Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Exercise 4.2: FDD, TDD and Half-Duplex"
From LNTwww
m (Text replacement - "[[Beispiele_von_Nachrichtensystemen" to "[[Examples_of_Communication_Systems") |
m (Text replacement - "Category:Exercises for Mobile Communications" to "Category:Mobile Communications: Exercises") |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite= | + | {{quiz-Header|Buchseite=Mobile_Communications/Technical_Innovations_of_LTE |
}} | }} | ||
| − | [[File:P_ID2280__Mob_A_4_2_version1.png|right|frame| | + | [[File:P_ID2280__Mob_A_4_2_version1.png|right|frame|FDD, TDD, and HD]] |
| − | + | Duplex processes are required in mobile radio to ensure that the uplink $\rm (UL)$ and downlink $\rm (DL)$ are clearly separated and thus do not interfere with each other. According to the graphic, a distinction is made between | |
| − | *[[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Allgemeine_Beschreibung_von_UMTS#Vollduplexverfahren |Frequency Division Multiplex]] (FDD), | + | *[[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Allgemeine_Beschreibung_von_UMTS#Vollduplexverfahren |Frequency Division Multiplex]] $\rm (FDD)$, |
| − | *[[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Allgemeine_Beschreibung_von_UMTS#Vollduplexverfahren |Time Division Multiplex]] (TDD), | + | *[[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Allgemeine_Beschreibung_von_UMTS#Vollduplexverfahren |Time Division Multiplex]] $\rm (TDD)$, |
| − | *[[Mobile_Communications/ | + | *[[Mobile_Communications/Technical_Innovations_of_LTE#FDD.2C_TDD_and_half-duplex_method|Half–Duplex]] $\rm (HD)$. |
| − | + | The first two duplex processes have already been used in [[Examples_of_Communication_Systems/Allgemeine_Beschreibung_von_UMTS|$\rm UMTS$]]. On the other hand, the half-duplex process is an innovation in Long Term Evolution $\rm (LTE)$. | |
| + | ''Note:'' | ||
| + | This task refers to the chapter [[Mobile_Communications/Technical_Innovations_of_LTE|Technical Innovations of LTE]]. | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | ===Questionnaire=== | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | === | ||
<quiz display=simple> | <quiz display=simple> | ||
| − | { | + | {Which duplex methods can be managed with only one frequency band? |
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
- Frequency Division Duplex (FDD), | - Frequency Division Duplex (FDD), | ||
| Line 34: | Line 31: | ||
- Half–Duplex (HD). | - Half–Duplex (HD). | ||
| − | { | + | {Which procedure is more favourable with the same load on uplink and downlink? |
| − | |type=" | + | |type="()"} |
+ Frequency Division Duplex (FDD), | + Frequency Division Duplex (FDD), | ||
- Time Division Duplex (TDD). | - Time Division Duplex (TDD). | ||
| − | { | + | {What advantages does the TDD method offer compared to FDD? |
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
| − | - TDD | + | - TDD offers no advantages whatsoever. |
| − | + | + | + The end devices can be produced cheaper than with FDD. |
| − | + TDD | + | + TDD appoaches FDD with unequal uplink/downlink load. |
| − | { | + | {What advantages does the half-duplex process offer? |
|type="[]"} | |type="[]"} | ||
| − | - HD | + | - HD offers no advantages whatsoever. |
| − | + | + | + The end devices can be produced cheaper than with FDD. |
| − | + | + | + In contrast to TDD, HD does not require "Guard Periods". |
| − | + | + | + With the same uplink/downlink requirements, HD is comparable with FDD. |
</quiz> | </quiz> | ||
| − | === | + | ===Solution=== |
{{ML-Kopf}} | {{ML-Kopf}} | ||
| − | '''(1)''' | + | '''(1)''' Correct is the <u>solution 2</u>: |
| − | * | + | * As shown in the graph on the data page, only one frequency band is sufficient for TTD. |
| − | * | + | *The other two duplex methods each require two frequency bands. In this context one also speaks of a "paired spectrum". |
| − | '''(2)''' | + | '''(2)''' At the same load of uplink and downlink, Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) is more favourable ⇒ <u>solution 1</u>: |
| − | * | + | *Although TDD requires only a single frequency band, only half of it can be used for uplink and downlink at the same load. Transmitter and receiver must therefore alternate during transmission. |
| − | * | + | *The main problem is the required but not always given synchronicity of the networks. In order to ensure largely undisturbed transmission even if synchronicity is not 100%, TDD requires "guard periods" between uplink and downlink use. |
| − | * | + | *The relative degradation of the TDD principle compared to FDD is quantitatively given by the percentage of yellow blocks at the same uplink and downlink load. |
| − | '''(3)''' | + | '''(3)''' The <u>solutions 2 and 3</u> are applicable: |
| − | * | + | *A TDD terminal does not have to transmit and receive simultaneously and is therefore more cost-effective than an FDD terminal ⇒ The battery life is longer. |
| − | * | + | *The TDD technique allows different modes that determine how much time should be used for downlink and uplink. |
| − | * | + | *Often the uplink requirements are much lower than the downlink requirements. With FDD there are many unused blue blocks in this case. |
| − | * | + | *Under this condition, the percentage degradation is reduced by the yellow "Guard Periods". In the limit case "no uplink activity", the same number of downlink blocks could be transmitted as with FDD, but already at half the frequency bandwidth. |
| − | '''(4)''' | + | '''(4)''' Here the <u>solutions 2 to 4</u> apply: |
| − | * | + | *Like FDD, half-duplex requires two frequency bands ⇒ a paired spectrum. Guard periods are therefore not required. |
| − | * | + | *Transmitter and receiver alternate with each other. This means that the terminal devices must also either only transmit or only receive, and are therefore cheaper. |
| − | * | + | *By a second connection to another terminal device with an interchanged downlink/uplink raster, the available paired band could be fully utilized. |
{{ML-Fuß}} | {{ML-Fuß}} | ||
| Line 85: | Line 82: | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Mobile Communications: Exercises|^4.2 Technical Innovations of LTE^]] |
Latest revision as of 13:37, 23 March 2021
FDD, TDD, and HD
Duplex processes are required in mobile radio to ensure that the uplink $\rm (UL)$ and downlink $\rm (DL)$ are clearly separated and thus do not interfere with each other. According to the graphic, a distinction is made between
- Frequency Division Multiplex $\rm (FDD)$,
- Time Division Multiplex $\rm (TDD)$,
- Half–Duplex $\rm (HD)$.
The first two duplex processes have already been used in $\rm UMTS$. On the other hand, the half-duplex process is an innovation in Long Term Evolution $\rm (LTE)$.
Note:
This task refers to the chapter Technical Innovations of LTE.
Questionnaire
Solution
(1) Correct is the solution 2:
- As shown in the graph on the data page, only one frequency band is sufficient for TTD.
- The other two duplex methods each require two frequency bands. In this context one also speaks of a "paired spectrum".
(2) At the same load of uplink and downlink, Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) is more favourable ⇒ solution 1:
- Although TDD requires only a single frequency band, only half of it can be used for uplink and downlink at the same load. Transmitter and receiver must therefore alternate during transmission.
- The main problem is the required but not always given synchronicity of the networks. In order to ensure largely undisturbed transmission even if synchronicity is not 100%, TDD requires "guard periods" between uplink and downlink use.
- The relative degradation of the TDD principle compared to FDD is quantitatively given by the percentage of yellow blocks at the same uplink and downlink load.
(3) The solutions 2 and 3 are applicable:
- A TDD terminal does not have to transmit and receive simultaneously and is therefore more cost-effective than an FDD terminal ⇒ The battery life is longer.
- The TDD technique allows different modes that determine how much time should be used for downlink and uplink.
- Often the uplink requirements are much lower than the downlink requirements. With FDD there are many unused blue blocks in this case.
- Under this condition, the percentage degradation is reduced by the yellow "Guard Periods". In the limit case "no uplink activity", the same number of downlink blocks could be transmitted as with FDD, but already at half the frequency bandwidth.
(4) Here the solutions 2 to 4 apply:
- Like FDD, half-duplex requires two frequency bands ⇒ a paired spectrum. Guard periods are therefore not required.
- Transmitter and receiver alternate with each other. This means that the terminal devices must also either only transmit or only receive, and are therefore cheaper.
- By a second connection to another terminal device with an interchanged downlink/uplink raster, the available paired band could be fully utilized.
