Aufgaben:Exercise 4.06Z: Signal Space Constellations: Difference between revisions

From LNTwww
Add German interlanguage link
Fix interlanguage link: resolve redirect chain
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
It should be noted here:
It should be noted here:
* ${\rm Q}(x)$  denotes the complementary Gaussian error function  (definition and approximation):
* ${\rm Q}(x)$  denotes the complementary Gaussian error function  (definition and approximation):
:$${\rm Q}(x) \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm}  \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}  \int_{x}^{\infty} {\rm e}^{-u^2/2} \,{\rm d} u  
:$${\rm Q}(x) \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm}  \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}  \int_{x}^{\infty} {\rm e}^{-u^2/2} \,{\rm d} u\approx  \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot x} \cdot {\rm e}^{-x^2/2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
\approx  \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot x} \cdot {\rm e}^{-x^2/2}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


* The parameter  $d$  specifies the distance between the two transmitted signal points  $s_0$  and  $s_1$  in vector space:
* The parameter  $d$  specifies the distance between the two transmitted signal points  $s_0$  and  $s_1$  in vector space:
Line 26: Line 24:


The mean energy per symbol  $(E_{\rm S})$  can be calculated as follows:
The mean energy per symbol  $(E_{\rm S})$  can be calculated as follows:
:$$E_{\rm S}  = {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) \cdot  ||  \boldsymbol{ s }_0||^2 +  
:$$E_{\rm S}  = {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) \cdot  ||  \boldsymbol{ s }_0||^2 +{\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_1) \cdot  ||  \boldsymbol{ s }_1||^2\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
{\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_1) \cdot  ||  \boldsymbol{ s }_1||^2\hspace{0.05cm}.$$




Line 98: Line 95:


'''(3)'''  For all variants considered here,  i.e.,  also for variant  $\rm A$,  the following holds:
'''(3)'''  For all variants considered here,  i.e.,  also for variant  $\rm A$,  the following holds:
:$$p_{\rm S}  = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E} ) =  {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{d/2}{\sigma_n} \right )=  {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{5/2 \cdot \sqrt{E}}{\sigma_n} \right )
:$$p_{\rm S}  = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E} ) =  {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{d/2}{\sigma_n} \right )=  {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{5/2 \cdot \sqrt{E}}{\sigma_n} \right )=  {\rm Q}(2.5)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
=  {\rm Q}(2.5)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


*With the given approximation we obtain
*With the given approximation we obtain
Line 106: Line 102:


'''(4)'''  For variant  $\rm C$,  the average energy per symbol is given by:
'''(4)'''  For variant  $\rm C$,  the average energy per symbol is given by:
:$$E_{\rm S}  \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) \cdot  (-2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E})^2 +  
:$$E_{\rm S}  \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) \cdot  (-2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E})^2 +{\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_1) \cdot  (+ 2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E})^2 =\left [ {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) + {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) \right ] \cdot 6.25 \cdot E = 6.25 \cdot E$$
{\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_1) \cdot  (+ 2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E})^2 =
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} E = \frac {E_{\rm S}}{6.25} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \sqrt{E}= \frac {\sqrt{E_{\rm S}}}{2.5}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
\left [ {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) + {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) \right ] \cdot 6.25 \cdot E = 6.25 \cdot E$$
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} E = \frac {E_{\rm S}}{6.25} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \sqrt{E}= \frac {\sqrt{E_{\rm S}}}{2.5}
\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


*Substituting this result into the equation found in  '''(3)''',  we obtain with  $\sigma_n^2 = N_0/2$:
*Substituting this result into the equation found in  '''(3)''',  we obtain with  $\sigma_n^2 = N_0/2$:
:$$p_{\rm S}  \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm}  {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E}}{\sigma_n} \right )=  {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{ \sqrt{E_{\rm S}}}{\sigma_n} \right )
:$$p_{\rm S}  \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm}  {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E}}{\sigma_n} \right )=  {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{ \sqrt{E_{\rm S}}}{\sigma_n} \right )=  {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{ \sqrt{2 \cdot E_{\rm S}}}{N_0} \right ) ={\rm Q} \left ( \sqrt{\frac{ 2 \cdot 6.25 \cdot 10^{-6}\,{\rm Ws}}{2 \cdot 10^{-6}\,{\rm W/Hz}}} \right )={\rm Q}(2.5) \hspace{0.1cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.7 \%}\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
=  {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{ \sqrt{2 \cdot E_{\rm S}}}{N_0} \right ) ={\rm Q} \left ( \sqrt{\frac{ 2 \cdot 6.25 \cdot 10^{-6}\,{\rm Ws}}{2 \cdot 10^{-6}\,{\rm W/Hz}}} \right )  
={\rm Q}(2.5) \hspace{0.1cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.7 \%}\hspace{0.05cm}. $$




Line 124: Line 115:


'''(6)'''  In variant  $\rm A$,  the average energy per symbol is
'''(6)'''  In variant  $\rm A$,  the average energy per symbol is
:$$E_{\rm S}  = {1}/{2} \cdot    \left [ (1^2 + 5^2) \cdot E + (4^2 + 1^2) \cdot E \right ] = 21.5 \cdot E  
:$$E_{\rm S}  = {1}/{2} \cdot    \left [ (1^2 + 5^2) \cdot E + (4^2 + 1^2) \cdot E \right ] = 21.5 \cdot E\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
\hspace{0.05cm}. $$


*The distance from the threshold,  which should be midway between  $\boldsymbol{s}_0$  and  $\boldsymbol{s}_1$  for equally probable symbols,  is  $d/2 = 2.5 \cdot E^{\rm 1/2}$,  as in the other variants.  
*The distance from the threshold,  which should be midway between  $\boldsymbol{s}_0$  and  $\boldsymbol{s}_1$  for equally probable symbols,  is  $d/2 = 2.5 \cdot E^{\rm 1/2}$,  as in the other variants.  


*Thus,  with  $\sigma_n^2 = N_0/2$,  we obtain the governing equation:
*Thus,  with  $\sigma_n^2 = N_0/2$,  we obtain the governing equation:
:$$p_{\rm S}  = {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{ 2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E}}{\sqrt{N_0/2}} \right )
:$$p_{\rm S}  = {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{ 2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E}}{\sqrt{N_0/2}} \right )={\rm Q}(2.5)\approx 0.7 \cdot 10^{-2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \sqrt{\frac {2E}{N_0}} = 1 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac {E}{N_0} = 0.5\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac {E_{\rm S}}{21.5 \cdot N_0} = 0.5$$
={\rm Q}(2.5)\approx 0.7 \cdot 10^{-2} \hspace{0.3cm}  
\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \sqrt{\frac {2E}{N_0}} = 1 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac {E}{N_0} = 0.5
\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac {E_{\rm S}}{21.5 \cdot N_0} = 0.5$$
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {E_{\rm S}} = 0.5 \cdot {21.5 \cdot N_0} \hspace{0.1cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 21.5 \cdot 10^{-6}\,{\rm Ws}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
:$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {E_{\rm S}} = 0.5 \cdot {21.5 \cdot N_0} \hspace{0.1cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 21.5 \cdot 10^{-6}\,{\rm Ws}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


Line 146: Line 133:


[[Category:Digital Signal Transmission: Exercises|^4.3 BER Approximation^]]
[[Category:Digital Signal Transmission: Exercises|^4.3 BER Approximation^]]
[[de:4.06Z_Signalraumkonstellationen]]
[[de:Aufgaben:Aufgabe 4.06Z: Signalraumkonstellationen]]

Latest revision as of 17:58, 16 March 2026

Three signal space constellations

The  (mean)  symbol error probability of an optimal binary system is:

$$p_{\rm S} = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E} ) = {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{d/2}{\sigma_n} \right )\hspace{0.05cm}.$$

It should be noted here:

  • ${\rm Q}(x)$  denotes the complementary Gaussian error function  (definition and approximation):
$${\rm Q}(x) \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int_{x}^{\infty} {\rm e}^{-u^2/2} \,{\rm d} u\approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot x} \cdot {\rm e}^{-x^2/2}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • The parameter  $d$  specifies the distance between the two transmitted signal points  $s_0$  and  $s_1$  in vector space:
$$d = \sqrt{ || \boldsymbol{ s }_1 - \boldsymbol{ s }_0||^2} \hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • $\sigma_n^2$  is the variance of the AWGN noise after the detector, which e.g. can be implemented as a matched filter.
    It is assumed that  $\sigma_n^2 = N_0/2$.


The graphic shows three different signal space constellations,  namely

  • Variant $\rm A$:   $s_0 = (+1, \, +5), \hspace{0.4cm} s_1 = (+4, \, +1)$,
  • Variant $\rm B$:   $s_0 = (-1.5, \, +2), \, s_1 = (+1.5, \, -2)$,
  • Variant $\rm C$:   $s_0 = (-2.5, \, 0), \hspace{0.45cm} s_1 = (+2.5, \, 0)$.


The mean energy per symbol  $(E_{\rm S})$  can be calculated as follows:

$$E_{\rm S} = {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) \cdot || \boldsymbol{ s }_0||^2 +{\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_1) \cdot || \boldsymbol{ s }_1||^2\hspace{0.05cm}.$$



Notes:

  • For numeric calculations, the energy  $E = 1$  can be set for simplification.
  • Unless otherwise specified, equally probable symbols can be assumed:
$${\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) = {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_1) = 0.5\hspace{0.05cm}.$$



Questions

1 Which prerequisites must absolutely  (in any case)  be fulfilled so that the given error probability equation is valid?

Additive white Gaussian noise with variance  $\sigma_n^2$.
Optimal binary receiver.
Decision boundary in the middle between the symbols.
Equally likely symbols  $s_0$  and  $s_1$.

2 Which statement applies to the error probability with  $\sigma_n^2 = E$?

Variant  $\rm A$  has the lowest error probability.
Variant  $\rm B$  has the lowest error probability.
Variant  $\rm C$  has the lowest error probability.
All variants show the same error behavior.

3 Give the error probability for variant  $\rm A$  with  $\sigma_n^2 = E$.   You can calculate  ${\rm Q}(x)$  according to the approximation.

$p_{\rm S} \ = \ $ $\ \%$

4 It is assumed that  $N_0 = 2 \cdot 10^{\rm –6} \ {\rm W/Hz}$,   $E_{\rm S} = 6.25 \cdot 10^{\rm –6} \ \rm Ws$.   What is the error probability for variant $\rm C$  with equally probable symbols?

$p_{\rm S} \ = \ $ $\ \%$

5 What is the error probability for variant   $\rm B$  under the same conditions?

$p_{\rm S} \ = \ $ $\ \%$

6 How large should the average energy per symbol  $(E_{\rm S})$  be chosen for variant $\rm A$  in order to obtain the same error probability as for variant  $\rm C$? 

$E_{\rm S} \ = \ $ $\ \cdot 10^{\rm –6} \ \rm Ws$


Solution

(1)  The  first three prerequisites  must be met in any case:

  • The equation then applies independently of the occurrence probabilities.
  • In the case of  ${\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{s} = \boldsymbol{s}_0) ≠ {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{s} = \boldsymbol{s}_1)$,  a lower error probability can be achieved by shifting the decision threshold.


(2)  The noise rms value  $\sigma_n$  and thus also the signal energy  $E = \sigma_n^2$  are the same for all three considered variants. 

  • The same applies to the distance of the signal space points.  For variant  $\rm A$,  for example,  the following applies:
$$d = \sqrt{ || \boldsymbol{ s }_1 - \boldsymbol{ s }_0||^2} = \sqrt{ E \cdot (4-1)^2 + E \cdot (1-5)^2} = 5 \cdot \sqrt{E}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • Due to the shifting of the coordinate system,  the distance between  $\boldsymbol{s}_0$  and  $\boldsymbol{s}_1$  does not change (variant  $\rm B$),  the same distance results in variant  $\rm C$  (after rotation).
  • Solution 4 is correct:
  1. By rotating the coordinate system,  one can always get by with one basis function  $(N = 1)$  for a binary system  $(M = 2)$.
  2. Since the two-dimensional noise is circularly symmetric   ⇒   equal standard deviation  $\sigma_n$  in all directions, 
    the noise term can also be described one-dimensionally as in the chapter  "Error Probability for Baseband Transmission".


(3)  For all variants considered here,  i.e.,  also for variant  $\rm A$,  the following holds:

$$p_{\rm S} = {\rm Pr}({ \cal E} ) = {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{d/2}{\sigma_n} \right )= {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{5/2 \cdot \sqrt{E}}{\sigma_n} \right )= {\rm Q}(2.5)\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • With the given approximation we obtain
$$p_{\rm S} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} \cdot 2.5} \cdot {\rm e}^{-2.5^2/2} \hspace{0.1cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.7 \%}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$


(4)  For variant  $\rm C$,  the average energy per symbol is given by:

$$E_{\rm S} \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) \cdot (-2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E})^2 +{\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_1) \cdot (+ 2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E})^2 =\left [ {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) + {\rm Pr}(\boldsymbol{ s } = \boldsymbol{ s }_0) \right ] \cdot 6.25 \cdot E = 6.25 \cdot E$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} E = \frac {E_{\rm S}}{6.25} \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \sqrt{E}= \frac {\sqrt{E_{\rm S}}}{2.5}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • Substituting this result into the equation found in  (3),  we obtain with  $\sigma_n^2 = N_0/2$:
$$p_{\rm S} \hspace{-0.1cm} \ = \ \hspace{-0.1cm} {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E}}{\sigma_n} \right )= {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{ \sqrt{E_{\rm S}}}{\sigma_n} \right )= {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{ \sqrt{2 \cdot E_{\rm S}}}{N_0} \right ) ={\rm Q} \left ( \sqrt{\frac{ 2 \cdot 6.25 \cdot 10^{-6}\,{\rm Ws}}{2 \cdot 10^{-6}\,{\rm W/Hz}}} \right )={\rm Q}(2.5) \hspace{0.1cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline {\approx 0.7 \%}\hspace{0.05cm}. $$


(5)  Rotating the coordinate system does not change the energy ratios.

  • Therefore,  $p_{\rm S} \ \underline {\approx 0.7\%}$  is obtained again.


(6)  In variant  $\rm A$,  the average energy per symbol is

$$E_{\rm S} = {1}/{2} \cdot \left [ (1^2 + 5^2) \cdot E + (4^2 + 1^2) \cdot E \right ] = 21.5 \cdot E\hspace{0.05cm}. $$
  • The distance from the threshold,  which should be midway between  $\boldsymbol{s}_0$  and  $\boldsymbol{s}_1$  for equally probable symbols,  is  $d/2 = 2.5 \cdot E^{\rm 1/2}$,  as in the other variants.
  • Thus,  with  $\sigma_n^2 = N_0/2$,  we obtain the governing equation:
$$p_{\rm S} = {\rm Q} \left ( \frac{ 2.5 \cdot \sqrt{E}}{\sqrt{N_0/2}} \right )={\rm Q}(2.5)\approx 0.7 \cdot 10^{-2} \hspace{0.3cm}\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \sqrt{\frac {2E}{N_0}} = 1 \hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} \frac {E}{N_0} = 0.5\hspace{0.3cm} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm}\frac {E_{\rm S}}{21.5 \cdot N_0} = 0.5$$
$$\Rightarrow \hspace{0.3cm} {E_{\rm S}} = 0.5 \cdot {21.5 \cdot N_0} \hspace{0.1cm} \hspace{0.15cm}\underline { = 21.5 \cdot 10^{-6}\,{\rm Ws}}\hspace{0.05cm}.$$
  • This means:  For variant  $\rm A$,  compared to the other two variants,  a mean symbol energy  $E_{\rm S}$  larger by a factor of  $3.44$  is required to achieve the same  $p_{\rm S} = 0.7\%$.  Because:
  1. This signal space constellation is very unfavorable.  It results in a very large  $E_{\rm S}$  without increasing the distance  $d$  at the same time.
  2. With $E_{\rm S} = 6.25 \cdot 10^{\rm –6} \ \rm Ws$,  on the other hand,  $p_{\rm S} = {\rm Q}(2.5/3.44^{\rm 1/2}) \approx {\rm Q}(1.35) \approx 9\%$  would result.
  3. That means:   The error probability would be larger by more than one power of ten.