp;  is given for&nbsp;  $\rm BQ1$&nbsp;  in the second column of the table above.
 
*This approximation&nbsp;  $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$&nbsp;  is given for&nbsp;  $\rm BQ1$&nbsp;  in the second column of the table above.
Line 54: Line 54:
  
  
''Hints:''
+
Hints:
 
*The task belongs to the chapter&nbsp;  [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch|Compression according to Lempel, Ziv and Welch]].
 
*The task belongs to the chapter&nbsp;  [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch|Compression according to Lempel, Ziv and Welch]].
 
*In particular, reference is made to the pages
 
*In particular, reference is made to the pages
:: [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch#Remaining_redundancy_as_a_measure_for_the_efficiency_of_coding_methods|Residual redundancy as a measure for the efficiency of coding methods]],
+
:: [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch#Remaining_redundancy_as_a_measure_for_the_efficiency_of_coding_methods|Remaining redundancy as a measure for the efficiency of coding methods]],
 
:: [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch#Efficiency_of_Lempel-Ziv_coding|Efficiency of Lempel-Ziv coding]] and
 
:: [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch#Efficiency_of_Lempel-Ziv_coding|Efficiency of Lempel-Ziv coding]] and
 
:: [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch#Quantitative_statements_on_asymptotic_optimality|Quantitative statements on asymptotic optimality]].   
 
:: [[Information_Theory/Komprimierung_nach_Lempel,_Ziv_und_Welch#Quantitative_statements_on_asymptotic_optimality|Quantitative statements on asymptotic optimality]].   
Line 96: Line 96:
  
  
{According to this result, what source entropy&nbsp; $H$&nbsp; could&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$&nbsp; ?&nbsp; <i>Hint:</i> Exactly one answer is correct.
+
{According to this result, what source entropy&nbsp; $H$&nbsp; could&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$&nbsp; ?&nbsp; <u>Hint:</u>&nbsp; Exactly one answer is correct.
 
|type="()"}
 
|type="()"}
- $H = 1.00 \ \rm bit/source symbol$,
+
- $H = 1.00 \ \rm bit/source\hspace{0.15cm}symbol$,
- $H = 0.75 \ \rm bit/source symbol$,
+
- $H = 0.75 \ \rm bit/source\hspace{0.15cm} symbol$,
- $H = 0.50 \ \rm bit/source symbol$,
+
- $H = 0.50 \ \rm bit/source\hspace{0.15cm} symbol$,
+ $H = 0.25 \ \rm bit/source symbol$.
+
+ $H = 0.25 \ \rm bit/source\hspace{0.15cm} symbol$.
  
  
Line 109: Line 109:
 
===Solution===
 
===Solution===
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
 
{{ML-Kopf}}
'''(1)'''&nbsp; Die Näherung&nbsp; $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$&nbsp; stimmt per Definition für die Folgenlänge&nbsp;  $N = 10000$&nbsp; mit der per Simulation ermittelten Restredundanz&nbsp; $r(N) = 0.265$&nbsp; exakt überein.  
+
'''(1)'''&nbsp; The approximation&nbsp; $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$&nbsp; agrees exactly by definition for the sequence length&nbsp;  $N = 10000$&nbsp; with the residual redundancy&nbsp; $r(N) = 0.265$&nbsp; determined by simulation.
*Damit ist
+
*Thus
 
:$$A = 4 \cdot  r(N = 10000) =4 \cdot {0.265} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 1.06}
 
:$$A = 4 \cdot  r(N = 10000) =4 \cdot {0.265} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 1.06}
 
\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
 
\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
Line 116: Line 116:
  
  
'''(2)'''&nbsp; Aus der Beziehung&nbsp; ${A}/{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}(N) &#8804; 0.05$ &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ${A}/{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}(N) = 0.05$&nbsp; folgt:
+
'''(2)'''&nbsp; From the relationship&nbsp; ${A}/{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}(N) &#8804; 0.05$ &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ${A}/{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}(N) = 0.05$&nbsp; it follows:
 
:$${{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}N_{\rm 2}} = \frac{A}{0.05} = 21.2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}
 
:$${{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}N_{\rm 2}} = \frac{A}{0.05} = 21.2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}
 
N_{\rm 2} = 10^{21.2} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 1.58 \cdot 10^{21}}
 
N_{\rm 2} = 10^{21.2} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 1.58 \cdot 10^{21}}
Line 123: Line 123:
  
  
'''(3)'''&nbsp; Allgemein gilt &nbsp;$r(N) = 1 - {H}/{K(N)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$&nbsp;  
+
'''(3)'''&nbsp; In general, &nbsp;$r(N) = 1 - {H}/{K(N)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$&nbsp;  
*$\rm BQ1$&nbsp; hat die Entropie&nbsp; $H = 0.5$ bit/Symbol.&nbsp;  
+
*$\rm BQ1$&nbsp; has entropy&nbsp; $H = 0.5$ bit/source symbol.&nbsp;  
*Daraus folgt wegen &nbsp;$r(N) &asymp; r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$&nbsp; für&nbsp; $K(N_3) = 0.6$:
+
*It follows that because &nbsp;$r(N) &asymp; r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$&nbsp; for&nbsp; $K(N_3) = 0.6$:
:$$r(N_{\rm c}) = 1 - \frac{0.5}{0.6} = 0.167 \hspace{0.1cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.1cm}  
+
:$$r(N_{\rm 3}) = 1 - \frac{0.5}{0.6} = 0.167 \hspace{0.1cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.1cm}  
 
{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}N_{\rm 3} = \frac{A}{0.167} = 6.36
 
{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}N_{\rm 3} = \frac{A}{0.167} = 6.36
 
\hspace{0.1cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.1cm}
 
\hspace{0.1cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.1cm}
Line 134: Line 134:
  
  
[[File:EN_Inf_A_2_5d_v2.png|right|frame|Ergebnisse für&nbsp;  $\rm BQ2$]]
+
[[File:EN_Inf_A_2_5d_v2.png|right|frame|Results for&nbsp;  $\rm BQ2$]]
'''(4)'''&nbsp; Für&nbsp; $N = 10000$&nbsp; gilt &nbsp;$r(N) &asymp; r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = 0.19$:
+
'''(4)'''&nbsp; For&nbsp; $N = 10000$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; $r(N) &asymp; r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = 0.19$:
 
:$$\frac{A}{{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}10000} = 0.19 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}
 
:$$\frac{A}{{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}10000} = 0.19 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm}
 
A = 0.19 \cdot 4 = 0.76 \hspace{0.05cm}. $$
 
A = 0.19 \cdot 4 = 0.76 \hspace{0.05cm}. $$
*Die Ergebnisse sind in nebenstehender Tabelle zusammengefasst.  
+
*The results are summarised in the table opposite.
*Man erkennt die sehr gute Übereinstimmung zwischen&nbsp; &nbsp;$r(N)$&nbsp; und &nbsp;$r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$.  
+
*One can see the very good agreement between&nbsp; &nbsp;$r(N)$&nbsp; and &nbsp;$r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$.  
*Die gesuchten Zahlenwerte sind in der Tabelle rot markiert:
+
*The numerical values sought are marked in red in the table:
 
$$r'(N = 50000)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.162},\hspace{0.3cm}r'(N = 10^{6})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.127},\hspace{0.3cm}
 
$$r'(N = 50000)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.162},\hspace{0.3cm}r'(N = 10^{6})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.127},\hspace{0.3cm}
 
r'(N = 10^{12})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.063}.$$
 
r'(N = 10^{12})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.063}.$$
  
*Für den Komprimierungsfaktor gilt (der Apostroph weist darauf hin, dass von der Näherung &nbsp;$r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$&nbsp; ausgegangen wurde):
+
*For the compression factor &nbsp; &ndash; &nbsp; the apostrophe indicates that the approximation &nbsp;$r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$&nbsp; was assumed:
 
:$$K\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = \frac{1}{1 - r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$K\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = \frac{1}{1 - r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*Damit gilt für die Länge des LZW&ndash;Ausgabestrings:
+
*Thus, for the length of the LZW output string:
 
:$$L\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = K\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) \cdot N  = \frac{N}{1 - r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$L\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = K\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) \cdot N  = \frac{N}{1 - r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  
  
  
[[File:EN_Inf_A_2_5e_v2.png|right|frame|Ergebnisse für&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$]]
+
[[File:EN_Inf_A_2_5e_v2.png|right|frame|Results for&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$]]
'''(5)'''&nbsp; Nach ähnlicher Vorgehensweise wie in der Teilaufgabe&nbsp; '''(4)'''&nbsp; erhält man für die Binärquelle&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$&nbsp; den Anpassungsparameter&nbsp; $A = 1.36$&nbsp; und daraus die Ergebnisse gemäß der blau hinterlegten Tabelle.
+
'''(5)'''&nbsp; Following a similar procedure as in subtask&nbsp; '''(4)'''&nbsp; we obtain the fitting parameter&nbsp; $A = 1.36$&nbsp; for the binary source&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$&nbsp; and from this the results according to the table with a blue background.
  
<u>Hinweis:</u> &nbsp; Die letzte Spalte dieser Tabelle ist nur bei Kenntnis der Teilaufgabe&nbsp; '''(6)'''&nbsp; verständlich. Dort wird gezeigt, dass die  Quelle&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$&nbsp; die Entropie&nbsp; $H = 0.25$ bit/Quellensymbol besitzt.
+
<u>Hint:</u> &nbsp; The last column of this table is only understandable with knowledge of subtask&nbsp; '''(6)'''.&nbsp; There it is shown that the source&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$&nbsp; has the entropy&nbsp; $H = 0.25$&nbsp; bit/source symbol.
  
*In diesem Fall gilt für den Komprimierungsfaktor:
+
*In this case, the following applies to the compression factor:
 
:$$K\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = \frac{H}{1 - r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)} = \frac{0.25}{1 - r'(N)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
 
:$$K\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = \frac{H}{1 - r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)} = \frac{0.25}{1 - r'(N)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
*Damit erhält man für die gesuchten Werte der Restredundanz:
+
*Thus, for the values of residual redundancy we are looking for, we obtain:
 
:$$r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N = 50000)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.289},\hspace{0.3cm}r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N = 10^{6})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.227},\hspace{0.3cm}
 
:$$r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N = 50000)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.289},\hspace{0.3cm}r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N = 10^{6})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.227},\hspace{0.3cm}
 
r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N = 10^{12})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.113}.$$
 
r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N = 10^{12})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.113}.$$
*Für&nbsp; $N = 10^{12}$&nbsp; weicht also der Komprimierungsfaktor&nbsp; $(0.282)$&nbsp; noch deutlich von der Entropie&nbsp; $(0.25)$&nbsp; ab, die erst  für&nbsp; $N \to \infty$&nbsp; erreicht werden kann (Quellencodierungstheorem).
+
*Thus, for&nbsp; $N = 10^{12}$&nbsp; , the compression factor&nbsp; $(0.282)$&nbsp; still deviates significantly from the entropy&nbsp; $(0.25)$&nbsp; which can only be achieved for&nbsp; $N \to \infty$&nbsp; ("Source Coding Theorem").
 
 
  
  
  
'''(6)'''&nbsp; Die einzelnen Näherungen&nbsp; $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$&nbsp; unterscheiden sich nur durch den Parameter&nbsp; $A$.&nbsp; Dabei haben wir festgestellt:
 
# Quelle&nbsp; $\rm BQ1$&nbsp; mit&nbsp; $H = 0.50$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; $A = 1.06$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; entsprechend dem Angabenblatt,
 
# Quelle&nbsp; $\rm BQ2$&nbsp; mit&nbsp; $H = 1.00$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; $A = 0.76$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; siehe Teilaufgabe&nbsp; '''(4)''',
 
# Quelle&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$&nbsp; $(H$ unbekannt$)$: $A = 4 &middot; 0.34 =1.36$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; entsprechend der letzten Spalte in der Tabelle.
 
  
 +
'''(6)'''&nbsp; The individual approximations&nbsp; $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$&nbsp; differ only by the parameter&nbsp; $A$.&nbsp; Here we found:
 +
# Source&nbsp; $\rm BQ1$&nbsp; with&nbsp; $H = 0.50$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; $A = 1.06$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; according to the specification sheet,
 +
# Source&nbsp; $\rm BQ2$&nbsp; with&nbsp; $H = 1.00$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; $A = 0.76$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; see subtask&nbsp; '''(4)''',
 +
# Source&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$&nbsp; $(H$ unknown$)$: $A = 4 &middot; 0.34 =1.36$ &nbsp; &rArr; &nbsp; corresponding to the table on the right.
  
*Je kleiner die Entropie&nbsp; $H$&nbsp; ist, um so größer ist offensichtlich der Anpassungsfaktor&nbsp; $A$&nbsp; (und umgekehrt).  
+
*Obviously, the smaller the entropy&nbsp; $H$&nbsp; the larger the adjustment factor&nbsp; $A$&nbsp; (and vice versa).  
*Da genau eine Lösung möglich ist, muss&nbsp; $H = 0.25$&nbsp; bit/Quellensymbol richtig sein &nbsp;&nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp;&nbsp; <u>Antwort 4</u>.
+
*Since exactly one solution is possible, &nbsp; $H = 0.25$&nbsp; bit/source&nbsp; symbol must be correct &nbsp;&nbsp;&#8658;&nbsp;&nbsp; <u>answer 4</u>.
  
*Tatsächlich wurden bei der Simulation für die Quelle&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$&nbsp; die Wahrscheinlichkeiten &nbsp;$p_{\rm A} = 0.96$&nbsp; und &nbsp;$p_{\rm B} = 0.04$&nbsp; &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; $H &asymp; 0.25$ verwendet.
+
*In fact, the probabilities&nbsp;$p_{\rm A} = 0.96$&nbsp; and &nbsp;$p_{\rm B} = 0.04$&nbsp; &nbsp; &#8658; &nbsp; $H &asymp; 0.25$ were used in the simulation for the source&nbsp; $\rm BQ3$.
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
 
{{ML-Fuß}}
  

Latest revision as of 14:12, 10 August 2021

Residual redundancy  $r(N)$  and approximation   $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  of three sources

We assume here a binary input sequence of length  $N$  and consider three different binary sources:

  • $\rm BQ1$:   Symbol probabilities  $p_{\rm A} = 0.89$  and  $p_{\rm B} = 0.11$, i.e. different
      ⇒   entropy   $H = 0.5\text{ bit/source symbol}$   ⇒   the source is redundant.
  • $\rm BQ2$:   $p_{\rm A} = p_{\rm B} = 0.5$  (equally probable)
      ⇒   entropy   $H = 1\text{ bit/source symbol}$   ⇒   the source is redundancy-free.
  • $\rm BQ3$:   There is no concrete information on the statistics here. 
    In subtask  (6)  you are to estimate the entropy  $H$  of this source.


For these three sources, the respective  "residual redundancy"  $r(N)$  was determined by simulation, which remains in the binary sequence after  Lempel–Ziv–Welch coding

The results are shown in the first column of the above table for the sources

  • $\rm BQ1$  (yellow background),
  • $\rm BQ2$  (green background) and
  • $\rm BQ3$  (blue background)


whereby we have restricted ourselves to sequence lengths  $N ≤ 50000$  in the simulation.

The  "relative redundancy of the output sequence" – simplified called  "residual redundancy" – can be calculated from

  • the length  $N$  of the input sequence,
  • the length  $L(N)$  of the output sequence and
  • the entropy  $H$


in the following way:

$$r(N) = \frac{L(N) - N \cdot H}{L(N)}= 1 - \frac{ N \cdot H}{L(N)}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

This takes into account that with perfect source coding the length of the output sequence could be lowered to the value  $L_{\rm min} = N · H$ .

  • With non-perfect source coding,  $L(n) - N · H$  gives the remaining redundancy  (with the pseudo–unit  "bit").
  • After dividing by  $L(n)$,  one obtains the relative redundancy  $r(n)$  with the value range between zero and one;  $r(n)$  should be as small as possible.


A second parameter for measuring the efficiency of LZW coding is the  "compression factor"  $K(N)$  as the quotient of the lengths of the output and input sequences, which should also be very small:

$$K(N) = {L(N) }/{N} \hspace{0.05cm},$$

In the  theory section  it was shown that the residual redundancy  $r(n)$  is well approximated by the function

$$r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) =\frac {A}{{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}(N)} \hspace{0.5cm}{\rm mit}\hspace{0.5cm} A = 4 \cdot {r(N = 10000)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


  • This approximation  $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  is given for  $\rm BQ1$  in the second column of the table above.
  • In subtasks  (4)  and  (5)  you are to make the approximation for sources  $\rm BQ2$  and  $\rm BQ3$ .





Hints:

Remaining redundancy as a measure for the efficiency of coding methods,
Efficiency of Lempel-Ziv coding and
Quantitative statements on asymptotic optimality.
  • The descriptive variables  $K(N)$  and  $r(N)$  are deterministically related.


Questions

1

With which parameter  $A$  was the approximation  $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  of the residual redundancy for the binary source  $\rm BQ1$  created?

$A \ = \ $

2

What is the minimum size of  $N = N_2$  for  $\rm BQ1$  so that the residual redundancy satisfies the condition  $r(N) ≈ r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) \le 5\%$ ?

$N_{2} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot 10^{21}$

3

What is the minimum size of  $N = N_3$  at  $\rm BQ1$  so that the compression factor  $K(N)= L(N)/N$  is not greater than  $0.6$?

$N_{3} \ = \ $

$\ \cdot 10^{6}$

4

Now determine the redundancy approximation  $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  for the redundancy-free binary source $\rm BQ2$, in particular:

$r'(N = 50000)\ = \ $

$r'(N = 10^6)\ = \ $

$r'(N = 10^{12})\ = \ $

5

What values does the redundancy approximation  $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  yield for the unspecified binary source  $\rm BQ3$? In particular:

$r'(N = 50000)\ = \ $

$r'(N = 10^6)\ = \ $

$r'(N = 10^{12})\ = \ $

6

According to this result, what source entropy  $H$  could  $\rm BQ3$  ?  Hint:  Exactly one answer is correct.

$H = 1.00 \ \rm bit/source\hspace{0.15cm}symbol$,
$H = 0.75 \ \rm bit/source\hspace{0.15cm} symbol$,
$H = 0.50 \ \rm bit/source\hspace{0.15cm} symbol$,
$H = 0.25 \ \rm bit/source\hspace{0.15cm} symbol$.


Solution

(1)  The approximation  $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  agrees exactly by definition for the sequence length  $N = 10000$  with the residual redundancy  $r(N) = 0.265$  determined by simulation.

  • Thus
$$A = 4 \cdot r(N = 10000) =4 \cdot {0.265} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 1.06} \hspace{0.05cm}. $$


(2)  From the relationship  ${A}/{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}(N) ≤ 0.05$    ⇒    ${A}/{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}(N) = 0.05$  it follows:

$${{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}N_{\rm 2}} = \frac{A}{0.05} = 21.2 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm} N_{\rm 2} = 10^{21.2} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 1.58 \cdot 10^{21}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(3)  In general,  $r(N) = 1 - {H}/{K(N)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$ 

  • $\rm BQ1$  has entropy  $H = 0.5$ bit/source symbol. 
  • It follows that because  $r(N) ≈ r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  for  $K(N_3) = 0.6$:
$$r(N_{\rm 3}) = 1 - \frac{0.5}{0.6} = 0.167 \hspace{0.1cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.1cm} {\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}N_{\rm 3} = \frac{A}{0.167} = 6.36 \hspace{0.1cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.1cm} N_{\rm 3} = 10^{6.36} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline{= 2.29 \cdot 10^{6}} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Results for  $\rm BQ2$

(4)  For  $N = 10000$   ⇒   $r(N) ≈ r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = 0.19$:

$$\frac{A}{{\rm lg}\hspace{0.1cm}10000} = 0.19 \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow\hspace{0.3cm} A = 0.19 \cdot 4 = 0.76 \hspace{0.05cm}. $$
  • The results are summarised in the table opposite.
  • One can see the very good agreement between   $r(N)$  and  $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$.
  • The numerical values sought are marked in red in the table:

$$r'(N = 50000)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.162},\hspace{0.3cm}r'(N = 10^{6})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.127},\hspace{0.3cm} r'(N = 10^{12})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.063}.$$

  • For the compression factor   –   the apostrophe indicates that the approximation  $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  was assumed:
$$K\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = \frac{1}{1 - r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • Thus, for the length of the LZW output string:
$$L\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = K\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) \cdot N = \frac{N}{1 - r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Results for  $\rm BQ3$

(5)  Following a similar procedure as in subtask  (4)  we obtain the fitting parameter  $A = 1.36$  for the binary source  $\rm BQ3$  and from this the results according to the table with a blue background.

Hint:   The last column of this table is only understandable with knowledge of subtask  (6).  There it is shown that the source  $\rm BQ3$  has the entropy  $H = 0.25$  bit/source symbol.

  • In this case, the following applies to the compression factor:
$$K\hspace{0.05cm}'(N) = \frac{H}{1 - r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)} = \frac{0.25}{1 - r'(N)} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • Thus, for the values of residual redundancy we are looking for, we obtain:
$$r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N = 50000)\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.289},\hspace{0.3cm}r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N = 10^{6})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.227},\hspace{0.3cm} r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N = 10^{12})\hspace{0.15cm}\underline{ = 0.113}.$$
  • Thus, for  $N = 10^{12}$  , the compression factor  $(0.282)$  still deviates significantly from the entropy  $(0.25)$  which can only be achieved for  $N \to \infty$  ("Source Coding Theorem").



(6)  The individual approximations  $r\hspace{0.05cm}'(N)$  differ only by the parameter  $A$.  Here we found:

  1. Source  $\rm BQ1$  with  $H = 0.50$   ⇒   $A = 1.06$   ⇒   according to the specification sheet,
  2. Source  $\rm BQ2$  with  $H = 1.00$   ⇒   $A = 0.76$   ⇒   see subtask  (4),
  3. Source  $\rm BQ3$  $(H$ unknown$)$: $A = 4 · 0.34 =1.36$   ⇒   corresponding to the table on the right.
  • Obviously, the smaller the entropy  $H$  the larger the adjustment factor  $A$  (and vice versa).
  • Since exactly one solution is possible,   $H = 0.25$  bit/source  symbol must be correct   ⇒   answer 4.
  • In fact, the probabilities $p_{\rm A} = 0.96$  and  $p_{\rm B} = 0.04$    ⇒   $H ≈ 0.25$ were used in the simulation for the source  $\rm BQ3$.